Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 79 - 90 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333 İndeks Tarihi: 30-05-2023

EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Öz:
Introduction: This study evaluated the importance of examining neuraxial anatomy by preprocedural ultrasonography to ensure effective spinal anesthesia administration, which can be technically challenging in geriatric patients owing to their physiological and pathological conditions. Materials and Methods: Geriatric patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists’ physical classification of I–III undergoing elective surgery under spinal anesthesia were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the anatomical landmark-guided group and the ultrasound-assisted group. Spinal block application times, number of attempts and number of needle redirections were recorded. Results: Among the studied patients, 29 and 30 patients were included in the anatomical landmark-guided group and the ultrasound-assisted group groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean age of the patients in the ultrasound-assisted group (74.6 ± 7.41 years) and the anatomical landmark-guided group (75.6 ± 7.52 years). Assisted procedure time and total operative time were significantly shorter in the anatomical landmark-guided group than in the ultrasound-assisted group (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively); however, spinal application times and number of trials and needle redirections were significantly lower in the ultrasound-assisted group than in the anatomical landmark-guided group (p<0.05 and p <0.05, respectively). Conclusion: Preprocedural ultrasonography before spinal anesthesia administration increases the first-attempt success rate and decreases the number of attempts and needle redirections in geriatric patients.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Bose R. Physiology and Anesthesia for Elderly Pa tients. In: Ehrenfeld JM, Urman RD, Segal S (Eds). Anesthesia Student Survival Guide: A Case-Based Approach. Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London, 2010. p. 369-80.
  • 2. Organization WH. Psychogeriatrics: report of a WHO scientific group [meeting held in Geneva from 19 to 23 October 1970]. [Internet] Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/40993/ glob al_health.pdf. Accessed:25.10.2022.
  • 3. Memtsoudis SG, Sun X, Chiu Y-L, et al. Peri operative Comparative Effectiveness of Anes thetic Technique in Orthopedic Patients. Anes thesiology. 2013;118(5):1046-58. DOI: 10.1097/ ALN.0b013e318286061d
  • 4. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epi dural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. Bmj. 2000;321(7275):1493. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493
  • 5. Narkhede HH, Kane D, Parekh V, Hemantkumar I. A cohort study of anatomical landmark-guided midline versus pre-procedure ultrasound-guided midline technique of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Journal of Anaes thesiology, Clinical Pharmacology. 2019;35(4):522. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_396_17
  • 6. de Oliveira Filho G, Gomes H, Da Fonseca M, Hoff man J, Pederneiras S, Garcia J. Predictors of success ful neuraxial block: a prospective study. European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA). 2002;19(6):447-51. DOI: 10.1017/s0265021502000716
  • 7. Lim B-G, Lee I-O. Anesthetic management of ger iatric patients. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2020;73(1),8-29. DOI: 10.4097/kja.19391
  • 8. Chen DX, Yang L, Ding L, Li SY, Qi YN, Li Q. Perioper ative outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgery with different anesthesia techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019;98(49). DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018220
  • 9. Helwani MA, Avidan MS, Abdallah AB, et al. Effects of regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propen sity-matched cohort study. JBJS. 2015;97(3):186-93. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00612
  • 10. Memtsoudis SG, Poeran J, Zubizarreta N, et al. Do hospitals performing frequent neuraxial anesthesia for hip and knee replacements have better out comes? Anesthesiology: The Journal of the Ameri can Society of Anesthesiologists. 2018;129(3):428-39. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002299
  • 11. Charuluxananan S, Sriprajittichai P, Sirichotvithyako rn P, Rodanant O, Kyokong O. Factors related to patient satisfaction regarding spinal anesthesia. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand= Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2003;86:S338-43.
