Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 189 - 205 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852 İndeks Tarihi: 31-05-2023

The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis

Öz:
In the mainstream economics and defense economics literature, the crowding-out relationship between defense expenditures and social welfare expenditures (education, health, social security, etc.) is discussed with the metaphor of “Guns and Butter”. Here, it is basically stated how much of the scarce resources should be allocated to defense services and how much to social welfare services (education, health, social security, etc.) by emphasizing the constraints of resource distribution in the economy. However, defense expenditures item that maintains its importance, although the degree varies from country to country. For this reason, defense expenditures have an important place in the public expenditures of countries. Another important expenditure item among public expenditures is education expenditures. Education expenditures constitute a locomotive power in increasing economic growth and social welfare by providing human resources and human capital stock. Therefore, it is of great importance to determine the effect of defense expenditures on social welfare expenditures. As a matter of fact, there is a significant deficiency in the literature at the point of determining the dynamic relationship between both expenditure items. In this study, it is aimed to determine the exclusion effect of defense expenditures on education expenditures by dynamic panel data analysis for 27 countries that are members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) based on the 2000-2019 period. As a result of the analysis, a positive relationship was found between defense expenditures and public education expenditures. In other words, no crowding-out relationship was found between defense expenditures and public education expenditures.
Anahtar Kelime:

Savunma Harcamaları ile Kamu Eğitim Harcamaları Arasında Dışlama İlişkisi: NATO Ülkeleri Analizi

Öz:
Ana akım iktisat öğretisinde ve savunma ekonomisi yazınında, savunma harcamaları ile sosyal refah harcamaları (eğitim, sağlık, sosyal güvenlik vb.) arasındaki dışlama ilişkisi “Silah ve Tereyağı” (Guns and Butter) metaforuyla tartışılmaktadır. Burada temel olarak, ekonomideki kaynak dağılımının kısıtları vurgulanarak kıt kaynakların ne kadarının savunma hizmetlerine ne kadarının sosyal refah hizmetlerine (eğitim, sağlık, sosyal güvenlik vb.) tahsis edilmesi gerektiği belirtilmektedir. Ancak savunma harcamaları, derecesi ülkeden ülkeye değişmekle birlikte her zaman önemini korumaktadır. Bu nedenle ülkelerin kamu harcamaları içerisinde savunma harcamaları önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. Kamu harcamaları içerinde bir diğer önemli harcama kalemi ise eğitim harcamalarıdır. Eğitim harcamaları, insan kaynağını ve beşerî sermaye stokunun oluşmasını sağlayarak ekonomik büyüme ve toplumsal refahın artmasında lokomotif bir güç oluşturmaktadır. Dolayısıyla savunma harcamalarının sosyal refah harcamaları üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi büyük önem arz etmektedir. Nitekim literatürde de her iki harcama kalemleri arasındaki dinamik ilişkinin belirlenmesi noktasında da önemli bir eksiklik bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, savunma harcamalarının eğitim harcamaları üzerindeki dışlama etkisinin, 2000-2019 dönemi baz alınarak Kuzey Atlantik Antlaşması Örgütü (NATO) üyesi 27 ülke için dinamik panel veri analizi ile tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Analiz sonucunda savunma harcamaları ile kamu eğitim harcamaları arasında pozitif bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Diğer bir ifade ile savunma harcamaları ile kamu eğitim harcamaları arasında herhangi bir dışlama ilişkisi bulunmamıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ali, H. E. (2011). Military expenditures and human development: Guns and butter arguments revisited: A case study from Egypt. Peace Economics Peace Science & Public Policy, 17(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-8597.1240
  • Baltagi, B. H. & Kao, C. (2000). Nonstationary panels, cointegration in panels and dynamic panels: A survey, New York: Center for Policy Research, No: 136, 2000, pp. 5-7.
  • Bar-El, R., Pecht, E. and Tishler, A. (2020). Human capital and national security. Defence and Peace Economics, 31(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2018.1485088
  • Batırel, Ö. F. (2007). Kamu maliyesi ve yönetimi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Benoit, E. (1973). Defense and Economic Growth in Developing Countries. D.C. Heath.
