One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth

Turkun, L. Sebnem; Lukarcanin, Jusuf; SADIKOĞLU, İSMAİL SERHAT; Türkün, Murat

One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth

Jusuf Lukarcanin, (Özel Muayenehane, İzmir, Türkiye)

İsmail Serhat SADIKOĞLU, (Lefke Avrupa Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Lefke, Kıbrıs)

Şebnem TÜRKÜN, (Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye)

Murat TÜRKÜN (Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye)

Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi

4 1

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 205 - 210 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 04-06-2023

One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth

Öz:

Introduction: Laboratory studies were demonstrated promising performances of fiber-reinforced materials with respect to fracture resistance and polymerization shrinkage, especially for non-vital teeth restorations. However, few clinical trials on this topic had been published. The aim of the present study is to investigate the clinical performance of short glass-fiber reinforced composite restorations. Methods: Thirty patients with root canal treated and temporarily filled molars include in this study. Half of them were restored with short glass-fiber reinforced composite restorations while the other half was restored with a nanohybrid resin composite only. Modified USPHS (US Public Health Service) criteria were used to evaluate restorations by two restorative dentistry specialist, at baseline, 6th month and 12th-month control sessions. Mc-Nemar test was used to compare baseline scores and control scores in the 6th and 12th months. Results: Although the restorations performed showed slight changes according to the marginal integrity, marginal coloration and anatomical form criteria, these changes did not create a significant difference between the groups (p> 0.05). Discussion and Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, all restorations were provided adequate aesthetics and function during the 12-month follow-up regardless of fiber reinforcement.

Anahtar Kelime:

Endodontik Tedavili Dişlerde Kısaltılmış Cam Fiber Destekli ve Desteksiz Direkt Posterior Kompozit Restorasyonların Bir Yıllık Klinik Değerlendirmesi

Öz:

Giriş ve Amaç: Devital dişlerin restorasyonlarında fiber ile desteklenmiş malzemelerin özellikle kırılma direnci ve polimerizasyon büzülmesi üzerindeki umut verici performansları çeşitli in vitro çalışmalar ile göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte, bu konuyla ilgili yayınlanan klinik çalışma sayısı konunun önemine kıyasla oldukça azdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kısa cam fiberler ile desteklenmiş kompozit rezin restorasyonların klinik performansını araştırmaktır. Yöntem ve Gereçler: Bu çalışmaya kanal tedavili ve geçici dolgulu azı dişlerine sahip 30 hasta dahil edilmiştir. Yarısı kısaltılmış cam fiber destekli kompozit restorasyonlarla restore edilirken, diğer yarısı ise sadece nanohibrit rezin kompozitler ile restore edilmiştir. Klinik performansı değerlendirmek amacıyla Modifiye USPHS (ABD Halk Sağlığı Servisi) kriterleri iki restoratif diş hekimliği uzmanı tarafından başlangıç, 6. ay ve 12. ay kontrol seanslarında olmak üzere 3 defa kullanıldı. Skorlar arasındaki farkın istatistiksel analizi için ise için Mc-Nemar testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Yapılan restorasyonlar marjinal bütünlük, marjinal renklenme ve anatomik form kriterlerine göre küçük değişiklikler gösterse de bu değişiklikler gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark yaratmadı (p> 0.05). Tartışma ve Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sınırları dahilinde, fiber takviyesine bakılmaksızın tüm restorasyonlara 12 aylık takip süresince yeterli estetik ve fonksiyon sağlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Adolphi G, Zehnder M, Bachmann L, Göhring T. Direct resin composite restorations in vital versus root-filled posterior teeth: a controlled comparative long-term follow-up. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 437-442.
2. Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 458-467.
3. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 583-609.
4. VȦrlan C, Dimitriu B, VȦrlan V, Bodnar D, Suciu I. Current opinions concerning the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: basic principles. J Med life 2009; 2: 165.
5. Kayahan MB, Malkondu Ö, Canpolat C, Kaptan F, Bayırlı G, Kazazoglu E. Periapical health related to the type of coronal restorations and quality of root canal fillings in a Turkish subpopulation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: e58-e62.
6. Tronstad L, Asbjørnsen K, Døving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen H. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Traumatol 2000; 16: 218-221.
7. McComb D. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Ensuring Countinuing Trust– DISPATCH 2008: 1-20.
8. Keulemans F, Garoushi S, Lassila L. Fillings and core build-ups. A Clinical Guide to Fibre Reinforced Composites (FRCs) in Dentistry: Elsevier; 2017. p. 131-163.
9. Stenhagen S, Skeie H, Bårdsen A, Laegreid T. Influence of the coronal restoration on the outcome of endodontically treated teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 2020; 78: 81-86.
10. Bijelic-Donova J, Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Keulemans F, Vallittu PK. Mechanical and structural characterization of discontinuous fiber-reinforced dental resin composite. J Dent 2016; 52: 70-78.
11. Atalay C, Yazici A, Horuztepe A, Nagas E, Ertan A, Ozgunaltay G. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bulk fill, bulk fill flowable, fiber-reinforced, and conventional resin composite. Oper Dent 2016; 41: E131-E40.
12. Van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study. J Dent 2016; 51: 29-35.
13. Yazici A, Antonson S, Kutuk Z, Ergin E. Thirty-six- month clinical comparison of bulk fill and nanofill composite restorations. Oper. Dent. 2017; 42: 478- 485.
14. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service; 1971.
15. Konde S, Raj S, Jaiswal D. Clinical evaluation of a new art material: Nanoparticulated resin-modified glass ionomer cement. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2012; 2: 42.
16. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14: 349-366.
17. Ástvaldsdóttir Á, Dagerhamn J, van Dijken JW, Naimi-Akbar A, Sandborgh-Englund G, Tranaeus S, et al. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults–A systematic review. J Dent 2015; 43: 934-954.
18. Opdam N, Van De Sande F, Bronkhorst E, Cenci M, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 943-949.
19. Neppelenbroek K H. The clinical challenge of achieving marginal adaptation in direct and indirect restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 2015; 23: 448-449.
20. Sadeghi M, Lynch CD, Shahamat N. Eighteen month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 532-537.
21. Frascino S, Fagundes T, Silva U, Rahal V, Barboza A, Santos P, et al. Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial of Class II Restorations Using Low-shrinkage Flowable Resin Composite Oper Dent 2020; 45: 19- 29.
22. Nicheva S, Filipov I. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth With Direct and Indirect Composite–6-Months Results. Journal of IMAB– Annual Proceeding Scientific Papers 2013; 19: 396- 400.
23. Sharafeddin F, Yousefi H, Modiri S, Tondari A, Jahromi SS. Microleakage of Posterior Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts Using two Adhesives after ging. J Dent 2013; 14: 90.
24. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans M-CD. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study. J Dent 2012; 40: 829-835.
25. Kemaloglu H, Karacolak G, Turkun LSJJoE. Can reduced step polishers be as effective as multiple step polishers in enhancing surface smoothness? J Esth Restor Dent 2017; 29: 31-40.

APA	Lukarcanin J, SADIKOĞLU İ, Turkun L, Türkün M (2022). One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth. , 205 - 210.
Chicago	Lukarcanin Jusuf,SADIKOĞLU İSMAİL SERHAT,Turkun L. Sebnem,Türkün Murat One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth. (2022): 205 - 210.
MLA	Lukarcanin Jusuf,SADIKOĞLU İSMAİL SERHAT,Turkun L. Sebnem,Türkün Murat One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth. , 2022, ss.205 - 210.
AMA	Lukarcanin J,SADIKOĞLU İ,Turkun L,Türkün M One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth. . 2022; 205 - 210.
Vancouver	Lukarcanin J,SADIKOĞLU İ,Turkun L,Türkün M One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth. . 2022; 205 - 210.
IEEE	Lukarcanin J,SADIKOĞLU İ,Turkun L,Türkün M "One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth." , ss.205 - 210, 2022.
ISNAD	Lukarcanin, Jusuf vd. "One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth". (2022), 205-210.

APA	Lukarcanin J, SADIKOĞLU İ, Turkun L, Türkün M (2022). One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, 43(3), 205 - 210.
Chicago	Lukarcanin Jusuf,SADIKOĞLU İSMAİL SERHAT,Turkun L. Sebnem,Türkün Murat One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi 43, no.3 (2022): 205 - 210.
MLA	Lukarcanin Jusuf,SADIKOĞLU İSMAİL SERHAT,Turkun L. Sebnem,Türkün Murat One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, vol.43, no.3, 2022, ss.205 - 210.
AMA	Lukarcanin J,SADIKOĞLU İ,Turkun L,Türkün M One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi. 2022; 43(3): 205 - 210.
Vancouver	Lukarcanin J,SADIKOĞLU İ,Turkun L,Türkün M One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi. 2022; 43(3): 205 - 210.
IEEE	Lukarcanin J,SADIKOĞLU İ,Turkun L,Türkün M "One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth." Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, 43, ss.205 - 210, 2022.
ISNAD	Lukarcanin, Jusuf vd. "One Year Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations With and Without Short Glass-Fiber Reinforcement in Endodontically Treated Teeth". Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi 43/3 (2022), 205-210.