Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 34 - 51 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047 İndeks Tarihi: 15-05-2023

Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya

Öz:
Urban transformation projects are being implemented to make spatial arrangements and improvements in line with the changing needs of cities and citizens in the world and Turkey. In urban transformation projects, sustainability goals are essential in order to protect the integrity of cities and to meet the spatial, social and economic needs of the citizens in an environmentally sensitive, balanced and equitable manner. This study aims to analyze the effects of urban transformation practices on citizens, urban space and the environment by using sustainability indicators. For this purpose, the Sur Yapı Antalya Project in Santral District Urban Transformation Area of Antalya was analyzed through the items of the sustainability indicator set. The project was evaluated under eight main criteria, namely “community participation”, “economy and work”, “transport”, “pollution”, “energy”, “waste and resources”, “buildings and land use” and “wildlife and open spaces”. As a result of the study, it was concluded that the effects of the decisions taken and the practices implemented during the planning phase of the project and the ongoing construction process on physical, economic, social and environmental sustainability vary and affect its utilization. This study is expected to contribute to the research and practice by evaluating how the urban transformation project aims to improve the region’s physical conditions and offer a new urban space to the citizens.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
0
0
0
  • Kim DK, Park S (2020) Business cycle and occupational accidents in Korea. Safety and Health at Work 11(3): 314-321.
  • Gençer Özdemir G (2019) Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects with Sustainability Indicators: Fikirtepe Urban Transformation Project. MSc Dissertation, Yıldız Technical University (in Turkish).
  • Korkmaz C (2015) Evaluation of Sustainability Performance of Urban Regeneration Projects: The Case of the North Entrance of Ankara Urban Regeneration Project. MSc Dissertation, Middle East Technical University.
  • Toptaş HG (2021) Examining of the Context of Sustainability Indicators of Urban Regeneration Projects Which Implemented in Turkey: The Case Study of Ankara Aktaş Neighborhood. MSc Dissertation, Gazi University (in Turkish).
  • Carroll E (2009) Twenty-five years in the making: Why sustainable development has eluded the UN, and how community-driven development offers the solution. Houston Journal of International Law 32: 545.
  • Mugoni H (2014) A resource management framework for sustainability of rural ICT4D projects in Zimbabwe. PhD Dissertation, University of Fort Hare.
  • Tatar H (2015) A Model for Analyzing Urban Transformation Projects in the Context of Sustainability Criteria: “Rightful Owners’ Residences within North Ankara Entrance Urban Transformation Project Phase I”. MSc Dissertation, Gazi University (in Turkish).
  • McCormick K, Anderberg S, Coenen L, Neij L (2013) Advancing sustainable urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production 50:1-11.
  • Ilıcalı E (2020) Sustainable performance measurement model for urban regeneration projects. PhD Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University.
  • Wolfram M, Frantzeskaki N, Maschmeyer S (2016) Cities, systems and sustainability: status and perspectives of research on urban transformations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22:18-25.
  • Yiğitcanlar T, Dur F (2010) Developing a Sustainability Assessment Model: The Sustainable Infrastructure, Land-Use, Environment and Transport Model. Sustainability 2:321-340.
  • Bayraktar D, Bayraktar EA (2019) Urban Transformation Applications in Antalya City Center. Beykent University Journal of Science and Technology 12(1):19-35 (in Turkish).
  • Şirin A (2018) Assessment of Urban Transformation Studies in Kepez District of Antalya. MSc Dissertation, Süleyman Demirel University (in Turkish).
  • Adıgüzel Istıl Ş (2019) The Investigation of the Relationship Between Sustainability and Cost of the Urban Transformation Process in Turkey: A Case Study of Antalya. PhD Dissertation, Akdeniz University (in Turkish).
  • Elmastaş M (2020) The Sociological and Economic Effects of Urban Transformation: The Example of Urban Transformation in Antalya Kepez Santral Neighborhood. MSc Dissertation, Süleyman Demirel University (in Turkish).
  • Mansuroğlu S, Dağ V, Demir F (2019) The Effect development: Contributing to sustainability. Urban Studies 42(13):2407-2429.
  • Chan E, Lee GK (2007) Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research 85(2):243-of Urban Renewal Projects on Urban Identity in Turkey: Case of Istanbul and Antalya.In: 4th International Tourism Congress “City Tourism”. 256.
  • Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey (2012) Law No. 6306 on Transformation of Areas Under Disaster Risk. 28309 (in Turkish).
  • T.R. Antalya Governorship. Our Districts. http://www.antalya.gov.tr/ilcelerimiz. Accessed 19 February 2023.
  • Sur Yapı. Ongoing Housing Projects. https://www.suryapi.com.tr/projeler/konut/devam- eden-projeler/sur-yapi-antalya--57. Accessed 19 February 2023.
  • Sur Yapı Antalya. https://suryapiantalya.com.tr/tr. Accessed 19 February 2023.
  • Google Earth. Santral District. https://earth.google.com. Accessed 3 March 2023.
  • Aelenei L, Ferreira A, Monteiro CS, Gomes R, Gonçalves H, Camelo S, Silva C (2016). Smart city: A systematic approach towards a sustainable urban transformation. Energy Procedia 91:970- 979.
  • Bakıcı T, Almirall E, Wareham J (2013) A Smart City Initiative: The Case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4:135-148.
  • Couch C, Dennemann A (2000) Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain: The example of the Liverpool Ropewalks Partnership. Cities 17(2):137-147.
  • Hemphill L, Berry J, McGreal S (2004) An Indicator–Based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 2, Empirical Evaluation and Case-study Analysis. Urban Studies 41(4):757- 772.
  • Larsson N, Macias M (2012) Overview of the SB Tool Assessment Framework. The International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment and Manual Manias, Spain.
  • Laprise M, Lufkin S, Rey E (2015) An Indicator System for the Assessment of Sustainability Integrated into the Project Dynamics of Regeneration of Disused Urban Areas. Building and Environment (86):29-38.
  • Bromley RD, Tallon AR, Thomas CJ (2005) City centre regeneration through residential
  • Evans J, Jones P (2009) Rethinking sustainable urban regeneration: ambiguity, creativity, and the shared territory. Environment and Planning A 40(6):1416-1434.
  • Lombardi DR, Porter L, Barber A, Rogers CDF (2010) Conceptualising sustainability in UK urban regeneration: a discursive formation. Urban Studies 48(2):273-296.
  • Ernst L, de Graaf-Van Dinther RE, Peek GJ, Loorbach DA (2016) Sustainable urban transformation and sustainability transitions; conceptual framework and case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 112:2988-2999.
  • Özcan H (2018) A Research on New Generation Urban Transformation Antalya Kepez – Santral Neighbourhood Example. MSc Dissertation, Akdeniz University (in Turkish).
  • Ahsan R, Ahmad MH (2016) Development, displacement and resettlement a challenge for social sustainability: A study on mega development project (Bakun Dam) in Sarawak. International Journal of Advances in Agricultural and Environmental Engineering 3(1):1-5.
  • Yıldız S, Kıvrak S, Arslan G (2018) Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. Journal of Construction Engineering 1(1):33-42.
  • Yosef E, Damdelen Ö (2022) The reduction of energy consumption in sustainable buildings for North Cyprus. Journal of Construction Engineering 5(4):286-301.
  • Shah KJ, Pan SY, Lee I, Kim H, You Z, Zheng JM, Chiang PC (2021) Green transportation for sustainability: Review of current barriers, strategies, and innovative technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production 326:129392.
  • Al-Hagla KS (2008) Towards a sustainable neighborhood: The role of open spaces. International Journal of Architectural Research 2:162-177.
APA ECE KAYA B, Erbaş İ (2023). Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya. , 34 - 51. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
Chicago ECE KAYA BİRSU,Erbaş İkbal Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya. (2023): 34 - 51. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
MLA ECE KAYA BİRSU,Erbaş İkbal Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya. , 2023, ss.34 - 51. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
AMA ECE KAYA B,Erbaş İ Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya. . 2023; 34 - 51. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
Vancouver ECE KAYA B,Erbaş İ Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya. . 2023; 34 - 51. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
IEEE ECE KAYA B,Erbaş İ "Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya." , ss.34 - 51, 2023. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
ISNAD ECE KAYA, BİRSU - Erbaş, İkbal. "Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya". (2023), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
APA ECE KAYA B, Erbaş İ (2023). Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 6(1), 34 - 51. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
Chicago ECE KAYA BİRSU,Erbaş İkbal Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 6, no.1 (2023): 34 - 51. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
MLA ECE KAYA BİRSU,Erbaş İkbal Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), vol.6, no.1, 2023, ss.34 - 51. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
AMA ECE KAYA B,Erbaş İ Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2023; 6(1): 34 - 51. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
Vancouver ECE KAYA B,Erbaş İ Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2023; 6(1): 34 - 51. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
IEEE ECE KAYA B,Erbaş İ "Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya." Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 6, ss.34 - 51, 2023. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047
ISNAD ECE KAYA, BİRSU - Erbaş, İkbal. "Evaluation of Urban Transformation Projects Through the Sustainability Indicator: The Case of Santral District in Antalya". Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 6/1 (2023), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2023.01030047