Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea

Dilara KAYNAR, (Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Devrekani TOBB MYO, Veterinerlik Bölümü, Kastamonu, Türkiye)
Binali ÇOMAKLI (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Erzurum, Türkiye)
Research in agricultural sciences
6 0
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 54 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 81 - 88 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084 İndeks Tarihi: 05-06-2023

Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea

Öz:
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of two different doses (B0 or B1) of phosp horus-solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus megaterium M-3) inoculation, two different doses (0 or 3 t ha−1) of poultry manure, and three different doses (0, 50, and 100 kg P 2O5 ha−1) of commercially available phosphorus fertilizer on the dry matter yield, plant height, crude protein, neutral deter- gent fiber, and acid detergent fiber contents of forage pea in the irrigated condition of Erzurum between 2009 and 2010. While the effects of bacteria inoculation and poultry manure applica- tions on dry matter yield varied over the years, an increase was observed in dry matter yield with increasing doses of phosphorus fertilizer. In addition, considering the 2-year averages, the highest dry matter yield considering the 2-year averages was obtained with the application of bacteria, poultry manure, and phosphorus fertilization together. Therefore, in order to obtain the highest dry hay yield in Erzurum and similar ecological conditions with low and/or medium phosphorus content in the soil and irrigated, Bacillus megaterium inoculation and 3 t ha −1 poultry manure together with 100 kg ha−1 P2O5 application can be recommended.
Anahtar Kelime:

Çeşitli Fosfor Kaynaklarının Yem Bezelyesinde Kuru Ot Verimi ve Kalite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri

Öz:
Bu deneme, iki farklı dozda (B0 veya B1) fosfor çözücü bakteri (Bacillus megaterium M-3) aşılaması, iki farklı dozda (0 veya 3 t ha−1) tavuk gübresi ve 3 farklı dozda (0, 50 ve 100 kg P2O5 ha−1) ticari fos- forlu gübre uygulamasının yem bezelyesinin kuru madde verimi, bitki boyu, ham protein, NDF ve ADF içerikleri üzerine etkilerini değerlendirmek amacıyla 2009–2010 yılları arasında Erzurum'da sulu koşullarda yürütülmüştür. Bakteri aşılaması ve tavuk gübresi uygulamalarının kuru madde verimi üzerine etkileri yıllara göre değişirken, artan dozlarda fosforlu gübre uygulaması ile kuru madde veriminde artış gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca iki yıllık ortalamalar dikkate alındığında en yüksek kuru madde verimi bakteri, tavuk gübresi ve fosforlu gübrelemenin birlikte uygulanması ile elde edil- miştir. Bu nedenle, toprakta düşük ve/veya orta düzeyde fosfor içeriğine sahip, sulanan Erzurum ve benzer ekolojik koşullarda en yüksek kuru madde verimini elde etmek için Bacillus megaterium aşılaması ile beraber 3 t ha−1 tavuk gübresi ve 100 kg ha−1 P2O5 uygulaması önerilebilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abbas, Z., Zia, M. A., Ali, S., Abbas, Z., Waheed, A., Bahadur, A., & Sultan, T. (2013). Integrated effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, phosphate solubilizing bacteria and chemical fertilizers on growth of maize original research article. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 6(13), 913–921
  • Almaz, M. G., Halim, R. A., & Martini, M. Y. (2017). Effect of combined appli- cation of poultry manure and inorganic fertiliser on yield and yield components of maize intercropped with soybean. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, 40(1), 173–183
  • Amba, A. A., Agbo, E. B., Voncir, N., & Oyawoye, M. O. (2011). Effect of phos- phorus fertilizer on some soil chemical properties and nitrogen fixa- tion of legumes at Bauchi. Continental Journal of Agricultural Science, 5(1), 39–44.
  • Azmi, F. M., Tajudin, N. S., & Shahari, R. (2019). Effects of different poultry manure rates of on early growth of fig (Ficus carica). Environmental Contaminants Reviews (ECR), 2(1), 19–22.
  • Belete, S., Bezabih, M., Abdulkadir, B., Tolera, A., Mekonnen, K., & Wolde- Meskel, E. (2019). Inoculation and phosphorus fertilizer improve food-feed traits of grain legumes in mixed crop-livestock systems of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 279, 58–64. [CrossRef]
  • Budak, F., & Budak, F. (2014). Yem bitkilerinde kalite ve yem bitkileri kali- tesini etkileyen faktörler. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, 1, 1–6.
  • Chauhan, P. K., Upadhyay, S. K., Tripathi, M., Singh, R., Krishna, D., Singh, S. K., & Dwivedi, P. (2022). Understanding the salinity stress on plant and developing sustainable management strategies mediated salt- tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and CRISPR/Cas9. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 17, 1–37. [CrossRef]
  • Chen, Q., & Liu, S. (2019). Identification and characterization of the phos- phate-solubilizing bacterium Pantoea sp. S32 in reclamation soil in Shanxi, China. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10(2171), 2171. [CrossRef]
  • Chukwu, G. O., Tarfa, B. D., & Amapu, I. Y. (2014). Linking pedology and extension: Emerging trend in optimizing fertilizer recommendations and sustaining soil health in Nigeria. Sky Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 3(5), 42–49.
  • Çelik, A., Bellitürk, K.,Sakin, E. (2020). Agriculture friendly bio fertilisers in waste management: Vermicompost and biochar. In M. F. Baran(Eds.), New approaches and applications in agriculture (pp. 302-328). Iksad Publications.
  • Debele, R. D. (2021). The effect of integrated organic and inorganic ferti- lizer on soil fertility and productivity. Journal of Ecology and Natural Resources, 5(3), 1–6.
  • Eleduma, A. F., Aderibigbe, A. T. B., & Obabire, S. O. (2020). Effect of cattle manure on the performances of maize (Zea mays L) grown in forest- savannah transition zone Southwest Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology, 6(1), 110–114. [CrossRef]
  • Gee, G. W., & Hortage, K. H. (1986). Methods of soil analysis. Part I. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller & D. R. Keeney (Eds.), Physical and minerological methods (2nd edn), ASA SSSA Publisher.
  • Gupta, G., Parihar, S. S., Ahirwar, N. K., Snehi, S. K., & Singh, V. (2015). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Current and future pros- pects for development of sustainable agriculture. Journal of Micro- bial and Biochemical Technology, 7(2), 096–102.
  • Hoover, N. L., Law, J. Y., Long, L. A. M., Kanwar, R. S., & Soupir, M. L. (2019). Long-term impact of poultry manure on crop yield, soil and water quality, and crop revenue. Journal of Environmental Management, 252, 109582.
  • Jones Jr., J. B. (1991). Kjeldahl method for nitrogen determination. Micro- macro Publishing, Inc. ISBN:9781878148001
  • Kaynar, D. (2014). Tavuk gübresi, fosforlu gübre ve Bacillus megaterium M-3 uygulamalarının adi fiğin ot ve tohum verimine etkisi. (Tez No: 352101) [Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarla Bitkileri Ana Bilim Dalı]. Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu Tez Merkezi.
  • Lambers, H., & Plaxton, W. C. (2018). Phosphorus: Back to the roots. Annu. Journal of Plant Research, 48, 3–22.
  • Lin, Y., Watts, D. B., van Santen, E., & Cao, G. (2018). Influence of poultry litter on crop productivity under different field conditions: A meta- analysis. Agronomy Journal, 110(3), 807–818. [CrossRef]
  • Masarirambi, M. T., Dlamini, P., Wahome, P. K., & Oseni, T. O. (2012). Effects of kraal manure, chicken manure and inorganic fertilizer on growth and yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var Commander) in a semi-arid environment. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(1), 58–64.
  • Matse, D. T., Huang, C. H., Huang, Y. M., & Yen, M. Y. (2020). Effects of coinoculation of Rhizobium with plant growth promoting rhizobac- teria on the nitrogen fixation and nutrient uptake of Trifolium repens in low phosphorus soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(5), 739–752. [CrossRef]
  • McLean, E. O. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. In A. L. Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 Chemical and microbiological proper- ties (Vol. 9, pp. 199–224). ASA SSSA Publisher.
