Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 92 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 42 - 48 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.33188/vetheder.789268 İndeks Tarihi: 15-06-2023
Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality
Öz: The aim of our research is to investigate the effects of parthenogenetic activation on in vitro embryo development rates in different mouse strains. B6CBAF1, C57BL/6j, and B6D2F1 mouse strains were used in this study. Superovulated mice were sacrificed and oocytes were obtained 14 hours after the human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) injection and the parthenogenetic activation started 18 hours after hCG injection. The oocytes were activated for 6 hours in 10 mM SrCl2 + 5 μg/mL-1 Cytohalasine B (CB) + 5 nM Trichostatin A (TSA) containing Ca2+ free Chatot Ziomek Brinster (CZB) activation medium. After this, further incubation was performed for two hours in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in embryo culturing medium + TSA. Finally, embryos were cultured for 120 hours. Parthenogenetic activation success of the B6D2F1 mouse strain was found to be higher than C57BL/6j and B6CBAF1 strains.
Anahtar Kelime: Farklı fare ırklarında parthenogenotik oosit aktivasyonun in vitro gelişim oran ve kalitesinin karşılaştırılması
Öz: Çalışmamızın amacı, partenogenetik aktivasyonda farklı fare ırklarında in vitro embriyo gelişimi ve kalitesi üzerindeki etkilerinin araştırılmasıdır. Bu çalışmada, B6CBAF1, C57BL/6j, and B6D2F1 farelerin superovulasyon ile elde edilen oositleri kullanılmıştır. Superovule edilen fareler, insan koryonik gonadotropin (hCG) uygulamasından 14 saat sonra oositler elde edildi ve 18 saat sonra partenogenetik aktivasyona başlandı. Oositler, 10 mM SrCl2 + 5 μg/mL-1 sitokalazin B (CB) + 5 nM trikostatin A (TSA) Ca 2+ içermeyen Chatot Ziomek Brinster (CZB) medyumu içerisinde 6 saat bekletildi. Aktivasyon sonrası, embriyo kültür medyumu + TSA’da inkübatörde 37°C ve %5 CO2 ortamında 2 saat bekletildi. Son olarak, tüm embriyolar 120 saat süre ile kültüre edildi. Bu çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar göre, B6D2F1 ırkının partenogenetik aktivasyon başarısı, C57BL/6j ve B6CBAF1 ırklarına göre daha yüksek bulundu.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Cuthbertson KS, Whittingham DG, Cobbold PH (1981): Free Ca2+ increases in exponential phases during mouse oocyte activation. Nature, 294, 754-757.
- 2. Kline D (1996): Activation of the mouse egg. Theriogenology, 45, 81–90.
- 3. Kishikawa H, Wakayama T, Yanagimachi R (1999): Comparison of oocyte-activating agents for mouse cloning. Cloning, 1, 153–159.
- 4. Campbell KHS (1999): Nuclear equivalence, nuclear transfer, and the cell cycle. Cloning, 1, 3–15.
- 5. De Sousa PA, Dobrinsky JR, Zhu J, Archibald AL, Ainslie A, Bosma W, Bowering J, Bracken J, Ferrier PM, Fletcher J, Gasparrini B, Harkness L, Johnston P, Ritchie M, Ritchie WA, Travers A, Albertini D, Dinnyes A, King TJ, Wilmut I (2002): Somatic cell nuclear transfer in the pig: control of pronuclear formation and integration with improved methods for activation and maintenance of pregnancy. Biol Reprod, 66, 642–650.
- 6. Ma SF, Liu XY, Miao DQ, Han ZB, Zhang X, Miao YL, Yanagimachi R, Tan JH (2005): Parthenogenetic activation of mouse oocytes by strontium chloride: A search for the best conditions. Theriogenology, 64, 1142– 1157.
- 7. Versieren K, Heindryckx B, Lierman S, Gerris J, De Sutter P (2010): Developmental competence of parthenogenetic mouse and human embryos after chemical or electrical activation. Reprod Biomed Online, 21,769-775.
- 8. Han BS, Gao JL (2013): Effects of chemical combinations on the parthenogenetic activation of mouse oocytes. Exp Ther Med, 5, 1281-1288.
- 9. Bai GY, Song SH, Wang ZD, Shan ZY, Sun RZ, Liu CJ, Wu YS, Li T, Lei L (2016): Embryos aggregation improves development and imprinting gene expression in mouse parthenogenesis. Dev Growth Differ, 58, 270-279.
- 10. Fulka H, Hirose M, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Wakisaka N, Matoba S, Ogura A, Mosko T, Kott T, Fulka J (2011): Production of mouse embryonic stem cell lines from maturing oocytes by direct conversion of meiosis intomitosis. Stem Cells, 29, 517-527.
- 11. Didié M, Christalla P, Rubart M, Muppala V, Döker S, Unsöld B, El-Armouche A, Rau T, Eschenhagen T, Alexander P. Schwoerer AP, Ehmke H, Schumacher U, Fuchs S, Lange C, Becker A, Tao W, Scherschel JA, Soonpaa MH, Yang T, Lin Q, Zenke M, Han DW, Schöler HR, Rudolph C, Steinemann D, Schlegelberger B, Kattman S, Witty A, Keller G, Field LJ, Zimmermann WH (2013): Parthenogenetic stem cells for tissue-engineered heart repair. J Clin Invest, 123, 1285-1298.
- 12. Daughtry B, Mitalipov S (2014): Concise review: parthenote stem cells for regenerative medicine: genetic, epigenetic, and developmental features. Stem Cells Transl Med, 3, 290-298.
- 13. Dandekar PV, Glass RH (1987): Development of mouse embryos in vitro is affected by strain and culture medium. Gamete Res, 17, 279–285.
- 14. Herrick JR, Paik T, Strauss KJ, Schoolcraft WB, Krisher RL (2016): Building a better mouse embryo assay: effects of mouse strain and in vitro maturation on sensitivity to contaminants of the culture environment. J Assist Reprod Genet, 33, 237-245.
- 15. Czechanski A, Byers C, Greenstein I, Schrode N, Donahue LR, Hadjantonakis AK, Reinhold LG (2014): Derivation and characterization of mouse embryonic stem cells from permissive and nonpermissive strains. Nat Protoc, 9, 559-574.
- 16. Ogura A, Inoue, K, & Wakayama T (2013): Recent advancements in cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 368, 20110329.
- 17. Bagis H, Aktoprakligil D, Gunes C, Arat S, Akkoc T, Cetinkaya G, Kankavi O, Taskin AC, Arslan K, Dundar M, Tsoncheva VL, Ivanov IG (2011): Expression of biologically active human interferon gamma in the milk of transgenic mice under the control of the murine whey acidic protein gene promoter. Biochem Genet, 49, 251-257.
- 18. Mallol A, Santaló J, Ibáñez E (2014): Psammaplin a improves development and quality of somatic cell nuclear transfer mouse embryos. Cellular Reprogram, 16, 392-406.
- 19. Taşkın AC, Akkoç T, Sağırkaya H, Bağış H, Arat S (2016): Comparison of the development of mouse embryos manipulated with different biopsy techniques. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 40, 157-162.
- 20. Taşkın AC, Kocabay A, Ebrahimi A, Karahüseyinoğlu S, Şahin GN, Ozcimen B, Ruacan A, Onder TT (2019): Leptin treatment of in vitro cultured embryos increases outgrowth rate of inner cell mass during embryonicstem cell derivation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim, 55, 473-481.
- 21. Taşkın AC, Kocabay A (2019): Leptin supplementation in embryo culture medium increases in vivo implantation rates in mice. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 43, 359-363.
- 22. Mallol A, Santaló J, Ibáñez E (2014): Psammaplin a improves development and quality of somatic cell nuclear transfer mouse embryos. Cellular Reprogram, 16, 392-406.
- 23. Mallol A, Santaló J, Ibáñez E (2013) Comparison of three differential mouse blastocyst staining methods. Syst Biol Reprod Med, 59, 117-122.
- 24. Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R (1998): Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature, 394, 369-374.
- 25. Beck JA, Lloyd S, Hafezparast M, Lennon Pierce M, Eppig JT, Festing MF, Fisher EM (2000): Genealogies of mouse inbred strains. Nat Genet, 24, 23–25.
- 26. Heytens E, Soleimani R, Lierman S, De Meester S, Gerris J, Dhont M, Van der Elst J, De Sutter P (2008): Effect of ionomycin on oocyte activation and embryo development in mouse. Reprod Biomed Online, 17, 764-771.
- 27. Sung LY, Chang CC, Amano T, Lin CJ, Amano M, Treaster SB, Xu J, Chang WF, Nagy ZP, Yang X, Tian XC (2010): Efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells from nuclear transfer and parthenogenetic embryos derived from cryopreserved oocytes. Cellular Reprogram, 12, 203-211.
- 28. Gao W, Yu X, Hao J, Wang L, Qi M, Han L, Lin C, Wang D (2019): Ascorbic acid improves parthenogenetic embryo development through TET proteins in mice. Biosci Rep, 39, 1-8.
- 29. Alberio R, Zakhartchenko V, Motlik J, Wolf E (2001): Mammalianoocyte activation: lessons from the sperm and implications for nuclear transfer. Int J Dev Biol, 45, 797-809.
- 30. Carvacho I, Lee HC, Fissore RA, Clapham DE (2013): TRPV3 channels mediate strontium-induced mouse-egg activation. Cell Rep, 5, 1375-1386.
- 31. Miao YL, Stein P, Jefferson WN, Padilla-Banks E, Williams CJ (2012): Calcium influx-mediated signaling is required for complete mouse egg activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109, 4169-4174.
- 32. Haverfield J, Nakagawa S, Love D, Tsichlaki E, Nomikos M, Lai FA, Swann K, FitzHarris G (2016): Ca 2+ dynamics in oocytes from naturally-aged mice. Sci Rep, 6, 19357.
- 33. McDonough CE, Bernhardt ML, Williams CJ (2020): Mouse strain dependent egg factors regulate calcium signals at fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev, 87, 284-292.
- 34. Czajkowska K, Walewska A, Ishikawa T, Szczepańska K, Ajduk A (2020): Age-related alterations in fertilization-induced Ca2+ oscillations depend on the genetic background of mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod, 103, 986-999.
| APA | Taskin A, Kocabay A, GUL S, ÇAĞLAR ERKAL K (2021). Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality. , 42 - 48. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| Chicago | Taskin Ali Cihan,Kocabay Ahmet,GUL SEREF,ÇAĞLAR ERKAL Kübra Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality. (2021): 42 - 48. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| MLA | Taskin Ali Cihan,Kocabay Ahmet,GUL SEREF,ÇAĞLAR ERKAL Kübra Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality. , 2021, ss.42 - 48. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| AMA | Taskin A,Kocabay A,GUL S,ÇAĞLAR ERKAL K Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality. . 2021; 42 - 48. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| Vancouver | Taskin A,Kocabay A,GUL S,ÇAĞLAR ERKAL K Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality. . 2021; 42 - 48. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| IEEE | Taskin A,Kocabay A,GUL S,ÇAĞLAR ERKAL K "Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality." , ss.42 - 48, 2021. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| ISNAD | Taskin, Ali Cihan vd. "Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality". (2021), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| APA | Taskin A, Kocabay A, GUL S, ÇAĞLAR ERKAL K (2021). Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, 92(1), 42 - 48. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| Chicago | Taskin Ali Cihan,Kocabay Ahmet,GUL SEREF,ÇAĞLAR ERKAL Kübra Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi 92, no.1 (2021): 42 - 48. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| MLA | Taskin Ali Cihan,Kocabay Ahmet,GUL SEREF,ÇAĞLAR ERKAL Kübra Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, vol.92, no.1, 2021, ss.42 - 48. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| AMA | Taskin A,Kocabay A,GUL S,ÇAĞLAR ERKAL K Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi. 2021; 92(1): 42 - 48. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| Vancouver | Taskin A,Kocabay A,GUL S,ÇAĞLAR ERKAL K Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality. Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi. 2021; 92(1): 42 - 48. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| IEEE | Taskin A,Kocabay A,GUL S,ÇAĞLAR ERKAL K "Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality." Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi, 92, ss.42 - 48, 2021. 10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
| ISNAD | Taskin, Ali Cihan vd. "Comparison of parthenogenetic oocyte activation in different mouse strains on in vitro development rate and quality". Veteriner Hekimler Derneği Dergisi 92/1 (2021), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.33188/vetheder.789268 |
