Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans

Fatih DOĞAN (Boş)
Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences
2 1
Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 19 - 25 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans

Öz:
Türkiye’de mesleğini serbest klinisyen olarak icra eden Veteriner Hekimlere ulaşılarak meslek hayatları boyunca yaşadıkları ters ilaç reaksiyonları araştırılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırma 22 farklı ilde çalışan 13 farklı üniversite mezunu 250 katılımcı klinisyen veteriner hekimle yüz yüze görüşülerek gerçekleştirildi. Araştırmada klinisyen veteriner hekimlere farmakovijilans hakkında verilen ön bilgiyi takiben bu konudaki tecrübelerini paylaşmaları istendi. Bulgular: Hekimlerin %81’inin en az bir ters ilaç reaksiyonuna rastladığı belirlendi. İlaç grupları değerlendirildiğinde en çok (p<0.05) vitamin-mineral-aminoasit preparatlarının (%39) ters ilaç reaksiyonlarına neden olduğu, bu grubu antibakteriyel (%26) ve antiparaziterlerin (%26) takip ettiği tespit edildi. En sık gözlenen ters ilaç reaksiyonları ise anafilaksi ve enjeksiyon bölgesinde lokal reaksiyonlar olarak ifade edildi. Öneri: Ters ilaç reaksiyonları raporlarının toplanabilmesi için spontane raporlama sistemine ve bu raporların toplanıp değerlendirileceği bir merkezin olması gerektiği belirlendi. Gelişen ters ilaç reaksiyonlarının ise veteriner hekimliği alanında faaliyet gösteren özel ve tüzel kişilere bildirilmesinin faydalı olacağı kanaatine varıldı.
Anahtar Kelime: yan etkiler ilaçların etkileri farmakodinamik veteriner hekimlik farmakoloji anaflaksi

Konular: Alerji Veterinerlik

-

Öz:
The practising clinical veterinarians in Turkey were questioned about their opinions and experiences on adverse drug reactions. Materials and Methods: The research was applied on 250 clinic veterinarian who graduated from 13 different universities working in 22 different cities. It was expected that veterinarians shared their experiences in research, after pharmacovigilance was mentioned. Results: 81% of veterinarians had experienced at least one adverse drug reaction. When the drug groups were evaluated, most adverse drug reactions were determined (p<0.05) in vitamin-mineral-amino acid preparates (39%), and this group was followed by antibacterials (26%) and antiparasitics (26%). The most observed adverse drug reactions were anaphylaxis and the local reactions on the injected region. Conclusion: It is confirmed that, a center where the adverse drug reaction reports could be evaluated and a spontaneous reporting system is needed. It is decided that it would be beneficial to report adverse drug reaction cases to the authorized veterinarians under circumstances of these cases.
Anahtar Kelime: pharmacology anaphylaxis adverse effects drug effects pharmacodynamics veterinary medicine

