Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 47 - 59 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126 İndeks Tarihi: 22-05-2023

Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey

Öz:
Objective:Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a human rights violation and a public health concern. The incidence of IPV increases in mass events such as epi- demics. The aim of this study was to assess the nature and the extent of IPV among women in Turkey; to iden- tify the associated factors, and mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method:The study has a cross-sectional, descriptive design. An online self- report survey, based on World Health Organization guid- ance on epidemiological studies to assess IPV, was con- ducted among women between 09.01.2021 and 09.02.2021. The survey had 69 questions which covered sociodemographic characteristics, relationship history, types of violence and mental well-being. Inclusion crite- ria were being over the age of 18, and having a spouse/partner during the pandemic. Participation was on voluntary basis. 1372 women were included in the analysis. Results:Around a third (30.7%) of participants were exposed to any type of violence before the pan- demic, with most common form being emotional vio- lence, and this rate remained unchanged during the pan- demic, despite the time spent with partners were expect- ed to increase due to isolation measures. 61 women (4.4%), mostly university graduates living in cities, reported being subject to violence for the first time dur- ing the pandemic. 31.2% of them were cases of digital violence. Lower level of education, younger age and partner’s alcohol and substance use was associated with IPV, and IPV was associated with poorer mental well- being. Discussion:Despite the public health measures taken during the pandemic (e.g. lockdowns), where women would have spent more time isolated with their partners, rates of IPV did not change from pre-pandemic to pandemic. This outcome needs to be compared with findings from other contexts. Strategies to prevent IPV is of utmost importance for the protection of mental well- being of women and the society during and after the pandemic.
Anahtar Kelime:

COVID-19 pandemisi sırasında yakın partner şiddeti: Çevrim içi bir araştırma

Öz:
Amaç: Kadınlara yönelik yakın partner şiddeti (YPŞ), bir insan hakları ihlali ve bir halk sağlığı sorunudur. YPŞ insidansı, salgın hastalıklar gibi toplumsal olaylarda artmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amaçları, Türkiye'de COVID- 19 pandemisi sırasında kadınlara yönelik YPŞ'nin niteliğini ve boyutlarını değerlendirmek; YPŞ ile ilişkili etkenleri ve ruh sağlığı açısından sonuçlarını belirlemek- tir. Yöntem: Kesitsel, tanımlayıcı desende bir araştırma planlanmıştır. Kadınlara yönelik YPŞ'yi değerlendirmek için Dünya Sağlık Örgütü'nin epidemiyolojik çalışmalara ilişkin rehberlerine dayanarak hazırlanan, çevrimiçi öz bildirime dayanan bir anket 09.01.2021 ve 09.02.2021 tarihleri arasında uygulanmıştır. Ankette sosyode- mografik özellikler, ilişki geçmişi, şiddet türleri ve ruhsal iyilik halini kapsayan 69 soru bulunmaktadır. Çalışmaya dahil edilme kriterleri, 18 yaşından büyük olmak ve pan- demi sırasında bir eş/partner sahibi olmak olarak belirlenmiş, katılım gönüllülük esasına dayandırılmıştır. Analize dahil edilen katılımcı sayısı 1372'dir. Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaklaşık üçte biri (%30,7) pandemi öncesinde herhangi bir tür YPŞ'ye maruz kaldığını belirtti. Bu oranda önlemler nedeniyle kadınların partnerleri ile daha fazla zaman geçirmeleri beklenen pandemi sırasında anlamlı bir değişiklik olmamıştır; ancak üniver- site mezunu, şehirde yaşayan 61 (%4.4) kadının ilk kez pandemi döneminde YPŞ’ye maruz kaldığı görülmüştür. Bunların %31,2'si dijital şiddet olgularıdır. En sık YPŞ türü duygusal şiddet olarak bildirilmiştir. Düşük eğitim düzeyi, genç yaş ve partnerin alkol/madde kullanımı YPŞ ile ilişkili bulunmuştur. YPŞ'nin, düşük ruhsal iyilik hali skoru ile ilişkili olduğu belirlenmiştir.Sonuç: Bu araştırmada, karantina ve benzeri önlemler nedeniyle kadınların part- nerleri daha fazla izole zaman geçirmeleri beklenen pan- demi sırasında, YPŞ oranının pandemi öncesine göre değişkenlik göstermediği saptanmıştır. Bu sonucun diğer çalışmalardan elde edilen bulgularla karşılaştırılması gerekmektedir. YPŞ'yi önleme stratejileri, pandemi sırasında ve sonrasında kadınların ve toplumun ruh sağlığının korunması için büyük önem taşımaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Howard LM, Trevillion K, Agnew-Davies R. Domestic vio- lence and mental health. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(5):525-34.
  • 2. WHO. Factsheet - Violence against women 2021 [Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/vio- lence-against-women.
  • 3. Stuart P. Risk factors for recent domestic physical assault in patients presenting to the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2004;16(3):216-24.
  • 4. Organization WH. Violence against women. 2014.
  • 5. Lauve-Moon K, Ferreira RJ. An Exploratory Investigation: Post-disaster Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence. Clinical Social Work Journal. 2017;45(2):124-35.
  • 6. Anastario M, Shehab N, Lawry L. Increased gender-based violence among women internally displaced in Mississippi 2 years post-Hurricane Katrina. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(1):18-26.
  • 7. Fisher S. Violence against women and natural disasters: find- ings from post-tsunami Sri Lanka. Violence Against Women. 2010;16(8):902-18.
  • 8. Parkinson D. Investigating the Increase in Domestic Violence Post Disaster: An Australian Case Study. J Interpers Violence. 2019;34(11):2333-62.
  • 9. Sediri S, Zgueb Y, Ouanes S, Ouali U, Bourgou S, Jomli R, et al. Women's mental health: acute impact of COVID-19 pandem- ic on domestic violence. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2020;23(6):749-56.
  • 10. Ford L. 'Shadow pandemic' of violence against women to be tackled with $25m UN fund. 2020.
  • 11. Guardian T. Violence against women ‘a pandemic’, warns UN envoy. The Guardian. 2021 2021-05-13.
  • 12. Bellizzi S, Nivoli A, Lorettu L, Farina G, Ramses M, Ronzoni AR. Violence against women in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;150(2):258- 9.
  • 13. Kelly F. Google reports a 75 per cent spike in searches for help with domestic violence - RN Breakfast - ABC Radio National. 2020.
  • 14. MorÇatı. Monitoring Report on Combating Violence Against Women During the Coronavirus Outbreak. Mor Çatı Women’s Shelter Foundation; 2020.
  • 15. TMA. Statement by women from DISK, KESK, TMMOB and TTB: End violence against women (DİSK, KESK, TMMOB ve TTB’li kadınlardan açıklama: Kadına yönelik şiddete son): Türk Tabipleri Birliği (Turkish Medical Association); 2020 [Available from: https://www.ttb.org.tr/465yi2j.
  • 16. KCDP. Report on Online Applications April 2020 (Nisan 2020 Başvuru Karşılama Raporu) 2021 [Available from: http://kadincinayetlerinidurduracagiz.net/aciklamalar/2912/nisa n-2020-basvuru-karsilama-raporu.
  • 17. ABB. Bulletin of Women and Children (Kadın ve Çocuk Bülteni). Ankara Metropolitan Municipality; 2020.
  • 18. Evcili F, Demirel G. From the perspective of Turkish women: intimate partner violence and perceived stress level in the Covid-19 pandemic. 2022;62:108-16.
  • 19. Akalin A, Ayhan F. Intimate Partner Violence against Women in Turkey during the COVID-19 Pandemic. 2022;43:68- 75.
  • 20. Adibelli D, Sümen A, Teskereci G. Domestic violence against women during the Covid-19 pandemic: Turkey sample. Health Care for Women International. 2021;42(3):335-50.
  • 21. Ünal B, Gülseren L. The hidden side of COVID-19 pandem- ic: Domestic violence Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2020;23:89-94.