  • Meena, K. K., Sorty, A. M., Bitla, U. M., Choudhary, K., Gupta, P., Pareek, A., Singh, D. P., Prabha, R., Sahu, P. K., Gupta, V. K., Singh, H. B., Krisha- nani, K. K., & Minhas, P. S. (2017). Abiotic stress responses and microbe-mediated mitigation in plants: The omics strategies. Fron- tiers in Plant Science, 8, 172. [CrossRef]
  • Mitran, T., Meena, R. S., Lal, R., Layek, J., Kumar, S., & Datta, R. (2018). Role of soil phosphorus on legume production. In R. S. Meena, A. Das, G. S. Yadav, R. Lal (Eds.), Legumes for soil health and sustainable man- agement (pp. 487–510). Springer.
  • Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1982). Organic matter. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller & D. R. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (2nd edn, pp. 574–579). ASA SSSA Publisher.
  • Nelson, R. E. (1982). Carbonate and gypsum. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller & D. R. Keeney (Eds.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (2nd edn, pp. 191–197). ASA SSSA Publisher.
  • Olsen, S. R., & Sommers, L. E. (1982). Phosphorus. In R. H. Miller & D. R. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (2nd edn, pp. 403–427). ASA SSSA Publisher.
  • Osman, M. E. H., El-Sheekh, M. M., El-Naggar, A. H., & Gheda, S. F. (2010). Effect of two species of cyanobacteria as biofertilizers on some met- abolic activities, growth, and yield of pea plant. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46(8), 861–875. [CrossRef]
  • Öksel, C., Balkan, A., Bilgin, O., Mirik, M., & Başer, İ. (2022). Investıgatıon of the effect of PGPR on Yıeld and some Yıeld components in Wınter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 27(1), 127–133.
  • Roba, T. B. (2018). Review on: The effect of mixing organic and inorganic fertilizer on productivity and soil fertility. Open Access Library Jour- nal, 5(06), 1–11.
  • SAS (2002). The SAS System for Windows. SAS Institute.
  • Schnug, E., & Haneklaus, S. H. (2016). The enigma of fertilizer phosphorus utilization. In E. Schnug & L. J. De Kok (Eds.), Phosphorus in Agricul- ture: 100% Zero (pp. 7–26). Springer.
  • Sümer, F. Ö., & Erten, H. (2022). Farklı fosfor Dozlarının Baklada (vicia Faba L.) verim ve verim Komponentleri Ile protein oranı üzerine etkisi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 103–109.
  • Tan, M. (2018). Baklagil ve Buğdaygil Yem Bitkileri (286 s). Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak.
  • Thomas, G. W. (1982). Exchangeable cations. In A. L. Page (Ed.). Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 159–165). ASA Monograph Number 9. ASA SSSA Publisher.
  • Türkkan, Ö. Y., & Kibar, B. (2022). Effects of different organic fertilizers on plant growth, yield, quality properties and element contents in spin- ach. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 208–222.
  • Van Soest, P. V., Lewis, B. A. (1991). Forage Fiber Analysis (apparatus, rea- gents, procedures and some applications)United States Department of Agriculture, agricultural handbook No 37974(10),35833597
  • Yavuz, M., İptaş, S., Ayhan, V., & Karadağ, Y. (2009). Yem bitkilerinde kalite ve yem bitkilerinden kaynaklanan beslenme bozuklukları. In R. Avcio- glu, R. Hatipoglu & Y. Karadag (Eds.). Yem bitkilerinde kalite tayini ve kullanım alanları (pp. 163–172). T.C. Tarım & Köyişleri Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  • Yıldız, N., & Bircan, H. (1994). Araştırma ve Deneme Metotları. Atatürk Üni- versitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları.
  • Yılmaz, S. (2008). Effects of increased phosphorus faba bean plants rates and plant densities on yield and yield-related traits of narbon vetch lines. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 32, 49–56.
  • Yüksel, O., & Türk, M. (2019). The effects of phosphorus fertilization and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(5), 4165–4170.
APA Kaynar D, ÇOMAKLI B (2023). Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea. , 81 - 88. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
Chicago Kaynar Dilara,ÇOMAKLI Binali Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea. (2023): 81 - 88. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
MLA Kaynar Dilara,ÇOMAKLI Binali Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea. , 2023, ss.81 - 88. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
AMA Kaynar D,ÇOMAKLI B Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea. . 2023; 81 - 88. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
Vancouver Kaynar D,ÇOMAKLI B Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea. . 2023; 81 - 88. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
IEEE Kaynar D,ÇOMAKLI B "Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea." , ss.81 - 88, 2023. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
ISNAD Kaynar, Dilara - ÇOMAKLI, Binali. "Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea". (2023), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
APA Kaynar D, ÇOMAKLI B (2023). Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea. Research in agricultural sciences, 54(2), 81 - 88. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
Chicago Kaynar Dilara,ÇOMAKLI Binali Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea. Research in agricultural sciences 54, no.2 (2023): 81 - 88. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
MLA Kaynar Dilara,ÇOMAKLI Binali Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea. Research in agricultural sciences, vol.54, no.2, 2023, ss.81 - 88. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
AMA Kaynar D,ÇOMAKLI B Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea. Research in agricultural sciences. 2023; 54(2): 81 - 88. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
Vancouver Kaynar D,ÇOMAKLI B Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea. Research in agricultural sciences. 2023; 54(2): 81 - 88. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
IEEE Kaynar D,ÇOMAKLI B "Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea." Research in agricultural sciences, 54, ss.81 - 88, 2023. 10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
ISNAD Kaynar, Dilara - ÇOMAKLI, Binali. "Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources on the Yield and Yield Components of Forage Pea". Research in agricultural sciences 54/2 (2023), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.5152/AUAF.2023.23084
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 7:46

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları