Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907)

İNAL, Tuba

Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907)

Tuba İNAL (Department of Political Science and Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies Program, University of Richmond)

Uluslararası İlişkiler

3 0

Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 29 Sayfa Aralığı: 27 - 47 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907)

Öz:

Bu makale savaşlarda görülen benzer iki uygulama olan yağma ve tecavüzün uluslararası hukukça ele alınışına bakarak birbiriyle ilişkili iki teorik soruya cevap aramaktadır: Uluslararası ilişkilerde değişim, bilhassa hukuksallaşmış rejim değişimi nasıl gerçekleşir ve toplumsal cinsiyetin bir kategori olarak bu değişim sürecindeki rolü nedir? Buradaki görüş, hukuksallaşmış bir yasak rejiminin ortaya çıkabilmesi için üç şartın gerekli olduğudur: Öncelikle devletler yasağa uyabileceklerine inanmalıdır çünkü ihlâlin maliyeti yüksektir. İkincisi söz konusu uygulamanın anormal/istenmeyen olduğuna dair fikirlerin gelişmesine elverişli bir normatif ortam gereklidir. Son olarak, bu fikirleri yayarak rejim oluşumu için çalışan aktörler olmalıdır. Yağma ve tecavüze karşı rejimlerin oluşumu arasındaki 100 yıllık zaman farkı toplumsal cinsiyetin bu süreçteki rolünü de açığa çıkarır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Uluslararası İlişkiler

The (non-)prohibition of rape and pillage in war: the hague conventions (1899, 1907)

Öz:

Th is article seeks to explain two related theoretical questions by looking at the treatment of two related practices of war, pillage and rape, by international law: How does change, particularly legalized regime change, happen in international relations and what is the role of “gender” as a category in this process of change? Th e argument here is that three conditions are necessary for the emergence of a legalized prohibition regime: Firstly, states must believe that they can comply with the prohibition because non-compliance is costly. Secondly, a normative context conducive to the idea that the particular practice is abnormal/undesirable is necessary. Th irdly, actors actively propagating these ideas to promote the creation of a particular regime should exist. Th e 100-year temporal diff erence between the emergence of the regimes against pillage and rape reveals the role of gender in this process.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Uluslararası İlişkiler

