BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller

İlkay ÇAMLIDAĞ (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Samsun, Türkiye)
Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri
3 1
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 275 - 285 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.5152/trs.2022.221966 İndeks Tarihi: 05-07-2023

BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller

Öz:
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1]. Elsayes KM, Al-Hawary MM, Jagdish J, Ganesh HS, Platt JF. CT enterography: principles, trends, and interpretation of findings. RadioGraphics. 2010; 30(7):1955-70. [CrossRef]
  • [2]. Macari M, Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ. A pattern approach to the abnormal small bowel: observations at MDCT and CT enterography. AJR Am J Roentge- nol. 2007; 188(5):1344-55. [CrossRef]
  • [3]. Megibow AJ, Babb JS, Hecht EM et al. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT. Radiology-Radiological Society of North America.Radiology. 2006;238(1):87-95.[CrossRef]
  • [4]. Baker ME, Hara AK, Platt JF, Maglinte DD, Fletc- her JG. CT enterography for Crohn’s disease: opti- mal technique and imaging issues. Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40(5):938-52. [CrossRef]
  • [5]. Ilangovan R, Burling D, George A, Gupta A, Mars- hall M, Taylor SA. CT enterography: review of tech- nique and practical tips. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1015):876-86. [CrossRef]
  • [6]. Singla D, Chandak S, Malhotra A, Agarwal A, Raman T, Chaudhary M. CT Enterography using four different endoluminal contrast agents: A com- parative study. J Gastrointest Abdom Rad. 2022; 05(1):016-22. [CrossRef]
  • [7]. Boudiaf M, Jaff A, Soyer P, Bouhnik Y, Hamzi L, Rymer R. Small-bowel diseases: prospective evalu- ation of multi–detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2004; 233(2):338-44. [CrossRef]
  • [8]. Wnorowski AM, Guglielmo FF, Mitchell DG. How to perform and interpret cine MR enterography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 42(5):1180-9. [CrossRef]
  • [9]. Hong SS, Kim AY, Byun JH et al. MDCT of small- bowel disease: value of 3D imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(5):1212-21. [CrossRef]
  • [10]. Hebert JJ, Taylor AJ, Winter TC, Reichelderfer M, Weichert JP. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography. Abdom Imaging. 2006; 31(1):48-53. [CrossRef]
  • [11]. Leduc F, De A, Rebello R, Muhn N, Ioannidis G. A comparative study of four oral contrast agents for small bowel distension with computed tomography enterography. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2015; 66(2):140- 4. [CrossRef]
  • [12]. Young BM, Fletcher JG, Booya F et al. Head-to- head comparison of oral contrast agents for cross-se- ctional enterography: small bowel distention, timing, and side effects. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008; 32(1):32-8. [CrossRef]
  • [13]. Ajaj W, Goyen M, Schneemann H et al. Oral cont- rast agents for small bowel distension in MRI: inf- luence of the osmolarity for small bowel distention. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15(7):1400-6. [CrossRef]
  • [14]. Borthne AS, Abdelnoor M, Hellund JC et al. MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concent- rations of an oral osmotic agent. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15(4):666-71. [CrossRef]
  • [15]. Bruining DH, Zimmermann EM, Loftus Jr EV et al. Consensus recommendations for evaluation, interp- retation, and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance enterography in patients with small bowel Crohn’s disease. Gastroentero- logy. 2018; 154(4):1172-94. [CrossRef]
  • [16]. American College of Radiology. ACR-SAR-SPR Practice parameter for the performance of CT ente- rography. 2017. Available at: https://www.acr.org/-/ media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/CT-Entero. pdf
  • [17]. Schindera ST, Nelson RC, DeLong DM et al. Multi– detector row CT of the small bowel: peak enhance- ment temporal window—initial experience. Radio- logy. 2007; 243(2):438-44. [CrossRef]
  • [18]. Baker ME, Walter J, Obuchowski NA et al. Mural attenuation in normal small bowel and active inflam- matory Crohn's disease on CT enterography: location, absolute attenuation, relative attenuation, and the effect of wall thickness. AJR Am J Roentge- nol. 2009; 192(2):417-23. [CrossRef]
  • [19]. Vandenbroucke F, Mortelé KJ, Tatli S et al. Nonin- vasive multidetector computed tomography ente- rography in patients with small-bowel Crohn's disease: is a 40-second delay better than 70 seconds? Acta Radiol. 2007; 48(10):1052-60. [CrossRef]
  • [20]. Hara AK, Walker FB, Silva AC, Leighton JA. Pre- liminary estimate of triphasic CT enterography per- formance in hemodynamically stable patients with suspected gastrointestinal bleeding. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(5):1252-60. [CrossRef]
  • [21]. Huprich JE, Barlow JM, Hansel SL, Alexander JA, Fidler JL. Multiphase CT enterography evaluation of small-bowel vascular lesions. AJR Am J Roentge- nol. 2013; 201(1):65-72. [CrossRef]
  • [22]. Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL et al. Prospective blinded comparison of wireless capsule endoscopy and multiphase CT enterography in obscure gastro- intestinal bleeding. Radiology. 2011; 260(3):744-51. [CrossRef]
  • [23]. Lee SS, Oh TS, Kim HJ et al. Obscure gastrointes- tinal bleeding: diagnostic performance of multidete- ctor CT enterography. Radiology. 2011; 259(3):739- 48. [CrossRef]
  • [24]. Sun H, Hou XY, Xue HD et al. Dual-source dual-e- nergy CT angiography with virtual non-enhanced images and iodine map for active gastrointestinal bleeding: image quality, radiation dose and diagnos- tic performance. Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84(5):884-91. [CrossRef]
  • [25]. Fiorino G, Bonifacio C, Peyrin-Biroulet L et al. Prospective comparison of computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography for assessment of disease activity and complications in ileocolonic Crohn's disease. Inflam Bowel Dis. 2011; 17(5):1073-80. [CrossRef]
  • [26]. Siddiki HA, Fidler JL, Fletcher JG et al. Prospective comparison of state-of-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small-bowel Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol . 2009; 193(1):113-21. [CrossRef]
  • [27]. Quencer KB, Nimkin K, Mino-Kenudson M, Gee MS. Detecting active inflammation and fibrosis in pediatric Crohn’s disease: prospective evaluation of MR-E and CT-E. Abdom Imaging. 2013; 38(4):705-13. [CrossRef]
  • [28]. Chatterji M, Fidler JL, Taylor SA, Anupindi SA, Yeh BM, Guglielmo FF. State of the art MR ente- rography technique. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2021; 30(1):3-11. [CrossRef]
  • [29]. Grand DJ, Guglielmo FF, Al-Hawary MM. MR enterography in Crohn’s disease: current consensus on optimal imaging technique and future advances from the SAR Crohn’s disease-focused panel. Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40(5):953-64. [CrossRef]
  • [30]. Grand DJ, Beland MD, Machan JT, Mayo- Smith WW. Detection of Crohn's disease: compari- son of CT and MR enterography without anti-peris- taltic agents performed on the same day. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(8):1735-41. [CrossRef]
  • [31]. Boone D, Taylor SA. Magnetic resonance of the small bowel: how to do it. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2020; 28(1):17-30. [CrossRef]
  • [32]. Gutzeit A, Binkert CA, Koh DM et al. Evaluation of the anti-peristaltic effect of glucagon and hyoscine on the small bowel: comparison of intravenous and intramuscular drug administration. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(6):1186-94. [CrossRef]
  • [33]. Rao A, Sitheeque F, Gustafson S, Lu M, Prior M. MR enterography–Impact on image quality between single-versus split-dose Buscopan. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020; 64(3):331-7. [CrossRef]
  • [34]. Cronin CG, Lohan DG, Mhuircheartaigh JN et al. MRI small-bowel follow-through: prone versus supine patient positioning for best small-bowel dis- tention and lesion detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191(2):502-6. [CrossRef]
  • [35]. Masselli G, Gualdi G. MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology. 2012; 264(2):333-48. [CrossRef]
  • [36]. Loftus EV. Using CT and MR enterography to diag- nose and monitor IBD. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2010; 6(12):754-6.
  • [37]. Klöppel R, Thiele J, Bosse J. The Sellink CT met- hod. RöFo. 1992; 156(3):291-2. [CrossRef]
  • [38]. Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Lappas JC, Chio- rean M. CT enteroclysis. Radiology. 2007; 245(3):661-71. [CrossRef]
  • [39]. Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Lappas JC. CT enteroclysis: techniques and applications. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007; 45(2):289-301. [CrossRef]
  • [40]. Rajesh A, Maglinte DD. Multislice CT enteroclysis: technique and clinical applications. Clin Radiol. 2006; 61(1):31-9. [CrossRef]
  • [41]. Minordi LM, Vecchioli A, Mirk P, Bonomo L. LCT enterography with polyethylene glycol solution vs CT enteroclysis in small bowel disease. Br J Radiol. 2011; 84(998):112-9. [CrossRef]
  • [42]. Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L et al. A prospec- tive randomized comparison between two MRI stu- dies of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(9):2294-301. [CrossRef]
APA Çamlıdağ i (2022). BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller. , 275 - 285. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
Chicago Çamlıdağ ilkay BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller. (2022): 275 - 285. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
MLA Çamlıdağ ilkay BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller. , 2022, ss.275 - 285. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
AMA Çamlıdağ i BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller. . 2022; 275 - 285. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
Vancouver Çamlıdağ i BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller. . 2022; 275 - 285. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
IEEE Çamlıdağ i "BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller." , ss.275 - 285, 2022. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
ISNAD Çamlıdağ, ilkay. "BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller". (2022), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.5152/trs.2022.221966
APA Çamlıdağ i (2022). BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, 10(3), 275 - 285. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
Chicago Çamlıdağ ilkay BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri 10, no.3 (2022): 275 - 285. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
MLA Çamlıdağ ilkay BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, vol.10, no.3, 2022, ss.275 - 285. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
AMA Çamlıdağ i BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri. 2022; 10(3): 275 - 285. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
Vancouver Çamlıdağ i BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri. 2022; 10(3): 275 - 285. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
IEEE Çamlıdağ i "BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller." Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, 10, ss.275 - 285, 2022. 10.5152/trs.2022.221966
ISNAD Çamlıdağ, ilkay. "BT ve MR Enterografi/Enteroklizis: Hasta hazırlığı, Teknik, Sekanslar ve Protokoller". Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri 10/3 (2022), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.5152/trs.2022.221966
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
09-05-2024 11:53

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları