Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 12 Sayfa Aralığı: 1731 - 1738 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400 İndeks Tarihi: 24-05-2023

The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years

Öz:
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patient with inter- trochanteric fracture (IFF) treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) aged over 65 years. Primary outcome of study was to investigate the relationship between fracture type (stable or unstable) and bone density. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at single trauma center which included patients aged >65 years, mini- mum 3 months’ control postoperatively, patients with simple fall by evaluating the patient data from 2010 to 2021. All fractures were classified based on the AO classification system. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation was used between 2010 and 2016, while InterTAN was used after 2016 in our clinic practice. For the evaluation of the bone morphology, we measured the canal-to-calcar ratio (CCR) and cortical thickness index (CTI) and classified with Dorr morphology on anteroposterior (AP) hip radiograph of both the fracture side and contralateral sides. Complications were also evaluated on radiological view. Failures were defined as non-union or failure of fixation. Excessive collapse and screw/blade prominence also evaluated by hip radiograph on the 3rd month control visit. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty females and 59 males were included in this study. The average age was 81.6±8.8 years. One hundred and forty-four patients were treated with InterTAN and 65 patients with helical blade type IMN (PFN-A®). There were 78 patients with stable IFF type A1 fracture and 131 patients with unstable IFF (109 patients with A2 and 22 patients with A3 AO type fracture). The mean CTI was 0.469±0.09 and 0.510±0.09 in the fracture and unaffected side femurs, respectively (p<0.001), the CCR was 0.636±0.15 and 0.568±12 in the fracture and unaffected side femurs, respectively (p<0.001). There were 36 patients with Dorr type A, 115 pa- tients with Dorr type B, and 48 patients with Dorr type C in fracture side and 65 patients with Dorr type A, 123 patients with Dorr type B, and 21 patients with Dorr type C in non-affected side (p<0.001). There were 29 (13.9%) patients with screw (n=14) and blade (n=15) prominence. Excessive collapse was seen 30 patients (14.4%) and 16 patients (7.7) evaluated as a failure. CONCLUSION: We found a significant difference in the failure rate between unstable group than stable group which higher in unsta- ble group according to the AO classification. In addition, the mean CTI, CCR, and Dorr index were significant difference in fractured side than unaffected side which indicated lower bone quality at fracture side.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Rodan GA. Good hope for making osteoporosis a disease of the past. Osteoporos Int 1994;4:S5–6.
  • 2. Tucker A, Donnelly KJ, McDonald S, Craig J, Foster AP, Acton JD. The changing face of fractures of the hip in Northern Ireland. Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1223–31.
  • 3. Sun D, Wang C, Chen Y, Liu X, Zhao P, Zhang H, et al. A meta-analysis comparing intramedullary with extramedullary fixations for unstable fem- oral intertrochanteric fractures. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e17010.
  • 4. Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ. Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:643–50.
  • 5. Kaufer H. Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;146:53–61.
  • 6. Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ Jr., Ishizuka T. A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1959;41-A:1399–408.
  • 7. Stern LC, Gorczyca JT, Kates S, Ketz J, Soles G, Humphrey CA. Radio- graphic review of helical blade versus lag screw fixation for cephalomed- ullary nailing of low-energy peritrochanteric femur fractures: There is a difference in cutout. J Orthop Trauma 2017;31:305–10.
  • 8. Chapman T, Zmistowski B, Krieg J, Stake S, Jones CM, Levicoff E. He- lical Blade versus screw fixation in the treatment of hip fractures with cephalomedullary devices: Incidence of failure and atypical “Medial Cut- out”. J Orthop Trauma 2018;32:397–402.
  • 9. Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma 2018;32:S1–170.
  • 10. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal fe- mur. Bone 1993;14:231–42.
  • 11. Cai SQ, Ren XJ, Yan JX, Yan LS, Cai DL, Li HJ, et al. Effect of aging on the proximal femur geometry and its clinical significance. J Chongqing Med Univ 2012;37:1080–3.
  • 12. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C, Johansson H, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Oden A, et al. Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporosis Int 2005;16:581–9.
  • 13. Nguyen BN, Hoshino H, Togawa D, Matsuyama Y. cortical thickness index of the proximal femur: a radiographic parameter for preliminary assessment of bone mineral density and osteoporosis status in the age 50 Years and over population. Clin Orthop Surg 2018;10:149–56.
  • 14. Tarantino U, Rao C, Tempesta V, Gasbarra E, Feola M. Hip fractures in elderly: The role of cortical bone. Injury 2016;47:S107–11.