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne-Marie Slaughter ve Duncan Snidal, “Th e Concept of Legalization”, International Organization, Cilt 54, No 3, 2000, s.401-419.
Abbott, Kenneth W. ve Duncan Snidal, “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance”, International Organization, Cilt 54, No 3, 2000, s. 421-456.
Anderson, Bonnie S., “Th e Lid Comes Off : International Radical Feminism and the Revolutions of 1848”, NWSA Journal, Cilt 10, No 2. http://iupjournals.org/nwsa/nws10-2.html (Erişim Tarihi 3 ubat 2008).
Best, Geoff rey, “Peace Conferences and the Century of Total War: Th e 1899 Hague Conference and What Came After”, International Aff airs, Cilt 75, No 3, 1999, s. 619-634.
Brownmiller, Susan, Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1975.
Burgess-Jackson, Keith, “A History of Rape Law”, Keith Burgess-Jackson (der.), A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape, New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999.
Card, Claudia, “Rape as a Weapon of War”, Hypatia, Cilt 11, No 4, 1996, s. 5-18.
Clark, Anne, “Rape or Seduction? A controversy Over Sexual Violence in the Nineteenth Century”, Th e Sexual Dynamics of History: Men’s Power, Women’s Resistance, Th e London Feminist History Group, London, Pluto Press, 1983.
Clark, Anne, Women’s Silence, Men’s Violence: Sexual Assault in England 1770-1845, London, New York, Pandora, 1987.
Copelon, Rhonda, “Surfacing Gender: Reconceptualizing Crimes Against Women in Time of War”, Alexandra Stiglmayer (der.), Mass Rape: Th e War Against Women in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Lincoln, London, University of Nebraska Press, 1994.
Davis, Calvin D., Th e United States and the Second Hague Peace Conference, Durham, Duke University Press, 1976.
Donat, Patricia L.N. ve John D’Emilio, “A Feminist Redefinition of Rape and Sexual Assault: Historical Foundations and Change”, Mary E. Odem, M.E. ve Jody Clay-Warner (der.), Confronting Rape and Sexual Assault, Lanham, Scholarly Resources, 1998.
Edwards, Susan S.M., Female Sexuality and the Law, Oxford, Martin Robertson, 1981.
Enloe, Cynthia, Does Khaki Become You? Th e Militarisation of Women’s Lives, London, Boston, South End Press, 1983
Enloe, Cynthia, Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1990.
Enloe, Cynthia, Maneuvers: Th e International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2000.
Estrich, Susan, Real Rape, Cambridge, London, Harvard University Press, 1987.
Feilchenfeld, Ernst H., Th e International Economic Law of Belligerent Occupation, Washington D.C., Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1942.
Florini, Ann, “Th e Evolution of International Norms”, International Studies Quarterly, Cilt 40, 1996, s. 363-389.
Graber, Doris A., Th e Development of the Law of Belligerent Occupation 1863-1914, New York, Columbia University Press, 1949.
Higgins, A. Pearce, War and the Private Citizen, London, P.S. King and Son, 1912.
Inge, William R., Outspoken Essays, London, Longmans, Green and Co, 1927.
Katzenstein, Peter J., (der.), Th e Culture of National Security, New York, Columbia University Press, 1996.
Kelley, Judith, “Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? Th e International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements”, American Political Science Review, Cilt 101, No 3, 2007, s. 573-589.
Kenney, Sally J., “New Research on Gendered Political Institutions”, Political Research Quarterly, Cilt 49, No 2, 1996, s. 445-466.
Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1984.
Krasner, Stephen D. (der.), International Regimes, Ithaca, London, Cornell University Press, 1983.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. ve John G. Ruggie, “International Organization: A State of the Art on the Art of the State”, International Organization, Cilt 40, No 4, 1986, s. 753-775.
Mearsheimer, John J., “Th e False Promise of International Institutions”, International Security, Cilt 19, No 3, 1995, s. 5-49.
Morris, Madeline, “By Force of Arms: Rape, War and Military Culture”, Duke Law Journal, Cilt 45, No 4, 1996, s. 651-781.
Morrow, James D., “When Do States Follow the Laws of War?” American Political Science Review, Cilt 101, No 3, 2007, s. 559-572.
Nabulsi, Karma, Traditions of War: Occupation, Resistance and the Law, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, 1999.
Nadelmann, Ethan A., “Global Prohibition Regimes: Th e Evolution of Norms in International Society”, International Organization, Cilt 44, No 4, 1990, s. 479-526.
Okin, Susan Moller, Women in Western Political Th ought, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1979.
Peterson, V. Spike ve Anne Sisson Runyan, Global Gender Issues in the New Millennium, Boulder, Westview Press, 2010.
Pustogarov, Vladimir, “Fyodor Fyodorovich Martens (1845-1909) - A Humanist of Modern Times”, International Review of the Red Cross, Cilt 312, 1996, s. 300-314.
Redlich, Fritz, De Praeda Militari, Pillage and Booty 1500-1815, Wiesbaden, Franz Steiner, 1956.
Rupp, Leila J., “Solidarity and Wartime Violence against Women”, Lois Ann Lorentzen ve Jennifer Turpin, (der.), The Women and War Reader, New York, London, New York University Press, 1998.
Sanday, Peggy R., “Rape-Free versus Rape-Prone”, Cheryl Brown-Travis (der.), Evolution, Gender and Rape, Cambridge, London, MIT Press, 2003.
Scott, James B., Th e Proceedings of Th e Hague Peace Conferences: Translation of the Off icial Texts, Th e Conference of 1899, New York, Oxford University Press, 1920.
Shanley, Mary L., Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850-1895, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1989.
Smart, Carol, “Disruptive Bodies and Unruly Sex: Th e Regulation of Reproduction and Sexuality in the Nineteenth Century”, Carol Smart (der.), Regulating Womanhood: Historical Essays on Marriage, Motherhood, and Sexuality, London, New York, Routledge, 1992.
Spadafora, David, Th e Idea of Progress in 18th Century Britain, New Haven, London, Yale University Press, 1990.
Sunstein, Cass R., Free Markets and Social Justice, New York, Oxford University Press, 1997.
“Th e Hague Appeal for Peace”, http://www.haguepeace.org/index.php?action=history&subAction=conf&selection= when (Erişim Tarihi 8 Haziran 2008).
Tickner, Ann J., Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security, New York, Columbia, 1992.
Vigarello, Georges, A History of Rape: Sexual Violence in France from the 16th Century to the 20th Century, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2001.
Vogel, Ursula, “Th e Double Standard of Adultery in Nineteenth-Century Law”, Carol Smart (der.), Regulating Womanhood: Historical Essays on Marriage, Motherhood, and Sexuality, London, New York, Routledge, 1992.
White, Andrew D., Th e Hague Peace Conference, Boston, Th e World Peace Foundation, 1912.
“Who were the Comfort Women?-Th e Establishment of Comfort Stations,” Digital Museum- Th e Comfort Women Issue and the Asian Women’s Fund, http://www.awf.or.jp/e1/facts-01.html (Erişim Tarihi 16 Mayıs 2008).

APA	İNAL T (2011). Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907). , 27 - 47.
Chicago	İNAL Tuba Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907). (2011): 27 - 47.
MLA	İNAL Tuba Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907). , 2011, ss.27 - 47.
AMA	İNAL T Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907). . 2011; 27 - 47.
Vancouver	İNAL T Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907). . 2011; 27 - 47.
IEEE	İNAL T "Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907)." , ss.27 - 47, 2011.
ISNAD	İNAL, Tuba. "Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907)". (2011), 27-47.

APA	İNAL T (2011). Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907). Uluslararası İlişkiler, 8(29), 27 - 47.
Chicago	İNAL Tuba Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907). Uluslararası İlişkiler 8, no.29 (2011): 27 - 47.
MLA	İNAL Tuba Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907). Uluslararası İlişkiler, vol.8, no.29, 2011, ss.27 - 47.
AMA	İNAL T Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907). Uluslararası İlişkiler. 2011; 8(29): 27 - 47.
Vancouver	İNAL T Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907). Uluslararası İlişkiler. 2011; 8(29): 27 - 47.
IEEE	İNAL T "Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907)." Uluslararası İlişkiler, 8, ss.27 - 47, 2011.
ISNAD	İNAL, Tuba. "Savaş hukukunda tecavüz ve yağmayı yasakla(ma)yan rejimler lahey sözleşmeleri (1899, 1907)". Uluslararası İlişkiler 8/29 (2011), 27-47.