  • 22. Trevillion K, Oram S, Feder G, Howard LM. Experiences of domestic violence and mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51740.
  • 23. Jonas S, Khalifeh H, Bebbington PE, McManus S, Brugha T, Meltzer H, Howard LM. Gender differences in intimate partner violence and psychiatric disorders in England: results from the 2007 adult psychiatric morbidity survey. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014 Jun;23(2):189-99.
  • 24. Kurt E, Kupeli NY, Sonmez E, Bulut NS, Akvardar Y. Domestic Violence Among Women Attending to Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2018;55(1):22-8.
  • 25. Plichta SB. Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences: policy and practice implications. J Interpers Violence. 2004;19(11):1296-323.
  • 26. Dillon G, Hussain R, Loxton D, Rahman S. Mental and Physical Health and Intimate Partner Violence against Women: A Review of the Literature. Int J Family Med. 2013;2013:313909.
  • 27. Yılmaz Karaman İG, Akı Z, Çanakçı ME, Altınöz AE, Özakın E. Violence Against Women During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study from a Turkish Emergency Department. 2022;37:1-6.
  • 28. Aydin R, Aktaş S, Kaloğlu Binici D. Examination of the effect of the perceived stress in the coronavirus-19 pandemic on marital adjustment, sexual life and intimate partner violence. 2022.
  • 29. Hamzaoglu N, Rozant-Reisyan R, Kalfoglou S. The Evaluation of Depression Levels and Domestic Violence during the COVID-19 Pandemic. 2022:1-11.
  • 30. Sundborg EM, Saleh-Stattin N, Wandell P, Tornkvist L. Nurses' preparedness to care for women exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: a quantitative study in primary health care. BMC Nurs. 2012;11:1.
  • 31. KSGM. Domestic violence against women in Turkey (Türkiye’de kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet). Ankara - TC Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü; 2009. Report No.: 9751944988.
  • 32. Yüksel Kaptanoğlu İ, Çavlin A, Akadlı Ergöçmen B. Research on Domestic Violence Against Women in Turkey (Türkiye’de Kadına Yönelik Aile içi Şiddet Araştırması). 2015.
  • 33. Ellsberg M, Heise L, Organization WH. Researching vio- lence against women: a practical guide for researchers and activists. 2005.
  • 34. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. The Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1260-9.
  • 35. Çalışkan H, Çevik Eİ. The Determinants of Violence Against Women: Evidence from Turkey. BJSS Balkan Journal of Social Sciences 2018;7(14):218-33.
  • 36. Bech P, Olsen LR, Kjoller M, Rasmussen NK. Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a com- parison of the SF-36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO-Five Well-Being Scale. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12(2):85- 91.
  • 37. Eser E, Çevik C, Baydur H, Güneş S, Esgin TA, Öztekin ÇS, Eker E, Gümüşsoy U, Eser GB, Özyurt B. Reliability and valid- ity of the Turkish version of the WHO-5, in adults and older adults for its use in primary care settings. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jul 1;20:e100.
  • 38. UNWomen. The Shadow Pandemic: Violence against women during COVID-19 2020 [Available from: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/in-focus-gender- equality-in-covid-19-response/violence-against-women-during- covid-19.
  • 39. Sugg N. Intimate partner violence: prevalence, health conse- quences, and intervention. Med Clin North Am. 2015;99(3):629- 49.
  • 40. SSAM. Research report on the impact of the covid-19 quar- antine on women and violence against women and children (Covid-19 karantinasından kadının etkilenimi ile kadın ve çocuğa yönelik şiddete ilişkin Türkiye araştırma raporu). Sosyopolitik Saha Araştırmaları Merkezi; 2020.
  • 41. Reichelt M, Makovi K, Sargsyan A. The impact of COVID- 19 on gender inequality in the labor market and gender-role atti- tudes. European Societies. 2021;23(sup1):S228-S45.
  • 42. Dang H-AH, Viet Nguyen C. Gender inequality during the COVID-19 pandemic: Income, expenditure, savings, and job loss. World Development. 2021;140:105296.
