Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations

Yanıkoğlu, Nuran; Şencan, Beyza Betül

doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550

Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations

Beyza Betül ŞENCAN, (Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Atatürk Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Diş Hekimliği, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Nuran YANIKOĞLU (Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Atatürk Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Diş Hekimliği, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Current research in dental sciences (Online)

21 13

Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 58 - 65 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550 İndeks Tarihi: 02-06-2023

Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations

Öz:

Laminate veneers are restorations applied to dental tissue with or without minimal preparation. Laminate veneers have recently been a fairly common treatment in dentistry, with aesthetic con- cerns coming to the fore in patients. But the indications of these restorations should be taken into account, and treatment should be decided after an accurate diagnosis and planning. With the spread of laminate veneers, research on success rates has also come to the fore. It is believed that the factors affecting success in laminate veneers are multifactorial. Laminate veneers are a con- servative form of treatment and require precise technique and attention. There are various types of preparations applied according to the patient in laminate veneers. Different materials can be used in laminate veneer restorations and require a precise simification procedure. In this article, the effects of these factors on treatment and their role in success are examined.

Anahtar Kelime:

Lamine veneer restorasyonlarda başarıyı etkileyen faktörler

Öz:

Lamine veneerler diş dokusundan minimal preparasyon yapılarak ya da preparasyon uygulanan- madan yapılan restorasyonlardır. Lamine veneerler son zamanlarda hastalardaki estetik kaygıların ön plana çıkmasıyla birlikte diş hekimliğinde oldukça sık uygulanan bir tedavi olmuştur. Fakat bu restorasyonların endikasyonları dikkate alınmalı ve doğru bir tanı ve planlamadan sonra teda- viye karar verilmelidir. Lamine veneerlerin yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte başarı oranları hakkındaki araştırmalar da ön plana çıkmıştır. Lamine veneerlerde başarıyı etkileyen etkenlerin multifaktöri- yel olduğu düşünülmektedir. Lamine veneerler konservatif bir tedavi şeklidir ve hassas bir teknik ve dikkat gerektirir. Lamine veneerlerde hastaya göre uygulanan çeşitli preparasyon türleri vardır. Lamine veneer restorasyonlarında farklı materyaller kullanılabilmektedir ve hassas bir siman- tasyon prosedürü gerektirirler. Bu makalede bu etkenlerin tedaviye etkileri ve başarıdaki rolleri incelenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. McLean JW. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(1):61-66. [CrossRef]
2. Gresnigt MMM, Özcan M, Carvalho M, et al. Effect of luting agent on the load to failure and accelerated-fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater. 2017;33(12):1392-1401. [CrossRef]
3. Calamia JR. The etched porcelain veneer technique. N Y State Dent J. 1988;54(7):48-50.
4. Faunce FR, Faunce AR. The use of laminate veneers for restoration of fractured or discolored teeth. Tex Dent J. 1975;93(8):6-7.
5. Morita RK, Hayashida MF, Pupo YM, Berger G, Reggiani RD, Betiol EA. Minimally invasive laminate veneers: Clinical aspects in treatment planning and cementation procedures. Case Rep Dent. 2016; 2016:1839793. [CrossRef]
6. Calamia J. Effect of coupling agents on bond strength of etched por- celain. J Dent Res. 1984;63:179.
7. Christensen GJ. Thick or thin veneers? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(11):1541-1543. [CrossRef]
8. Nahas de Castro Pinto RC, Chambrone L, Colombini BL, Ishikir - iama SK, Britto IM, Romito GA. Minimally invasive esthetic therapy: A case report describing the advantages of a multidisciplinary approach. Quintessence Int. 2013;44:385-391.
9. Gresnigt MM, Cune MS, de Roos JG, Özcan M. Effect of immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the fracture strength, failure type and Weilbull characteristics of lithiumdisilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater. 2016;32(4):e73-e81. [CrossRef]
10. Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6-to 12-year clinical evaluation – a retrospective study. Int J Perio- dontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25(1):9-17.
11. Calamia JR, Calamia CS. Porcelain laminate veneers: Reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):399-417. [CrossRef]
12. Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Sanderson IR. Microleakage patterns of porcelain and castable ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(3):276-282. [CrossRef]
13. Ferrari M, Patroni S, Balleri P. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(5):407-413.
14. Veneer Ciol. Renk Değişimine ve Erozyona Uğramiş Dişlerde Laminat Veneer.
15. Sheets CG, Taniguchi T. Advantages and limitations in the use of por- celain veneer restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64(4):406-411. [CrossRef]
16. Hui KK, Williams B, Davis EH, Holt RD. A comparative assessment of the strengths of porcelain veneers for incisor teeth dependent on their design characteristics. Br Dent J. 1991;171(2):51-55. [CrossRef]
17. Ustun O, Ozturk AN. The evaluation of stress patterns in porcelain laminate veneers with different restoration designs and loading angles induced by functional loads: a three-dimensional finite ele- ment analysis study. NigerJ Clin Pract. 2018;21(3):337-342. [CrossRef]
18. Magne P, Kwon KR, Belser UC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Crack pro- pensity of porcelain laminate veneers: a simulated operatory evalu- ation. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(3):327-334. [CrossRef]
19. Haralur SB. Microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers cemented with different bonding techniques. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(2): e166-e171. [CrossRef]
20. Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, Jansen K, Van der Made SAM, Özcan M. Randomized clinical trial on indirect resin composite and ceramic laminate veneers: UP to 10-year findings. J Dent. 2019;86:102-109. [CrossRef]
21. Çöterta HS, Dündarb M, Öztürka B. The effect of various preparation designs on the survival of porcelain laminate veneers. margin. 2009;26:38.
22. Stappert CF, Ozden U, Gerds T, Strub JR. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(2):132-139. [CrossRef]
23. KING, Debra Gray. Methods and materials for porcelain veneers. Cur- rent opinion in cosmetic dentistry, 1995, 45-50.
24. Lin TM, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Essig ME, Givan DA, PanYH. Fracture resist- ance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influ- enced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro. J Dent. 2012;40(3):202-209. [CrossRef]
25. Gilmour AS, Stone DC. Porcelain laminate veneers: a clinical suc - cess? Dent Update. 1993;20(4):167-169.
26. Gribble AR. Multiple diastema management: an interdisciplinary approach. J Esthet Restorative Dent. 1994;6(3):97-102. [CrossRef]
27. Rouse JS. Full veneer versus traditional veneer preparation: a discus- sion of interproximal extension. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78(6):545-549. [CrossRef]
28. Chai SY, Bennani V, Aarts JM, Lyons K. Incisal preparation design for ceramic veneers: a critical review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149(1): 25-37. [CrossRef]
29. Clyde JS, Gilmour A. Porcelain veneers: a preliminary review. Br Dent J. 1988;164(1):9-14. [CrossRef]
30. Walls AW, Steele JG, Wassell RW. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: porcelain laminate veneers. Br Dent J. 2002;193(2): 73-76, 79-82. [CrossRef]
31. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH, Phillips K, Nicholls JI, Kois JC. Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(2):171-180. [CrossRef]
32. Alothman Y, Bamasoud MS. The success of dental veneers according to preparation design and material type. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(12):2402-2408. [CrossRef]
33. Hong N, Yang H, Li J, Wu S, Li Y. Effect of preparation designs on the prognosis of porcelain laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent. 2017;42(6):E197-E213. [CrossRef]
34. Troedson M, Dérand T. Effect of margin design, cement polymeriza- tion, and angle of loading on stress in porcelain veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82(5):518-524. [CrossRef]
35. Zarone F, Apicella D, Sorrentino R, Ferro V, Aversa R, Apicella A. Influ- ence of tooth preparation design on the stress distribution in maxil- lary central incisors restored by means of alumina porcelain veneers: a 3D-finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2005;21(12):1178-1188. [CrossRef]
36. Ben-Amar A. Porcelain laminate veneers – for improved aesthetics of anterior teeth. Refuat Hashinayim. 1989;7(1):17-23.
37. Brunton PA, Wilson NH. Preparations for porcelain laminate veneers in general dental practice. Br Dent J. 1998;184(11):553-556. [CrossRef]
38. Nordbø H, Rygh-Thoresen N, Henaug T. Clinical performance of por- celain laminate veneers without incisal overlapping: 3-year results. J Dent. 1994;22(6):342-345. [CrossRef]
39. Boksman L, Jordan RE, Suzuki M, Galil KA, Burgoyne AR. Etched por- celain labial veneers. Ont Dent. 1985;62(1):11, 13, 15-19.
40. Gilmour AS, Stone DC. Porcelain laminate veneers: a clinical suc - cess? Dent Update. 1993;20(4):167-169.
41. Garber D. Porcelain laminate veneers: ten years later Part I: tooth preparation. J Esthet Restorative Dent. 1993;5:57-62.
42. Garber DA. Rational tooth preparation for porcelain laminate veneers. Compend (Newtown Pa). 1991;12(316):318, 320 passim-316, 318, 320 passim.
43. Dumfahrt H, Schäffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II – clinical results. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(1):9-18.
44. Albanesi RB, Pigozzo MN, Sesma N, Laganá DC, Morimoto S. Incisal coverage or not in ceramic laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;52:1-7. [CrossRef]
45. Bergoli CD, Meira JBC, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Survival rate, load to fracture, and finite element analysis of incisors and canines restored with ceramic veneers having varied preparation design. Oper Dent. 2014;39(5):530-540. [CrossRef]
46. Magne P, Douglas WH. Design optimization and evolution of bonded ceramics for the anterior dentition: a finite-element analysis. Quin- tessence Int. 1999;30(10):661-672.
47. Li Z, Yang Z, Zuo L, Meng Y. A three-dimensional finite element study on anterior laminate veneers with different incisal preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(2):325-333. [CrossRef]
48. Alshehri SA. An investigation into the role of core porcelain thickness and lamination in determining the flexural strength of in-ceram den- tal materials. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(4):261-266. [CrossRef]
49. Reitemeier B, Hänsel K, Kastner C, Walter MH. Metal-ceramic failure in noble metal crowns: 7-year results of a prospective clinical trial in private practices. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(4):397-399.
50. Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal–ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(suppl 3):86-96. [CrossRef]
51. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000;28(3):163-177. [CrossRef]
52. Seymour KG, Cherukara GP, Samarawickrama DY. Stresses within porcelain veneers and the composite lute using different preparation designs. J Prosthodont. 2001;10(1):16-21. [CrossRef]
53. Layton DM, Walton TR. The up to 21-year clinical outcome and sur- vival of feldspathic porcelain veneers: accounting for clustering. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25(6):604-612.
54. Calamia JR. Etched porcelain facial veneers: a new treatment modal- ity based on scientific and clinical evidence. N Y J Dent. 1983;53(6): 255-259.
55. Nicholls JI. Tensile bond of resin cements to porcelain veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;60(4):443-447. [CrossRef]
56. Stacey GD. A shear stress analysis of the bonding of porcelain veneers to enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70(5):395-402. [CrossRef]
57. Horn HR. A new lamination: porcelain bonded to enamel. N Y State Dent J. 1983;49(6):401-403.
58. Plant CG, Thomas GD. Porcelain facings: a simple clinical and labora- tory method. Br Dent J. 1987;163(7):231-234. [CrossRef]
59. Yen TW, Blackman RB, Baez RJ. Effect of acid etching on the flexural strength of a feldspathic porcelain and a castable glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70(3):224-233. [CrossRef]
60. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(3):227-235. [CrossRef]
61. Höland W, Schweiger M, Watzke R, Peschke A, Kappert H. Ceramics as biomaterials for dental restoration. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(6):729-745. [CrossRef]
62. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(3):265-273. [CrossRef]
63. Romanini-Junior JC, Kumagai RY, Ortega LF, et al. Adhesive/silane application effects on bond strength durability to a lithium disilicate ceramic. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(4):346-351. [CrossRef]
64. Morimoto S, Albanesi RB, Sesma N, Agra CM, Braga MM. Main clinical outcomes of feldspathic porcelain and glass-ceramic laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and com- plication rates. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(1):38-49. [CrossRef]
65. Karaagaclioglu L, Yilmaz B. Influence of cement shade and water storage on the final color of leucite-reinforced ceramics. Oper Dent. 2008;33(4):386-391. [CrossRef]
66. Carossa S, Lombardo S, Pera P, Corsalini M, Rastello ML, Preti PG. Influence of posts and cores on light transmission through different all-ceramic crowns: spectrophotometric and clinical evaluation. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(1):9-14.
67. Vafaei F, Izadi A, Abbasi S, Farhadian M, Bagheri Z. Comparison of optical properties of laminate veneers made of Zolid FX and katana UTML zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics. Front Dent. 2019; 16(5):357-368. [CrossRef]
68. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate--, alumina-, and zirconia-based three- unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(3):231-238.
69. Guess PC, Att W, Strub JR. Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(5):633-645. [CrossRef]
70. Papaspyridakos P, Lal K. Immediate loading of the maxilla with pre- fabricated interim prosthesis using interactive planning software, and CAD/CAM rehabilitation with definitive zirconia prosthesis: 2-year clinical follow-up. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010;22(4):223-232. [CrossRef]
71. Weinberg LA. Tooth preparation for porcelain laminates. N Y State Dent J. 1989;55(5):25-28.
72. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stan- ford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(1):10-15. [CrossRef]
73. Shah K, Holloway JA, Denry IL. Effect of coloring with various metal oxides on the microstructure, color, and flexural strength of 3Y-TZP. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;87(2):329-337. [CrossRef]
74. Baldissara P, Llukacej A, Ciocca L, Valandro FL, Scotti R. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems. J Pros- thet Dent. 2010;104(1):6-12. [CrossRef]
75. Haralur SB. Microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers cemented with different bonding techniques. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(2): e166-e171. [CrossRef]
76. Giordano R, McLaren EA. Ceramics overview: classification by micro- structure and processing methods. Compend Contin Educ Dent (Jamesburg NJ 1995). 2010;31(682-684):686, 688 passim; quiz 698, 700.
77. Layton DM, Clarke M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of non-feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2013;26(2):111-124. [CrossRef]
78. Meijering AC, Roeters FJ, Mulder J, Creugers NH. Patients’ satisfac- tionwithdifferenttypesofveneerrestorations.JDent.1997;25(6):493- 497. [CrossRef]
79. Nalbandian S, Millar BJ. The effect of veneers on cosmetic improve- ment. Br Dent J. 2009;207(2):E3. [CrossRef]
80. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000;28(3):163-177. [CrossRef]
81. Gurel G, Morimoto S, Calamita MA, Coachman C, Sesma N. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers: outcomes of the aes - thetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT) technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32(6):625-635.
82. Hitz T, Stawarczyk B, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. Are self-adhe- sive resin cements a valid alternative to conventional resin cements? A laboratory study of the long-term bond strength. Dent Mater. 2012;28(11):1183-1190. [CrossRef]
83. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(2): 127-134. [CrossRef]
84. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Spec No):60D-76D.
85. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Toksavul S, Vallittu PK. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(2):128-133. [CrossRef]
86. Addison O, Fleming GJ. The influence of cement lute, thermocycling and surface preparation on the strength of a porcelain laminate veneering material. Dent Mater. 2004;20(3):286-292. [CrossRef]
87. Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater. 2009;25(8):960-968. [CrossRef]
88. Sundfeld Neto D, Naves LZ, Costa AR, et al. The effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration on the bond strength and morphology of the surface and interface of glass ceramics to a resin cement. Oper Dent. 2015;40(5):470-479. [CrossRef]
89. Kameyama A, Bonroy K, Elsen C, et al. Luting of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: direct composite versus dual-cure luting cement. Bio Med Mater Eng. 2015;25(3):279-288. [CrossRef]
90. Kameyama A, Bonroy K, Elsen C, et al. Luting of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: direct composite versus dual-cure luting cement. Bio Med Mater Eng. 2015;25(3):279-288. [CrossRef]
91. Gregor L, Bouillaguet S, Onisor I, Ardu S, Krejci I, Rocca GT. Micro- hardness of light-and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(4): 942-948. [CrossRef]
92. Linden JJ, Swift Jr EJ, Boyer DB, Davis BK. Photo-activation of resin cements through porcelain veneers. J Dent Res. 1991;70(2):154-157. [CrossRef]
93. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res. 1987;66(9):1460-1465. [CrossRef]
94. Wakiaga J, Brunton P, Silikas N, Glenny AM. Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD004347. [CrossRef]
95. Hekimoğlu C, Anıl N, Etikan I. Effect of accelerated aging on the color stability of cemented laminate veneers. IntJ Prosthodont. 2000;13(1): 29-33.
96. Heydecke G, Zhang F, Razzoog ME. In vitro color stability of double- layer veneers after accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(6): 551-557. [CrossRef]
97. Sidhu SK, Carrick TE, McCabe JF. Temperature mediated coefficient of dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2004;20(5):435-440. [CrossRef]

APA	Şencan B, Yanıkoğlu N (2023). Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. , 58 - 65. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
Chicago	Şencan Beyza Betül,Yanıkoğlu Nuran Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. (2023): 58 - 65. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
MLA	Şencan Beyza Betül,Yanıkoğlu Nuran Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. , 2023, ss.58 - 65. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
AMA	Şencan B,Yanıkoğlu N Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. . 2023; 58 - 65. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
Vancouver	Şencan B,Yanıkoğlu N Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. . 2023; 58 - 65. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
IEEE	Şencan B,Yanıkoğlu N "Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations." , ss.58 - 65, 2023. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
ISNAD	Şencan, Beyza Betül - Yanıkoğlu, Nuran. "Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations". (2023), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550

APA	Şencan B, Yanıkoğlu N (2023). Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. Current research in dental sciences (Online), 33(1), 58 - 65. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
Chicago	Şencan Beyza Betül,Yanıkoğlu Nuran Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. Current research in dental sciences (Online) 33, no.1 (2023): 58 - 65. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
MLA	Şencan Beyza Betül,Yanıkoğlu Nuran Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. Current research in dental sciences (Online), vol.33, no.1, 2023, ss.58 - 65. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
AMA	Şencan B,Yanıkoğlu N Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. Current research in dental sciences (Online). 2023; 33(1): 58 - 65. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
Vancouver	Şencan B,Yanıkoğlu N Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations. Current research in dental sciences (Online). 2023; 33(1): 58 - 65. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
IEEE	Şencan B,Yanıkoğlu N "Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations." Current research in dental sciences (Online), 33, ss.58 - 65, 2023. 10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550
ISNAD	Şencan, Beyza Betül - Yanıkoğlu, Nuran. "Factors that affect the success of laminate veneer restorations". Current research in dental sciences (Online) 33/1 (2023), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.1030550