Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 11 Sayfa Aralığı: 114 - 118 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794 İndeks Tarihi: 14-05-2023

Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review

Öz:
Osteoseptocutaneous fibula flap is commonly used as the workhorse flap for bone reconstruction. However, the use of previously fractured fibula as a free or pedicled flap for bone reconstruction has a limited knowledge in the literature. There is not any data in the literature about a case with proximal level of fibula fracture which was used as an anterograde pedicled osteocutaneous fibula flap for composite tibial reconstruction after high-energy injury. Based on a patient in whom the composite defect of the proximal tibial region was reconstructed with osteocutaneous fibula flap after a gunshot injury, it was tried to show that the fibula with a proximal level frac- ture could be used with anterograde flow in the subacute period and it is thought that the usability of this flap should be kept in mind. It is possible to harvest the pedicled fibula flap even in the subacute period with the evaluation of CT angiography preoperatively and with the checking the patency and flow direction of peroneal artery perioperatively. The success of the procedure may be increased through total dissection of inflammatory areas of pedicle which would extend into the injury zone during the subacute period.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Olgu Sunumu Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ian Taylor G, Miller GD, Ham FJ. The free vascularized bone graft: A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975;55:533–44.
  • Chen ZW, Chen LE, Zhang GJ, Yu HL. Treatment of tibial defect with vascularized osteocutaneous pedicled transfer of fibula. J Reconstr Mi- crosurg 1986;2:199–203, 205.
  • Minami A, Itoga H, Suzuki K. Reverse-flow vascularized fibular graft: A new method. Microsurgery 1990;11:278–81.
  • Jubbal KT, Zavlin D, Doval AF, et al. Immediate soft-tissue reconstruc- tion for chronic infected tibia nonunions treated with an ilizarov frame. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019;7:e2180.
  • Li J, Wang Z, Guo Z, Chen GJ, Fu J, Pei GX. The use of allograft shell with intramedullary vascularized fibula graft for intercalary reconstruction after diaphyseal resection for lower extremity bony malignancy. J Surg Oncol 2010;102:368–74.
  • Kapukaya A, Subasi M, Arslan H, Tuzuner T, Selek S. Technique and complications of callus distraction in the treatment of bone tumors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006;126:157–63.
  • Pederson WC, Person DW. Long bone reconstruction with vascularized bone grafts. Orthop Clin North Am 2007;38:23–35.
  • Goren D, Sapir O, Stern A, Nyska M. Ipsilateral fibular transfer for a large tibial defect caused by a gunshot injury: Case report. Mil Med 2005;170:418–21.
  • Di Pompeo FS, Selvaggi G, Longo B, Laporta R, Amorosi V, Sorotos M. Double-barrel vascularized dual fibula transfer with epiphyseal growth plate for hip reconstruction: A case report. Microsurgery 2018;38:572–5.
  • Grewal R, Otsuka NY, Jones NF. Successful transfer of a vascularized fibular osteocutaneous bone graft harvested distal to a previously frac- tured fibula. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:2127–9.
  • Sadek AF, Halim AS, Ismail FW, Imran YM. Reconstruction of a tibial defect with a previously fractured fibula including the fractured segment as a free osteoseptocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 2014;73:402–4.
  • Chan RC, Wei FC, Wong JK, Wu CM. Is distal fibular fracture an ab- solute contraindication to free fibular flap harvesting? A review of evidence in the literature and illustration by a successful case. Microsurgery 2015;35:60–3.
  • Swartz WM, Mears DC. Management of difficult lower extremity frac- tures and nonunions. Clin Plast Surg 1986;13:633–44.
  • Antonini A, Rossello C, Salomone C, Iacoviello P, Chiarlone F, Buras- tero G. Bone defect management with vascularized fibular grafts in the treatment of grade III-IV osteomyelitis. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2019;51:444–52.
  • Shi SS, Xiu ST, Li YF. Treatment of tibia and femur massive defect with pedicled fibula transposition. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2000;14:156–8.
  • Weiland AJ. Vascularized bone transfers. Instr Course Lect 1984;33:446– 10. Foy JP, Qassemyar Q, Assouly N, Temam S, Kolb F. Harvesting tech- nique of chimeric multiple paddles fibular flap for wide oromandibular defects. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2016;61(4):292–7. 60.
  • Kim HS, Jahng JS, Han DY, Park HW, Chun CH. Immediate ipsilat- eral fibular transfer in a large tibial defect using a ring fixator. Int Orthop 1998;22:321–4.
  • Sharma S, Tiwari P, Kasabian AK, Longaker MT. Reconstruction of a tibial defect with microvascular transfer of a previously fractured fibula. Ann Plast Surg 2000;45:202–6.
  • El-Sayed Semaya A, Badawy E, Hasan M, El-Nakeeb RM. Management of post traumatic bone defects of the tibia using vascularised fibular graft combined with Ilizarov external fixator. Injury 2016;47:969–75.
  • Kwok AC, Tatro E, Jones KB, Agarwal JP. Pedicled retrograde fibula flap for ankle reconstruction after oncologic resection of the distal fibula. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017;5:e1232.
APA yasar e, DEMİR C, Yıldırım Ç, Memisoglu K (2022). Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review. , 114 - 118. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
Chicago yasar emrah,DEMİR CAN İLKER,Yıldırım Çavgın,Memisoglu Kaya Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review. (2022): 114 - 118. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
MLA yasar emrah,DEMİR CAN İLKER,Yıldırım Çavgın,Memisoglu Kaya Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review. , 2022, ss.114 - 118. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
AMA yasar e,DEMİR C,Yıldırım Ç,Memisoglu K Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review. . 2022; 114 - 118. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
Vancouver yasar e,DEMİR C,Yıldırım Ç,Memisoglu K Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review. . 2022; 114 - 118. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
IEEE yasar e,DEMİR C,Yıldırım Ç,Memisoglu K "Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review." , ss.114 - 118, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
ISNAD yasar, emrah vd. "Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review". (2022), 114-118. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
APA yasar e, DEMİR C, Yıldırım Ç, Memisoglu K (2022). Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28(11), 114 - 118. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
Chicago yasar emrah,DEMİR CAN İLKER,Yıldırım Çavgın,Memisoglu Kaya Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28, no.11 (2022): 114 - 118. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
MLA yasar emrah,DEMİR CAN İLKER,Yıldırım Çavgın,Memisoglu Kaya Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.28, no.11, 2022, ss.114 - 118. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
AMA yasar e,DEMİR C,Yıldırım Ç,Memisoglu K Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(11): 114 - 118. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
Vancouver yasar e,DEMİR C,Yıldırım Ç,Memisoglu K Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(11): 114 - 118. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
IEEE yasar e,DEMİR C,Yıldırım Ç,Memisoglu K "Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28, ss.114 - 118, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794
ISNAD yasar, emrah vd. "Is it safe to harvest a proximally fractured fibula as an osseocutaneous anterograde pedicled flap for proximal tibial reconstruction in subacute period? A case report and literature review". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28/11 (2022), 114-118. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.26794