  • 15. Holzer G, von Skrbensky G, Holzer LA, Pichl W. Hip fractures and the contribution of cortical versus trabecular bone to femoral neck strength. J Bone Miner Res 2009;24:468–74.
  • 16. Feola M, Rao C, Tempesta V, Gasbarra E, Tarantino U. Femoral cortical index: An indicator of poor bone quality in patient with hip fracture. Ag- ing Clin Exp Res 2015;27:S45–50.
  • 17. Zhuang H, Li Y, Lin J, Cai D, Cai S, Yan L, et al. Cortical thickness in the intertrochanteric region may be relevant to hip fracture type. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18:305.
  • 18. Bayram S, Yıldırım AM, Birişik F, Salduz A. Radiological parameter associated with the survival of old patients with hip fracture. Injury 2021;52:3388–96.
  • 19. Nyholm AM, Palm H, Sandholdt H, Troelsen A, Gromov K. DFDB COLLABORATORS. Risk of reoperation within 12 months following osteosynthesis of a displaced femoral neck fracture is linked mainly to initial fracture displacement while risk of death may be linked to bone quality: A Cohort study from Danish fracture database. Acta Orthop 2020;91:1–75.
  • 20. Serrano R, Blair JA, Watson DT, Infante AF J., Shah AR, Mir HR, et al. Cephalomedullary nail fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures: Are two proximal screws better than one? J Orthop Trauma 2017;31:577–82.
  • 21. Liu W, Liu J, Ji G. Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femo- ral nail anti-rotation versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2020;15:500.
  • 22. Onggo JR, Nambiar M, Onggo JD, Ambikaipalan A, Singh PJ, Baba- zadeh S. Integrated dual lag screws versus single lag screw cephalomed- ullary nail constructs: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Hip Int 2021;32:1120700020985067.
APA Polat G, Bayram S, Gokceoglu Y, ALBAYRAK O, Kahraman A, Durmaz H (2022). The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years. , 1731 - 1738. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
Chicago Polat Gökhan,Bayram Serkan,Gokceoglu Yasar Samet,ALBAYRAK OĞUZHAN,Kahraman Abdullah,Durmaz Hayati The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years. (2022): 1731 - 1738. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
MLA Polat Gökhan,Bayram Serkan,Gokceoglu Yasar Samet,ALBAYRAK OĞUZHAN,Kahraman Abdullah,Durmaz Hayati The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years. , 2022, ss.1731 - 1738. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
AMA Polat G,Bayram S,Gokceoglu Y,ALBAYRAK O,Kahraman A,Durmaz H The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years. . 2022; 1731 - 1738. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
Vancouver Polat G,Bayram S,Gokceoglu Y,ALBAYRAK O,Kahraman A,Durmaz H The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years. . 2022; 1731 - 1738. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
IEEE Polat G,Bayram S,Gokceoglu Y,ALBAYRAK O,Kahraman A,Durmaz H "The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years." , ss.1731 - 1738, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
ISNAD Polat, Gökhan vd. "The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years". (2022), 1731-1738. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
APA Polat G, Bayram S, Gokceoglu Y, ALBAYRAK O, Kahraman A, Durmaz H (2022). The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28(12), 1731 - 1738. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
Chicago Polat Gökhan,Bayram Serkan,Gokceoglu Yasar Samet,ALBAYRAK OĞUZHAN,Kahraman Abdullah,Durmaz Hayati The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28, no.12 (2022): 1731 - 1738. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
MLA Polat Gökhan,Bayram Serkan,Gokceoglu Yasar Samet,ALBAYRAK OĞUZHAN,Kahraman Abdullah,Durmaz Hayati The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.28, no.12, 2022, ss.1731 - 1738. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
AMA Polat G,Bayram S,Gokceoglu Y,ALBAYRAK O,Kahraman A,Durmaz H The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(12): 1731 - 1738. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
Vancouver Polat G,Bayram S,Gokceoglu Y,ALBAYRAK O,Kahraman A,Durmaz H The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(12): 1731 - 1738. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
IEEE Polat G,Bayram S,Gokceoglu Y,ALBAYRAK O,Kahraman A,Durmaz H "The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28, ss.1731 - 1738, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400
ISNAD Polat, Gökhan vd. "The effect of bone morphology on fracture type and treatment result in patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture aged over 65 years". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28/12 (2022), 1731-1738. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400