Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 17 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 İndeks Tarihi: 08-06-2023
Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space
Öz: Due to the COVID-19, a lot has changed regarding daily routines. Homes have become an extension of the public sphere. Because of the pandemic, people’s daily roles have moved mainly into the home via the internet and this shift has created a new multi-role situation. Within the scope of the study, an online semistructured interview was conducted to examine people’s experiences of the new representations of the house. The findings in this case study were evaluated with the literature and discussed under these headings: representation of self and representation of space. The study showed that; house, as the new representation space, has become a part of the social identity shared with the public. Objects seen by the camera served as an indicator of self-representation. The privacy of the home was disturbed by the host of the public. The house has become a place where many identities have to exist together. Interviews show that the home’s effect on representation cannot be denied. The house is now both a private and a public space, hosting many formal and informal activities. Moreover, while at home, many personal and spatial representations have been transferred to the virtual world. The COVID-19 pandemic has made the home a part of the public space. However, the house is not designed to function as a public space and acts as an insufficient representation of self and place. If daily life continues with a focus on home, the house should be redesigned by the new representations it hosts.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Aiken, A. (2020). Zooming in on privacy concerns: Video app Zoom is surging in popularity. In our rush to stay connected, we need to make security checks and not reveal more than we think. Index on Censorship, 49(2), 24-27.
- Allen, T. D., Cho, E., & Meier, L. L. (2014). Work–family boundary dynamics. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychology Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 99-121.
- Altan, İ. (1993). Mimarlıkta Mekan Kavramı. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 19, 75- 88.
- Auxemery, Y. (2021). From digital identity to connected personality, from augmented diagnostician to virtual caregiver: What are the challenges for the psychology and the psychiatry of the future? Evolution Psychiatrique, 86(2), 261-283.
- Bloom, N. (2020, June). How working from home works out. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR) Policy Brief.
- Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Univ of California Press.
- Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. NJ: Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs.
- Capitanoa J., & Greenhaus J. H. (2018). When work enters the home: Antecedents of role boundary permeability behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 109, 87–100.
- Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.
- Chang, Y., Wong, S. F., Libaque- Saenz, C. F., & Lee, H. (2018). The role of privacy policy on consumers’ perceived privacy. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 445-459.
- Ching, F.D.K. (2016). Mimarlık, Biçim, Mekan ve Düzen. (S. Lökçe, Trans.). İstanbul: Yem Yayınları. (Original work published 2014)
- De Beauvoir, S. (1993). İkinci Cins. (B. Onaran, Trans.). İstanbul: Payel. (Original work published 1953)
- Debord, G. (1996). Gösteri Toplumu. (A. Ekmekçi, O. Taşkent, Trans.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. (Original work published 1967)
- De Certeau, M. (2009). Gündelik Hayatın Keşfi I. (L.A. Özcan, Trans.). Ankara: Dost Yayınları. (Original work published 1980)
- Desrochers, S., Hilton, J. M., & Larwood, L. (2005). Preliminary validation of the work-family integration- blurring scale. Journal of Family Issues, 26(4), 442-466.
- Ellemers, N., & Van Knippenberg, E. (1997). Stereotyping in Social Context. In R. Spears, Penelope J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Stereotyping and Group Life (pp. 208-235), MA: Blackwell.
- Evans, G. W., & Howard, R. B. (1973). Personal space. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 334-344.
- Fisher, M., Boland Jr, R., & Lyytinen, K. (2016). Social networking as the production and consumption of a self. Information and Organization, 26(4), 131-145.
- Gal, U., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr, R. (2005). The dynamics of boundary objects, social infastructures and social identities. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems and Organizations, 5(1), pp. 33-48.
- Garber, M. (2020). Homes actually need to be practical now: One of the ironies of social distancing is that it can put privacy in short supply. Retrieved from The Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic. com/culture/archive/2020/03/ finding-privacy-duringpandemic/ 608944/
- Goffman, E. (2020). Günlük Yaşamda Benliğin Sunumu. (B. Cezar, Trans.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. (Original work published 1959)
- Hogg, M. A. (2006). Social Identity Theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary Social Psychological Theories (pp. 111–136). Stanford University Press.
- Konuk, G. (2020). Kentsel gelişme stratejilerinde “Yeni arayüzler”: Gerçek mekan-Sanal toplum. Spektrum, Tasarım Rehberleri, 1, 59-63.
- Koronavirüs ile Mücadele Kapsamında - Yeni Kısıtlama ve Tedbirler Genelgeleri. (2020, Dec 1). https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/koronavirus- ile-mucadele-kapsaminda-sokaga- cikma-kisitlamalari---yeni-kisitlama- ve-tedbirler-genelgeleri
- Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the workhome interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 704-730.
- Krippendorff, K., & Butter, R. (2007). Semantics: Meanings and contexts of artifacts. In H. N. J. Schifferstein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product experience. New York, NY: Elsevier. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_ papers/91
- Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R., & Archambault, L. (2020). Thinking beyond Zoom: Using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 383-391.
- Lynch, K. (2020). Kent İmgesi (13th ed.). (İ. Başaran, Trans.). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. (Original work published 1960).
- Marcus, C. C. (1992). House as a Mirror of Self: Exploring the Deeper Meaning of Home. York Beach: Nicolas- Hays.
- Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 299–337.
- Massey, D. (1993). Power-Geometry and a Progressive Sense of Place, In Bird, J., Curtis, B., Putnam, T., & Tickner, L. (Eds.), Mapping Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change. London: Routledge.
- Matthews, R. A., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Bulger, C. A. (2010). Advancing measurement of work and family domain boundary characteristics. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 447-460.
- Munar, A. (2010). Digital exhibitionism: The age of exposure. Culture Unbound Journal of Current Cultural Research, 2, 401.
- Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Civitas Books.
- Olgun, İ., Dinç, S. & Çılgın, K. (2020). Preface. Pandemide Kentsel Sistem: Yaşama, Çalışma ve Sosyalleşme Mekânlarında Yeni Standartlara Doğru, Spektrum, 1.
- Owens, T. J. (2006). Self and identity. Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 205–232). Springer.
- Özen, A. (2006). Mimari Sanal Gerçeklik Ortamlarında Algı Psikolojisi. Bilgi Teknolojileri Kongresi IV, Akademik Bilişim 2006, Denizli, Turkey
- Pfund, G. N., Hill, P. L., & Harriger, J. (2020). Video chatting and appearance satisfaction during COVID 19: Appearance comparisons and selfobjectification as moderators. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 53(12), 2038-204.
- Prus, R. (1997). Subcultural mosaics and intersubjective realities: An ethnographic research agenda for pramatizing the social sciences. State Univ of New York Pr.
- Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Individuality and the prejudiced personality. European Review of Social Psychology. 17 (1): 233–270.
- Rhodewalt, F. (1986). Self-presentation and the phenomenal self: On the stability and malleability of self-conceptions. Public Self and Private Self, 117–142.
- Roth, A., Ranjan, N., King, G., Homayun, S., Hendershott, R., & Dennis, S. (2021). Zooming in on COVID: The intimacies of screens, homes and learning hierarchies. Anthropology in Action, 28(1), 67-72.
- Sahin, B., & Varli, C. G., (2021) Meaning Shift in Space due to Covid-19 Pandemic, In G. G. Çiftçi & Y. Unlubas (Eds.), 4th International Conference On Covid-19 Studies (pp. 608-618).
- Spieler, I., Scheibe, S. & Stamov Roßnagel, C. (2018). Keeping work and private life apart: Age related differences in managing the work–nonwork interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 1233–1251.
- Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 224-237.
- Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
- Turner, J. C. & Onorato, R. S. (2012). Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: A self-categorization perspective. Tyler, T. R.; Kramer, R. M.; John, O. P. (eds.). The Psychology of the Social Self (pp. 11-46). Psychology Press. (Original work published in 1999)
- Van Bavel, J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., ... Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460-471.
- Wong, A. H. K., Cheung, J. O., & Chen, Z. (2020). Promoting effectiveness of “working from home”: findings from Hong Kong working population under COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10 (2), 210- 228
- Young, S. (2021). Zoombombing your toddler: User experience and the communication of Zoom’s privacy crisis. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 147-153.
- Yuan, E. S. (2020, April 1). A message to our users. Retrieved from https:// blog.zoom.us/a-message-to-our-users/
| APA | VARLI Ç, ŞAHİN B (2023). Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space. , 1 - 17. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| Chicago | VARLI Çağrı G.,ŞAHİN Betül Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space. (2023): 1 - 17. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| MLA | VARLI Çağrı G.,ŞAHİN Betül Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space. , 2023, ss.1 - 17. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| AMA | VARLI Ç,ŞAHİN B Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space. . 2023; 1 - 17. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| Vancouver | VARLI Ç,ŞAHİN B Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space. . 2023; 1 - 17. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| IEEE | VARLI Ç,ŞAHİN B "Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space." , ss.1 - 17, 2023. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| ISNAD | VARLI, Çağrı G. - ŞAHİN, Betül. "Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space". (2023), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| APA | VARLI Ç, ŞAHİN B (2023). Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 1 - 17. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| Chicago | VARLI Çağrı G.,ŞAHİN Betül Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 20, no.1 (2023): 1 - 17. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| MLA | VARLI Çağrı G.,ŞAHİN Betül Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.20, no.1, 2023, ss.1 - 17. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| AMA | VARLI Ç,ŞAHİN B Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 20(1): 1 - 17. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| Vancouver | VARLI Ç,ŞAHİN B Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 20(1): 1 - 17. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| IEEE | VARLI Ç,ŞAHİN B "Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space." A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, ss.1 - 17, 2023. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
| ISNAD | VARLI, Çağrı G. - ŞAHİN, Betül. "Transforming perception of space in the pandemic agenda: From real space to virtual space". A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 20/1 (2023), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.62447 |
