Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8

Menekşeoğlu, Ahmet Kıvanç; Ketenci, Ayşegül; Zure, Mert

doi:10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857

Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8

Mert ZURE, (İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Ahmet Kıvanç MENEKŞEOĞLU, (İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Ayşegül KETENCİ (İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

5 1

Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 69 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 216 - 221 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857 İndeks Tarihi: 10-07-2023

Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8

Öz:

Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the validity of the Turkish version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)-8. Patients and methods: This methodological and cross-sectional study was conducted with 80 female patients (mean age: 49.5±10 years; range, 28 to 75 years) diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome between January 2020 and December 2021. Participants completed the Turkish version of the CPAQ-8, as well as the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale. Internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis, and construct validity were examined in the statistical analysis of the data obtained. Results: The two-factor model created by exploratory factor analysis provided a better fit than the global factor model. Cronbach's alphas of both subscales of the CPAQ-8 were found to be 0.76 and 0.80; therefore, they provided internal consistency. The CPAQ-8 was found to be significantly correlated with all other scales compared. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the CPAQ-8 is an assessment tool with sufficient validity in assessing pain acceptance levels in fibromyalgia patients experiencing chronic pain. Future studies are needed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the questionnaire in different chronic pain models.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Hylands-White N, Duarte RV, Raphael JH. An overview of treatment approaches for chronic pain management. Rheumatol Int 2017;37:29-42.
2. McCracken LM, Marin FM. Current and future trends in psychology and chronic pain: Time for a change? Pain Manag 2014;4:113-21.
3. Evcik D, Ketenci A, Sindel D. The Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (TSPMR) guideline recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia syndrome. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 2019;65:111-23.
4. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Häuser W, Katz RL, et al. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2016;46:319-29.
5. Feliu-Soler A, Montesinos F, Gutiérrez-Martínez O, Scott W, McCracken LM, Luciano JV. Current status of acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: A narrative review. J Pain Res 2018;11:2145-59.
6. McCracken LM, Morley S. The psychological flexibility model: A basis for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management. J Pain 2014;15:221-34.
7. Pei JH, Ma T, Nan RL, Chen HX, Zhang YB, Gou L, et al. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for treating chronic pain a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Health Med 2021;26:333-46.
8. Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of metaanalyses. Cognit Ther Res 2012;36:427-40.
9. Nicholas MK, Asghari A. Investigating acceptance in adjustment to chronic pain: Is acceptance broader than we thought? Pain 2006;124:269-79.
10. Reneman MF, Dijkstra A, Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU. Psychometric properties of Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaires: A systematic review. Eur J Pain 2010;14:457-65.
11. Akmaz HE, Uyar M, Kuzeyli Yıldırım Y, Akın Korhan E. Validity and reliability of the Turkish chronic pain acceptance questionnaire. Balkan Med J 2018;35:238-44.
12. Fish RA, McGuire B, Hogan M, Morrison TG, Stewart I. Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in an Internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8. Pain 2010;149:435-43.
13. Eide H, Leren L, Sørebø Ø. The Norwegian versions of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 - validation and reliability studies. Disabil Rehabil 2017;39:1441-8.
14. Sánchez-Rodríguez E, de la Vega R, Racine M, Roy R, Jensen MP, Miró J. Support for the Spanish version of the CPAQ-8 as a measure of chronic pain acceptance. J Eval Clin Pract 2019;25:881-8.
15. Rovner GS, Arestedt K, Gerdle B, Börsbo B, McCracken LM. Psychometric properties of the 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) in a Swedish chronic pain cohort. J Rehabil Med 2014;46:73-80.
16. Liu Y, Wang L, Wei Y, Wang X, Xu T, Sun J. Validation of a Chinese version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CAPQ) and CPAQ-8 in chronic pain patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e4339.
17. MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Preacher KJ, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behav Res 2001;36:611-37.
18. Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennett RM. The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: Development and validation. J Rheumatol 1991;18:728-33.
19. Sarmer S, Ergin S, Yavuzer G. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Rheumatol Int 2000;20:9-12.
20. Dicle A, Karayurt O, Dirimese E. Validation of the Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory in surgery patients. Pain Manag Nurs 2009;10:107-13.e2.
21. Pallant JF, Bailey CM. Assessment of the structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in musculoskeletal patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3:82.
22. Paker N, Bugdayci D, Midik M, Celik B, Kesiktas N. Reliability of the Turkish version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in the people with traumatic spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2013;33:337-41.
23. Vlaeyen JWS, Kole-Snijders AMJ, Boeren RGB, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995;62:363-72.
24. Tunca Yilmaz Ö, Yakut Y, Uygur F, Ulug N. Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 2011;22:44-9.
25. Vowles KE, McCracken LM, Eccleston C. Processes of change in treatment for chronic pain: The contributions of pain, acceptance, and catastrophizing. Eur J Pain 2007;11:779-87.
26. Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ 2013;5:541-2.

APA	Zure M, Menekşeoğlu A, Ketenci A (2023). Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8. , 216 - 221. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
Chicago	Zure Mert,Menekşeoğlu Ahmet Kıvanç,Ketenci Ayşegül Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8. (2023): 216 - 221. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
MLA	Zure Mert,Menekşeoğlu Ahmet Kıvanç,Ketenci Ayşegül Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8. , 2023, ss.216 - 221. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
AMA	Zure M,Menekşeoğlu A,Ketenci A Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8. . 2023; 216 - 221. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
Vancouver	Zure M,Menekşeoğlu A,Ketenci A Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8. . 2023; 216 - 221. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
IEEE	Zure M,Menekşeoğlu A,Ketenci A "Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8." , ss.216 - 221, 2023. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
ISNAD	Zure, Mert vd. "Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8". (2023), 216-221. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857

APA	Zure M, Menekşeoğlu A, Ketenci A (2023). Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69(2), 216 - 221. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
Chicago	Zure Mert,Menekşeoğlu Ahmet Kıvanç,Ketenci Ayşegül Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 69, no.2 (2023): 216 - 221. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
MLA	Zure Mert,Menekşeoğlu Ahmet Kıvanç,Ketenci Ayşegül Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol.69, no.2, 2023, ss.216 - 221. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
AMA	Zure M,Menekşeoğlu A,Ketenci A Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2023; 69(2): 216 - 221. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
Vancouver	Zure M,Menekşeoğlu A,Ketenci A Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2023; 69(2): 216 - 221. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
IEEE	Zure M,Menekşeoğlu A,Ketenci A "Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8." Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, ss.216 - 221, 2023. 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857
ISNAD	Zure, Mert vd. "Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8". Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 69/2 (2023), 216-221. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857