Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 69 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 105 - 110 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374 İndeks Tarihi: 02-06-2023

Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?

Öz:
Objectives: This study analyzed whether the isokinetic muscle strength of bilateral knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a predictor for prior surgery side. Patients and methods: In the prospective study conducted between April 2021 and December 2021, 58 knees of 29 unilateral TKA candidates (6 males, 23 females; mean age: 66.7±7.4 years; range, 53 to 81 years) were enrolled. The patients were divided into surgical (n=29)and nonsurgical (n=29) groups. The knees of patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis (Stage III or IV) according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) scale were scheduled for unilateral TKA. An isokinetic testing system was used to assess knee flexor and extensor muscle strength (peak torque) at angular velocities of 60°/sec and 180°/sec (five cycles per velocity). The radiological (X-ray-based KL scale and magnetic resonance imaging-based quadriceps angle) and clinical findings (isokinetic test and Visual Analog Scale pain scores) in both groups were compared. Results: The mean symptom duration was 10±5.4 years. The KL score and quadriceps angle showed no significant differences (p=0.056 and p=0.663, respectively). Isokinetic test results were in accordance with the clinical results of the surgery group. In the isokinetic evaluation, both the 60°/sec concentric extension (35.00 vs. 46.00, p=0.002) and flexion peak torque (18.00 vs. 26.00, p=0.001) values were significantly lower in the surgical group than in the nonsurgical group. Conclusion: Isokinetic testing can be a supportive tool for assessing the prior side of TKA in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis. Further studies are required to support these findings.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Riddle DL, Perera RA. Appropriateness and total knee arthroplasty: An examination of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons appropriateness rating system. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017;25:1994-8. doi: 10.1016/j. joca.2017.08.018.
  • 2. Ahmed GO, ELSweify K, Ahmed AF. Usability of the AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the surgical management of knee osteoarthritis in clinical practice. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020;28:2077-81. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05908-7.
  • 3. Zanasi S. Innovations in total knee replacement: New trends in operative treatment and changes in peri-operative management. Eur Orthop Traumatol 2011;2:21-31. doi: 10.1007/s12570-011-0066-6.
  • 4. Wang WJ, Sun MH, Palmer J, Liu F, Bottomley N, Jackson W, et al. Patterns of compartment involvement in endstage knee osteoarthritis in a Chinese Orthopedic Center: Implications for implant choice. Orthop Surg 2018;10:227- 34. doi: 10.1111/os.12395.
  • 5. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Appropriate Use Criteria. Published December 9, 2016. Available at: https:// www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/ surgical-management-knee/smoak-auc_hardcopytreatment_ 1.4.171.pdf [Accessed: 26.03.2022].
  • 6. McGrory BJ, Weber KL, Jevsevar DS, Sevarino K. Surgical management of osteoarthritis of the knee: Evidence-based guideline. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016;24:e87-93. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00159.
  • 7. Zhou QQ, Yang X, Zhang H, Zhang X, Qing Z, Liu J, et al. Predictive value of digital radiographic characteristics in combination with clinical evaluation scores in assessing the need for knee replacement. Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology 2019;2:23-31. doi: 10.1007/s42058-019-00017-y.
  • 8. Riis A, Rathleff MS, Jensen MB, Simonsen O. Low grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis pre-operatively is associated with a lower functional level after total knee replacement: A prospective cohort study with 12 months’ follow-up. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1498-502. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.33726.
  • 9. Heisinger S, Hitzl W, Hobusch GM, Windhager R, Cotofana S. Predicting total knee replacement from symptomology and radiographic structural change using artificial neural networks-data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). J Clin Med 2020;9:1298. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051298.
  • 10. de Araujo Ribeiro Alvares JB, Rodrigues R, de Azevedo Franke R, da Silva BG, Pinto RS, Vaz MA, et al. Intermachine reliability of the Biodex and Cybex isokinetic dynamometers for knee flexor/extensor isometric, concentric and eccentric tests. Phys Ther Sport 2015;16:59- 65. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.04.004.
  • 11. de Amorim Aquino M, Leme LE. Isokinetic dynamometry in elderly women undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A comparative study. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2006;61:215-22. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322006000300006.
  • 12. Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016;474:1886-93. doi: 10.1007/ s11999-016-4732-4.
  • 13. Wu CC, Yeow KM, Yeow YJ. Varied influence of the femoral or tibial component on quadriceps angles: Verified by imaging studies. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2019;53:287- 91. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.04.011.
  • 14. Pokorny J, Křen J. The patellofemoral joint and the total knee replacement. Applied and Computational Mechanics 2007;1:595-602.
  • 15. Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:1315-6. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d.
  • 16. Harbo T, Brincks J, Andersen H. Maximal isokinetic and isometric muscle strength of major muscle groups related to age, body mass, height, and sex in 178 healthy subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012;112:267-75. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011- 1975-3.
  • 17. Berman AT, Bosacco SJ, Israelite C. Evaluation of total knee arthroplasty using isokinetic testing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;(271):106-13.
  • 18. Klasan A, Luger M, Hochgatterer R, Young SW. Measuring appropriate need for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Results of the MANUKA study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022;30:3191-8. doi: 10.1007/ s00167-021-06632-6.
  • 19. Adie S, Harris I, Chuan A, Lewis P, Naylor JM. Selecting and optimising patients for total knee arthroplasty. Med J Aust 2019;210:135-41. doi: 10.5694/mja2.12109.
  • 20. Wang XF, Ma ZH, Teng XR. Isokinetic strength test of muscle strength and motor function in total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Surg 2020;12:878-89. doi: 10.1111/ os.12699.
  • 21. Cavanellas NT, Cossich VRA, Nicoliche EB, Martins MB, Sousa EB, Salles JI. Comparative analysis of quadriceps and hamstrings strength in knee osteoarthritis before and after total knee arthroplasty: A cross-sectional study. Rev Bras Ortop 2018;53:158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.02.009.
  • 22. Jette DU, Hunter SJ, Burkett L, Langham B, Logerstedt DS, Piuzzi NS, et al. Physical therapist management of total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2020;100:1603-31. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa099.
APA Saral İ, SÜRÜCÜ S, TEKECİ E, agirman m, MAHİROĞULLARI M, ÇAKAR E (2023). Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?. , 105 - 110. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
Chicago Saral İlknur,SÜRÜCÜ SERKAN,TEKECİ ESRA,agirman mehmet,MAHİROĞULLARI MAHİR,ÇAKAR Engin Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?. (2023): 105 - 110. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
MLA Saral İlknur,SÜRÜCÜ SERKAN,TEKECİ ESRA,agirman mehmet,MAHİROĞULLARI MAHİR,ÇAKAR Engin Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?. , 2023, ss.105 - 110. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
AMA Saral İ,SÜRÜCÜ S,TEKECİ E,agirman m,MAHİROĞULLARI M,ÇAKAR E Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?. . 2023; 105 - 110. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
Vancouver Saral İ,SÜRÜCÜ S,TEKECİ E,agirman m,MAHİROĞULLARI M,ÇAKAR E Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?. . 2023; 105 - 110. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
IEEE Saral İ,SÜRÜCÜ S,TEKECİ E,agirman m,MAHİROĞULLARI M,ÇAKAR E "Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?." , ss.105 - 110, 2023. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
ISNAD Saral, İlknur vd. "Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?". (2023), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
APA Saral İ, SÜRÜCÜ S, TEKECİ E, agirman m, MAHİROĞULLARI M, ÇAKAR E (2023). Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69(1), 105 - 110. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
Chicago Saral İlknur,SÜRÜCÜ SERKAN,TEKECİ ESRA,agirman mehmet,MAHİROĞULLARI MAHİR,ÇAKAR Engin Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 69, no.1 (2023): 105 - 110. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
MLA Saral İlknur,SÜRÜCÜ SERKAN,TEKECİ ESRA,agirman mehmet,MAHİROĞULLARI MAHİR,ÇAKAR Engin Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol.69, no.1, 2023, ss.105 - 110. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
AMA Saral İ,SÜRÜCÜ S,TEKECİ E,agirman m,MAHİROĞULLARI M,ÇAKAR E Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2023; 69(1): 105 - 110. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
Vancouver Saral İ,SÜRÜCÜ S,TEKECİ E,agirman m,MAHİROĞULLARI M,ÇAKAR E Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2023; 69(1): 105 - 110. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
IEEE Saral İ,SÜRÜCÜ S,TEKECİ E,agirman m,MAHİROĞULLARI M,ÇAKAR E "Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?." Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, ss.105 - 110, 2023. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374
ISNAD Saral, İlknur vd. "Can isokinetic test be a supportive tool for unilateral knee arthroplasty decision?". Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 69/1 (2023), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2023.12374