  • 12. Rhee WJ, Chung CJ, Lim YH, Lee KH, Lee SC. Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal re garding spinal anesthesia. Korean journal of an esthesiology. 2010;59(4):260-264. DOI: 10.4097/ kjae.2010.59.4.260
  • 13. Rabinowitz A, Bourdet B, Minville V, et al. The para median technique: a superior initial approach to con tinuous spinal anesthesia in the elderly. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2007;105(6):1855-7. DOI: 10.1213/01. ane.0000287655.95619.fa
  • 14. Park S-K, Yoo S, Kim WH, Lim Y-J, Bahk J-H, Kim J-T. Ultrasound-Assisted vs. landmark-guided paramed ian spinal anaesthesia in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthe siology (EJA). 2019;36(10):763-71. DOI: 10.1097/ EJA.0000000000001029
  • 15. Jiang L, Zhang F, Wei N, Lv J, Chen W, Dai Z. Could preprocedural ultrasound increase the first-pass success rate of neuraxial anesthesia in obstetrics? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Anesthesia. 2020: 34(3), 434-444. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-020-02750-6
  • 16. Soleiman J, Demaerel P, Rocher S, Maes F, Mar chal G. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the level of termination of the conus medulla ris and the thecal sac: influence of age and gen der. Spine. 2005;30(16):1875-80. DOI: 10.1097/01. brs.0000174116.74775.2e
  • 17. Broadbent C, Maxwell W, Ferrie R, Wilson D, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaes thesia. 2000;55(11):1122-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365- 2044.2000.01547-4.x
  • 18. Furness G, Reilly M, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ul trasound imaging for identificationof lumbar in tervertebral level. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(3):277-80. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.2403_4.x
  • 19. Park S-K, Bae J, Yoo S, et al. Ultrasound-Assisted Ver sus Landmark-Guided Spinal Anesthesia in Patients with Abnormal Spinal Anatomy: A Randomized Con trolled Trial. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2020;130(3):787- 95. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004600
  • 20. Lim Y, Choo C, Tan K. A randomised controlled tri al of ultrasound-assisted spinal anaesthesia. An aesthesia and intensive care. 2014;42(2):191-8. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1404200205
  • 21. Rizk MS, Zeeni CA, Bouez JN, et al. Preprocedural ultrasound versus landmark techniques for spinal anesthesia performed by novice residents in elderly: a randomized controlled trial. BMC anesthesiology. 2019;19(1):208. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0882-8
  • 22. Srinivasan KK, Leo A-M, Iohom G, Loughnane F, Lee PJ. Pre-procedure ultrasound-guided parame dian spinal anaesthesia at L5–S1: Is this better than landmark-guided midline approach? A randomised controlled trial. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2018;62(1):53. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_448_17
  • 23. Geng J, Chen X, Wang X, Guo X, Li M. Ultrasound imaging increases first-attempt success rate of neuraxial block in elderly patients. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. 2016;96(43):3459-63. DOI: 10.3760/cma. j.issn.0376-2491.2016.43.004
  • 24. Chin KJ, Perlas A, Chan V, Brown-Shreves D, Koshkin A, Vaishnav V. Ultrasound imaging facilitates spinal anesthesia in adults with difficult surface anatomic landmarks. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the Amer ican Society of Anesthesiologists. 2011;115(1):94- 101. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821a8ad4
  • 25. Sahin T, Balaban O, Sahin L, Solak M, Toker K. A ran domized controlled trial of preinsertion ultrasound guidance for spinal anaesthesia in pregnancy: out comes among obese and lean parturients. Jour nal of anesthesia. 2014;28(3):413-9. DOI: 10.1007/ s00540-013-1726-1
APA IŞIKER A, Onay M, AKCAN A, AKKEMİK Ü, Güleç M (2023). EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL. , 79 - 90. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
Chicago IŞIKER ARDA,Onay Meryem,AKCAN ALPASLAN,AKKEMİK ÜMİT,Güleç Mehmet Sacit EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL. (2023): 79 - 90. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
MLA IŞIKER ARDA,Onay Meryem,AKCAN ALPASLAN,AKKEMİK ÜMİT,Güleç Mehmet Sacit EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL. , 2023, ss.79 - 90. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
AMA IŞIKER A,Onay M,AKCAN A,AKKEMİK Ü,Güleç M EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL. . 2023; 79 - 90. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
Vancouver IŞIKER A,Onay M,AKCAN A,AKKEMİK Ü,Güleç M EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL. . 2023; 79 - 90. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
IEEE IŞIKER A,Onay M,AKCAN A,AKKEMİK Ü,Güleç M "EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL." , ss.79 - 90, 2023. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
ISNAD IŞIKER, ARDA vd. "EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL". (2023), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
APA IŞIKER A, Onay M, AKCAN A, AKKEMİK Ü, Güleç M (2023). EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, 26(1), 79 - 90. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
Chicago IŞIKER ARDA,Onay Meryem,AKCAN ALPASLAN,AKKEMİK ÜMİT,Güleç Mehmet Sacit EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL. Türk Geriatri Dergisi 26, no.1 (2023): 79 - 90. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
MLA IŞIKER ARDA,Onay Meryem,AKCAN ALPASLAN,AKKEMİK ÜMİT,Güleç Mehmet Sacit EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, vol.26, no.1, 2023, ss.79 - 90. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
AMA IŞIKER A,Onay M,AKCAN A,AKKEMİK Ü,Güleç M EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL. Türk Geriatri Dergisi. 2023; 26(1): 79 - 90. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
Vancouver IŞIKER A,Onay M,AKCAN A,AKKEMİK Ü,Güleç M EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL. Türk Geriatri Dergisi. 2023; 26(1): 79 - 90. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
IEEE IŞIKER A,Onay M,AKCAN A,AKKEMİK Ü,Güleç M "EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL." Türk Geriatri Dergisi, 26, ss.79 - 90, 2023. 10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333
ISNAD IŞIKER, ARDA vd. "EVALUATING THE ROLE OF VERTEBRAL ANATOMY EXAMINATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE ADMINISTERING SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL". Türk Geriatri Dergisi 26/1 (2023), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.29400/tjgeri.2023.333