  • 43. Del Boca D, Oggero N, Profeta P, Rossi M. Women’s and men’s work, housework and childcare, before and during COVID-19. Review of Economics of the Household. 2020;18(4):1001-17.
  • 44. Almis BH, Kutuk EK, Gumustas F, Celik M. Risk Factors for Domestic Violence in Women and Predictors of Development of Mental Disorders in These Women. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2018;55(1):67-72.
  • 45. Erden G, Akdur S. Domestic violence against women and murders of women in Turkey. Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi. 2018;2(3):128-39.
  • 46. OECD. Violence Against Women, indicator 2021 [Available from: https://data.oecd.org/inequality/violence-against- women.htm.
  • 47. Dokkedahl S, Kok RN, Murphy S, Kristensen TR, Bech- Hansen D, Elklit A. The psychological subtype of intimate part- ner violence and its effect on mental health: protocol for a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):198.
  • 48. Thiel F, Büechl VCS, Rehberg F, Mojahed A, Daniels JK, Schellong J, Garthus-Niegel S. Changes in Prevalence and Severity of Domestic Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 13;13:874183.
  • 49. Hoehn-Velasco L, Silverio-Murillo A, de la Miyar JRB. The great crime recovery: Crimes against women during, and after, the COVID-19 lockdown in Mexico. Economics & Human Biology. 2021;41:100991.
  • 50. Bakanlığı İ. Koronavirüs Salgını Yeni Tedbirleri İle İlgili Basın Açıklaması [Available from: https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/koronavirus-salgini-yeni-tedbirleri- ile-ilgili-basin-aciklamasi-11-01-21.
  • 51. Türkçe BN. Aşı: Sağlık çalışanları için ikinci doz, 65 yaş üstü için ilk doz Covid aşısı uygulaması başladı [Available from: https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-56020820.
  • 52. Arenas-Arroyo E, Fernández-Kranz D, Nollenberger N. Can't Leave You Now! Intimate Partner Violence Under Forced Coexistence and Economic Uncertainty. SSRN; 2020.
  • 53. Semahegn A, Mengistie B. Domestic violence against women and associated factors in Ethiopia; systematic review.Reprod Health. 2015;12:78.
  • 54. Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention. Lancet. 2002;359(9315):1423-9.
  • 55. Schmidt RA, Genois R, Jin J, Vigo D, Rehm J, Rush B. The early impact of COVID-19 on the incidence, prevalence, and severity of alcohol use and other drugs: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Nov 1;228:109065.
  • 56. Roberts A, Rogers J, Mason R, Siriwardena AN, Hogue T, Whitley GA, Law GR. Alcohol and other substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Dec 1;229(Pt A):109150
  • 57. Peltzer K, Pengpid S, McFarlane J, Banyini M. Mental health consequences of intimate partner violence in Vhembe district, South Africa. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2013;35(5):545-50.
  • 58. Boyacioğlu NE, Günaydın S, Özcan NK, Dinç Kaya H. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy in turkey: A system- atic review and meta-analysis. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care. 2021.
  • 59. Kocacik F, Dogan O. Domestic violence against women in Sivas, Turkey: survey study. Croat Med J. 2006;47(5):742-9.
  • 60. Balci YG, Ayranci U. Physical violence against women: eval- uation of women assaulted by spouses. J Clin Forensic Med. 2005;12(5):258-63.
  • 61. Baysak E, Yorguner N, Kandemir G, Denizman IA, Akvardar Y. Is early marriage practice a problem for women liv- ing in Istanbul? A qualitative study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2021;24(2):243-50.
  • 62. Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L. What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 16;11:109.
  • 63. Shitu S, Yeshaneh A, Abebe H, . Intimate partner violence and associated factors among reproductive age women during COVID-19 pandemic in Southern Ethiopia, 2020. 2021;18.
  • 64. Efe ŞY, Ayaz S. Domestic violence against women and women's opinions related to domestic violence. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry. 2010;11(1):23-9.
