Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 65 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 512 - 522 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268 İndeks Tarihi: 12-07-2023

Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study

Öz:
Background. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish versions of the Measure of Processes of Care, MPOC-56 and MPOC-20, in children with disability aged 5-17 years. Methods. A total of 290 parents of children with disability due to various disorders were evaluated with the MPOC-56 and MPOC-20. Internal consistency was determined with Cronbach`s alpha, and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to investigate the factor structure of the Turkish MPOC-56 and -20. Results. Cronbach`s alpha values for the MPOC-56 and MPOC-20 ranged between 0.84-0.97 and 0.87-0.92, respectively. Test-retest ICC values were 0.96-0.99 for MPOC-56 and 0.94-0.98 for MPOC-20. The correlations of the subscale scores of MPOC- 56 and MPOC-20 were shown to be at very good to excellent levels for reliability. Factor structure for MPOC-20 and MPOC-56 were found to be acceptable. Conclusions. This study has shown that the Turkish versions of MPOC-56 and MPOC-20 are valid, reliable, and applicable for the evaluation of parents` experiences of processes of care for children with disability aged 5-17 years.
Anahtar Kelime: measure of processes of care children with disability family-centered service validity reliability

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Kuo DZ, Houtrow AJ, Arango P, Kuhlthau KA, Simmons JM, Neff JM. Family-centered care: current applications and future directions in pediatric health care. Matern Child Health J 2012; 16: 297-305. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0751-7
  • 2. Rosenbaum P, King S, Law M, King G, Evans J. Family-centered service: a conceptual framework and research review. J Physical Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 1998; 18: 1-20. https://doi. org/10.1300/j006v18n01_01
  • 3. King S, King G, Rosenbaum P. Evaluating health service delivery to children with chronic conditions and their families: development of a refined Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20). Children’s Health Care 2004; 33: 35-57. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15326888chc3301_3
  • 4. King S, Teplicky R, King G, Rosenbaum P. Familycentered service for children with cerebral palsy and their families: a review of the literature. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2004; 11: 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. spen.2004.01.009
  • 5. Bamm EL, Rosenbaum P, Stratford P. Validation of the measure of processes of care for adults: a measure of client-centred care. Int J Qual Health Care 2010; 22: 302-309. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzq031
  • 6. World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). WHO; 2001.
  • 7. Trabacca A, Vespino T, Di Liddo A, Russo L. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for patients with cerebral palsy: improving long-term care. J Multidiscip Healthc 2016; 9: 455-462. https://doi. org/10.2147/JMDH.S88782
  • 8. Rosenbaum P. The environment and childhood disability: opportunities to expand our horizons. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 643. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00643.x
  • 9. King SM, Rosenbaum PL, King GA. Parents’ perceptions of caregiving: development and validation of a measure of processes. Dev Med Child Neurol 1996; 38: 757-772. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15110.x
  • 10. King G. Family-centered caregiving and well-being of parents of children with disabilities: linking process with outcome. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 1999; 24: 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/24.1.41
  • 11. King G, Law M, King S, Rosenbaum P. Parents’ and service providers’ perceptions of the familycentredness of children’s rehabilitation services. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 1998; 18: 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/j006v18n01_02
  • 12. Cunningham BJ, Rosenbaum PL. Measure of processes of care: a review of 20 years of research. Dev Med Child Neurol 2014; 56: 445-452. https://doi. org/10.1111/dmcn.12347
  • 13. Darrah J, Wiart L, Magill-Evans J, Ray L, Andersen J. Are family-centred principles, functional goal setting and transition planning evident in therapy services for children with cerebral palsy? Child Care Health Dev 2012; 38: 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2214.2010.01160.x
  • 14. King S, Rosenbaum P, King G. The Measure of processes of care: a means to assess family-centered behaviours of health care providers. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University; 1995.
  • 15. Dyke P, Buttigieg P, Blackmore AM, Ghose A. Use of the measure of process of care for families (MPOC- 56) and service providers (MPOC-SP) to evaluate family-centred services in a paediatric disability setting. Child Care Health Dev 2006; 32: 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00604.x
  • 16. Himuro N, Miyagishima S, Kozuka N, Tsutsumi H, Mori M. Measurement of family-centered care in the neonatal intensive care unit and professional background. J Perinatol 2015; 35: 284-289. https://doi. org/10.1038/jp.2014.204
  • 17. Joachim KC, Wilk P, Ryan BL, Speechley KN. Familycentered care in children with epilepsy: evaluating the Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20). Epilepsia 2016; 57: 1660-1668. https://doi.org/10.1111/ epi.13494
  • 18. Klassen AF, Dix D, Cano SJ, Papsdorf M, Sung L, Klaassen RJ. Evaluating family-centred service in paediatric oncology with the measure of processes of care (MPOC-20). Child Care Health Dev 2009; 35: 16- 22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00887.x
  • 19. Swaine BR, Pless IB, Friedman DS, Montes JL. Using the measure of processes of care with parents of children hospitalized for head injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 78: 323-329. https://doi. org/10.1097/00002060-199907000-00006
  • 20. Poenaru D, Roblin N, Bird M, et al. The pediatric bowel management clinic: initial results of a multidisciplinary approach to functional constipation in children. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32: 843- 848. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90633-3
  • 21. McKean K, Phillips B, Thompson A. A familycentred model of care in paediatric speech-language pathology. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2012; 14: 235- 246. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2011.604792
  • 22. Stewart V, Slattery M, McKee J. Deaf and hard of hearing early intervention: Perceptions of family-centered practice. Journal of Early Intervention 2021; 43: 221-234. https://doi. org/10.1177/1053815120962547
