Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 25 Sayfa Aralığı: 507 - 522 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 İndeks Tarihi: 17-05-2023
Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri
Öz: Görsel tarama görevlerinde denemeler arasında hedef uyaran özelliklerinin tekrarlanması veya değişmesi performansı farklı etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmada hedef uyaranın pozisyonu farklı koşullarda denemeler arasında (deneme n deneme n+1) değişimlemeye uğrayarak önceki denemede yer alan hedef uyaran, çeldirici uyaran pozisyonunda ya da nötr/boş bir pozisyonda konumlanmıştır. Hedef uyaranın uyaran setindeki pozisyonunun önceki deneme ile aynı olması hedef uyaranın tespitini boş pozisyona kıyasla kolaylaştırmaktadır ve kolaylaştırıcı hazırlama etkisi olarak adlandırılır. Hedef uyaranın uyaran setindeki pozisyonunun önceki denemedeki çeldirici uyaran pozisyonunda olması ise boş pozisyona kıyasla hedef uyaranın tespitini zorlaştırarak performansta zayıflığa yol açmaktadır ve ketleyici hazırlama etkisi olarak adlandırılır (Maljkovic ve Nakayama, 1996). Bu çalışmanın amacı, mekânsal dikkat süreçlerini incelemeyi mümkün kılan pozisyona bağlı kolaylaştırıcı ve ketleyici hazırlama etkilerinin sembolik, kelime ve nötr ipucu uyaranlarının yer aldığı koşullarda ne tür bir değişikliğe uğradığını incelemektir. Uyaran setinden önce sembolik, semantik ya da nötr ipucu uyaranlarından biri gösterilmiştir. İpucu uyaranları, uyaran setinde bulunan hedef uyaranın bulunduğu noktayı ya da çeldirici uyaranlardan birinin bulunduğu noktayı işaret etmiştir. İpucu uyaranının işaret ettiği nokta hedef uyaranın bulunduğu nokta olduğunda geçerli ipucu; çeldirici uyaranlardan birinin yer aldığı nokta olduğunda ise geçersiz ipucu koşulu ortaya çıkmıştır. Deney görevi performansı farklı ipucu türleri ve ipucu geçerliliği koşullarında tepki süresi bağımlı değişkeni temelinde incelenmiştir. Bulgular, ipucu geçerliliği ve ipucu türü değişkenlerinin kolaylaştırıcı ve ketleyici hazırlama etkilerinde farklılıklar olduğunu göstermiştir. Önceki çalışmalarda bir arada incelenmeyen bu faktörlere ait bulgular, mekânsal dikkat süreçlerine dair alan yazına katkı sağlama potansiyeli taşımaktadır.a
Anahtar Kelime: Semantic and Symbolic Cueing Effects on the Spatial Attenion Processes
Öz: In a given visual search task, repetition or switch of the target features affect the task performance differently. In the current study, the position of the target is manipulated across trials (trial n trial n+1) and the target could appear at previous target, distractor or empty /neutral position. Positioning the target at the same position as in the previous trial, compared to neutral position, facilitates the target detection process, known as facilitatory priming effect. Positioning the target at previous distractor location, compared to neutral position, impairs the target detection process, known as inhibitory priming effect. The aim of the present study is to investigate modulations in the facilitatory and inhibitory priming effects,which are related to spatial attention processes, in the presence of different cue types (symbolic, semantic, neutral cues). One of the symbolic, semantic or neutral cues was presented prior to the display onset. The spatial cue could either indicate the location of the target or the distractor item. The cue pointing the target’s location generated the valid cue condition and the cue pointing one of the distractors’ location generated the invalid cue condition. Task performance was assessed by the reaction time dependent variable for the different cue types and cue validty conditions. The results revealed that cue validity and cue type factors affected the facilitatory and inhibitory priming effects differently. As the current study is the first one to investigate these factors, the findings have the potential to deepen the knowledge on spatial attention processes.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Becker, S. I. (2010). The role of target–distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(2), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018808
- Besner, D., Risko, E. F. ve Sklair, N. (2005). Spatial Attention as a Necessary Preliminary to Early Processes in Reading. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 59(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087465
- Bravo, M. J. ve Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(5), 465-472. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211642
- Cristescu, T. C., Devlin, J. T. ve Nobre, A. C. (2006). Orienting attention to semantic categories. Neuroimage, 33(4), 1178-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.017
- Cristescu, T. C. ve Nobre, A. C. (2008). Differential Modulation of Word Recognition by Semantic and Spatial Orienting of Attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20 (5), 787-801, doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20503
- Fecteau, J. H. (2007). Priming of pop-out depends on the current goals of observers. Journal of Vision, 7(6), 1, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.6.1
- Fecteau, J. H. ve Munoz, D. P. (2003). Exploring the consequences of the previous trial. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 435-443. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1114
- Finke, K., Bucher, L., Kerkhoff, G., Keller, I., von Rosen, F., Geyer, T., Müller, H. ve Bublak, P. (2009). Inhibitory and facilitatory location priming in patients with left-sided visual hemi-neglect. Psychological Research, 73, 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0209-8
- Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J. ve Milliken, B. (2005). The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects. Cognitive Processing, 6(2), 98-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-004-0038-7
- Geyer, T., Müller, H. J. ve Krummenacher, J. (2006). Cross-trial priming in visual search for singleton conjunction targets: Role of repeated target and distractor features. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(5), 736-749. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193697
- Geyer, T., Zehetleitner, M. ve Müller, H. J. (2010). Positional priming of pop-out-out: A relational-encoding account. Journal of Vision, 10(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.2.3
- Gibson, B. S., ve Kingstone, A. (2006). Visual attention and the semantics of space: Beyond central and peripheral cues. Psychological Science, 17(7), 622-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2006.01754.x
- Gibson, B. S. ve Sztybel, P. (2014). The spatial semantics of symbolic attention control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(4), 271-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414536728
- Gibson, B. S., Thompson, A. N., Davis, G. J. ve Biggs, A. T. (2011). Going the distance: Extra-symbolic contributions to the symbolic control of spatial attention. Visual Cognition, 19(10), 1237-1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2011.628636
- Gokce, A., Müller, H. J. ve Geyer, T. (2015). Positional priming of pop-out search is supported by multiple spatial reference frames. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 838, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00838
- Gokce, A., Geyer, T., Finke, K., Müller, H. J. ve Töllner, T. (2014). What pops out in positional priming of pop-out: insights from event-related EEG lateralizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:688, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00688
- Gokce, A., Müller, H. J. ve Geyer, T. (2013). Positional priming of pop-out is nested in visuospatial context. Journal of Vision, 13(3):32, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.32
- Goolsby, A. B. ve Suzuki, S. (2001). Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and “retrieval”. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(6), 929-944. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194513
- Gökçe, A. (2021). Global ve lokal işleme süreçlerinde mekansal dikkat ve duyguların etkisi. Nesne, 9(21), 637- 655. DOI: 10.7816/nesne-09-21-10
- Hauer, B. J. ve MacLeod, C. M. (2006). Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory. Acta Psychologica, 122(3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.12.008
- Hendricks, R. K., ve Boroditsky, L. (2017). New space–time metaphors foster new nonlinguistic representations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 800-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12279
- Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 800-817. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206924
- Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L. ve Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12(5), 360-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00367
- Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Starr, M. ve Greenberg, S. (2000). Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade programming during reading. In Reading as a perceptual process (s. 221-246). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50012-7
- Lamy, D., Antebi, C., Aviani, N. ve Carmel, T. (2008). Priming of pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Vision Research, 48(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.009
- Lamy, D., Amunts, L. ve Bar-Haim, Y. (2008). Emotional priming of pop-out in visual search. Emotion, 8(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.151
- Lupyan, G., Rahman, R. A., Boroditsky, L. ve Clark, A. (2020). Effects of language on visual perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(11), 930-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.08.005
- Kristjánsson, Á. ve Driver, J. (2008). Priming in visual search: Separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role reversal. Vision Research, 48, 1217-1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.007
- Kristjánsson, Á., Ingvarsdöttir, Á. ve Teitsdöttir, U. D. (2008). Object-and feature-based priming in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 378-384. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.378
- Krummenacher, J., Müller, H. J., Zehetleitner, M., ve Geyer, T. (2009). Dimension-and space-based intertrial effects in visual pop-out search: modulation by task demands for focal-attentional processing. Psychological Research, 73(2), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0206-y
- Lamy, D. ve Kristjánsson, Á. (2013). Is goal-directed attentional guidance just intertrial priming? A review. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 14, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.14
- Lamy, D., ve Yashar, A. (2008). Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: Target uncertainty does. Vision Research, 48(10), 1274-1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.021
- Logan, G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 103-174. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1995.1004
- Maljkovic, V. ve Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out I: Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 657-672. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209251
- Maljkovic, V. ve Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out-out II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(7), 977-991. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206826
- Maljkovic, V. ve Nakayama, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out III. A short term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7(5), 571-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062800407202
- Olk, B., Tsankova, E., Petca, A. R. ve Wilhelm, A. F. (2014). Measuring effects of voluntary attention: A comparison among predictive arrow, colour, and number cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(10), 2025-2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.898670
- Pashler, H. (1987). Target-distractor discriminability in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 41(4), 285-292. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208228
- Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1- 2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
- Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J. ve Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. Modes of perceiving and processing information, 137(158), 2.
- Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. ve Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 109(2), 160-174. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
- Ristic, J. ve Kingstone, A. (2006). Attention to arrows: Pointing to a new direction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(11), 1921-1930. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500416367
- Spruyt, A., De Houwer, J. ve Hermans, D. (2009). Modulation of automatic semantic priming by feature specific attention allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.03.004
- Stolz, J. A. ve McCann, R. S. (2000). Visual word recognition: Reattending to the role of spatiaattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(4), 1320–1331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1320
- The jamovi project (2021). jamovi (Version 2.2) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org
- Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(6), 599-606. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211656
- Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 799-806. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.799
- Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
- Waechter, S., Besner, D. ve Stolz, J. A. (2011). Basic processes in reading: Spatial attention as a necessary preliminary to orthographic and semantic processing. Visual Cognition, 19(2),171-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2010.517228
- Wiese, E., Wykowska, A., Zwickel, J. ve Müller, H. J. (2012). I See What You Mean: How Attentional Selection Is Shaped by Ascribing Intentions to Others. PLoS ONE 7(9), e45391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045391
- Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C. ve Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of topdown and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096- 1523.29.2.483
| APA | Gokce A (2022). Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri. , 507 - 522. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| Chicago | Gokce Ahu Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri. (2022): 507 - 522. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| MLA | Gokce Ahu Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri. , 2022, ss.507 - 522. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| AMA | Gokce A Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri. . 2022; 507 - 522. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| Vancouver | Gokce A Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri. . 2022; 507 - 522. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| IEEE | Gokce A "Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri." , ss.507 - 522, 2022. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| ISNAD | Gokce, Ahu. "Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri". (2022), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| APA | Gokce A (2022). Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri. Nesne Dergisi, 10(25), 507 - 522. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| Chicago | Gokce Ahu Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri. Nesne Dergisi 10, no.25 (2022): 507 - 522. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| MLA | Gokce Ahu Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri. Nesne Dergisi, vol.10, no.25, 2022, ss.507 - 522. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| AMA | Gokce A Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri. Nesne Dergisi. 2022; 10(25): 507 - 522. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| Vancouver | Gokce A Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri. Nesne Dergisi. 2022; 10(25): 507 - 522. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| IEEE | Gokce A "Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri." Nesne Dergisi, 10, ss.507 - 522, 2022. 10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
| ISNAD | Gokce, Ahu. "Mekânsal Dikkat Süreçlerinde Semantik ve Sembolik İpuçlama Etkileri". Nesne Dergisi 10/25 (2022), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-25-09 |
