Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 20 - 33 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029 İndeks Tarihi: 15-05-2023

Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study

Öz:
Time planning for the accurate estimation of construction duration is important to prevent construction delays and successfully complete projects on time. Although the main reasons for construction delays differ among developing countries, several factors related to project characteristics and clients contribute. In this study, interviews and observations were conducted with TOKI (Toplu Konut Idaresi-Housing Development Administration of the Republic of Turkey), a major housing construction authority in Turkey, to explore construction delays. It was revealed that TOKI uses three factors to estimate total construction duration, which are the number of flats, type of drawings utilized during the tender stage, and nonworking days. Data analysis of the TOKI Projects Status Table, which lists detailed project information for 2800 completed TOKI projects, showed that most delays occurred in housing projects. Therefore, the construction delays for TOKI housing projects were investigated in this case study. The findings revealed that there is a wide construction duration gap between calculated construction durations using TOKI’s calculation method and durations indicated in official construction contracts between TOKI as a client and the awarded contractors. Therefore, it was emphasized that TOKI significantly shortened the contract duration, which ultimately resulted in delays for a considerable number of housing projects. These findings can be helpful for clients and project managers worldwide to mitigate construction delays. To effectively overcome construction delays in developing countries, suggestions are made for the need to develop accurate construction duration estimation models.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Culfik MS, Sarikaya O, Altun H (2014) Causes of delays in construction projects in Turkey. In: Proceedings of 11th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering. Istanbul Technical University, Turkey.
  • Assaf SA, Al-Hejji S (2006) Causes of delay in large construction projects. Int J Proj Manag 24(4):349-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.010
  • Luu VT, Kim S, Van Tuan NV, Ogunlana SO (2009) Quantifying schedule risk in construction projects using Bayesian belief networks. Int J Proj Manag 27(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.03.003.
  • Enshassi A, Mohamed S, Abushaban S (2009) Factors affecting the performance of construction projects in the Gaza Strip. J Civ Eng Manag 15(3):269-280. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392- 3730.2009.15.269-280.
  • Kazaz A, Ulubeyli S, Tuncbilekli NA (2012) Causes of delays in construction projects in Turkey. J Civ Eng Manag 18(3):426-435. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.698913.
  • Toor SUR, Ogunlana SO (2008) Problems causing delays in major construction projects in Thailand. Constr Manag Econ 26(4):395-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190801905406.
  • Tafazzoli M, Shrestha P (2017) Factor analysis of construction delays in the U.S. construction industry. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure. New York. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481196.011.
  • Haslinda AN, Xian TW, Norfarahayu K, Hanafi RM, Fikri HM (2018) Investigation on the factors influencing construction time and cost overrun for high-rise building projects in Penang. J Phys: Conf Ser 995:012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/995/1/012043.
  • Aibinu AA, Jagboro GO (2002) The effects of construction delays on project delivery in Nigerian construction industry. Int J Proj Manag 20(8):593- 599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263- 7863(02)00028-5.
  • Gidado K (2004) Enhancing the prime contractor’s pre-construction planning. J Constr Res 5(1):87- 106. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1609945104000073.
  • Khoshgoftar M, Bakar AHA, Osman O (2010) Causes of delays in Iranian construction projects. Int J Constr Manag 10(2):53-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2010.10773144.
  • Carr PG, Beyor PS (2005) Design fees, the state of the profession, and a time for corrective action. J Manage Eng 21(3):110-117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742- 597X(2005)21:3(110).
  • Scheepbouwer E, Gransberg DD, del Puerto CL (2017) Construction engineering management culture shift: Is the lowest tender offer dead? Front Eng Manag 4(1):49-57. https://doi.org/10.15302/J- FEM-2017014.
  • Ireland V (1985) The role of managerial actions in the cost, time and quality performance of high-rise commercial building projects. Constr Manag Econ 3(1):59-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446198500000006.
  • FIDIC (2017) Conditions of Contract for Construction, Second Edition. Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Akkaynak B (2014) Real Estate Valuation and An Application On Real Estate Valuation. MSc Dissertation, University of Mersin (in Turkish).
  • Arditi D, Akan GT, Gurdamar S (1985) Reasons for delays in public projects in Turkey. Constr Manage Econ 3(2):171-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446198500000013.
  • Birgönül MT, Dikmen İ, Özorhon B, Işık Z (2007) Expectations of the construction industry from construction management education. In: Proceedings of 4th Construction Management Congress. Middle East Technical University, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • Erbas İ, Ciraci AM (2013) Construction project delivery system as a form of project implementation in Turkish public procurement. NWSA 8(2):108-119.
  • Koktas A, Karaosmanoglu F, Bilgic FK (2009) Public procurement and ethics: Ethics for the prevention of corruption project academic research work. Ankara, Turkey.
  • Usta Y (2014) A model approach for project management in public development. Verimlilik Dergisi 3:115-139 (in Turkish).
  • Yitmen İ, Dikbaş A (2002) Web-based integrated construction management system model. ITU Dergisi/a 1(1):31-41 (in Turkish).
  • Public Procurement Authority (2012) Public Procurement Law. Kariyer Ltd. Publishing, Turkey.
  • Demirci G (2009) Contractor Evaluation System in Construction Project Biddings. MSc Dissertation, Anadolu University (in Turkish).
  • Kaplan S (2012) How should be an ideal public procurement law, public procurement authority and public procurement board? A functional model study. Maliye Dergisi 162:18-50 (in Turkish).
  • Karapinar O (2005) Procurement Laws Numbered at 2886 and 4734 and Solution Proposals for the Application Problems of Public Procurement Law at Numbered 4734 at Construction Affairs. MSc Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University (in Turkish).
  • Tokalakoglu D (2010) A Sample Study For Constituting A Detailed Cost Estimate Specification in Public Construction Sector. MSc Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University.
  • Turesoy M (1989) Estimation of Duration in Construction Production and Factors Affecting Construction Duration. MSc Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University (in Turkish).
  • Shokri-Ghasabeh M, Chileshe N (2016) Critical factors influencing the bid/no bid decision in the Australian construction industry. Constr Innov 16(2):127-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04- 2015-0021.
  • Walraven A, de Vries B (2009) From demand driven contractor selection towards value driven contractor selection. Constr Manage Econ 27(6):597-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902933356.
  • Obodo CE, Xie ZN, Cobbinah BB, Yari KDY (2021) Evaluating the factors affecting contractors tender for project construction: An empirical study of small scale indigenous contractors in Awka, Nigeria. Open J Soc Sci 9(7):381-397. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.97028.
  • Turkish Republic Presidency of Strategy and Budget (2001) The Eighth Development Plan (2001-6). Ankara.
  • Turkish Republic Presidency of Strategy and Budget (2007) The Ninth Development Plan (2007- 13). Ankara.
  • Durdyev S, Ismail S, Abu Bakar N (2012) Factors causing cost overruns in construction of residential projects: Case study of Turkey. Int J Sci Manag 1(1):3-12.
  • Odabasi E (2009) Models for Estimating Construction Duration: An Application For Selected Buildings On the METU Campus. MSc Dissertation, Middle East Technical University.
  • Baltaci MK (2012) A Research About the Provision For Land Sales Income-Sharing Model of TOKI. MSc Dissertation, Yıldız Technical University (in Turkish).
  • Sonmez M (2019) Time and Cost Relationship For Superstructure Projects in Turkey. PhD Dissertation, Sakarya University (in Turkish).
  • Turhan N (2006) Reflections of Recent Changes in Public Tender System On Time and Cost of Construction Investements. MSc Dissertation, Çukurova University (in Turkish).
  • PMI (2021) Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  • Majid IA (2006) Causes and Effect of Delays in Aceh Construction Industry. MSc Dissertation, University of Technology Malaysia.
  • Barclay CR (1994) Composing proto-selves through improvisation. In: Neisser U, Fivush R (eds) The Remembering Self: Construction and Accuracy in the Self Narrative. Cambridge University Press, 55-77.
  • Ismail S (2013) Factors attracting the use of public private partnership in Malaysia. J Constr Dev Ctries 18(1):95-108.
  • Tunc G, Ozsarac E (2015) Recommendations for Improving the Public-Private Partnership Model in Turkey. In: 3rd National Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir (in Turkish).
  • Elinwa AU, Joshua M (2001) Time-overrun factors in Nigerian construction industry. J Constr Eng Manag 127(5):419-425. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9364(2001)127:5(419).
  • Ibironke OT, Ibironke D (2011) Factors affecting time, cost and quality management in building construction projects. FUTY Journal of the Environment 6(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.4314/fje.v6i1.68323.
  • Turkish Republic Official Gazette (1983) Public Housing Law, No. 2886. Gazette No. 18161.
  • Turkish Republic Official Gazette (1984) Public Housing Law, No. 2985. Gazette No. 18344.
  • Turkish Republic Official Gazette (2003) Public Housing Law, No. 4966. Gazette No. 24317.
  • Turkish Republic Official Gazette (2004) Toplu Konut Kanununda ve Genel Kadro ve Usulü Hakkında Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamenin Eki Cetvellerin Toplu Konut İdaresi Başkanlığına Ait Bölümünde Değişiklik Yapılması Hakkında Kanun (Law No. 5162). Gazette No. 25460
  • Solak A (2013) Problems and Solutions in Construction Tenders. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 16(2):13-21 (in Turkish).
  • Jin RZ, Han SW, Hyun CT, Cha YW (2016) Application of case-based reasoning for estimating preliminary duration of building projects. J Constr Eng Manag 142(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943- 7862.0001072.
  • Lee H, Shin J, Park M, Ryu HG (2009) Probabilistic duration estimation model for high- rise structural work. J Constr Eng Manag 135(12):1289-1298. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943- 7862.0000105.
  • Yeom DJ, Seo HM, Kim YJ, Cho CS, Kim Y (2018) Development of an approximate construction duration prediction model during the project planning phase for general office buildings. J Civ Eng Manag 24(3):238-253. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2018.1646.
  • Bayram S (2017) Duration prediction models for construction projects: In terms of cost or physical characteristics? KSCE J Civ Eng 21(6):2049-2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0691-2.
  • Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Shahsavand P, Marefat A, Parchamijalal M (2018) Causes of delays in construction industry and comparative delay analysis techniques with SCL protocol. Eng Constr Archit Manag 25(4):497-533. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2016-0220.
  • Turkish Republic Official Gazette (2002) Regulation on the Use of TOKI Resources, Law No. 24730, Public Housing Law, No.4734, Gazette No.24648, Public Housing Law, No.5162, Gazette No.21253.
  • Turkish Republic Official Gazette (2009) Regulation on Construction Tenders Implementation. Gazette No.27159.
  • Supreme Court Office (2010) Case 2010/2081 and 2010/9729 numbered decision. Ankara: The General Assembly of Supreme Court.
  • Supreme Court Office (2011) Case 2011/4202 and 2011/14042 numbered decision. Ankara: The General Assembly of Supreme Court.
  • Supreme Court Office (2013) Case 2012/24284 and 201/1694 numbered decision. Ankara: The General Assembly of Supreme Court.
  • Supreme Court Office (2014) Case 2013/13-1143 ve 2014/625 numbered decision. Ankara: The General Assembly of Supreme Court.
  • Supreme Court Office (2015) Case 2013/13-2342 and 2015/1066 numbered decision. Ankara: The General Assembly of Supreme Court.
  • Barlish K, Sullivan K (2012) How to measure the benefits of BIM - A case study approach. Autom Constr 24:149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.008.
  • Jrade A, Lessard J (2015) An integrated BIM system to track the time and cost of construction projects: A case study. J Constr Eng 2015:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/579486.
  • Al-Khalil MI, Al-Ghafly MA (1999) Important causes of delay in public utility projects in Saudi Arabia. Constr Manag Econ 17(5):647-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461999371259.
APA TIRATACI H, Yaman H (2023). Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study. , 20 - 33. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
Chicago TIRATACI Hakan,Yaman Hakan Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study. (2023): 20 - 33. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
MLA TIRATACI Hakan,Yaman Hakan Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study. , 2023, ss.20 - 33. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
AMA TIRATACI H,Yaman H Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study. . 2023; 20 - 33. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
Vancouver TIRATACI H,Yaman H Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study. . 2023; 20 - 33. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
IEEE TIRATACI H,Yaman H "Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study." , ss.20 - 33, 2023. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
ISNAD TIRATACI, Hakan - Yaman, Hakan. "Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study". (2023), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
APA TIRATACI H, Yaman H (2023). Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 6(1), 20 - 33. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
Chicago TIRATACI Hakan,Yaman Hakan Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 6, no.1 (2023): 20 - 33. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
MLA TIRATACI Hakan,Yaman Hakan Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), vol.6, no.1, 2023, ss.20 - 33. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
AMA TIRATACI H,Yaman H Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2023; 6(1): 20 - 33. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
Vancouver TIRATACI H,Yaman H Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2023; 6(1): 20 - 33. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
IEEE TIRATACI H,Yaman H "Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study." Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 6, ss.20 - 33, 2023. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029
ISNAD TIRATACI, Hakan - Yaman, Hakan. "Total Construction Duration Calculation of Public Housing Projects in Turkey: A Case Study". Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 6/1 (2023), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2023.01016029