Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 147 - 162 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623 İndeks Tarihi: 08-06-2023

From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation

Öz:
The act of knowing the architectural representation which is controlled by the ratio centralism of the classical subject, prevents the representation from exploring the potentials of experiencing the event and creating the concept and difference. This study purposes to offer the issue that transforms architectural representation from knowing to designing may be revealed through the differentiations of becoming in the virtual space and non-human human comprehensions. The study deciphers Bryan Cantley’s becoming-representation atmosphere in the context of experiencing the field of possibilities of imagination and critical creativity by remaining in the event. The methodology of this research area experience to dismantle the case study of Cantley’s atmosphere with the posthuman critical theory of Rosi Braidotti and the differentiation theory of Gilles Deleuze, as the enablers of imagining, escaping from the historicist linearity and creating conceptual becoming-representations. In line with these methods, the relationalities and probabilities of Cantley’s conceptual creations such as mechudzu, post-liminal fuzz, enantiomorphistic inversions and third-space with his representation design atmosphere are deciphered. Contribution of this study for the medium of architecture is thought as attracting attention to the issues which are creating representation lexicons, differentiations by the encounters in virtual space, becoming-grab among all the humans with non-humans and leaving the linearity of prediction for being able to open the field of possibilities about becoming-representation.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Agrest, D. (2000). Representation as articulation between theory and practice. In S. Allen (Aut.), Practice: Architecture, technique and representation (pp. 163-178). London: Routledge.
  • Allen, L., & Pearson, L. C. (2016). Drawing futures: Speculations in contemporary drawing for art and architecture. London: UCL Press.
  • Allen, S. (2000). Practice: Architecture, technique and representation. London: Routledge.
  • Betsky, A. (2011). In a galaxy closer than we think: Bryan Cantley’s marginal architecture. In B. Cantley (Aut.), Mechudzu: New rhetorics for architecture (pp. 40-45). Vienna: Springer-Verlag.
  • Burden, E. (2000). Visionary architecture: Unbuilt works of the imagination. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Cantley, B. (2019). Interview with Bryan Cantley. Reflections of narrative architecture in transformational representations on the architectural design studio. Project No: MGA-2018-41686. Istanbul: ITU Coordination Unit of Scientific Research Projects.
  • Cantley, B. (2016a). Deconstructive text(s). Journal of Architectural Education, 70(1), 60-61.
  • Cantley, B. (2016b). Deviated futures and fantastical histories. In L. Allen, & L. C. Pearson (Eds.), Drawing futures: Speculations in contemporary drawing for art and architecture (pp. 184-187). London: UCL Press.
  • Cantley, B. (2011). Mechudzu: New rhetorics for architecture. Vienna: Springer-Verlag.
  • Chard, N. & Kulper, P. (2013). Pamphlet architecture 34: Fathoming the unfathomable. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  • Çelik, E. E. (2017). İnsan ve sonrası. Felsefi Düşün Akademik Felsefe Dergisi, 9, 1-15.
  • Deleuze, G. (2004). Desert islands and other texts 1953-1974. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1998). Essays critical and clinical. London: Verso.
  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. London: The Athlone.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
  • Dolin, B. (2005). Matta’s lucid landscape. In T. Mical (Ed.), Surrealism and architecture (pp. 53-59). New York: Routledge.
  • Heynen, H. (1999). Architecture and modernity: A critique. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Kaufmann, E. (1952). Three Revolutionary Architects, Boullée, Ledoux and Lequeu, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 42(3), 433- 564.
  • Mari, B. (1999). Preface. In M. Wigley (Aut.), Constant’s New Babylon: The Hyper-architecture of desire (pp. 5-6). Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
  • Michelis, M. D. (2002). Plates: Postmodern roots. In T. Riley (Ed.), The changing of the avant-garde: Visionary architectural drawings from the Howard Gilman collection (pp. 99-146) New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
  • Mucci, M. (2016). The Fall and the Rise: Lebbeus Woods’ Metaphorical and Narrative Drawings, In L. Allen, & L. C. Pearson (Eds.), Drawing futures: Speculations in contemporary drawing for art and architecture (pp. 155-161). London: UCL Press.
  • Ichida, Y., & Zourabichvili, F. (2016). İki ayrı düşünce olarak Deleuze ve Negri: Bir zenginlik ve bir şans. Cogito, 82, 27-32.
  • Pérez-Gómez, A. (1983). Architecture and the crisis of modern science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Riley, T., Deyong, S., Michelis, M. D., Antonelli, P. (2002). The changing of the avant-garde: Visionary architectural drawings from the Howard Gilman collection. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
  • Scolari, M. (2012). Oblique drawing: A history of anti hperspective. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Shojaee, S. M., & Saremi, S. A. (2018). Explaining the methods of architecture representation using semiotic analysis (Umberto Eco’s theory of architecture codes). International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 8(3), 33-48.
  • Spiller, N. (2018). A glimpse into Bryan Cantley’s thirdspace. In N. Spiller (Ed.), Celebrating the marvellous: Surrealism in architecture (pp. 92-97). Architectural Design.
  • Spiller, N. (2016). Architecture and surrealism: A blistering romance. London: Thames & Hudson.
  • Spiller, N. (2011). Drawing strength from machinery. In B. Cantley (Aut.), Mechudzu: New rhetorics for architecture (pp. 4-6). Vienna: Springer-Verlag.
  • Tafuri, M. (1987). The sphere and the labyrinth: Avant-gardes and architecture from Piranesi to the 1970’s. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Whyte, I. B. (1985). Crystal chain letters: Architectural fantasies by Bruno Taut and his circle. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Yalım, B., & Koyuncu, E. (2017). Çevirmenin notu. In G. Deleuze (Aut.), Fark ve tekrar (pp. 5-7). İstanbul: Norgunk.
  • Yavuz, O. (2018). Smooth surfaces: Discourse of passport photograph as a representation of origin. Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 8(2), 406-421.
  • Yücefer, H. (2016a). Gilles Deleuze: Ortadan başlamak. Cogito, 82, 5-10.
  • Yücefer, H. (2016b). Potansiyelleri düşünmek: Deleuze’de virtüellik, oluş ve tarih. Cogito, 82, 87-118.
APA MORTAŞ M, ÇEBİ P (2023). From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation. , 147 - 162. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
Chicago MORTAŞ Mustafa,ÇEBİ Pelin DURSUN From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation. (2023): 147 - 162. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
MLA MORTAŞ Mustafa,ÇEBİ Pelin DURSUN From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation. , 2023, ss.147 - 162. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
AMA MORTAŞ M,ÇEBİ P From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation. . 2023; 147 - 162. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
Vancouver MORTAŞ M,ÇEBİ P From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation. . 2023; 147 - 162. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
IEEE MORTAŞ M,ÇEBİ P "From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation." , ss.147 - 162, 2023. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
ISNAD MORTAŞ, Mustafa - ÇEBİ, Pelin DURSUN. "From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation". (2023), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
APA MORTAŞ M, ÇEBİ P (2023). From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 147 - 162. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
Chicago MORTAŞ Mustafa,ÇEBİ Pelin DURSUN From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 20, no.1 (2023): 147 - 162. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
MLA MORTAŞ Mustafa,ÇEBİ Pelin DURSUN From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.20, no.1, 2023, ss.147 - 162. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
AMA MORTAŞ M,ÇEBİ P From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 20(1): 147 - 162. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
Vancouver MORTAŞ M,ÇEBİ P From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 20(1): 147 - 162. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
IEEE MORTAŞ M,ÇEBİ P "From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation." A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, ss.147 - 162, 2023. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623
ISNAD MORTAŞ, Mustafa - ÇEBİ, Pelin DURSUN. "From actualization to virtuality: Differentiations of becoming in Bryan Cantley’s critical architectural representation". A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 20/1 (2023), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.98623