Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 121 - 130 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232 İndeks Tarihi: 21-05-2023

Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Öz:
Background:­In this study, we present our minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy technique and survival rates of this technique. Methods: Between September 2013 and December 2020, a total of 140 patients (56 males, 84 females; mean age: 55.5±10.3 years; range, 32 to 76 years) who underwent minimally invasive Ivor- Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative patient data, oncological and surgical outcomes, pathological results, and complications were recorded. Results:­Primary diagnosis was esophageal cancer in all cases. Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was carried out in all of the cases included in the study. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was administrated in 97 (69.3%) of the cases. The mean duration of surgery was 261.7±30.6 (range, 195 to 330) min. The mean amount of intraoperative blood loss was 115.1±190.7 (range, 10 to 800) mL. In 60 (42.9%) of the cases, complications occurred in intraoperative and early-late postoperative periods. The anastomotic leak rate was 7.1% and the pulmonary complication rate was 22.1% in postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay length was 10.6±8.4 (range, 5-59) days and hospital mortality rate was 2.1%. The median follow-up duration was 37 (range, 2-74) months and the three- and five-year overall survival rates were 61.8% and 54.6%, respectively. Conclusion:­Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy can be used safely with low mortality and long-time survival rates in esophageal cancer.
Anahtar Kelime: Esophageal cancer esophagectomy Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy laparoscopic thoracoscopic esophagectomy minimally invasive esophagectomy surgical techniques.

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Eroğlu A, Aydın Y, Altuntaş B, Gündoğdu B, Yılmaz Ö. The increasing incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in women in Turkey. Turk J Med Sci 2016;46:1443-8.
  • Mitzman B, Lutfi W, Wang CH, Krantz S, Howington JA, Kim KW. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent survival to open esophagectomy: An analysis of the national cancer database. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;29:244-53.
  • Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2241-52.
  • Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128-37.
  • Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: An analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:1919-26.
  • Ferguson MK, Martin TR, Reeder LB, Olak J. Mortality after esophagectomy: Risk factor analysis. World J Surg 1997;21:599-603.
  • Worrell SG, Bachman KC, Sarode AL, Perry Y, Linden PA, Towe CW. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with superior survival, lymphadenectomy and surgical margins: Propensity matched analysis of the National Cancer Database. Dis Esophagus 2020;33:doaa017.
  • Mao WM, Zheng WH, Ling ZQ. Epidemiologic risk factors for esophageal cancer development. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12:2461-6.
  • Huang J, Bashir M, Iannettoni MD. Carcinoma of the esophagus. In: Shields TW, LoCicero J, Reed CE, Feins RN, editors. General thoracic surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2009. p. 1983-2010.
  • AJCC Cancer Staging Manueal. Esophagus. New York: 5th ed. Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 65-70
  • Türkdogan MK, Akman N, Tuncer I, Uygan I, Kösem M, Ozel S, et al. Epidemiological aspects of endemic upper gastrointestinal cancers in eastern Turkey. Hepatogastroenterology 2005;52:496-500.
  • Turkyilmaz A, Eroglu A, Subasi M, Karaoglanoglu N. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of esophageal cancer in young patients. Is there a difference in outcome? Dis Esophagus 2009;22:211-5.
  • DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, de Paula RA, Grecco E. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995;5:1-5.
  • Swanstrom LL, Hansen P. Laparoscopic total esophagectomy. Arch Surg 1997;132:943-7.
  • Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003;238:486-94.
  • Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D, Bains MS, Turnbull AD, Karpeh M, et al. The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:42-50.
  • Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, Buenaventura PO, Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:402-6.
  • Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 2012;256:95-103.
  • Pennathur A, Zhang J, Chen H, Luketich JD. The "best operation" for esophageal cancer? Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:S2163-7.
  • Schröder W, Hölscher AH, Bludau M, Vallböhmer D, Bollschweiler E, Gutschow C. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with and without laparoscopic conditioning of the gastric conduit. World J Surg 2010;34:738-43.
  • Lee JM, Cheng JW, Lin MT, Huang PM, Chen JS, Lee YC. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg 2011;35:790-7.
  • Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decaluwé H, Decker G, De Leyn P, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: A valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:1455-63.
  • Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:486-94.
  • Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:486-94.
  • Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:486-94. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:911-9.
  • Baker CR, Bailey ME, Soon Y, Singh S, Preston SR. Two-phase laparoscopic-assisted oesophago-gastrectomy: A single-unit experience of 111 consecutive cases and outcomes. Surg Endosc 2011;25:3658-67.
  • Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, Faiz O, Moorthy K, Aylin P. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: Trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg 2010;252:292-8.
  • Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Franchetti Y, Catalano PJ, Swanson S, Sugarbaker DJ, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study. Ann Surg 2015;261:702-7.
  • Tapias LF, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, Wain JC, Gaissert HA, Muniappan A, et al. Outcomes with open and minimally invasive ivor lewis esophagectomy after Neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:1097-103.
APA Eroglu A, Daharli C, Ulas A, KESKİN H, Aydin Y (2022). Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. , 121 - 130. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
Chicago Eroglu Atilla,Daharli Coskun,Ulas Ali Bilal,KESKİN HİLMİ,Aydin Yener Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. (2022): 121 - 130. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
MLA Eroglu Atilla,Daharli Coskun,Ulas Ali Bilal,KESKİN HİLMİ,Aydin Yener Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. , 2022, ss.121 - 130. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
AMA Eroglu A,Daharli C,Ulas A,KESKİN H,Aydin Y Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. . 2022; 121 - 130. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
Vancouver Eroglu A,Daharli C,Ulas A,KESKİN H,Aydin Y Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. . 2022; 121 - 130. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
IEEE Eroglu A,Daharli C,Ulas A,KESKİN H,Aydin Y "Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer." , ss.121 - 130, 2022. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
ISNAD Eroglu, Atilla vd. "Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer". (2022), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
APA Eroglu A, Daharli C, Ulas A, KESKİN H, Aydin Y (2022). Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, 30(3), 121 - 130. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
Chicago Eroglu Atilla,Daharli Coskun,Ulas Ali Bilal,KESKİN HİLMİ,Aydin Yener Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi 30, no.3 (2022): 121 - 130. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
MLA Eroglu Atilla,Daharli Coskun,Ulas Ali Bilal,KESKİN HİLMİ,Aydin Yener Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, vol.30, no.3, 2022, ss.121 - 130. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
AMA Eroglu A,Daharli C,Ulas A,KESKİN H,Aydin Y Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi. 2022; 30(3): 121 - 130. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
Vancouver Eroglu A,Daharli C,Ulas A,KESKİN H,Aydin Y Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi. 2022; 30(3): 121 - 130. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
IEEE Eroglu A,Daharli C,Ulas A,KESKİN H,Aydin Y "Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer." Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, 30, ss.121 - 130, 2022. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232
ISNAD Eroglu, Atilla vd. "Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer". Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi 30/3 (2022), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2022.22232