Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 107 - 124 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724 İndeks Tarihi: 10-07-2023

The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint

Öz:
Animal-standpoint criticism focuses on the way human rights are treated in literary texts. It is against speciesism, which is a kind of species-based discrimination which gives different values to different species and inevitably leads to a hierarchy among species. Speciesism is thus regarded as a kind of racism by those defining and theorizing the field of animal-standpoint criticism, which is essentially against the supremacy of the human species over animals and which seeks the establishment of equality among species. Animal rights are emphasized by this criticism and the idea that animals are to be used for human benefits and/or progress is challenged. J. M. Coetzee, the South African novelist known for his allegorical works of fiction set in unknown times and places as well as his questioning stance on matters of colonialism, remains a writer of fiction who consciously tries to give a voice to animals, which cannot speak for themselves and are subjected to not only illegal but cruel treatment by human beings. For Coetzee, it is wrong to permit the establishment of a hierarchy between humans and animals and to disregard animal rights seeing them as entities in the service of human beings. From Disgrace to Life and Times of Michael K., several novels, as well as nonfictional works by Coetzee, focus in some way or another on the rights of animals and the strange ties between human beings and them. It is realised in this treatments of animals that Coetzee also carries out his critique of Western rationalism through his focus on the related issue.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aaltola, E. (2010). “Coetzee and alternative animal ethics”. In A. Leist & P. Singer (Eds.), J. M. Coetzee and ethics, Columbia University Press, 119-144.
  • Aristotle. (2009). Politics, trans. by E. Barker, Oxford University Press.
  • Bach, R. E. (2018). Birds and other creatures in renaissance literature: shakespeare, descartes, and animal studies, Routledge.
  • Best, S. (2014). The politics of total liberation: revolution for the 21st century, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Coetzee, J. M. (2000). Disgrace, Penguin Books.
  • ------------------(2003). Elizabeth Costello, Penguin Books.
  • ------------------(2007). Diary of a Bad Year, Harvill Secker.
  • Coleman, D. (2009). “The dog-man: race, sex, species, and lineage in coetzee’s disgrace”. In Twentieth-Century Literature, 55:4, pp. 597-617.
  • Danta, C. (2018). Animal fables after darwin: literature, speciesism, and metaphor, Cambridge University Press.
  • Fellenz, M. R. (2007). Moral menagerie: philosophy and animal rights, University of Illinois Press.
  • Foltz, R. C. (2006). Animals in islamic tradition and muslim cultures, Oneworld Publications.
  • Franklin, J. H. (2005). Animal rights and moral philosophy, Columbia University Press.
  • Fudge, E. (2002). Animal, Reaktion Books.
  • Goatly, A. (2006). “Humans, animals, and metaphors”. In Society & animals, 14:1, pp. 15-37.
  • Head, D. (1997). J. M. Coetzee, Cambridge University Press.
  • Heerden, A. van. (2010). “Disgrace, desire, and the dark side of the new south africa”. In J. M. Coetzee and Ethics. In A. Leist & P. Singer (Eds.), J. M. Coetzee and ethics, Columbia University Press, 43-63.
  • Herron, T. (2005). “The dog man: becoming animal in coetzee’s disgrace”. In Twentieth Century Literature, 51: 4, pp. 467-490.
  • Horta, O. (2010). “What is speciesism?”. In Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23:3, pp. 243-266.
  • Hovanec, C. (2018). Animal subjects: literature, zoology, and british modernism, Cambridge University Press.
  • Kant, I. (1997). Lectures on ethics, trans. by P. Heath, Cambridge University Press.
  • Leist, A. & Singer, P. (2010) J. M. Coetzee and ethics, Anton Leist & Peter Singer (Eds.), Columbia University Press.
  • Linzey, A. (1998). Animal gospel, Westminster John Knox Press.
  • Meyer, W. B. & Guss, D.M.T. (2017). Neo-Environmental determinism: geographical critiques, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mulhall, S. (2008). The wounded animal: j. m. coetzee & the difficulty of reality in literature and philosophy, Princeton University Press.
  • Oerlemans, O. (2007). “A defense of anthropomorphism: comparing coetzee and gowdy”. In Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 40:1, pp. 181-196.
  • Ortiz-Robles, M. (2016). Literature and animal studies, Routledge.
  • Ovid. (1958). The metamorphoses, trans. by Horace Gregory, The Viking Press.
  • Regan, T. (2003). Animal rights, human wrongs: an introduction to moral philosophy, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Ryder, R. D. (2011). Speciesism, painism, and happiness: a morality for the 21st century, Imprint Academic.
  • ----------------(2003). Painism: a modern morality, Open Gate Press.
  • ----------------(1998). The political animal, the conquest of speciesism, McFarland Publishing.
  • Singer, P. (2002). Animal liberation, Ecco.
  • ------------(2006). In defense of animals: the second wave, Peter Singer (Ed.) Blackwell Publishing.
  • Vinding, M. ( 2015). Speciesism: why it is wrong and the implications of rejecting it, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
  • Wiegandt, K. (2019). J. m. coetzee’s revisions of the human: posthumanism and narrative form, Palgrave Macmillan.
APA Gecikli K (2023). The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint. , 107 - 124. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
Chicago Gecikli Kubilay The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint. (2023): 107 - 124. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
MLA Gecikli Kubilay The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint. , 2023, ss.107 - 124. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
AMA Gecikli K The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint. . 2023; 107 - 124. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
Vancouver Gecikli K The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint. . 2023; 107 - 124. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
IEEE Gecikli K "The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint." , ss.107 - 124, 2023. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
ISNAD Gecikli, Kubilay. "The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint". (2023), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
APA Gecikli K (2023). The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint. Litera: Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online), 33(1), 107 - 124. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
Chicago Gecikli Kubilay The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint. Litera: Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online) 33, no.1 (2023): 107 - 124. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
MLA Gecikli Kubilay The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint. Litera: Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online), vol.33, no.1, 2023, ss.107 - 124. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
AMA Gecikli K The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint. Litera: Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online). 2023; 33(1): 107 - 124. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
Vancouver Gecikli K The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint. Litera: Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online). 2023; 33(1): 107 - 124. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
IEEE Gecikli K "The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint." Litera: Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online), 33, ss.107 - 124, 2023. 10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724
ISNAD Gecikli, Kubilay. "The Anti-Speciesist Stance in J. M. Coetzee’s Novels: An Analysis of Animal-Standpoint". Litera: Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online) 33/1 (2023), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2022-1085724