Konular: Alerji Veterinerlik
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abdullah AS, Sheikh-Omar AR, Baggot JD, Zamri M, 1984. Adverse effects of imidocarb dipropionate (Imizol) in a dog (abstract). Vet Res Commun, 8, 55-59.
  • AHFS Drug Information 2001. American Society of Health- System Pharmacists, MD, USA.
  • Altan F, Elmas M, Er A, Uney K, Cetin G, Tras B, Yazar E, 2010. Effects of drugs on kinetic values of cytokines, adenosine deaminase and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F2α in endotoxemia: A different approach. Eurasian J Vet Sci, 26, 15-19
  • Anonim, 1996. Note for Guidance: Pharmacovigilance of Veterinary Medicinal Products. Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Product, Veterinary Medicine Evaluation Unit., EMEA/CVMP/183/96-FINAL.
  • Anonim, 2008a. http://www.apvma.gov.au/qa/aer95. shtml. Erişim tarihi: 18.12.2008.
  • Anonim, 2008b. http://www.safefetus.com/. Erişim tarihi: 31.12.2008.
  • Anonim, 2008c. http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/vet/ mrls/enro01en.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 31.12.2008.
  • Chen RT, 2004. Evaluation of vaccine safety after the events of 11 September 2001: role of cohort and case-control studies. Vaccine, 22, 2047–2053.
  • Das BP, Rauniar GP, Bhattacharya SK, 2006. Medical errors challenges for the healt professionals: need of Pharmacovigilance to prevent. J Nepal Med Assoc, 45, 273-278.
  • De Giovanni N, d’Aloja E, 2001. Death due to baclofen and dipyrone ingestion. Forensic Sci Int, 123, 26-32.
  • Dowling PM, 2006. Amimoglycosides, in: Antimicrobial Therapy, Eds; Giguere S, Prescott JF, Baggot JD, Walker RD, Dowling PM, 4th edition, Blackwell, UK, pp:207-229.
  • Dyer F, Mulugeta R, Weaver MS, Tait A, 2004. Suspected adverse reactions, 2003. Vet Rec, 154, 806-808.
  • Dyer F, Mulugeta R, Weaver MS, Tait A, 2005. Suspected adverse reactions, 2004. Vet Rec, 156, 561-563.
  • Ergün H, Frattarelli DAC, Aranda JV, Tulunay FC, 2003. Letter to the editor. Forensic Sci Int, 132, 233-234.
  • Evans SJW, 2000. Pharmacovigilance: a science or fielding emergencies?. Stat Med, 19, 3199-3209.
  • Frana TS, Elsken LA, Karli SA, 2006. Summary of adverse event reports for veterinary biologic products received by the USDA from 1999 through 2005. JAVMA, 7, 1100- 1102.
  • Gehring R, 2001. Suspected adverse reactions to veterinary drugs reported in South Africa (January 1998-february 2001). J S Afr Vet Ass, 72, 120-126.
  • Giguere S, 2006a. Tetracyclines and glycylcylines, in: Antimicrobial Therapy, Eds; Giguere S, Prescott JF, Baggot JD, Walker RD, Dowling PM, 4th edition, Blackwell, UK, pp:231-204.
  • Giguere S 2006b. Macrolides, azalides, and ketolies, in: Antimicrobial Therapy, Eds; Giguere S, Prescott JF, Baggot JD, Walker RD, Dowling PM, 4th edition, Blackwell, UK, pp:191-240.
  • Gray AK, 1994. Suspected adverse reaction surveillance scheme 1992: summary of results. Vet Rec, 135, 77-81.
  • Gray A, 1997. Experience the UK pharmacovigilance scheme since harmonization and highlights of current problem. Proceeding 2nd International Symposium on Veterinary Pharmacovigilance. 29-30.09.1997, BGVV Berlin, Germany.
  • Gary AK, Knivett S, 2002. Suspected adverse reactions, 2001. Vet Rec, 151, 749-752.
  • Gray AK, Kidd AR, Obrien O, Evans CW, 1989. Suspected adverse reactions to medicines during 1988. Vet Rec, 124, 286-287.
  • Gross U, 2003. Treatment of microsporidiosis including albendazole. Parasitol Res, 90, Supp 1, 14-18.
  • Hampshire VA, Doddy FM, Post LO, Koogler TL, Burgess TM, Batten PO, Hudson R, McAdams DR, Brown MA, 2004. Adverse drug event reports at the United States Food and Drug Administration Center for veterinary medicine. JAVMA, 225, 533-536.
  • Hoigne R, Zoppi M, Sollberger J, Hess T, Fritschy D, 1986. Fall in systolic blood pressure due to metamizol (dipyrone, noramidopyrine, novaminsulfone). Results from the Comprehensive Hospital Drug Monitoring Berne (CHDMB). Agents Actions, 19,189-195.
  • Ibrahim C, 1997. Introduction to the German pharmacovigilance system with a special view on ADR report received during the past 3 years. Proceeding 2nd International Symposium on Veterinary Pharmacovigilance. 29-30.09.1997, BGVV Berlin, Germany.
  • Jaszczuk E, Graczyk M, Oszukowski P, Brzezinski P, 1999. Anaphylactic shock leading to death in a young woman after oral administration of metamizole (Pyralginum- Polfa), case report, (Abstract). Przegl Lek, 56, 175-176.
  • Kaya S, 2002a. Vitaminler, in: Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakoloji, Eds; Kaya S, Pirinçci İ, Bilgili A, cilt 2, baskı 3, Medisan, Ankara.
  • Kaya S, 2002b. Antelmintikler, in: Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakoloji, Eds; Kaya S, Pirinçci İ, Bilgili A, cilt 2, baskı 3, Medisan, Ankara.
  • Kayaalp SO, 2002. Farmakovijilans, in: Klinik Farmakolojinin Esasları ve Temel Düzenlemeler, baskı 2, Hacettepe- Taş, Feryal Matbaacılık, Sıhhiye, Ankara.
