Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 50 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 35 - 40 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 İndeks Tarihi: 31-05-2023
Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis
Öz: Purpose: This study was conducted to compare őve implant-supported rehabilitation concepts of an edentulous jawbone and to investigate the most biomechanically advantageous technique. Materials and Methods: Five models with implants in different conőgurations were created: All-on-4 concept (two anterior axial and two posterior distally curved implants), All-on-4v4 concept (four distal curved interforaminal implants), All-on-4W (two anterior mesial curved interforaminal implants and two posterior distally curved implants), the All-on-3 concept (one anterior axial and two posterior distally curved implants), and the trefoil system (three interforaminal implants with titanium bar guide support). For this study, bone-level (4.3 × 13 mm) implants of Nobel Biocare and implants of the trefoil system (5 × 13 mm) were used. Spherical loads were applied from the canine and molar regions to evaluate the tension, compression and von Mises stresses by applying 3D őnite element analysis. Results: Among the alternative concepts, trefoil system was the most successful treatment option in biomechanical terms. On the other hand, All-on-3 concept was found to be the last method of choice. This was because of the high stresses on cortical and trabecular bones in most conditions. Conclusions: If the technical details of the Trefoil system are simpliőed in the upcoming period, it will őnd a very common usage area. Classical All-on-4 and All-on-4v4 techniques are the preferred and biomechanically successful treatment options today.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Branemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of őxed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Branemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6(4):227ś31. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x.
- 2. Enlow DH, Bianco HJ, Eklund S. The remodeling of the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;36(6):685ś93. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(76)90035-4.
- 3. Saglam AA. The vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of dentate and edentulous subjects. Quintessence Int. 2002;33(6):433ś8.
- 4. de NDFJ, Pecorari VGA, Martins CB, Del Fabbro M, Casati MZ. Short implants versus bone augmentation in combination with standard-length implants in posterior atrophic partially edentulous mandibles: systematic review and metaanalysis with the Bayesian approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48(1):90ś96. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2018.05.009.
- 5. Pieri F, Forlivesi C, Caselli E, Corinaldesi G. Short implants (6mm) vs. vertical bone augmentation and standard-length implants (>/=9mm) in atrophic posterior mandibles: a 5-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(12):1607ś 1614. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.005.
- 6. Branemark PI, Engstrand P, Ohrnell LO, Grondahl K, Nilsson P, Hagberg K, et al. Branemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 1999;1(1):2ś16. doi:10.1111/j.1708- 8208.1999.tb00086.x.
- 7. Engstrand P, Grondahl K, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Nannmark U, Branemark PI. Prospective follow-up study of 95 patients with edentulous mandibles treated according to the Branemark Novum concept. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(1):3ś10. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00176.x.
- 8. Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. "All-on-Four" immediatefunction concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2ś9. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x.
- 9. Jensen OT, Adams MW. All-on-4 treatment of highly atrophic mandible with mandibular V-4: report of 2 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(7):1503ś9. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.031.
- 10. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindstrom H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(3):405ś 14.
- 11. Ayna M, Gulses A, Acil Y. A comparative study on 7-year results of "All-on-Four" immediate-function concept for completely edentulous mandibles: metal-ceramic vs. barretained superstructures. Odontology. 2018;106(1):73ś82. doi:10.1007/s10266-017-0304-7.
- 12. Soto-Penaloza D, Zaragozi-Alonso R, Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha-Diago M. The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(3):e474śe488. doi:10.4317/jced.53613.
- 13. Ayna M, Sagheb K, Gutwald R, Wieker H, Florke C, Acil Y, et al. A clinical study on the 6-year outcomes of immediately loaded three implants for completely edentulous mandibles: "the all-on-3 concept". Odontology. 2020;108(1):133ś142. doi:10.1007/s10266-019-00440-8.
- 14. Borgonovo AE, Galbiati SLM, Re D. Trefoil System for the Treatment of Mandibular Edentulism: A Case Report with 30 Months Follow-Up. Case Rep Dent. 2020;2020:8845649. doi:10.1155/2020/8845649.
- 15. Al-Sukhun J, Kelleway J. Biomechanics of the mandible: Part II. Development of a 3-dimensional őnite element model to study mandibular functional deformation in subjects treated with dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(3):455ś 66.
