ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 272 - 303 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.17943/etku.1193761 İndeks Tarihi: 18-07-2023
ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ
Öz: Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir devlet üniversitesinin Öğretme ve Öğrenme Merkezi tarafından öğretim elemanlarının teknolojik becerilerini geliştirmek ve derslerinde teknolojiyi etkili kullanmalarını desteklemek üzere yürütülen Teknoloji Mentorluk Programının (TMP) etkililiğini sürece katılan öğretim elemanları ve öğrenci mentorların görüşlerine göre incelemektir. Çalışmanın temelini oluşturan kuramsal çerçeve Collins, Brown ve Newman (1989) tarafından geliştirilen bilişsel çıraklık modelidir. Araştırmanın katılımcılarını 13 öğretim elemanı ve mentorluk yapan 26 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Veriler “Teknoloji Mentorluk Programına Yönelik Beklentileri Belirleme Anketi”, haftalık şablonlar ve “Teknoloji Mentorluk Programına Yönelik Deneyimler Anketi” aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde betimsel analiz ile içerik analizi yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, TMP’nin hem öğrenci mentorlar hem de öğretim elemanlarına önemli katkılar sunduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Lisans öğrencilerinin mentorluk yaptığı bu çalışmada programın başarılı bulunması önemli bir sonuç olarak değerlendirilebilir.
Anahtar Kelime: INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TECHNOLOGY MENTORING PROGRAM BASED ON THE STUDENT MENTORS AND FACULTY VIEWS
Öz: The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the Technology Mentoring Program (TMP), which is carried out by the Teaching and Learning Center of a state university to improve the technological skills of the faculty and to support their effective use of technology in their lessons, according to the views of the faculty and student mentors participating in the process. The theoretical framework that forms the basis of the study is the cognitive apprenticeship model developed by Collins, Brown and Newman (1989). The participants of the research consisted of 13 faculty and 26 student mentors. Data were collected through the “Identifying the Expectations for the Technology Mentoring Program Questionnaire”, the weekly templates, and the “Experiences for the Technology Mentoring Program Questionnaire”. In the analysis of the data, descriptive analysis and content analysis methods were used. The results of the research revealed that TMP makes significant contributions to both student mentors and faculty. The success of the program in this study, in which undergraduate students mentored, can be considered as an important result.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Adnan, M. (2017). Professional development in the transition to online teaching: The voice of entrant online instructors. ReCALL, 30(1), 88-111.
- Baran, E. (2016). Investigating faculty technology mentoring as a university-wide professional development model. J Comput High Educ, 28, 45-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528- 015-9104-7
- Baran, E. ve Correia, A. (2014). A professional development framework for online teaching. TechTrends, 58(5), 95–101.
- Baser, D., Akkus, R., Akayoglu, S., Top, E. ve Gürer, M. D. (2021). Training in-service teachers through individualized technology-related mentorship. Education Tech Research Dev., 69, 3131-3151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10065-w
- Belt, E., ve Lowenthal, P. (2020). Developing faculty to teach with technology: Themes from the literature. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 64(2), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00447-6
- Brill, J., Kim, B. ve Galloway, C. (2001). Cognitive apprenticeships as an instructional model. M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/ adresinden 13 Nisan 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A. ve Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-41.
- Buchanan, T., Sainter, P. ve Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(1), 1-11.
- Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. L. Idol ve B. F. Jones (Ed.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (s. 121-138) içinde. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Collins, A., Brown, J. S. ve Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11.
- Collins, A., Brown, J. S. ve Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (s. 453-494) içinde. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Corso, J. ve Devine, J. (2013). Student technology mentors: A community college success story. Community College Enterprise, 19(2), 9-21.
- Cox, M. D. (1997). Long-term patterns in a mentoring program for junior faculty: Recommendations for practice. To Improve the Academy, 376. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/podimproveacad/376 adresinden 27 Nisan 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
- El Fadil, B. (2015). High school technology design process – goals and challenges, International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8(6), 109-116.
- Feist, L. (2003). Removing barriers to professional development. THE Journal, 30(11).
- Ferdig, R. E. ve Kennedy, K. (2014). Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning. Library of Congress, ETC Press, Pittsburgh, PA. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/149393/ adresinden 27 Nisan 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
- Frey, T. K. (2021). Overcoming technological barriers to instruction: Situating Gen Z students as reverse mentors. Front. Commun, 6:630899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.630899
- García-Morales VJ, Garrido-Moreno A ve Martín-Rojas R (2021). The transformation of higher education after the COVID disruption: Emerging challenges in an online learning scenario. Front. Psychol., 12:616059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
- Gökoğlu, S. ve Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2017). Determining the roles of mentors in the teachers’ use of technology: Implementation of systems-based mentoring model. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(1), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.1.0234
- Gibbons, A. S. (1996). New techniques for an old profession. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=567862 adresinden 13 Nisan 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
- Gunuc, S. (2015). Implementation and evaluation of technology mentoring program developed for teacher educators: A 6M-Framework. Qualitative Research in Education, 4(2), 164-191. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2015.1305
- Hampel, R. ve Stickler, U. (2005) New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach language online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500335455
- Jensen, T. (2019). Higher education in the digital era: The current state of transformation around the world. International Association of Universities (IAU). https://www.iau- aiu.net/IMG/pdf/technology_report_2019.pdf adresinden 2 Ocak 2023 tarihinde alınmıştır.
