Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 77 - 82 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037 İndeks Tarihi: 06-06-2023

Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis

Öz:
Objective: The aims of this study are to compare bone mineral densitometry and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in postmenopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis and the investigation of the effectiveness of MRI in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Materials and Methods: Forty female patients, 50 years of age or older who underwent lumbar MRI examination and were diagnosed with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) osteoporosis were included in our study. Forty healthy women aged 20-29 years with lumbar MRI examinations were included in the control group. On sagittal T1-weighted (T1W) images of individuals in the patient and control groups signal to-noise ratio (SNR) was measured from L1-L4 vertebrae. To facilitate the diagnosis of osteoporosis, a quantitative score called the M-score was obtained using SNR values. The relationship between DEXA and the obtained SNR and M-score values were investigated. Results: In the patient group, median SNR values of L1, L2, L3, L4 vertebrae obtained from T1-weighted sequence was 57.49 (25.18-182.48), and they were 24.90 (7.40-41.70) in the control group. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed for L1, L2, L3, L4 vertebrae. The area under the curve for the mean value of L1-L4 vertebra was found to be 0.966 (p<0.001), and the 95% confidence interval was found 0.933-1.000. The mean SNR predictive value of L1-L4 was calculated as 33.45, and sensitivity for this value was found to be 90%, and specificity was found to be 90%. There was a negative correlation between lumbar MRI SNR-DEXA (p>0.05) and M score-DEXA (p>0.05). Conclusion: It has been concluded that L1-L4 vertebral SNR measurement in T1-weighted sequence in lumbar MRI can be used to distinguish osteoporosis patients from normal individuals. Thus, osteoporosis can be diagnosed without X-ray exposure.
Anahtar Kelime:

Osteoporozlu Kadınlarda Lomber Spinal Manyetik Rezonans Görüntülemenin Tanıya Katkısının Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı osteoporoz tanılı postmenopozal kadınlarda kemik mineral dansitometri ve manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) bulgularının karşılaştırılması ve osteoporoz tanısında MRG’nin etkinliğinin araştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza 6 ay içerisinde lomber MRG incelemesi yapılan ve dual-enerji X-ışını absorbsiyometri (DEXA) ile osteoporoz tanısı almış 50 yaş ve üstü 40 kadın hasta dahil edildi. Kontrol grubunda lomber MRG incelemesi bulunan 20-29 yaşlarında 40 sağlıklı kadın incelendi. Hasta ve kontrol grubundaki bireylerin sagittal T1 ağırlıklı görüntülerinde L1-L4 vertebralardan sinyal gürültü oranı (SNR) ölçümü yapıldı. Osteoporoz tanısında kolaylık sağlaması için SNR değerleri kullanılarak M-skoru adında kantitatif bir skor elde edildi. Elde edilen SNR ve M-skoru değerleri ile DEXA arasındaki ilişki araştırıldı. Bulgular: L1, L2, L3, L4 vertebralarının T1 ağırlıklı sekanstan elde edilen SNR ortanca değerleri hasta grubunda 57,49 (25,18-182,48), kontrol grubunda 24,90 (7,40-41,70) idi. L1, L2, L3, L4 vertebralarının alıcı işletim karakteristiği analizi yapıldı. L1-L4 vertebra ortalama değeri için eğri altında kalan alan 0,966 (p<0,001), %95 güven aralığı 0,933-1,000 bulundu. L1-L4 ortalama SNR kestirim değeri 33,45 olarak hesaplanmış olup bu değer için duyarlılık %90, özgünlük %90 olarak bulundu. Lomber MRG SNR-DEXA (p>0,05) ile M-skoru-DEXA arasında negatif yönlü bir ilişki saptandı (p>0,05). Sonuç: Lomber MRG’de T1 ağırlıklı sekansta L1-L4 vertebra SNR ölçümünün osteoporozlu hastaları normal bireylerden ayırt etmede kullanılabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır. Böylece osteoporoz, röntgen ışınlarına maruz kalmadan teşhis edilebilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Kanis JA. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 2002;359:1929-36.
  • 2. Laib A, Newitt DC, Lu Y, Majumdar S. New model-independent measures of trabecular bone structure applied to in vivo high resolution MR images. Osteoporos Int 2002;13:130-6.
  • 3. Shayganfar A, Khodayi M, Ebrahimian S, Tabrizi Z. Quantitative diagnosis of osteoporosis using lumbar spine signal intensity in magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 2019;92:20180774
  • 4. Tang GY, Lv ZW, Tang RB, Liu Y, Peng YF, Li W, et al. Evaluation of MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted MRI in detecting bone marrow changes in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Clin Radiol 2010;65:377-81.
  • 5. Yeung DK, Griffith JF, Antonio GE, Lee FK, Woo J, Leung PC. Osteoporosis is associated with increased marrow fat content and decreased marrow fat unsaturation: a proton MR spectroscopy study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:279-85.
  • 6. Griffith JF, Yeung DK, Antonio GE, Wong SY, Kwok TC, Woo J, et al. Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation. Radiology 2006;241:831-8.
  • 7. Schellinger D, Lin CS, Hatipoglu HG, Fertikh D. Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1620-7.
  • 8. Shah LM, Hanrahan CJ. MRI of spinal bone marrow: part I, techniques and normal age-related appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:1298-308.
  • 9. Abate N, Burns D, Peshock RM, Garg A, Grundy SM. Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging: validation against dissection in human cadavers. J Lipid Res 1994;35:1490- 6.
  • 10. Shen W, Scherzer R, Gantz M, Chen J, Punyanitya M, Lewis CE, et al. Relationship between MRI-measured bone marrow adipose tissue and hip and spine bone mineral density in African-American and Caucasian participants: the CARDIA study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:1337-46.
  • 11. Bandirali M, Di Leo G, Papini GD, Messina C, Sconfienza LM, Ulivieri FM, et al. A new diagnostic score to detect osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI. Eur Radiol 2015;25:2951- 9.
  • 12. WHO Scientific Group on Prevention, Management of Osteoporosis, and World Health Organization. Prevention and management of osteoporosis: report of a WHO scientific group. No. 921. World Health Organization, 2003.
  • 13. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001;285:785-95.
  • 14. Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA, Beaton DE. Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:767-78.
  • 15. Rosen CJ, Ackert-Bicknell C, Rodriguez JP, Pino AM. Marrow fat and the bone microenvironment: developmental, functional, and pathological implications. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2009;19:109-24
APA Atik I, Atik S, Gul E, BULUT S (2022). Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis. , 77 - 82. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
Chicago Atik Irfan,Atik Seda,Gul Enes,BULUT SEMA Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis. (2022): 77 - 82. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
MLA Atik Irfan,Atik Seda,Gul Enes,BULUT SEMA Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis. , 2022, ss.77 - 82. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
AMA Atik I,Atik S,Gul E,BULUT S Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis. . 2022; 77 - 82. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
Vancouver Atik I,Atik S,Gul E,BULUT S Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis. . 2022; 77 - 82. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
IEEE Atik I,Atik S,Gul E,BULUT S "Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis." , ss.77 - 82, 2022. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
ISNAD Atik, Irfan vd. "Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis". (2022), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
APA Atik I, Atik S, Gul E, BULUT S (2022). Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi, 28(2), 77 - 82. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
Chicago Atik Irfan,Atik Seda,Gul Enes,BULUT SEMA Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi 28, no.2 (2022): 77 - 82. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
MLA Atik Irfan,Atik Seda,Gul Enes,BULUT SEMA Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi, vol.28, no.2, 2022, ss.77 - 82. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
AMA Atik I,Atik S,Gul E,BULUT S Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi. 2022; 28(2): 77 - 82. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
Vancouver Atik I,Atik S,Gul E,BULUT S Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis. Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi. 2022; 28(2): 77 - 82. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
IEEE Atik I,Atik S,Gul E,BULUT S "Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis." Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi, 28, ss.77 - 82, 2022. 10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037
ISNAD Atik, Irfan vd. "Contribution of Lumbar Vertebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnosis in Women with Osteoporosis". Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi 28/2 (2022), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.4274/tod.galenos.2021.65037