Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 72 Sayfa Aralığı: 71 - 95 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 İndeks Tarihi: 03-07-2023
Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law
Öz: In this paper, the “legal aid” mechanism, which is an institution that enables parties to participate effectively in the judicial process and “balances” interference with the right of access to court, is discussed. The discussion focusses on the way it facilitates various possibilities of putting forward the claims and pieces of evidence of parties wishing to prove their claims. In this context, the legal aid institution is dealt with primarily within the framework of the right of access to court within the scope of the right to a fair trial. Then, under article 31 of the İYUK, the legal framework of the legal aid institution in the civil procedure is drawn and the application of the legal aid institution in the administrative jurisdiction is examined. This is done only in terms of administrative disputes, excluding cases related to tax disputes due to the difference in the nature of taxation transactions.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Akıncı M, İdari Yargıda Adil Yargılanma Hakkı (Turhan, 2008)
- Akyılmaz B - Sezginer M - Kaya C, Türk İdari Yargılama Hukuku (6th Ed., Savaş 2021)
- Arslan R - Yılmaz E - Taşpınar Ayvaz S – Hanağası E, Medeni Usul Hukuku (7th. Ed., Yetkin, 2021)
- Aslan Z - Barlass İ - Berk K - Arat N - Kağıtçıoğlu M - Altındağ H - Gümüşkaya G - Sayhan Ş - Bardakçı M.A. - Yüzbaşıoğlu C, Açıklamalı İçtihatlı İdari Yargılama Usulü Kanunu -Vergi Yargılaması Dahil (Ed. Zehreddin Aslan) (3rd Ed., Seçkin, 2022)
- Candan T, “Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun Hükümlerinin İdari Yargıda Uygulanabilirliği”, https://turgutcandan.com/2021/04/08/hukuk-muhakemeleri-kanununun-hukumlerinin-idari- davalarda-uygulanabilirligi/ (Online Access 14.12.2022)
- Candan T, İdari Yargılama Usulü Kanunu (4th Ed., Adalet, 2011)
- Çırakman E, “Hukuk Yargılama Usulünün İdari Yargıda Uygulanabilirliği” İdari Yargıda Son Gelişmeler Sempozyumu (Danıştay Yayınları, 1982)
- Duran L, “Danıştay’ın 1979 Yılı Kararları Üzerine Kısa Mülahazalar”, 13 (3) Amme İdaresi Dergisi (1980)
- Erem F, “Adli Yardım”, İmran Öktem’e Armağan (Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, 1970) 107-124
- Gözübüyük, Ş - Dinçer, G, İdari Yargılama Usulü (Kanun – Açıklama – İçtihat) (2.Ed., Turhan, 2001)
- Günday M, “Hukuk Usulü Muhakemeleri Kanunu Hükümlerinin İdari Yargıda Uygulanma Alanı” İdari Yargının Yeniden Yapılandırılması ve Karşılaştırmalı İdari Yargılama Usulü Sempozyumu (11-12 May 2001) (Danıştay Başkanlığı Yayınları No.63, 2003) 79-86
- Harris D - O’Boyle M - Bates E - Buckley C, European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford, 2018)
- İnceoğlu S, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı (Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler) (4th. Ed., Beta, 2013)
- İnceoğlu S - Arat N - Duymaz E, İdari Yargıda Adil Yargılanma Hakkına İlişkin Emsal Kararlar, (Avrupa Konseyi Yayınları, 2022)
- Kaplan O, “The Legal Aid in Turkish Administrative Procedure Law in the Light of the ECHR Case-Law” Law & Justice Review (Year 11, Issue 20, June 2020) 89-107
- Kılınç A, “Bir İnsan Hakkı Olarak ‘Adli Yardım’” Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi (V.3, N.1, 2011) 1-10
- Kodakoğlu L, İstinaf Sürecinde Bölge İdare Mahkemesinde Görevli Personelin Görev Tanımı ve İş Akışı Rehber El Kitabı (Avrupa Konseyi Yayınları, 2022)
- Köksal M, “Adli Yardım (Müzahereti Adliye) Kurumunun İdari Yargıdaki Uygulaması” Terazi Hukuk Dergisi (No.40, Aralık 2009) 97-112
- Kuru B, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usulü, V.5 (6th Ed., Demir, 2001)
- Pekcanıtez H, Medeni Usul Hukuku V. III (15th Ed, Oniki Levha, 2018)
- Pekcanıtez H - Atalay, O - Özekes, M, Medeni Usul Hukuku (9. Ed., Oniki Levha, 2021)
- Postacıoğlu İ - Altay S, Medeni Usul Hukuku Dersleri (8th Ed.,Vedat, 2020)
- Süslü G, “Türk Hukuku’nda Adil Yargılanma Hakkı Çerçevesinde Bir Mahkemeye Başvuru Hakkı ve Bu Alanda Devletin Pozitif Yükümlülüğü” Hukuk ve Adalet Eleştirel Hukuk Dergisi (V.6, N.16, 2014) 83-117
- Tanrıver S, Medeni Usul Hukuku, V.I, (4rd Ed., Yetkin, 2022)
- Ulusoy A, İdari Yargılama Hukuku, (3rd Ed., Yetkin, 2022)
- Yılmaz E, “Adli Yardım Kurumunun İdari Yargıda Uygulanması” Ejder Yılmaz “Makaleler (1973- 2013) V.1 (Yetkin, 2014) 565-575
- Yılmaz E, “Yargılama Giderlerinin İşlevi ve Sosyal Hukuk Devleti” Ejder Yılmaz “Makaleler (1973-2013) V.1 (Yetkin, 2014) 383-403
- Airey v Ireland, App no 6289/73 (ECHR, 9 October 1979)
- Ait-Mouhoub v France, App no 103/1997/887/1099 (ECtHR, 28 October 1998)
- Ashingdane v UK, App no 8225/78 (ECHR, 12 May 1983)
- Bakan v Turkey, App no. 50939/99 (ECtHR, 12 June 2007)
- Eyüp Kaya v Turkey, App no 17582/04 (ECtHR, 23 September 2008)
- Golder v UK, App no 4451/70 (ECHR, 21 February 1975)
- İlbeyi Kemaloğlu and Meriye Kemaloğlu v Turkey, App no 19986/06, (ECtHR, 10 July 2012)
- Kaba v Turkey, App no. 1236/05, (ECtHR, 1 March 2011)
- Kreuz v Poland, App no 28249/95 (ECtHR, 19 June 2001)
- Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v Turkey, App no 52658/99 (ECtHR, 17 July 2007)
- Stubbings and Others v UK App no 22083/93, 22095/93 (ECtHR, 22 October 1996)
- Sialkowska v. Poland App no 8932/05 (ECtHR, 9 July 2007)
- Quaranda v Switzerland, App no 12744/87 (ECtHR, 24 May 1991)
- File nr. 2014/177, Decision nr.2015/49 (AYM, 14 May 2015)
- Famiye Beğim ve Mehmet Tahir Beğim, App no 2017/21882 (AYM, 10 February 2021)
- Özkan Şen, App no 2012/791 (AYM, 07 November 2013)
- S.B., App no 2017/19758, (AYM, 02 December 2020)
- Serkan AcarApp no 2013/1613, (AYM, 02 October 2013)
- Tacettin Ceylan, App no 2017/39062 (AYM, 10 November 2021)
- File nr. 1971/1, Decision nr. 1979/1 (Danıştay General Assembly on Unification of Case Law, 08 March 1979)
- File nr. 2000/8454, Decision nr. 2003/4807 (Danıştay 7th Chamber, 19 November 2003)
- File nr. 2009/313 (Van 2nd Administrative Court’s judgment, 12 February 2009)
- File nr. 2009/3631, Decision nr. 2009/3579, (Danıştay 8th Chamber, 01 June 2009)
- File nr. 2008/2007, Decision nr. 2010/1843, (Danıştay 10th Chamber, 09 March 2010)
- File nr. 2008/1136, Decision nr. 2011/4131 (Danıştay 10th Chamber, 10 October 2011)
- File nr..2009/9171, Decision nr. 2013/2229, (Danıştay 10th Chamber,12 March 2013)
- File nr. 2013/100, Decision nr. 2013/1943, (Danıştay 15th Chamber, 14 March 2013)
- File nr. 2012/335, Decision nr. 2013/1490, (Danıştay 15th Chamber, 21 March 2013)
- File nr. 2012/8689, Decision nr. 2015/795, (Danıştay 10th Chamber, 26 February 2015)
- File nr. 2014/10421, Decision nr. 2015/5156, (Danıştay 6th Chamber, 11 September 2015)
- File nr. 2014/5592, Decision nr. 2016/720, (Danıştay 6th Chamber, 23 February 2016)
- File nr. 2015/4528, Decision nr. 2016/1687 (Danıştay 10th Chamber, 28 March 2016)
- File nr. 2015/4837, Decision nr. 2016/1832, (Danıştay 10th Chamber, 31 March 2016)
- File nr. 2017/915, Decision nr. 2017/2524, (Danıştay 6th Chamber, 12 April 2017).
- File nr. 2017/333, Decision nr. 2018/503, (Danıştay 10th Chamber, 12 Februry 2018)
- File nr. 2016/13856, Decision nr. 2018/505, (Danıştay 10th Chamber, 12 February 2018)
- File nr. 2020/957, Decision nr. 2020/776 (Konya Regional Administrative Court 2nd Administrative Case Chamber, 31 March 2020)
- File nr. 2020/2476, Decision nr. 2020/2418, (Danıştay 5th Chamber, 17 June 2020)
- File nr. 2019/3824, Decision nr. 2020/1625 (Ankara Regional Administrative Court 13th Administrative Case Chamber, 25 June 2020)
- File nr. 2018/6356, Decision nr. 2020/3661 (Danıştay 8th Chamber, 17 September 2020)
- File nr. 2020/955, Decision nr. 2020/993 (İzmir Regional Administrative Court 5th Administrative Case Chamber, 13 October 2020)
- File nr. 2020/1094, Decision nr. 2020/1856 (Danıştay Plenary Session of Administrative Law Chambers, 14 October 2020)
- File nr. 2019/5812, Decision nr. 2020/2639 (Ankara Regional Administrative Court 13th Administrative Case Chamber, 10 November 2020)
- File nr. 2020/2273, Decision nr. 2020/3453, (Danıştay 2nd Chamber, 24 November 2020)
- File nr. 2020/3499, Decision nr. 2020/3381 (Ankara Regional Administrative Court 13th Administrative Case Chamber, 09 December 2020)
- File nr. 2019/6086, Decision nr. 2020/3591 (Ankara Regional Administrative Court 13th Administrative Case Chamber, 17 December 2020)
- File nr. 2020/2272, Decision nr. 2020/3667, (Danıştay 2nd Chamber, 29 December 2020)
- File nr. 2019/1801, Decision nr. 2020/1610, (Danıştay Plenary Session of Tax Court Chambers, 30 December 2020)
- File nr. 2020/4737, Decision nr. .2021/965, (Danıştay 12th Chamber, 24 February 2021)
- File nr. 2021/744, Decision nr. 2021/1098, (Danıştay 10th Chamber, 11 March 2021)
- File nr. 2021/17256, Decision nr. 2021/2428, (Danıştay 2nd Chamber, 07 July 2021)
- File nr. 2021/4257, Decision nr. 2022/120 (Danıştay 13th Chamber, 19 January 2022)
- File nr. 2012/16745, Decision nr. 2013/15211 (Yargıtay 11th Chamber, 09 September 2013)
- File nr. 2015/3915, Decision nr. 2015/4401 (Yargıtay 15th Chamber, 14 September 2015)
- File nr. 2015, 5208, Decision nr. 2015/5910 (Yargıtay 15th Chamber, 19 November 2015)
| APA | arat n (2023). Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law. , 71 - 95. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| Chicago | arat nilay Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law. (2023): 71 - 95. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| MLA | arat nilay Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law. , 2023, ss.71 - 95. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| AMA | arat n Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law. . 2023; 71 - 95. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| Vancouver | arat n Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law. . 2023; 71 - 95. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| IEEE | arat n "Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law." , ss.71 - 95, 2023. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| ISNAD | arat, nilay. "Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law". (2023), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| APA | arat n (2023). Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d Istanbul, 0(72), 71 - 95. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| Chicago | arat nilay Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d Istanbul 0, no.72 (2023): 71 - 95. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| MLA | arat nilay Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d Istanbul, vol.0, no.72, 2023, ss.71 - 95. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| AMA | arat n Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d Istanbul. 2023; 0(72): 71 - 95. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| Vancouver | arat n Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d Istanbul. 2023; 0(72): 71 - 95. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| IEEE | arat n "Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law." Annales de la Faculté de Droit d Istanbul, 0, ss.71 - 95, 2023. 10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
| ISNAD | arat, nilay. "Legal Aid Under Turkish Administrative Judicial Procedural Law". Annales de la Faculté de Droit d Istanbul 72 (2023), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2023.72.0005 |
