Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 258 - 267 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.36519/idcm.2022.187 İndeks Tarihi: 16-05-2023

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment

Öz:
Objective: There are many difficulties in diagnosing and treating Stenotrophomonas maltophil ia bacteremia. In this study, we aimed to evaluate “true” and “false-positive bacteremia” and assess mortality risk factors and the impact of different treatment regimens. Materials and Methods: Hospitalized adult patients with S. maltophilia-positive blood cul tures were assessed by a two-stage analysis. First, the clinical significance of blood cultures was assessed, and patients were divided into “true” and “false-positive bacteremia” groups. Then, excluding false positives, we analyzed the antimicrobial regimens and the factors associated with 28-day mortality in true bacteremia cases performing univariate and mul tivariate analyses. Results: The study included 127 out of 138 patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia. True bacteremia was identified in 51.2% and false-positive bacteremia in 48.8% of patients. In the true bacteremia group, hypotension, nosocomial bacteremia, concomitant infections, a source of bacteremia, two positive blood culture sets, and 28-day mortality were more common. The 28-day mortality was 50.7% among true bacteremia cases. In multivariate analysis, age and solid tumor were the independent predictors of 28-day mortality. Early effective antimicrobial therapy and different antimicrobial regimens, including trimeth oprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), fluoroquinolones (FQs), and tigecycline (TGC), did not have any significant impact on survival. Conclusion: Patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia should first be assessed regarding clin ical significance. Clinical findings, the presence of multiple positive blood culture sets and the primary sources of bacteremia are useful parameters while discriminating true from false-positive bacteremia. Patients with advanced age and solid tumors should be followed carefully in terms of mortality. Antimicrobial regimens, including SXT, FQs, or TGC, can be preferred in patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia considering antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects or toxicity.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1 de Oliveira-Garcia D, Dall’Agnol M, Rosales M, Azzuz AC, Al cántara N, Martinez MB, et al. Fimbriae and adherence of Ste notrophomonas maltophilia to epithelial cells and to abiotic sur faces. Cell Microbiol. 2003;5(9):625-36. [CrossRef]
  • 2 Juhász E, Krizsán G, Lengyel G, Grósz G, Pongrácz J, Kristóf K. Infection and colonization by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an timicrobial susceptibility and clinical background of strains isolated at a tertiary care centre in Hungary. Ann Clin Microbi ol Antimicrob. 2014;13:333. [CrossRef]
  • 3 Adegoke AA, Stenström TA, Okoh AI. Stenotrophomonas malto philia as an emerging ubiquitous pathogen: looking beyond contemporary antibiotic therapy. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2276. [CrossRef]
  • 4 Park YS, Kim SY, Park SY, Kang JH, Lee HS, Seo YH, et al. Pseu dooutbreak of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in a general ward. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(1):29-32. [Cross Ref]
  • 5 Klausner JD, Zukerman C, Limaye AP, Corey L. Outbreak of Ste notrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia among patients under going bone marrow transplantation: association with faulty replacement of handwashing soap. Infect Control Hosp Epide miol. 1999;20(11):756-8. [CrossRef]
  • 6 Muder RR, Harris AP, Muller S, Edmond M, Chow JW, Papada kis K, et al. Bacteremia due to Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia: a prospective, multicenter study of 91 episodes. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(3):508-12. [CrossRef]
  • 7 Gales AC, Seifert H, Gur D, Castanheira M, Jones RN, Sader HS. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acine tobacter baumannii complex and Stenotrophomonas maltophil ia clinical isolates: results from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (1997-2016). Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(Suppl 1):S34-S46. [CrossRef]
  • 8 Ebara H, Hagiya H, Haruki Y, Kondo E, Otsuka F. Clinical char acteristics of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia: a re gional report and a review of a Japanese case series. Intern Med. 2017;56(2):137-42. [CrossRef]
  • 9 Weinstein MP, Towns ML, Quartey SM, Mirrett S, Reimer LG, Parmi giani G, et al. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the micro biology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(4):584-602. [CrossRef]
  • 10 Siebor E, Llanes C, Lafon I, Ogier-Desserrey A, Duez JM, Pechi not A, et al. Presumed pseudobacteremia outbreak resulting from contamination of proportional disinfectant dispenser. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;26(3):195-8. [CrossRef]
  • 11 Hall KK, Lyman JA. Updated review of blood culture contami nation. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(4):788-802. [CrossRef]
  • 12 Kanaujia R, Bandyopadhyay A, Biswal M, Sahni N, Kaur K, Vig S, et al. Colonization of the central venous catheter by Steno trophomonas maltophilia in an ICU setting: an impending out break managed in time. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50(6):663-7. [CrossRef]
  • 13 Mendes ET, Paez JIG, Ferraz JR, Marchi AP, Silva ILAFE, Batista MV, et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of pa tients colonized or infected by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: is resistance to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim a problem? Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2020;62:e96. [CrossRef]
  • 14 Jones BM, Wagner JL, Chastain DB, Bookstaver PB, Stover K, Lin J, et al. Real-world, multicentre evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022;28:282-7. [CrossRef]
  • 15 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consen sus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-10. [CrossRef]
  • 16 Lamy B, Dargère S, Arendrup MC, Parienti JJ, Tattevin P. How to optimize the use of blood cultures for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections? A State-of-the Art. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:697. [CrossRef]
  • 17 Pien BC, Sundaram P, Raoof N, Costa SF, Mirrett S, Woods CW, et al. The clinical and prognostic importance of positive blood cultures in adults. Am J Med. 2010;123(9):819-28. [CrossRef]
  • 18 Dargère S, Cormier H, Verdon R. Contaminants in blood cul tures: importance, implications, interpretation and prevention. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:964–9. [CrossRef]
  • 19 Nishimura T, Hattori K, Inoue A, Ishii T, Yumoto T, Tsukahara K, et al. Bacteremia or pseudobacteremia? Review of pseudomo nas fluorescens infections. World J Emerg Med. 2017;8:151-4. [CrossRef]
  • 20 Garcia Paez JI, Tengan FM, Barone AA, Levin AS, Costa SF. Fac tors associated with mortality in patients with bloodstream infection and pneumonia due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;27:901-6. [CrossRef]
  • 21 Garazi M, Singer C, Tai J, Ginocchio CC. Bloodstream infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a seven-year review. J Hosp Infect. 2012;81:114-8. [CrossRef]
  • 22 Chen Y, Suo J, Du M, Chen L, Liu Y, Wang L et al. Clinical features, outcomes, and risk factors of bloodstream infec tions due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a tertiary-care hospital of China: a retrospective analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:4931501. [CrossRef]
  • 23 Duan Z, Qin J, Liu Y, Li C, Ying C. Molecular epidemiology, and risk factors of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections in a Chi nese teaching hospital. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:294. [CrossRef]
  • 24 Bocharova YA, Savinova TA, Lyamin AV, Kondratenko OV, Po likarpova SV, Zhilina SV, et al. Characteristics of Stenotro phomonas maltophilia isolates from cystic fibrosis patients in Russia. Klin Lab Diagn. 2022;67:315-20. [CrossRef]
  • 25 Kanchanasuwan S, Rongmuang J, Siripaitoon P, Kositpan tawong N, Charoenmak B, Hortiwakul T, et al. Clinical Char acteristics, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Mortality in Pa tients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia. J Clin Med. 2022;11:3085. [CrossRef]
  • 26 Garcia Paez JI, Costa SF. Risk factors associated with mortality of infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a system atic review. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70:101-8. [CrossRef]
  • 27 Ko JH, Kang CI, Cornejo-Juárez P, Yeh KM, Wang CH, Cho SY. Fluoroquinolones versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25:546-54. [CrossRef]
APA AYSERT-YILDIZ P, Yildiz Y, Habibi H, eser s, ozgen top o, Ozger H, Dizbay M (2022). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment. , 258 - 267. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
Chicago AYSERT-YILDIZ PINAR,Yildiz Yesim,Habibi Hamid,eser sedanur,ozgen top ozge,Ozger H.Selcuk,Dizbay Murat Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment. (2022): 258 - 267. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
MLA AYSERT-YILDIZ PINAR,Yildiz Yesim,Habibi Hamid,eser sedanur,ozgen top ozge,Ozger H.Selcuk,Dizbay Murat Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment. , 2022, ss.258 - 267. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
AMA AYSERT-YILDIZ P,Yildiz Y,Habibi H,eser s,ozgen top o,Ozger H,Dizbay M Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment. . 2022; 258 - 267. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
Vancouver AYSERT-YILDIZ P,Yildiz Y,Habibi H,eser s,ozgen top o,Ozger H,Dizbay M Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment. . 2022; 258 - 267. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
IEEE AYSERT-YILDIZ P,Yildiz Y,Habibi H,eser s,ozgen top o,Ozger H,Dizbay M "Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment." , ss.258 - 267, 2022. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
ISNAD AYSERT-YILDIZ, PINAR vd. "Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment". (2022), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2022.187
APA AYSERT-YILDIZ P, Yildiz Y, Habibi H, eser s, ozgen top o, Ozger H, Dizbay M (2022). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment. Infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (Online), 4(4), 258 - 267. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
Chicago AYSERT-YILDIZ PINAR,Yildiz Yesim,Habibi Hamid,eser sedanur,ozgen top ozge,Ozger H.Selcuk,Dizbay Murat Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment. Infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (Online) 4, no.4 (2022): 258 - 267. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
MLA AYSERT-YILDIZ PINAR,Yildiz Yesim,Habibi Hamid,eser sedanur,ozgen top ozge,Ozger H.Selcuk,Dizbay Murat Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment. Infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (Online), vol.4, no.4, 2022, ss.258 - 267. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
AMA AYSERT-YILDIZ P,Yildiz Y,Habibi H,eser s,ozgen top o,Ozger H,Dizbay M Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment. Infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (Online). 2022; 4(4): 258 - 267. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
Vancouver AYSERT-YILDIZ P,Yildiz Y,Habibi H,eser s,ozgen top o,Ozger H,Dizbay M Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment. Infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (Online). 2022; 4(4): 258 - 267. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
IEEE AYSERT-YILDIZ P,Yildiz Y,Habibi H,eser s,ozgen top o,Ozger H,Dizbay M "Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment." Infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (Online), 4, ss.258 - 267, 2022. 10.36519/idcm.2022.187
ISNAD AYSERT-YILDIZ, PINAR vd. "Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: From Diagnosis to Treatment". Infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (Online) 4/4 (2022), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2022.187