- Kabakci, I., Odabasi, H. F. ve Kilicer, K. (2010). Transformative learning-based mentoring for professional development of teacher educators in information and communication technologies: an approach for an emerging country. Professional Development in Education, 36 (1-2), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415250903457224
- Koh, J. H. L. (2020). Three approaches for supporting faculty technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) creation through instructional consultation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2529-2543. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12930
- Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers and Education, 59, 1109-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014
- Kopcha, T.J. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(2), 175- 190, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9095-4
- Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609268
- Leh, A. S. C. (2005). Lessons learned from service learning and reverse mentoring in faculty development: A case study in technology training. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 25-41. Norfolk, VA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/6565 adresinden 27 Nisan 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
- Lumpkin, A. (2011). A Model for mentoring university faculty. The Educational Forum, 75(4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2011.602466
- Marinoni, G., Van't Land, H. ve Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world. IAU Global Survey Report. https://www.iau- aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf adresinden 2 Ocak 2023 tarihinde alınmıştır.
- Mercader, C. ve Gairín, J. (2020). University teachers' perception of barriers to the use of digital technologies: the importance of the academic discipline. Int J Educ Technol High Educ., 17, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0182-x
- Meyer, K. A. ve Murrell, V. S. (2014). A national study of training content and activities for faculty development for online teaching. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(1), 3-18.
- Naidu, S. (2016). The case for open educational practice. Distance Education, 37(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1157010
- Nicol, A. A., Owens, S. M., Le Coze, S. S. L., MacIntyre, A. ve Eastwood, C. (2018). Comparison of high-technology active learning and low-technology active learning classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 253-265.
- Ng, W. (2015). Adopting new digital technologies in education: Professional learning. W. Ng (Ed.), New digital technology in education: Conceptualizing professional learning for educators (s. 25-48) içinde. Switzerland: Springer.
- Pamuk, S. (2008). Faculty technology mentoring: How graduate student mentors benefit from technology mentoring relationship. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15860. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15860
- Porter, W. W. ve Graham, C. R. (2015). Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption ofblended learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 748-762. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12269
- Schneckenberg, D. (2009). Understanding the real barriers to technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Educational Research, 51(4), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880903354741
- Somera, S. L. (2018). Educator experiences transitioning to blended learning environment in K-6 public schools. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6094&context=disserta tions
- Stiles, M. ve Yorke, J. (2006). Technology supported learning – tensions between innovation, and control and organizational and professional cultures. Journal of Organizational Transformation and Social Change, 3(3), 251-67.
- Stein, S. J., Shephard, K. ve Harris, I. (2011). Conceptions of e-learning and professional development for e-learning held by tertiary educators in New Zealand. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 145-165.
- Thompson, A. (2008). History of the faculty technology mentoring program. A. D. Thompson, H. Chuang ve I. Sahin (Ed.), Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing technology expertise (s. 29-46) içinde. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
- Top, E., Baser, D., Akkuş, R., Akayoğlu, S. ve Gurer, M. D. (2021). Secondary school teachers’ preferences in the process of individual technology mentoring. Computers and Education, 160, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104030
- Wilson, B. ve Cole, P. (1991). A review of cognitive teaching models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(4), 47-64.
- Wilson, B. G., Jonassen, D. H. ve Cole, P. (1993). Cognitive approaches to instructional design. G. M. Piskurich (Ed.), The ASTD handbook of instructional technology (pp. 21.1-21.22) içinde. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (3. Baskı). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Yu, J. ve Karakaya, O. (2018). Examination of the impact of a one-on-one technology mentoring program: Multiple case studies on the mentees’ perspectives. E. Langran ve J. Borup (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (s. 594-599) içinde. Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182588 3 Ocak 2023 tarihinde alınmıştır.
- Zellers, D. F., Howard, V. M. ve Barcic M. A. (2008). Faculty mentoring programs: Reenvisioning rather than reinventing the wheel. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 552-588.
| APA | Demiraslan Çevik Y (2023). ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ. , 272 - 303. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| Chicago | Demiraslan Çevik Yasemin ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ. (2023): 272 - 303. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| MLA | Demiraslan Çevik Yasemin ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ. , 2023, ss.272 - 303. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| AMA | Demiraslan Çevik Y ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ. . 2023; 272 - 303. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| Vancouver | Demiraslan Çevik Y ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ. . 2023; 272 - 303. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| IEEE | Demiraslan Çevik Y "ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ." , ss.272 - 303, 2023. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| ISNAD | Demiraslan Çevik, Yasemin. "ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ". (2023), 272-303. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| APA | Demiraslan Çevik Y (2023). ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 13(1), 272 - 303. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| Chicago | Demiraslan Çevik Yasemin ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama 13, no.1 (2023): 272 - 303. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| MLA | Demiraslan Çevik Yasemin ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, vol.13, no.1, 2023, ss.272 - 303. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| AMA | Demiraslan Çevik Y ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama. 2023; 13(1): 272 - 303. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| Vancouver | Demiraslan Çevik Y ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama. 2023; 13(1): 272 - 303. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| IEEE | Demiraslan Çevik Y "ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ." Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 13, ss.272 - 303, 2023. 10.17943/etku.1193761 |
| ISNAD | Demiraslan Çevik, Yasemin. "ÖĞRENCİ MENTORLAR VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANI BAKIŞ AÇILARINA GÖRE TEKNOLOJİ MENTORLUK PROGRAMININ ETKİLİLİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ". Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama 13/1 (2023), 272-303. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.1193761 |
