Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması

Muhammet COŞKUN, (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Banu CİNGÖZ ULU (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Nesne Dergisi
22 5
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 26 Sayfa Aralığı: 637 - 654 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07 İndeks Tarihi: 18-05-2023

Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması

Öz:
Olumlu bir sosyal davranış türü olan ahlaki cesaret, olası sosyal maliyet ve riskler barındıran ahlaki norm ihlalleri karşısında yüreklilik göstererek doğruyu savunmaktır. Toplumsal işleyişin yanı sıra bireysel esenlik için öneminin anlaşılması, birçok araştırmacıyı bu kavramı daha iyi anlamaya yöneltmiştir. Bu makalenin amacı, ahlaki cesaret ile ilgili Türkçe kaynak eksikliğini gidererek bu kavram hakkında farkındalık oluşturmak, önemine dikkat çekmek ve Türk örnekleminde yapılacak çalışmalar ve geliştirilecek uygulamalar için güncel bir bilgi içeriği ve yol haritası sunmaktır. Bu bağlamda, öncelikle ahlaki cesaretin önemi gerçek hayattan örneklerle ve görgül çalışmalarla açıklanmıştır. Ardından, olumlu sosyal davranış (prososyal davranış) ve türleri ile ilgili kavramsal karmaşa betimlenerek ahlaki cesaretin içerik ve amaç yönüyle farklılığı ortaya konmuştur. Daha sonra bu davranışın altında yatan psikolojik ve durumsal süreçler ilgili alanyazın çalışmaları derlenerek açıklanmıştır. Ayrıca, ahlaki cesaretin ölçülmesinde kullanılan yöntemler ve Türkiye’de yapılmış olan sınırlı sayıda çalışmaya da yer verilmiştir. Son olarak, konuyla ilgili sonuç değerlendirmesi yapılarak gelecekteki ahlaki cesaret çalışmaları için önerilerde bulunulmuştur. Sonuç olarak, ahlaki cesaret, benzer diğer olumlu sosyal davranışlardan, yardım eden kişiye yüksek sosyal maliyet barındırmasına rağmen gerektirdiği güçlü ahlaki duruş yönü ile ayrışmakta; bu açıdan toplumsal işleyiş için ayrı bir öneme sahip olduğu görülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Moral Courage: A Review on Its Determinants, Importance and Consequences

Öz:
As a specific type of prosocial behavior, moral courage means standing up against moral norm violations with potential risks and social cost to the helper. Understanding its importance led scholars to work on capturing and promoting moral courage. The current paper aims to raise an awareness, draw attention to its importance, address the gaps in literature, and provide an up-to-date source of moral courage for future studies and intervention programs in Turkish culture. To this end, first, importance of moral courage was explained by real life examples and empirical research findings. Then, conceptual confusion in prosocial behavior and its subtypes was addressed. Especially, unique nature of moral courage as a different prosocial behavior was operationally defined and explained by comparing with other types of prosocial behaviors. Following that, psychological processes and situational determinants of moral courage were explained by reviewing the related literature. Moreover, measurement of moral courage and scarce number of studies conducted in Turkey were mentioned. Finally, suggestions for future research and implementations in the field were listed. In conclusion, moral courage is crucially important for healthy functioning of individuals and society, and it appears to be a distinct prosocial behavior as it requires strong moral stance against situations high in social cost.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Alınak, N. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinde ahlaki cesaret, benlik saygısı ve güvensiz bağlanma stilleri arasındaki ilişkiler [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Nişantaşı Üniversitesi.
  • Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Penguin.
  • Arslan, G. ve Coşkun, M. (2020). Student subjective wellbeing, school functioning, and psychological adjustment in high school adolescents: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 4(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.47602/jpsp.v4i2.231
  • Ayaz, E. (2020). Hemşirelerde ahlaki cesaret ölçeği: Uyarlama, geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Kafkas Üniversitesi.
  • Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R. ve Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656-1666. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237647
  • Baumert, A., Halmburger, A. ve Schmitt, M. (2013). Interventions against norm violations: Dispositional determinants of self-reported and real moral courage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1053-1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490032
  • Baumert, A., Li, M., Sasse, J. ve Skitka, L. (2020). Standing up against moral violations: Psychological processes of moral courage. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, 103951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103951
  • Becker, S. W. ve Eagly, A. H. (2004). The heroism of women and men. American Psychologist, 59(3), 163- 178. Bierhoff, H. W. (2002). Prosocial behavior. Psychology Press.