  • Biscione, A, & Caruso, R. (2021). Military expenditures and income inequality evidence from a panel of transition countries (1990-2015). Defence and Peace Economics, 32(1), 46-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2019.1661218
  • Breusch T. & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  • Bulutoğlu, K. (2003). Kamu ekonomisine giriş: Demokraside devletin ekonomik bir kuramı. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Cengiz, S. & Gör, Y. (2016). Kurumsal yönetim uygulamaları ve denetim kalitesi arasındaki ilişki: Borsa İstanbul kurumsal yönetim endeksinde bir araştırma. Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 136, 59-82.
  • Chang, T., Lee, C. C., Hung, K. & Lee, K. H. (2014). “Does military spending really matter for economic growth in china and g7 countries: The roles of dependency and heterogeneity”. Defence and Peace Economics, 25(2), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2013.763460
  • Dedebek, E. & Meriç, M. (2015). Avrupa birliği ülkelerinde savunma harcamalarını belirleyen ekonomik ve sosyal faktörler: Panel veri analizi. Sayıştay Dergisi, 97/Nisan-Haziran, 89- 104.
  • Değer, S. & Sen, S. (1995). Military expenditure and developing countries. Hartley, K. & Sandler, T. (Der), Handbook of defence economics (pp. 275-307), Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0013(05)80013-4
  • Dunne, J. P. (2015). Economic effects of military expenditure in developing countries. In the Peace Dividend, 445.
  • Dunne, J. P. & Tian, N. (2013). Military expenditure and economic growth: A survey. The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 8(1), 5-11.
  • Fan, H., Liu, W. & Coyte P. C. (2018). Do military expenditures crowdout health expenditures? evidence from around the world, 2000-2013. Defence and Peace Economics, 29(7), 766-779. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2017.1303303
  • Fiott, D. (2022). The foh of war: Russia’s war on Ukraine, European defence spending and military capabilities. Intereconomics, 57(3), 152-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-022-1051-8
  • Gifford, B. (2006). Why no trade-off between “guns and butter”? armed forces and social spending in the advanced ındustrial democracies 1960–1993. American Journal of Sociology, 112(2), 473-509.
  • Giray, F. (2004). Savunma harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 181-199.
  • Giray, F., & Taşdelen, S. (2018). Ortadoğu’daki krizlerin NATO ülkelerinin savunma harcamalarına etkisi. Arı, T. & Özdal, B. (Der.), X. Uluslararası İlişkiler Kongresi.
  • Harris, G., Kelly, M. & Pranowo. (1985). Trade-offs between defence and education/health expenditures in developing countries. Journal of Peace Research, 25(2), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234338802500205
  • Harris, R. D., & Tzavalis, E. (1999). Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed. Journal of econometrics, 91(2), 201-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304- 4076(98)00076-1
  • Hatemi-J, A., Chang, T., Chen, W., Lin, F. & Gupta, R. (2018). Asymmetric causality between military expenditures and economic growth in top six defense spenders. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 52(3), 1193-1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135- 017-0512-9
  • Hess, P. & Mullan, B. (1988). The military burden and public education expenditures in contemporary developing nations: ıs there a trade-off?. The Journal of Developing Areas, 22(4), 497-514.
  • Hirnissa, M. T., Habibullah, M. S. & Baharom, A. H. (2009). The relationship between defense, education and health expenditures in selected asian countries. International Journal of Economicsand Finance, 1(2), 149-155.
  • Huang, C. & Ho, Y. H. (2018). Does taiwan’s defense spending crowd out education and social welfare expenditures?. Journal of Economics and Management, 14(1), 67-82.
  • Hurlin C. & Mignon, V. (2007). Second generation panel unit root tests. HAL Seciences Humaines et Sociales (halshs-00159842), 1-24.
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. & Shin Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
  • Kollias, C. & Paleologou, S. M. (2011). Budgetary trade-offs between defence, education and social spending in Greece. Applied Economics Letters, 18(11), 1071-1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2010.524606
  • Kollias, C., Manolas, G., & Paleologou, S. M. (2004). Defence expenditure and economic growth in the european union a causality analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26(5), 553-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2004.03.013
  • Kovacevic, T. & Smiljanic, D. (2017). Causality analysis between GDP, defence expenditure and the number of armed forces personnel: The case of Croatia. Ekonomski Pregled, 68(4), 413- 431.
  • Kusi, N. K. (1994). Economic growth and defense in developing countries: A causal analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(1), 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002794038001009
  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite- sample properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304- 4076(01)00098-7
  • Lin, E. S., Ali, H. E. and Lu, Y. L. (2015). Does military spending crowd out social welfare expenditures? evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Defence and Peace Economics, 26(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2013.848576
  • Looney, R. E. (1988). Third-world military expenditure and arms production. London: Macmillan Press.
  • Mendez, R. P. (1999). Peace as a global public goods. Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. & Stern, M. A. (Der.), International Cooperetion in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press.
  • Ozsoy, O. (2002). Budgetary trade-offs between defense, education and health expenditures: The case of Turkey. Defence and Peace Economics, 13(2), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690210968
  • NATO, (1992). Financial and economic data relating to NATO defence: Defence expenditures of nato countries (1970-1991).
  • NATO, (1976). NATO facts and figures. NATO İnformation Service.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60, 13-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
  • Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias adjusted LM test of error cross section independence. The econometrics journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368- 423X.2007.00227
  • Russett, B. M. (1969). Who pays for defence?. American Political Science Review, 63(2) 412-426.
  • Sandler, T. & Tschirhart, J. (1997). Club theory: Thirty years later. Public Choice, 93(3/4), 335-355.
  • Stiglitz, J. E. & Bilmes, L. J. (2009). Üç trilyon dolarlık savaş: Irak savaşının gerçek maliyeti. ODTÜ Yayıncılık.
  • Tekeoglu, E. (2008). Defence expenditure and economic growth: Empirical study on case of Turkey. Naval Postgraduate School.
  • Turhan, M. & Erol, Y. C. (2020). Eğitim Ekonomisine İlişkin Temel Kavramlar. Sağır, M. ve Yirci, R. (Der.), Eğitim Ekonomisi ve Planlaması İçinde (pp. 1-26), Pegem Akademi.
  • Wang, Y. (2014). Guns–butter tradeoff in contemporary China. Defense & Security Analysis, 30(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2013.864867
  • Yakovlev, P. (2007). Arms trade, military spending, and economic growth. Defence And Peace Economics, 18(4), 319-321.
  • Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2018). Panel Zaman Serileri Analizi. Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
  • Yıldırım, J. & Sezgin, S. (2002). Defence, education and health expenditures in Turkey, 1924-96. Journal of Peace Research, 39(5), 569-580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039005004
  • Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, J. & Wang, R. (2017). Does military spending promote social welfare? a comparative analysis of the BRICS and G7 countries. Defence and Peace Economics, 28(6), 686-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2016.1144899
  • Zhao, L., Zhao, L. & Chen, B. (2017). The ınterrelationship between defence spending, public expenditures and economic growth: Evidence from China. Defence and Peace Economics, 28(6), 703-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2015.1111603
APA giray f, TASDELEN S (2023). The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis. , 189 - 205. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
Chicago giray filiz,TASDELEN Servet The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis. (2023): 189 - 205. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
MLA giray filiz,TASDELEN Servet The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis. , 2023, ss.189 - 205. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
AMA giray f,TASDELEN S The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis. . 2023; 189 - 205. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
Vancouver giray f,TASDELEN S The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis. . 2023; 189 - 205. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
IEEE giray f,TASDELEN S "The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis." , ss.189 - 205, 2023. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
ISNAD giray, filiz - TASDELEN, Servet. "The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis". (2023), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
APA giray f, TASDELEN S (2023). The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis. Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics , 18(1), 189 - 205. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
Chicago giray filiz,TASDELEN Servet The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis. Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics 18, no.1 (2023): 189 - 205. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
MLA giray filiz,TASDELEN Servet The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis. Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics , vol.18, no.1, 2023, ss.189 - 205. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
AMA giray f,TASDELEN S The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis. Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics . 2023; 18(1): 189 - 205. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
Vancouver giray f,TASDELEN S The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis. Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics . 2023; 18(1): 189 - 205. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
IEEE giray f,TASDELEN S "The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis." Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics , 18, ss.189 - 205, 2023. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852
ISNAD giray, filiz - TASDELEN, Servet. "The Crowding-Out Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Public Education Expenditures: NATO Countries Analysis". Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics 18/1 (2023), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.66852