- 16. Cicciù M, Cervino G, Terranova A, Risitano G, Raffaele M, Cucinotta F, et al. Prosthetic and Mechanical Parameters of the Facial Bone under the Load of Different Dental Implant Shapes: A Parametric Study. Prosthesis. 2019;1(1):41ś53. doi:10.3390/prosthesis1010006.
- 17. Van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC. Application of the őnite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2006;9(4):257ś70. doi:10.1080/10255840600837074.
- 18. Heydecke G, Zwahlen M, Nicol A, Nisand D, Payer M, Renouard F, et al. What is the optimal number of implants for őxed reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:217ś28. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02548.x.
- 19. Balshi TJ, Wolőnger GJ, Balshi SF, Bidra AS. A 30-Year FollowUp of a Patient with Mandibular Complete-Arch Fixed ImplantSupported Prosthesis on 4 Implants: A Clinical Report. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):97ś102. doi:10.1111/jopr.13012.
- 20. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1ś132.
- 21. Krennmair G, Seemann R, Weinlander M, Krennmair S, Piehslinger E. Clinical outcome and peri-implant őndings of four-implant-supported distal cantilevered őxed mandibular prostheses: őve-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(3):831ś40. doi:10.11607/jomi.3024.
- 22. Chan MH, Holmes C. Contemporary "All-on-4" concept. Dent Clin North Am. 2015;59(2):421ś70. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2014.12.001.
- 23. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A. The prognosis of partial implant-supported őxed dental prostheses with cantilevers. A 5-year retrospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013;6(1):51ś9.
- 24. Torrecillas-Martinez L, Monje A, Lin GH, Suarez F, OrtegaOller I, Galindo-Moreno P, et al. Effect of cantilevers for implant-supported prostheses on marginal bone loss and prosthetic complications: systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(6):1315ś21. doi:10.11607/jomi.3660.
- 25. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Moss SM, Molina GJ. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142(3):310ś20. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0170.
- 26. Ozan O, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in Allon-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):64ś71. doi:10.11607/jomi.6201.
- 27. Menini M, Bagnasco F, Pera P, Tealdo T, Pesce P. Branemark Novum Immediate Loading Rehabilitation of Edentulous Mandibles: Case Series with a 16-Year Follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(5):729ś735. doi:10.11607/prd.4340.
- 28. Primo BT, Mezzari LM, da Fontoura Frasca LC, Linderman R, Rivaldo EG. Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Three-Implant-Supported Fixed-Prosthesis Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Mandible: Immediate Versus Delayed Loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(3):653ś660. doi:10.11607/jomi.5870.
| APA | tükel h, geçkil n (2023). Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. , 35 - 40. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| Chicago | tükel hüseyin can,geçkil nida Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. (2023): 35 - 40. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| MLA | tükel hüseyin can,geçkil nida Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. , 2023, ss.35 - 40. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| AMA | tükel h,geçkil n Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. . 2023; 35 - 40. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| Vancouver | tükel h,geçkil n Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. . 2023; 35 - 40. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| IEEE | tükel h,geçkil n "Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis." , ss.35 - 40, 2023. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| ISNAD | tükel, hüseyin can - geçkil, nida. "Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis". (2023), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| APA | tükel h, geçkil n (2023). Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. European annals of dental sciences (Online), 50(1), 35 - 40. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| Chicago | tükel hüseyin can,geçkil nida Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. European annals of dental sciences (Online) 50, no.1 (2023): 35 - 40. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| MLA | tükel hüseyin can,geçkil nida Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. European annals of dental sciences (Online), vol.50, no.1, 2023, ss.35 - 40. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| AMA | tükel h,geçkil n Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. European annals of dental sciences (Online). 2023; 50(1): 35 - 40. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| Vancouver | tükel h,geçkil n Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. European annals of dental sciences (Online). 2023; 50(1): 35 - 40. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| IEEE | tükel h,geçkil n "Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis." European annals of dental sciences (Online), 50, ss.35 - 40, 2023. 10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
| ISNAD | tükel, hüseyin can - geçkil, nida. "Comparison of Implant Systems Applied in the Mental Region in the Prosthetic Treatment of Atrophic Mandible: A 3D Finite Element Analysis". European annals of dental sciences (Online) 50/1 (2023), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.52037/eads.2023.0008 |