  • Brandstätter, V. ve Jonas, K. J. (2012). Moral courage training programs as a means of overcoming societal crises. K. J. Jonas ve T. A. Morton (Eds.), Restoring civil societies: The psychology of intervention and engagement following crisis içinde (s.265–283). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118347683.ch16
  • Brody, G. H. (1978). A social learning explanation of moral development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(78)90004-8
  • Bronstein, P., Fox, B. J., Kamon, J. L. ve Knolls, M. L. (2007). Parenting and gender as predictors of moral courage in late adolescence: a longitudinal study. Sex Roles, 56, 661-674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9182-8
  • Brownell, C. A. (2013). Early development of prosocial behavior: Current perspectives. Infancy, 18(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12004
  • Bussey, K., Fitzpatrick, S. ve Raman, A. (2015). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.954045
  • Bussey, K., Luo, A., Fitzpatrick, S. ve Allison, K. (2020). Defending victims of cyberbullying: The role of self-efficacy and moral disengagement. Journal of School Psychology, 78, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.11.006
  • Carr, E. G., Dunlap, G., Horner, R. H., Koegel, R. L., Turnbull, A. P., Sailor, W., ... Fox, L. (2002). Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830070200400102
  • Coşkun, M. (2021). Öğrencilerde prososyal davranışlar. G. Arslan ve M. Yıldırım (Eds.), Okulda pozitif psikoloji: Kuramdan uygulamaya içinde (s. 109-124). Pegem Akademi.
  • de Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.1030
  • Ding, W., Shao, Y., Sun, B., Xie, R., Li, W. ve Wang, X. (2018). How can prosocial behavior be motivated? The different roles of moral judgment, moral elevation, and moral identity among the young Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00814
  • Dungan, J., Waytz, A. ve Young, L. (2015). The psychology of whistleblowing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.005
  • Dyck, A., Morse, A., ve Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? Journal of Finance, 65, 2213–2254. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01614.x
  • Eisenberg, N. (1982). The development of prosocial behavior. Academic Press.
  • Fehr, E. ve Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/415137a.
  • Garcia, D. M., Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R. ve Ellemers, N. (2010). Women's reactions to ingroup members who protest discriminatory treatment: The importance of beliefs about inequality and response appropriateness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 733-745. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.644
  • Gentile, D. A., Anderson, C. A., Yukawa, S., Ihori, N., Saleem, M., Ming, L. K. ... ve Sakamoto, A. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: International evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(6), 752-763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333045
  • Gibson, E. (2019). Longitudinal learning plan for developing moral courage. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 14(2), 122-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.12.012
  • Goodwin, R., Graham, J. ve Diekmann, K. A. (2020). Good intentions aren't good enough: Moral courage in opposing sexual harassment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 86, 103894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103894
  • Graham, J., Meindl, P., Beall, E., Johnson, K. M. ve Zhang, L. (2016). Cultural differences in moral judgment and behavior, across and within societies. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.007
  • Greitemeyer, T., Osswald, S., Fischer, P. ve Frey, D. (2007). Civil courage: Implicit theories, related concepts, and measurement. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701228789
  • Greitemeyer, T. ve Osswald, S. (2010). Effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016997
  • Habashi, M. M., Graziano, W. G. ve Hoover, A. E. (2016). Searching for the prosocial personality: A Big Five approach to linking personality and prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1177-1192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216652859
  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
  • Haidt, J. (2003). “Elevation and the positive psychology of morality”. Keyes, C. L. M. and Haidt, J (Eds.) Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived içinde (s. 275-289). American Psychological Association.
  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
  • Haidt, J. (2013). Moral psychology for the twenty-first century. Journal of Moral Education, 42(3), 281-297. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2013.817327
  • Halmburger, A., Baumert, A. ve Schmitt, M. (2015). Anger as driving factor of moral courage in comparison with guilt and global mood: A multimethod approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2071
  • Halmburger, A., Baumert, A. ve Schmitt, M. (2016). Everyday heroes: Determinants of moral courage. S. T. Allison, G. R. Goethals, ve R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Handbook of heroism and heroic leadership içinde (s. 165-184). Routledge.
  • Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K. ve Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(22), 557– 560. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06288
  • Hamlin, J. K. (2013). Moral judgment and action in preverbal infants and toddlers: evidence for an innate moral core. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 186– 193.https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412470687
  • Hürriyet (2020, Aralık 28). Evsiz adam kahraman ilan edildi, onlarca hayvanı yanmaktan kurtardı. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dunya/evsiz-adam-kahraman-ilan-edildi-onlarca-hayvani-yanmaktan- kurtardi-41700109
  • Jonas, K. ve Brandstatter, V. (2004). Zivilcourage. Definition, Befunde, Maßnahmen [Moral courage. Definition, findings, and interventions]. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 35, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.35.4.185
  • Jonas, K., Boos, M. ve Brandstätter, B. (Eds.) (2007). Training moral courage! Theory and practice. Hogrefe.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, C. ve Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology, 54(3), 317-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00213.x Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. ve Cemalcılar, Z. (2016). Dünden bugüne insan ve insanlar: Sosyal psikolojiye giriş. Evrim Yayınevi.
  • Kaiser, C. R., Hagiwara, N., Malahy, L. W. ve Wilkins, C. L. (2009). Group identification moderates attitudes toward ingroup members who confront discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 770-777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.027
  • Kinnunen, S. P., Lindeman, M. ve Verkasalo, M. (2016). Help-giving and moral courage on the Internet. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10(4), article 6. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2016-4-6
  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, (s. 347-380). Rand, McNally ve Co. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experiencies as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
  • Kovancı, M. S. ve Hiçdurmaz, D. Ahlaki cesaret: Tanımı, ahlaki sıkıntı ve ahlaki duyarlılık ile ilişkisi ve geliştirilmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(1), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.33631/duzcesbed.683548
  • Kuhnert, R. L., Begeer, S., Fink, E. ve de Rosnay, M. (2017). Gender-differentiated effects of theory of mind, emotion understanding, and social preference on prosocial behavior development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 154, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.001
  • Kumru, A., Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V. ve Samper, P. (2012). Prosocial moral reasoning and prosocial behavior among Turkish and Spanish adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(2), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.2.205
  • Kutlaca, M., Becker, J. ve Radke, H. (2020). A hero for the outgroup, a black sheep for the ingroup: Societal perceptions of those who confront discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103832
  • Labhardt, D., Holdsworth, E., Brown, S. ve Howat, D. (2017). You see but you do not observe: A review of bystander intervention and sexual assault on university campuses. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.05.005
  • Lamm, C., Rütgen, M. ve Wagner, I. C. (2019). Imaging empathy and prosocial emotions. Neuroscience Letters, 693, 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.06.054
  • Landmann, H. ve Hess, U. (2017). What elicits third-party anger? The effects of moral violation and others’ outcome on anger and compassion. Cognition and Emotion, 31(6), 1097-1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1194258
  • Lay, J. C. ve Hoppmann, C. A. (2015). Altruism and prosocial behavior. N. A. Pachana (Ed.), Encyclopedia of geropsychology içinde (s. 1–9). Springer.
  • Lopez, S., O’Byrne, K. K. ve Petersen, S. (2003). Profiling courage. S. Lopez ve C. R. Snyder (eds), Positive psychology assessment: A handbook of models and measures içinde (ss. 185–197). American Psychological Association.
  • Mallett, R. K. ve Wagner, D. E. (2011). The unexpectedly positive consequences of confronting sexism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.001
  • May, D. R., Luth, M. T. ve Schwoerer, C. E. (2014). The influence of business ethics education on moral efficacy, moral meaningfulness, and moral courage: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1860-6
  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper & Row.