  • 65. Sanchez OR, Vale DB, Rodrigues L, Surita FG. Violence against women during the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrative review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;151(2):180-7.
  • 66. Sacco MA, Caputo F, Ricci P, Sicilia F, De Aloe L, Bonetta CF, et al. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on domestic vio- lence: The dark side of home isolation during quarantine. Med Leg J. 2020;88(2):71-3.
  • 67. Vora M, Malathesh BC, Das S, Chatterjee SS. COVID-19 and domestic violence against women. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;53:102227.
  • 68. Mazza M, Marano G, Lai C, Janiri L, Sani G. Danger in dan- ger: Interpersonal violence during COVID-19 quarantine. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113046.
  • 69. Rai A, Choi YJ, Cho S, Das U, Tamayo J, Menon GM. “#Domestic Violence Isn’t Stopping for Coronavirus .......”: Intimate Partner Violence Conversations on Twitter during the Early Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Evidence- Based Social Work. 2022;19(1):108-28.
  • 70. Boserup B, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(12):2753-5.
  • 71. Emezue C. Digital or Digitally Delivered Responses to Domestic and Intimate Partner Violence During COVID-19. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(3):e19831.
  • 72. McCrary J, Sanga S. The Impact of the Coronavirus Lockdown on Domestic Violence. American Law and Economics Review. 2021.
  • 73. UNWomen. COVID-19 and ending violence against women and girls. UN Women Headquarters: United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women); 2020.
  • 74. Gosangi B, Park H, Thomas R, Gujrathi R, Bay CP, Raja AS, Seltzer SE, Balcom MC, McDonald ML, Orgill DP, Harris MB, Boland GW, Rexrode K, Khurana B. Exacerbation of Physical Intimate Partner Violence during COVID-19 Pandemic. Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):E38-E45.
  • 75. UNWomen. Online and ICT-facilitated violence against women and girls during COVID-19. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women); 2020.
  • 76. Cumhuriyet. Turkey is among the countries with the least public support during the pandemic (“Türkiye pandemide halkına en az destek veren ülkeler arasında”). Cumhuriyet Newspaper. 2021.
  • 77. WEF. Global Gender Gap Report 2021. World Economic Forum; 2021.
  • 78. Duvar G. İstanbul Sözleşmesiz bir ay: Daha kaç kadının ölümüne seyirci kalacağız: Gazete Duvar; 2021 [Available from: https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/istanbul-sozlesmesiz-bir-ay- daha-kac-kadinin-olumune-seyirci-kalacagiz-haber-1530791.
  • 79. KDCP. Kadın Cinayetlerini Durduracağız Platformu 2021 Yıllık Veri Raporu 2021 [Available from: https://kadincinayet- lerinidurduracagiz.net/veriler/3003/kadin-cinayetlerini-durdu- racagiz-platformu-2021-yillik-veri-raporu.
  • 80. Sharma R, Tikka SK. COVID-19 online surveys need to fol- low standards and guidelines: Comment on "Does COVID-19 pandemic affect sexual behaviour? A cross-sectional, cross- national online survey" and "Binge watching behavior during COVID 19 pandemic: A cross-sectional, cross-national online survey". Psychiatry Res. 2020;290:113173.
  • 81. Hlatshwako TG, Shah SJ, Kosana P, Adebayo E, Hendriks J, Larsson EC, Hensel DJ, Erausquin JT, Marks M, Michielsen K, Saltis H, Francis JM, Wouters E, Tucker JD. Online health sur- vey research during COVID-19. Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Feb;3(2):e76-e77.
  • 82. TurkSTAT. İstatistiklerle Kadın (Women in Statistics). Turkish Statistical Institute; 2020. Contract No.: 33732.
  • 83. TurkSTAT. Address Based Population Registration System Results, 2020 (Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları, 2020) 2021 [Available from: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus- Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2020-37210
APA Sönmez Güngör E, YILMAZ İ, Erim B, güvenç h, Ergül C, LAÇİNER K, akçay oruç g, ALTUN F, Erkan A, erzin g, Toprak E, AKVARDAR Y (2023). Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey. , 47 - 59. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
Chicago Sönmez Güngör Ekin,YILMAZ İMRAN GÖKÇEN,Erim Burcu Rahşan,güvenç hasibe rengin,Ergül Ceylan,LAÇİNER KEREM,akçay oruç gamze,ALTUN Fatmagül DİKYAR,Erkan Arzu,erzin gamze,Toprak Ebru,AKVARDAR YILDIZ Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey. (2023): 47 - 59. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
MLA Sönmez Güngör Ekin,YILMAZ İMRAN GÖKÇEN,Erim Burcu Rahşan,güvenç hasibe rengin,Ergül Ceylan,LAÇİNER KEREM,akçay oruç gamze,ALTUN Fatmagül DİKYAR,Erkan Arzu,erzin gamze,Toprak Ebru,AKVARDAR YILDIZ Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey. , 2023, ss.47 - 59. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
AMA Sönmez Güngör E,YILMAZ İ,Erim B,güvenç h,Ergül C,LAÇİNER K,akçay oruç g,ALTUN F,Erkan A,erzin g,Toprak E,AKVARDAR Y Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey. . 2023; 47 - 59. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
Vancouver Sönmez Güngör E,YILMAZ İ,Erim B,güvenç h,Ergül C,LAÇİNER K,akçay oruç g,ALTUN F,Erkan A,erzin g,Toprak E,AKVARDAR Y Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey. . 2023; 47 - 59. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
IEEE Sönmez Güngör E,YILMAZ İ,Erim B,güvenç h,Ergül C,LAÇİNER K,akçay oruç g,ALTUN F,Erkan A,erzin g,Toprak E,AKVARDAR Y "Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey." , ss.47 - 59, 2023. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
ISNAD Sönmez Güngör, Ekin vd. "Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey". (2023), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
APA Sönmez Güngör E, YILMAZ İ, Erim B, güvenç h, Ergül C, LAÇİNER K, akçay oruç g, ALTUN F, Erkan A, erzin g, Toprak E, AKVARDAR Y (2023). Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, 26(1), 47 - 59. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
Chicago Sönmez Güngör Ekin,YILMAZ İMRAN GÖKÇEN,Erim Burcu Rahşan,güvenç hasibe rengin,Ergül Ceylan,LAÇİNER KEREM,akçay oruç gamze,ALTUN Fatmagül DİKYAR,Erkan Arzu,erzin gamze,Toprak Ebru,AKVARDAR YILDIZ Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi 26, no.1 (2023): 47 - 59. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
MLA Sönmez Güngör Ekin,YILMAZ İMRAN GÖKÇEN,Erim Burcu Rahşan,güvenç hasibe rengin,Ergül Ceylan,LAÇİNER KEREM,akçay oruç gamze,ALTUN Fatmagül DİKYAR,Erkan Arzu,erzin gamze,Toprak Ebru,AKVARDAR YILDIZ Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, vol.26, no.1, 2023, ss.47 - 59. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
AMA Sönmez Güngör E,YILMAZ İ,Erim B,güvenç h,Ergül C,LAÇİNER K,akçay oruç g,ALTUN F,Erkan A,erzin g,Toprak E,AKVARDAR Y Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2023; 26(1): 47 - 59. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
Vancouver Sönmez Güngör E,YILMAZ İ,Erim B,güvenç h,Ergül C,LAÇİNER K,akçay oruç g,ALTUN F,Erkan A,erzin g,Toprak E,AKVARDAR Y Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2023; 26(1): 47 - 59. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
IEEE Sönmez Güngör E,YILMAZ İ,Erim B,güvenç h,Ergül C,LAÇİNER K,akçay oruç g,ALTUN F,Erkan A,erzin g,Toprak E,AKVARDAR Y "Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey." Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, 26, ss.47 - 59, 2023. 10.5505/kpd.2023.85126
ISNAD Sönmez Güngör, Ekin vd. "Intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey". Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi 26/1 (2023), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.5505/kpd.2023.85126