Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 47 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 19 - 22 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474 İndeks Tarihi: 17-05-2023

Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement

Öz:
Background: Procalcitonin (PCT) measurement is required for intensive care patients with systemic inflammation symptoms, early diagnosis of possible infections, and evaluation of sepsis severity and prognosis. Objectives: We aimed to determine the analytical performance of PCT measurement in a Roche Modular E170 (ECLIA) analyzer and compare the performance with VIDAS (BRAHMS/ELFA) analyzer findings. Material and methods: Within-day and between-day precision value, linearity was determined, and two methods were compared with regression and Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Both ECLIA and ELFA assays indicated excellent precision, where within-day precision varied between 1.18% and 3.97% CV, and between-day precision varied between 1.77% and 3.93% CV. The ECLIA method was linear up to 62.15 ng/mL. The arithmetic mean was 6.02 ng/mL with the ECLIA method and 8.02 ng/mL with the ELFA method. The correlation coefficient was r=0.996 and p=0.001. The correlation was linear between the two methods. Regression equation was found y=0.78x − 0.23. The Bland–Altman figure was revealed the difference between the methods was specifically in lower concentrations (<0.15 ng/mL). Conclusions: Both methods show good precision and correlation. It was determined that the difference between methods was significant, especially at <0.15 ng/mL concentration.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Scuhuetz P, Bretscher C, Bernasconi L, Mueller B. Overview of procalcitonin and procalcitonin-guided protocols for the management of patients with infections and sepsis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2017;17:593–601.
  • 2. Scuhuetz P, Mueller B, Christ-CrainM, Stolz D, TammM, BouadmaL, et al. Procalcitonin to initiate or discontinue antibiotics in acute respiratory tract infections. Cohrane Database Syst Rev UK 2017;10: CD007498.
  • 3. Scuhuetz P, Briel M, Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Bouadma L, Wolff M, et al. Procalcitonin to guide initiation and duration of antibiotic treatment in acute respiratory infections: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:651–62.
  • 4. Soni NJ, Samson DJ, Galaydick JL, Vats V, Pitrak DL, Aronson N. Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Researchand Quality (US); 2012.
  • 5. Li P, Chen Z, Liu B, Li K, Wang H, Lin L, et al. Establishment of a novel homogeneous nanoparticle-based assay for sensitive procalcitonin detection of ultra low-volume serum samples. Int J Nanomed 2018;13:5395–404.
  • 6. Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples. CLSI guideline EP09c, 3rd ed. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018.
  • 7. Preliminary evaluation of quantitative clinical laboratory measurement procedures; approved guideline. CLSI document EP10-A3-AMD, 3rd ed. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014.
  • 8. Evaluation of linearity of quantitative measurement procedures. CLSI guideline EP06, 2nd ed. USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020.
  • 9. Steinbach G, Rau B, Debard AL, Javourez JF, Bienvenu J, Ponzio A, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a new immunoassay for procalcitonin measurement on the Kryptor System. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004;42:440–9.
  • 10. de Wolf HK, Gunnewiek JK, Berk Y, van den Ouweland J, de Metz M. Comparison of a new procalcitonin assay from the Roche with the established method on the Brahms Kryptor. Clin Chem 2009;55: 1043–4.
  • 11. Barassi A, Pallotti F, Melzid’Eril G. Biological variation of procalcitonin in healthy individuals clin. Inside Chem 2004;50:1878. 12. Saraçlı S, Doğan İ, Doğan N. Medikal metot Karşılaştırma Çalışmalarında deming Regresyon Tekniği. Türkiye Klinikleri J Biostat 2009;1:9–15.
  • 13. Wang G, Wan Y, Lin G, Li Z, Dong Z, Liu T. Development of a novel chemiluminescence immunoassay for the detection of procalcitonin. J Immunol Methods 2020;484–485:112829.
APA erdem kınaş b, etem akagac a, A, BATCIK S, URAŞ A (2022). Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement. , 19 - 22. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
Chicago erdem kınaş burçin,etem akagac arzu, Aybala,BATCIK SULE,URAŞ Ahmet Rıza Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement. (2022): 19 - 22. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
MLA erdem kınaş burçin,etem akagac arzu, Aybala,BATCIK SULE,URAŞ Ahmet Rıza Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement. , 2022, ss.19 - 22. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
AMA erdem kınaş b,etem akagac a, A,BATCIK S,URAŞ A Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement. . 2022; 19 - 22. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
Vancouver erdem kınaş b,etem akagac a, A,BATCIK S,URAŞ A Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement. . 2022; 19 - 22. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
IEEE erdem kınaş b,etem akagac a, A,BATCIK S,URAŞ A "Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement." , ss.19 - 22, 2022. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
ISNAD erdem kınaş, burçin vd. "Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement". (2022), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
APA erdem kınaş b, etem akagac a, A, BATCIK S, URAŞ A (2022). Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, 47(1), 19 - 22. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
Chicago erdem kınaş burçin,etem akagac arzu, Aybala,BATCIK SULE,URAŞ Ahmet Rıza Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi 47, no.1 (2022): 19 - 22. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
MLA erdem kınaş burçin,etem akagac arzu, Aybala,BATCIK SULE,URAŞ Ahmet Rıza Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, vol.47, no.1, 2022, ss.19 - 22. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
AMA erdem kınaş b,etem akagac a, A,BATCIK S,URAŞ A Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi. 2022; 47(1): 19 - 22. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
Vancouver erdem kınaş b,etem akagac a, A,BATCIK S,URAŞ A Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement. Türk Biyokimya Dergisi. 2022; 47(1): 19 - 22. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
IEEE erdem kınaş b,etem akagac a, A,BATCIK S,URAŞ A "Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement." Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, 47, ss.19 - 22, 2022. 10.1515/tjb-2020-0474
ISNAD erdem kınaş, burçin vd. "Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement". Türk Biyokimya Dergisi 47/1 (2022), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2020-0474