  • Moisuc, A., Brauer, M., Fonseca, A., Chaurand, N. ve Greitemeyer, T. (2018). Individual differences in social control: Who ‘speaks up’when witnessing uncivil, discriminatory, and immoral behaviours?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 524-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12246
  • Niesta Kayser, D., Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P. ve Frey, D. (2010). Why mood affects help giving, but not moral courage: Comparing two types of prosocial behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1136-1157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.717
  • Nilsson, A. ve Erlandsson, A. (2015). The Moral Foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.049
  • Numminen, O., Katajisto, J. ve Leino-Kilpi, H. (2019). Development and validation of nurses’ moral courage scale. Nursing Ethics, 26(7-8), 2438-2455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733018791325
  • Ogunfowora, B., Maerz, A. ve Varty, C. T. (2021). How do leaders foster morally courageous behavior in employees? Leader role modeling, moral ownership, and felt obligation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(4), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2508
  • Osswald S., Frey D. ve Streicher B. (2011) Moral Courage. Kals E. ve Maes J. (eds), Justice and conflicts içinde. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_24
  • Osswald, S., Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P. ve Frey, D. (2010). Moral prototypes and moral behavior: Specific effects on emotional precursors of moral behavior and on moral behavior by the activation of moral prototypes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 1078-1094. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.728
  • Pajakoski, E., Rannikko, S., Leino Kilpi, H. ve Numminen, O. (2021). Moral courage in nursing–An integrative literature review. Nursing & Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12805
  • Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T. ve Sparks, P. (2012). “I help because I want to, not because you tell me to” empathy increases autonomously motivated helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 681-689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211435940
  • Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A. ve Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 365-392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Pouwels, J. L., van Noorden, T. H. ve Caravita, S. C. (2019). Defending victims of bullying in the classroom: The role of moral responsibility and social costs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103831
  • Prysmakova, P. ve Evans, M. D. (2020). Whistleblowing motivation and gender: Vignette-based study in a local government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 1-26, 0734371X20967982. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20967982
  • Redondo-Pacheco, J., Inglés-Saura, C. J., Parra-Galvis, L. K., Nieto-Barroso, L. M. ve Navarro-Galvis, M. L. (2016). Prosocial behavior: Theoretical perspectives. International Journal of Psychology Research, 11(3/4), 299-320. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v6i1.53
  • Rochat, F. & Modigliani, A. (1995). The ordinary quality of resistance: From Milgram's laboratory to the village of Le Chambon. Journal of Social Issues, 51(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 4560.1995.tb01341.x
  • Rullo, M., Lalot, F. ve Heering, M. S. (2021). Moral identity, moral self-efficacy, and moral elevation: A sequential mediation model predicting moral intentions and behaviour. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1871942
  • Sasse, J., Halmburger, A. ve Baumert, A. (2020). The functions of anger in moral courage. Insights from a behavioral study. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000906
  • Sasse, J., Li, M. ve Baumert, A. (2021). How prosocial is moral courage?. Current Opinion in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.004
  • Saylık, F. Z. (2021). Ahlaki benlik düzenlemenin, suçluluk ve utancın, ahlaki kimliğin, ahlaki cesaret ve yardım davranışlarına etkileri [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi.
  • Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J. ve Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.202
  • Sekerka, L. E. ve Godwin, L. (2010). Strengthening professional moral courage: A balanced approach to ethics training. Training & Management Development Methods, 24(5), 63-74.
  • Sekerka, L. E., Bagozzi, R. P. ve Charnigo, R. (2009). Facing ethical challenges in the workplace: Conceptualizing and measuring professional moral courage. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 565– 579. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-008-0017-5
  • Simola, S. (2018). Fostering collective growth and vitality following acts of moral courage: A general system, relational psychodynamic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3014-0
  • Skitka, L. J. (2011). Moral convictions and moral courage: Common denominators of good and evil. M. Mikulincer ve P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil içinde (s. 349–365). American Psychological Association.
  • Skitka, L. J. ve Mullen, E. (2002). Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context: A test of the value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1419-1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702236873
  • Skitka, L. J., Washburn, A. N. ve Carsel, T. S. (2015). The psychological foundations and consequences of moral conviction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.025
  • Stürmer, S., Snyder, M. ve Omoto, A. M. (2005). Prosocial emotions and helping: the moderating role of group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 532-546. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.532
  • Süssenbach, P., Rees, J. ve Gollwitzer, M. (2019). When the going gets tough, individualizers get going: On the relationship between moral foundations and prosociality. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.019
  • Szekeres, H., Halperin, E., Kende, A. ve Saguy, T. (2019). The effect of moral loss and gain mindset on confronting racism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103833
  • Taraz, Z., Loghmani, L., Abbaszadeh, A., Ahmadi, F., Safavibiat, Z. ve Borhani, F. (2019). The relationship between ethical climate of hospital and moral courage of nursing staff. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 16(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/93472
  • Teper, R., Zhong, C. B. ve Inzlicht, M. (2015). How emotions shape moral behavior: Some answers (and questions) for the field of moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(1), 1- 14. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12154
  • Thomas, E. F., Clark, A. J. ve Pedersen, A. (2020). Teaching bystander action: forming identities that promote opposition to prejudice towards Muslim people. Social Psychology of Education, 23, 653- 672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09553-3
  • Thomson, A. L. ve Siegel, J. T. (2013). A moral act, elevation, and prosocial behavior: Moderators of morality. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.754926
  • TRTHABER (2021, Mart 6). Güney Kore Türk vatandaşı Rabia Şirin’i konuşuyor. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/dunya/guney-kore-turk-vatandasi-rabia-sirini-konusuyor- 562228.html
  • Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J. ve Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-3514.92.1.56
  • Yalçındağ, B. (2009). Relationships between courage, self-construals and other associated variables. [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Yılmaz, O. ve Bayrak, F. (2022). Ahlak psikolojisine giriş: temel kavramlar, kuramsal yaklaşımlar ve tartışmalar. REFLEKTİF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2022.53
  • Yilmaz, O., Harma, M., Bahçekapili, H. G. ve Cesur, S. (2016). Validation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire in Turkey and its relation to cultural schemas of individualism and collectivism. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.090
  • Yılmaz-Öztürk, Z. (2019). İş yaşamında cinsel tacizin ortaya çıkarılmasında ve önlenmesinde ahlaki cesaretin rolü [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi.
  • Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Random House.
  • Zimbardo, P. G. (2016, Eylül 1). Creating everyday heroes and understanding the dynamics of time perspective. Psychology International. https://www.apa.org/international/pi/2016/09/generation- heroes
  • Zimbardo, P. G., Breckenridge, J. N. ve Moghaddam, F. M. (2013). “Exclusive” and “Inclusive” visions of heroism and democracy. Current Psychology, 32(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013- 9178-1
APA coşkun m, Cingöz-Ulu B (2022). Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması. , 637 - 654. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
Chicago coşkun muhammet,Cingöz-Ulu Banu Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması. (2022): 637 - 654. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
MLA coşkun muhammet,Cingöz-Ulu Banu Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması. , 2022, ss.637 - 654. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
AMA coşkun m,Cingöz-Ulu B Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması. . 2022; 637 - 654. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
Vancouver coşkun m,Cingöz-Ulu B Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması. . 2022; 637 - 654. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
IEEE coşkun m,Cingöz-Ulu B "Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması." , ss.637 - 654, 2022. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
ISNAD coşkun, muhammet - Cingöz-Ulu, Banu. "Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması". (2022), 637-654. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
APA coşkun m, Cingöz-Ulu B (2022). Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması. Nesne Dergisi, 10(26), 637 - 654. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
Chicago coşkun muhammet,Cingöz-Ulu Banu Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması. Nesne Dergisi 10, no.26 (2022): 637 - 654. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
MLA coşkun muhammet,Cingöz-Ulu Banu Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması. Nesne Dergisi, vol.10, no.26, 2022, ss.637 - 654. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
AMA coşkun m,Cingöz-Ulu B Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması. Nesne Dergisi. 2022; 10(26): 637 - 654. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
Vancouver coşkun m,Cingöz-Ulu B Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması. Nesne Dergisi. 2022; 10(26): 637 - 654. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
IEEE coşkun m,Cingöz-Ulu B "Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması." Nesne Dergisi, 10, ss.637 - 654, 2022. 10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
ISNAD coşkun, muhammet - Cingöz-Ulu, Banu. "Ahlaki Cesaret: Belirleyicileri, Önemi ve Sonuçlarına Dair Bir Derleme Çalışması". Nesne Dergisi 10/26 (2022), 637-654. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-26-07
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 7:11

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları