Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 118 - 125 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249 İndeks Tarihi: 05-07-2023

Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial

Öz:
Objective: To compare the adhesive pre-coated (APC) flash-free (FF) appliance system (3M Unitek) with an operator-coated (OC) system (Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive Paste; 3M Unitek) in terms of bond failure, bracket survival, and chair time. Methods: This single-center study was planned with 30 non-extraction patients, 22 females and 8 males with an average age of 17 years and 5 months. A split-mouth design was used, and bonding time, failed brackets, reasons for failure, and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were noted. The data were analyzed with the chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: OC and FF adhesive-coated brackets demonstrated bond failure rates of 0.7% and 3.0%, respectively. Failure rates and survival rates presented a statistically significant difference (p=0.033). Although higher bond failure for the lower arch along with higher bond failure for the incisor teeth compared with the premolar teeth were found, these findings were not statistically significant (p=0.128; p=0.261, respectively). The effect of gender on the bond failure rate (p=0.463) and survival rate (p=0.473) was not statistically significant. A significant difference was obtained for the ARI scores (p=0.011). The bonding time for each bracket type (64.43 seconds for FF versus 98.97 seconds for OC) demonstrated a significant difference (p=0.174). Conclusion: The bond failure rate was higher for the FF APC brackets, but the chair time reduction during bonding was recorded. Therefore, it seems that FF APC brackets are promising. Trial registration: ISRCTNand ISRCTN26731749. Registered October 7, 2020-Retrospectively registered, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN26731749
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Stasinopoulos D, Papageorgiou SN, Kirsch F, Daratsianos N, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Failure patterns of different bracket systems and their influence on treatment duration: A retrospective cohort study. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(3):338-347. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS 3rd. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2008;42(11):625-640. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Hirani S. Handling characteristics of precoated and operator-coated brackets. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39(7):429-431. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Foersch M, Schuster C, Rahimi RK, Wehrbein H, Jacobs C. A new flash-free orthodontic adhesive system: A first clinical and stereomicroscopic study. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:260-264. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Grünheid T, Larson BE. Comparative assessment of bonding time and 1-year bracket survival using flash-free and conventional adhesives for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154(5):621-628. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Grünheid T, Larson BE. A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(2):299-305. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Tümoğlu M, Akkurt A. Comparison of clinical bond failure rates and bonding times between two adhesive precoated bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155(4):523-528. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Pandis N, Walsh T, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T. Split mouth designs in orthodontics: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trials. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(6):783-789. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Khan H, Mheissen S, Iqbal A, Jafri AR, Alam MK. Bracket Failure in Orthodontic Patients: The Incidence and the Influence of Different Factors. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5128870. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Hitmi L, Muller C, Mujajic M, Attal JP. An 18-month clinical study of bond failures with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120(4):406-415. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-191. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Yılmaz Née Huda Abulkbash H, Elekdag-Türk S. Clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets. Clinical performance of uncoated and precoated polymer mesh base ceramic brackets. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):4. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Grünheid T, Sudit GN, Larson BE. Debonding and adhesive remnant cleanup: an in vitro comparison of bond quality, adhesive remnant cleanup, and orthodontic acceptance of a flash-free product. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(5):497-502. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85(4):333-340. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Linklater RA, Gordon PH. Bond failure patterns in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123(5):534-539. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Boehme A, Jost-Brinkmann PG. Effect of light-tip distance on the shear bond strengths of composite resin. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(3):386-391. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Marc MG, Bazert C, Attal JP. Bond strength of pre-coated flash free adhesive ceramic brackets. An in vitro comparative study on the second mandibular premolars. Int Orthod. 2018;16(3):425-439. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Faltermeier A, Rosentritt M, Faltermeier R, Reicheneder C, Müssig D. Influence of filler level on the bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(3):494-498. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Manning N, Chadwick SM, Plunckett D, Macfarlane TV. A randomized clinical trial comparing ‘one-step’ and ‘two-step’ orthodontic bonding systems. J Orthod. 2006;33(4):276-283. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod. 1998;25(4):283-287. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Adolfsson U, Larsson E, Ogaard B. Bond failure of a no-mix adhesive during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122(3):277-281. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Elekdag-Türk S, Yılmaz H, (née Abulkbash H). Ceramic brackets revisited. In: Aslan BI, Uzuner FD, eds. Current Approaches in Orthodontics. IntechOpen; 2018: 1-18. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, Lilford RJ. Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a “trial effect”. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(3):217-224. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Abdulraheem S, Bondemark L. Hawthorne effect reporting in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: truth or myth? Blessing or curse? Eur J Orthod. 2018;40(5):475-479. [CrossRef]
  • 25. McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(3):267-277. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Matasa CG. Microbial attack of orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108(2):132-141. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Daraqel B, Yingying T, Zheng L. Flash-free and conventional adhesive ceramic brackets in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2022;26(1):1-12. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Arifa MK, Ephraim R, Rajamani T. Recent advances in dental hard tissue remineralization: a review of literature. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12(2):139-144. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Zampetti P, Scribante A. Historical and bibliometric notes on the use of fluoride in caries prevention. Eur J Pediatr Dent. 2020;21(2):148- 152. [CrossRef]
APA Baker D, Elekdag-Turk S (2023). Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial. , 118 - 125. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
Chicago Baker Dina,Elekdag-Turk Selma Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial. (2023): 118 - 125. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
MLA Baker Dina,Elekdag-Turk Selma Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial. , 2023, ss.118 - 125. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
AMA Baker D,Elekdag-Turk S Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial. . 2023; 118 - 125. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
Vancouver Baker D,Elekdag-Turk S Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial. . 2023; 118 - 125. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
IEEE Baker D,Elekdag-Turk S "Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial." , ss.118 - 125, 2023. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
ISNAD Baker, Dina - Elekdag-Turk, Selma. "Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial". (2023), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
APA Baker D, Elekdag-Turk S (2023). Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 36(2), 118 - 125. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
Chicago Baker Dina,Elekdag-Turk Selma Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 36, no.2 (2023): 118 - 125. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
MLA Baker Dina,Elekdag-Turk Selma Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, vol.36, no.2, 2023, ss.118 - 125. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
AMA Baker D,Elekdag-Turk S Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2023; 36(2): 118 - 125. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
Vancouver Baker D,Elekdag-Turk S Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2023; 36(2): 118 - 125. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
IEEE Baker D,Elekdag-Turk S "Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial." Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 36, ss.118 - 125, 2023. 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249
ISNAD Baker, Dina - Elekdag-Turk, Selma. "Evaluation of the Flash-Free Adhesive System for a 6-month Period: A Split-Mouth Trial". Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 36/2 (2023), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0249