Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 9 Sayfa Aralığı: 1335 - 1339 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606 İndeks Tarihi: 06-06-2023

Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries

Öz:
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the musculoskeletal injuries related with 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake and their treatment protocols. METHODS: Data of patients applied to İnönü University Medical Faculty Hospital, Elazığ Training and Research Hospital and Malatya Training and Research Hospital emergency departments within 48 h after the earthquake, were evaluated retrospectively. Age, gender, soft tissue injuries and sites, fracture sites and types, fracture etiology, and treatment methods were evaluated. RESULTS: 247 patients were evaluated. 118 were women and 139 were men. There were 24 (9.7%) pediatric patients. Mean age was 37.3 (1–92) years. Waist majority of injuries were simple soft-tissue injuries. There were 103 fractures in 86 patients. Thirty-eight patients’ fractures were treated surgically. CONCLUSION: Every major disaster warrants retrospective studies so we can learn how to improve all levels of Emergency Medical Services. Great proportion of Elazıg earthquake victims had only simple soft tissue injuries such as sprain, laceration, or contusion. Many patients were injured due to reasons indirectly related to the destruction brought by the earthquake. Panic caused by the earthquake caused more injury than the destruction it brought.
Anahtar Kelime:

Hangisi daha tehlikeli, deprem mi yoksa panik mi? 24 Ocak 2020 Elazığ/Türkiye depremiyle ilişkili kas iskelet yaralanmalarının değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 24 Ocak 2020 Elazığ/Türkiye depremine bağlı kas-iskelet yaralanmaları ve tedavi protokollerini değerlendirmektir. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi, Elazığ Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi ve Malatya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi acil servislerine depremden sonraki ilk 48 saat içerisinde başvuran hastaların verileri geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Yaş, cinsiyet, yumuşak doku yaralanmaları ve bölgeleri, kırık bölgeleri ve tipleri, kırık etiyolojisi ve tedavi yöntemleri değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: İki yüz kırk yedi hasta değerlendirildi. Yüz on sekizi kadın, 139’u erkekti. Yirmi dört (%9.7) pediatrik hasta vardı. Ortalama yaş 37.3 (1–92) yıldı. Yaralanmaların çoğu basit yumuşak doku yaralanmalarıydı. Seksen altı hastada 103 kırık vardı. Otuz sekiz hastanın kırığı cerrahi olarak tedavi edildi. TARTIŞMA: Her büyük afet, geçmişe dönük çalışmaları hakeder, böylece acil sağlık hizmetlerinin tüm seviyelerini nasıl iyileştireceğimizi öğrenebiliriz. Depremzedelerin büyük bir kısmında burkulma, yırtılma veya kontüzyon gibi sadece basit yumuşak doku yaralanmaları vardı. Depremin getirdiği yıkımla dolaylı olarak ilgili nedenlerle birçok hasta yaralandı. Depremin neden olduğu panik, getirdiği yıkımdan daha fazla yaralanmaya neden oldu.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. World Health Organization. Collaborating Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. Universite’ Catholique de Louvain-Brussels- Belgium. Geneva: EM-DAT, The OFDA/CRED International Disasters Data Base; 2019. Available from: https://www.em-dat.net. Accessed July 18, 2022.
  • 2. Coban M, Sozbilir M, Goktas Y. Determining preparation perceptions before Earthquake of individuals experienced Earthquake: A case study. Eastern Geographical Rev 2017;22:113–34.
  • 3. Available from: https://www.emsc-csem.org. Accessed July 18, 2022.
  • 4. Guner S, Guner SI, Isik Y, Gormeli G, Kalender AM, Turktas U, et al. Review of Van earthquakes form an orthopaedic perspective: A multicentre retrospective study. Int Orthop 2013;37:119–24.
  • 5. Kang P, Tang B, Liu Y, Liu X, Liu Z, Lv Y, et al. Medical efforts and injury patterns of military hospital patients following the 2013 Lushan earthquake in China: A retrospective study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015;12:10723–38.
  • 6. Bartholdson S, Von Schreeb J. Natural disasters and injuries: What does a surgeon need to know? Curr Trauma Rep 2018;4:103–8.
  • 7. Missair A, Pretto EA, Visan A, Lobo L, Paula F, Castillo-Pedraza C, et al. A matter of life or limb? A review of traumatic injury patterns and anesthesia techniques for disaster relief after major earthquakes. Anesth Analg 2013;117:934–41.
  • 8. Bortolin M, Morelli I, Voskanyan A, Joyce NR, Ciottone GR. Earthquake-related orthopedic injuries in adult population: A systematic review. Prehosp Disaster Med 2017;32:201–8.
  • 9. Fan Z, Li A, Lian B, Zhou W, Wei H, Chen C, et al. Injury Types of victims in the 12th May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake: Analysis of 1,038 patients in Jiangyou City. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2011;37:3–7.
  • 10. Görmeli G, Görmeli CA, Güner S, Ceylan MF, Dursun R. The clinical profile of musculoskeletal injuries associated with the 2011 Van earthquake in Turkey. Joint Dis Relat Surg 2012;23:068–71.
  • 11. Ramirez M, Peek-Asa C. Epidemiology of traumatic injuries from earthquakes. Epidemiol Rev 2005;27:47–55.
  • 12. Arroyo-Berezowsky C, Abonce-Zenteno J. The epidemiology of patients treated at a private hospital as a consequence of the September 19th 2017 earthquake in Mexico City. Acta Ortop Mex 2020;34:215–21.
  • 13. Vaishya R, Agarwal AK, Vijay V, Hussaini M, Singh H. Surgical management of musculoskeletal injuries after 2015 Nepal Earthquake: Our experience. Cureus 2015;7:e306.
  • 14. Sever MS, Erek E, Vanholder R, Ozener C, Yavuz M, Kayacan SM, et al. Lessons learned from the Marmara disaster: Time period under the rubble. Crit Care Med 2002;30:2443–9.
  • 15. Karakaplan M, Görmeli G, Korkmaz MF, Ergen E. Gluteal compartment syndrome developing after nephrectomy and incisional hernia surgery. Joint Dis Relat Surg 2017;28:50–4.
  • 16. Tahmasebi MN, Kiani K, Mazlouman SJ, Taheri A, Kamrani RS, Panjavi B, et al. Musculoskeletal injuries associated with earthquake: A report of injuries of Iran’s December 26, 2003 Bam earthquake casualties managed in tertiary referral centers. Injury 2005;36:27–32.
  • 17. MacKenzie JS, Banskota B, Sirisreetreerux N, Shafiq B, Hasenboehler EA. A review of the epidemiology and treatment of orthopaedic injuries after earthquakes in developing countries. World J Emerg Surg 2017;12:9.
  • 18. Bar-On E, Lebel E, Blumberg N, Sagi R, Kreiss Y. Pediatric orthopedic injuries following an earthquake: Experience in an acute-phase field hospital. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:617–21.
  • 19. Herard P, Boillot F. Quality orthopaedic care in sudden-onset disasters: Suggestions from Médecins Sans Frontières-France. Int Orthop 2016;40:435–8.
  • 20. Awais S, Saeed A, Ch A. Use of external fixators for damage-control orthopaedics in natural disasters like the 2005 Pakistan earthquake. Int Orthop 2014;38:1563–8.
APA ergen e, kaya o, Yılmaz ö, Özdeş H, BATUR Ö, KARAMAN S, G, Aslantürk O (2022). Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. , 1335 - 1339. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
Chicago ergen emre,kaya oğuz,Yılmaz özgür,Özdeş Hüseyin Utku,BATUR ÖMER CİHAN,KARAMAN SERDAR, Guzel,Aslantürk Okan Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. (2022): 1335 - 1339. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
MLA ergen emre,kaya oğuz,Yılmaz özgür,Özdeş Hüseyin Utku,BATUR ÖMER CİHAN,KARAMAN SERDAR, Guzel,Aslantürk Okan Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. , 2022, ss.1335 - 1339. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
AMA ergen e,kaya o,Yılmaz ö,Özdeş H,BATUR Ö,KARAMAN S, G,Aslantürk O Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. . 2022; 1335 - 1339. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
Vancouver ergen e,kaya o,Yılmaz ö,Özdeş H,BATUR Ö,KARAMAN S, G,Aslantürk O Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. . 2022; 1335 - 1339. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
IEEE ergen e,kaya o,Yılmaz ö,Özdeş H,BATUR Ö,KARAMAN S, G,Aslantürk O "Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries." , ss.1335 - 1339, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
ISNAD ergen, emre vd. "Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries". (2022), 1335-1339. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
APA ergen e, kaya o, Yılmaz ö, Özdeş H, BATUR Ö, KARAMAN S, G, Aslantürk O (2022). Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28(9), 1335 - 1339. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
Chicago ergen emre,kaya oğuz,Yılmaz özgür,Özdeş Hüseyin Utku,BATUR ÖMER CİHAN,KARAMAN SERDAR, Guzel,Aslantürk Okan Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28, no.9 (2022): 1335 - 1339. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
MLA ergen emre,kaya oğuz,Yılmaz özgür,Özdeş Hüseyin Utku,BATUR ÖMER CİHAN,KARAMAN SERDAR, Guzel,Aslantürk Okan Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.28, no.9, 2022, ss.1335 - 1339. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
AMA ergen e,kaya o,Yılmaz ö,Özdeş H,BATUR Ö,KARAMAN S, G,Aslantürk O Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(9): 1335 - 1339. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
Vancouver ergen e,kaya o,Yılmaz ö,Özdeş H,BATUR Ö,KARAMAN S, G,Aslantürk O Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(9): 1335 - 1339. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
IEEE ergen e,kaya o,Yılmaz ö,Özdeş H,BATUR Ö,KARAMAN S, G,Aslantürk O "Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28, ss.1335 - 1339, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606
ISNAD ergen, emre vd. "Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic? Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Türkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28/9 (2022), 1335-1339. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606