  • 23. Russell S, McCloskey CR. Parent perceptions of care received by children with an autism spectrum disorder. J Pediatr Nurs 2016; 31: 21-31. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pedn.2015.11.002
  • 24. Woodside JM, Rosenbaum PL, King SM, King GA. Family-centered service: developing and validating a self-assessment tool for pediatric service providers. Children’s Health Care 2001; 30: 237-252. https://doi. org/10.1207/s15326888chc3003_5
  • 25. Hagen A-K, Bjorbækmo WS. Parents evaluation of the processes of care in child rehabilitation: a reliability study of the Norwegian translation of MPOC-20. Child Care Health Dev 2012; 38: 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01192.x
  • 26. van Schie PEM, Siebes RC, Ketelaar M, Vermeer A. The measure of processes of care (MPOC): validation of the Dutch translation. Child Care Health Dev 2004; 30: 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2214.2004.00451.x
  • 27. Bjerre IM, Larsson M, Franzon A-M, Nilsson MS, Strömberg G, Westbom LM. Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC) applied to measure parent’s perception of the habilitation process in Sweden. Child Care Health Dev 2004; 30: 123-130. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2003.00403.x
  • 28. Zengin Akkus P, Ilter Bahadur E, Coskun A, Koken G, Karahan S, Ozmert EN. Family-centred service: perspectives of paediatric residents from a non- Western country. Child Care Health Dev 2020; 46: 275-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12753
  • 29. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 3186-3191. https://doi. org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  • 30. Nunnally JC, Wilson WH. Method and theory for developing measures in evaluation research. In: Struening EL, Guttentag M, editors. Handbook of Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage; 1975: 227-289.
  • 31. Norman GR, Streiner DL. PDQ Statistics. PMPHUSA; 2003.
  • 32. Park MS, Kang KJ, Jang SJ, Lee JY, Chang SJ. Evaluating test-retest reliability in patient-reported outcome measures for older people: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2018; 79: 58-69. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.003
  • 33. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22: 276-282
  • 34. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications; 2015.
  • 35. Himuro N, Kozuka N, Mori M. Measurement of family-centred care: translation, adaptation and validation of the Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and -20) for use in Japan. Child Care Health Dev 2013; 39: 358-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2214.2012.01371.x
  • 36. An M, Kim JG, Kim J. Measure of processes of care (MPOC): translation and validation for use in Korea. Child Care Health Dev 2018; 44: 545-551. https://doi. org/10.1111/cch.12577
  • 37. Saleh M, Almasri NA. Use of the Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20) to evaluate health service delivery for children with cerebral palsy and their families in Jordan: validation of Arabictranslated version (AR-MPOC-20). Child Care Health Dev 2014; 40: 680-688. https://doi.org/10.1111/ cch.12116
  • 38. Arnadottir U, Egilson ST. Evaluation of therapy services with the Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20): the perspectives of Icelandic parents of children with physical disability. J Child Health Care 2012; 16: 62-74. https://doi. org/10.1177/1367493511423769
  • 39. Fauzi NFM, Ming ACE, Rasdi HFM, Saat NZM. The Measure of Processes of Care 20-Item (MPOC- 20): validity and reliability of the Malay Version. Malaysian Journal of Health Sciences 2015; 13: 61-67. https://doi.org/10.17576/JSKM-2015-1302-07
  • 40. Groleger Sršen K, Vidmar G, Zupan A. Validity, internal consistency reliability and one-year stability of the Slovene translation of the Measure of Processes of Care (20-item version). Child Care Health Dev 2015; 41: 569-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12198
  • 41. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. USA: Oxford University Press; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/ med/9780199685219.001.0001
APA Türker D, Özal C, Karahan S, Kerem Günel M (2023). Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study. , 512 - 522. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
Chicago Türker Duygu,Özal Cemil,Karahan Sevilay,Kerem Günel Mintaze Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study. (2023): 512 - 522. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
MLA Türker Duygu,Özal Cemil,Karahan Sevilay,Kerem Günel Mintaze Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study. , 2023, ss.512 - 522. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
AMA Türker D,Özal C,Karahan S,Kerem Günel M Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study. . 2023; 512 - 522. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
Vancouver Türker D,Özal C,Karahan S,Kerem Günel M Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study. . 2023; 512 - 522. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
IEEE Türker D,Özal C,Karahan S,Kerem Günel M "Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study." , ss.512 - 522, 2023. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
ISNAD Türker, Duygu vd. "Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study". (2023), 512-522. https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
APA Türker D, Özal C, Karahan S, Kerem Günel M (2023). Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, 65(3), 512 - 522. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
Chicago Türker Duygu,Özal Cemil,Karahan Sevilay,Kerem Günel Mintaze Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 65, no.3 (2023): 512 - 522. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
MLA Türker Duygu,Özal Cemil,Karahan Sevilay,Kerem Günel Mintaze Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, vol.65, no.3, 2023, ss.512 - 522. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
AMA Türker D,Özal C,Karahan S,Kerem Günel M Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics. 2023; 65(3): 512 - 522. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
Vancouver Türker D,Özal C,Karahan S,Kerem Günel M Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics. 2023; 65(3): 512 - 522. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
IEEE Türker D,Özal C,Karahan S,Kerem Günel M "Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study." Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, 65, ss.512 - 522, 2023. 10.24953/turkjped.2022.268
ISNAD Türker, Duygu vd. "Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-56 and 20): Turkish adaptation, reliability, and validity study". Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 65/3 (2023), 512-522. https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2022.268