  • Keck G, Ibrahim C, 2001. Veterinary pharmacovigilance: between regulation and science. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 24, 369-373.
  • Köklü A, 2008. Serbest veteriner hekim, Konya (Kişisel görüşme). Linnett P, 2006. APVMA veterinary pharmacovigilance program: suspected adverse experience reports for 2005. Aust Vet J, 84, 418-420.
  • Maddison JE, 1992. Adverse drug reactions: report of Australian Veterinary Association Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee, 1992. Aust Vet J, 69, 288-291.
  • Maddison JE, 1996. Adverse drug reactions: report of Australian Veterinary Association Adverse Drug Reaction Subcommittee, 1994. Aust Vet J, 73, 132-136.
  • Müntener CR, Bruckner L, Gassner B, Sturer A, Demuth DC, Althaus FR, Zwahlen R, 2007. Reported adverse reactions due to veterinary drugs in 2006, (Abstract). Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd, 149, 439-448.
  • Naidoo V, 2003. Overview of suspected adverse reactions to veterinary medicinal products reported in South Africa (March 2002-February 2003). J S Afr Vet Ass, 74, 137-140.
  • Naidoo V, Gehring R, 2002. Overview of suspected adverse reactions to veterinary medicinal products reported in South Africa (March 2001-February 2002). J S Afr Vet Ass, 73, 227-229.
  • Naidoo V, Sykes R, 2005. Overview of suspected adverse reactions to veterinary medicinal products reported in South Africa (March 2003-February 2004). J S Afr Vet Ass, 76, 49-52.
  • Naidoo V, Sykes R, 2006. Overview of suspected adverse reactions to veterinary medicinal products reported in South Africa (March 2004-February 2005). J S Afr Vet Ass, 77, 164-167.
  • Papich MG, 2002. Saunders Handbook of Veterinary Drugs. Sounders company, London, UK.
  • Raguet Y, Keck G, Vassalo N, 1995. Accident consecutifs aux traitements hors lactation chez la vache laitiere (abstract). Bulletin GTV, 1, 21-28.
  • Resmi Gazete, 2002. 23 Ekim 2002, Sayı 24915 Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı. Veteriner İspençiyari ve Tıbbi Müstahzarlar Yönetmeliği ve 27.03.2002 tarihli ve 24708 sayılı Resmi Gazetede yayımlanan Özel Hastaneler yönetmeliği.
  • Tjalve H, 1997a. The Swedich experience: cooperation with university pharmacology/toxicology department and important drug reactions reported within the pharmacovigilance system. Proceeding 2nd International Symposium on Veterinary Pharmacovigilance. 29- 30.09.1997, BGVV, Berlin, Germany.
  • Tjalve H, 1997b. Adverse reactions to veterinary drugs reported in Sweden during 1991-1995. Vet Pharmacol Ther, 20, 105-110.
  • Toman M, Krejci J, Pinka K, Mensik P, 1992. Causes of anaphylactoid reactions in cattle after administration of lipoid preparations (abstract). Vet Med (Praha), 37, 417-426.
  • Traş B, Yazar E, Elmas M, 2007. Veteriner Hekimliğinde İlaç Kullanımına Pratik ve Akılcı Yaklaşım, 2. Baskı, Olgun Ofset Matbaa, Konya.
  • Woodward KN, 2005a. Veterinary pharmacovigilance. Part 2. Veterinary pharmacovigilance in practice – the operation of a spontaneous reporting scheme in a European Union country – the UK, and schemes in other countries. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 28, 149–170.
  • Woodward KN, 2005b. Veterinary pharmacovigilance. Part 3. Adverse effects of veterinary medicinal products in animals and on the environment. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 28, 171–184.
  • Woodward KN, 2005c. Veterinary pharmacovigilance. Part 6. Predictability of adverse reactions in animals from laboratory toxicology studies. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 28, 213-231.
APA DOĞAN f (2011). Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans. , 19 - 25.
Chicago DOĞAN fatih Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans. (2011): 19 - 25.
MLA DOĞAN fatih Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans. , 2011, ss.19 - 25.
AMA DOĞAN f Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans. . 2011; 19 - 25.
Vancouver DOĞAN f Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans. . 2011; 19 - 25.
IEEE DOĞAN f "Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans." , ss.19 - 25, 2011.
ISNAD DOĞAN, fatih. "Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans". (2011), 19-25.
APA DOĞAN f (2011). Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 27(1), 19 - 25.
Chicago DOĞAN fatih Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 27, no.1 (2011): 19 - 25.
MLA DOĞAN fatih Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, vol.27, no.1, 2011, ss.19 - 25.
AMA DOĞAN f Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2011; 27(1): 19 - 25.
Vancouver DOĞAN f Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2011; 27(1): 19 - 25.
IEEE DOĞAN f "Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans." Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 27, ss.19 - 25, 2011.
ISNAD DOĞAN, fatih. "Veteriner Hekimliğinde Farmakovijilans". Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 27/1 (2011), 19-25.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
07-05-2024 7:27

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları