Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials

BAŞER, Barış; BAŞER, HANDE; Özel, Mehmet Birol

doi:10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098

Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials

Hande BAŞER, (Özel Diş Kliniği, Trabzon, Türkiye)

Mehmet Birol ÖZEL, (Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı, Kocaeli, Türkiye)

Barış BAŞER (Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı, Trabzon, Türkiye)

Annals of Medical Research

8 5

Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 621 - 627 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098 İndeks Tarihi: 06-06-2023

Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials

Öz:

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface conditioning method combinations on the shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded various temporary crown materials used in computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing systems. Materials and Methods: 100 polymethyl methacrylate, 100 bis-acrylic composite and 100 polyetherketoneketone surfaces were prepared from provisional temporary crown blocks. Five different conditioning protocols (etching with 9.6 % hydrofluoric acid, sandblasting with 50 µm Al2O3 particles, roughening with ultrafine diamond bur, Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiating and priming with methylmethacrylate monomer were applied to the surfaces for each material group. Shear test was performed to half of the bonded samples after 24 hours while the other half 14 days later. The share strengths of the bonded brackets were measured in Newton and Megapascals. Results: In all material groups, the highest share strength values were found in samples sandblasted with Al2O3 particles. For bis-acrylic composite and polymethyl methacrylate groups, the lowest bond strength value were found in samples irradiated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Conclusion: The shear bond strengths of the orthodontic brackets bonded to the temporary crown materials produced in CAD/CAM systems vary according to the structure of the material and surface conditioning processes.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Abdullah AO, Tsitrou EA, Pollington S. Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns. Journal of applied oral science. 2016;24:258-63. doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150451.
2. Alt V, Hannig M, Wöstmann B, Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dental materials. 2011;27(4):339- 47. doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012.
3. Göncü Başaran E, Ayna E, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design–computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated threeunit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2011;69(3):144-50. doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.545034.
4. Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Özcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clinical oral investigations. 2012;16:1669-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0670-4.
5. Güth JF, Almeida E Silva JS, Ramberger M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Treatment concept with CAD/CAM-fabricated high-density polymer temporary restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012 Oct;24(5):310-8.doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00497.x.
6. Stawarczyk B, Özcan M, Trottmann A, Schmutz F, Roos M, Hämmerle C. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2013;109(5):325-32. doi.org/10.56501/intjprosthorehab.v3i2.678.
7. Khng KYK, Ettinger RL, Armstrong SR, Lindquist T, Gratton DG, Qian F. In vitro evaluation of the marginal integrity of CAD/CAM interim crowns. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2016;115(5):617-23. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.002.
8. Peñate L, Basilio J, Roig M, Mercadé M. Comparative study of interim materials for direct fixed dental prostheses and their fabrication with CAD/CAM technique. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2015;114(2):248-53. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.023.
9. Wiegand A, Stucki L, Hoffmann R, Attin T, Stawarczyk B. Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA-and compositebased polymers. Clinical oral investigations. 2015;19:2007-13. doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1411-x.
10. Yao J, Li J, Wang Y, Huang H. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2014;112(3):649-57. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.012.
11. Craig R, Power J. Restorative dental materials. Mosby-year book. Inc, Missouri. 1997:486.
12. Matasa CG. Adhesion and its ten commandments. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1989;95(4):355-6. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90171-6.
13. Chay SH, Wong SL, Mohamed N, Chia A, Yap AUJ. Effects of surface treatment and aging on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets to provisional materials. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;132(5):577. e7-. e11. doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.024.
14. Bourke BM, Rock WP. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Br J Orthod. 1999 Dec;26(4):285-90. doi: 10.1093/ortho/26.4.285.
15. Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1998;114(4):387-92. doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70183-0.
16. Simonsen R. Tensile bond strength of etched porcelain. J Dent Res. 1983;62:297. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/157338744945720038414.
17. Yassaei S, Moradi F, Aghili H, Kamran M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain following etching with Er: YAG laser versus hydrofluoric acid. Orthodontics (Chic). 2013;14(1):e82- 7. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sogra- Yassaei2/publication/236640226_Shear_bond_strength_of_orthodon tic_ brackets_bonded_to_porcelain_following_etching_with _ErYAG_ laser_versus_hydrofluoric_acid/links/5703b8b908a ea09bb1a44a9e/ Shear-bond-strength-of-orthodontic-bracketsbonded -to-porcelain-following-etching-with- ErYAG- laserversus-hydrofluoric-acid.pdf.
18. Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. Recent advances in bonding to gold, amalgam, and porcelain. 1993.
19. Zachrisson YØ, Zachrisson BU, Büyükyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1996;109(4):420-30. doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70124-5.
20. Al Jabbari YS, Al Taweel SM, Al Rifaiy M, Alqahtani MQ, Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S. Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations. Angle Orthodontist. 2014;84(4):649-55. doi.org/10.2319/090313-649.1.
21. Blakey R, Mah J. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2010;138(1):72-8. doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.030.
22. Cumerlato M, Lima EMd, Osorio LB, Mota EG, Menezes LMd, Rizzatto SMD. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated teeth on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2017;22:47-52. doi.org/10.1590/2177- 6709.22.4.047-052.oar.
23. Dias FMCS, Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, Tavares RRdJ, Gurgel JdA, Bramante FS, Fialho MNP. Evaluation of an alternative technique to optimize direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to temporary crowns. Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2015;20:57-62. doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.4.057-062.oar.
24. Goymen M, Topcuoglu T, Topcuoglu S, Akin H. Effect of different temporary crown materials and surface roughening methods on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Photomedicine and laser surgery. 2015;33(2):55-60. doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3818.
25. Maryanchik I, Brendlinger EJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to various esthetic pontic materials. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2010;137(5):684-9. doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.031.
26. Rambhia S, Heshmati R, Dhuru V, Iacopino A. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to provisional crown materials utilizing two different adhesives. The Angle Orthodontist. 2009;79(4):784-9. doi.org/10.2319/060908-298.1ri.
27. Wan Abdul Razak WS, Sherriff M, Bister D, Seehra J. Bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to prefabricated acrylic teeth. Journal of orthodontics. 2017;44(2):105-9. doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2017.1296636.
28. Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Sayed NM, Ibrahim A, Jimbo R. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2015;114(3):414-9. doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.007.
29. ARICI S, Tamer T, Mete Ö. Rezinle Güçlendirilmiş Bir Camiyonomer Simanla Ortodontik Braket Yapıştırılması. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2000;2(3). doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.007.
30. Reynolds I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. British journal of orthodontics. 1975;2(3):171-8. doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666.
31. Bowen R, Rodriguez MS. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1962;64(3):378-87. doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0090.

APA	BAŞER H, Özel M, BAŞER B (2023). Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials. , 621 - 627. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
Chicago	BAŞER HANDE,Özel Mehmet Birol,BAŞER Barış Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials. (2023): 621 - 627. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
MLA	BAŞER HANDE,Özel Mehmet Birol,BAŞER Barış Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials. , 2023, ss.621 - 627. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
AMA	BAŞER H,Özel M,BAŞER B Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials. . 2023; 621 - 627. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
Vancouver	BAŞER H,Özel M,BAŞER B Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials. . 2023; 621 - 627. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
IEEE	BAŞER H,Özel M,BAŞER B "Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials." , ss.621 - 627, 2023. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
ISNAD	BAŞER, HANDE vd. "Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials". (2023), 621-627. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098

APA	BAŞER H, Özel M, BAŞER B (2023). Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials. Annals of Medical Research, 30(5), 621 - 627. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
Chicago	BAŞER HANDE,Özel Mehmet Birol,BAŞER Barış Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials. Annals of Medical Research 30, no.5 (2023): 621 - 627. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
MLA	BAŞER HANDE,Özel Mehmet Birol,BAŞER Barış Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials. Annals of Medical Research, vol.30, no.5, 2023, ss.621 - 627. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
AMA	BAŞER H,Özel M,BAŞER B Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials. Annals of Medical Research. 2023; 30(5): 621 - 627. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
Vancouver	BAŞER H,Özel M,BAŞER B Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials. Annals of Medical Research. 2023; 30(5): 621 - 627. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
IEEE	BAŞER H,Özel M,BAŞER B "Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials." Annals of Medical Research, 30, ss.621 - 627, 2023. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098
ISNAD	BAŞER, HANDE vd. "Effects of different surface conditioning protocols on shear strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to CAD/CAM materials". Annals of Medical Research 30/5 (2023), 621-627. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.04.098