Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 471 - 487 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14686/buefad.795391 İndeks Tarihi: 07-08-2023

Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices

Öz:
This study was aimed to examine guided inquiry-based learning effect, which is in the "human body systems" unit at the seventh-grade level, on academic achievement and scientific process skills. In this direction, the study was conducted with 46 seventh-grade students. One of the groups consisting of 23 students constituted the experimental group where the guided inquiry practices designed by the researchers were performed. And the other group constituted the control group where learning was provided through the direct instruction method. Data were obtained by the scientific process skills test and academic achievement test. These tests applied before and after the lessons to both groups. When the data were analyzed, the academic achievement test mean score of the experimental group was higher if we compare with the control group. But the mean score was not statistically significant. In the mean scores of the scientific process skills test, it was concluded that there was a statistically significant difference in favor of the experimental group. Accordingly, it is thought that guided inquiry-based learning can contribute the basic scientific process skills of the students but there is no extra contribution found to academic achievement if the concepts are easy to remember.
Anahtar Kelime: Guided inquiry-based learning Academic achievement Scientific process skills

Rehberlikli Araştırma-Sorgulamaya Dayalı Öğrenme Uygulamaları

Öz:
Bu çalışmada, yedinci sınıf düzeyinde "vücudumuzdaki sistemler" ünitesinde yer alan, rehberlikli araştırma-sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenmenin akademik başarı ve bilimsel süreç becerileri üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu doğrultuda araştırma 46 yedinci sınıf öğrencisi ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmacılar tarafından tasarlanan Rehberlikli araştırma-sorgulama uygulamalarının gerçekleştirildiği deney grubunu 23 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Diğer grup ise doğrudan öğretim yöntemi ile öğrenmenin sağlandığı kontrol grubunu oluşturmuştur. Veriler bilimsel süreç becerileri testi ve akademik başarı testi ile elde edilmiştir. Bu testler her iki gruba da derslerden önce ve sonra uygulanmıştır. Veriler incelendiğinde, deney grubunun akademik başarı testi puan ortalamasının kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırıldığında daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Ancak ortalama puanları arasındaki bu farklılık istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır. Bilimsel süreç becerileri testinin ortalama puanlarında deney grubu lehine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Buna göre, Rehberlikli araştırma-sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenmenin öğrencilerin temel bilimsel süreç becerilerine katkı sağlayabileceği ancak kavramların hatırlanması noktasında akademik başarıya katkıda bulunmayacağı düşünülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Rehberlikli araştırma-sorgulama Akademik başarı Bilimsel süreç becerileri

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2(1), 37-41
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). Benchmarks for science literacy. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/index.php
  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry?. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
  • Arnold, J. C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding students’ experiments—what kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2719–2749.
  • Aydoğdu, B. (2006). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersinde bilimsel süreç becerilerini etkileyen değişkenlerin belirlenmesi (Unpublished master’s thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
  • Bacak, J., & Jon Byker, E. (2021). Moving from levels of inquiry to the flexible phases of inquiry theory: a literature review of inquiry-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 10(2), 255-271.
  • Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2005). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29.
  • Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33.
  • Burris, S., & Garton, B. L. (2007). Effect of instructional strategy on critical thinking and content knowledge: Using problem-based learning in the secondary classroom. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(1), 106-116.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik [Statistics for social sciences] (6. Basım). Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Byker, E.J., Putman, S. M., Polly, D., & Handler, L. (2018). Modeling TPACK for the development of educators’ self-efficacy. In Charles B. Hodges’ (Ed.), Self-efficacy in Instructional Technology Contexts. Springer International.
  • Cairns, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship between instructional practices and science achievement in an inquiry-based learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 1-23.
  • Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613 – 642.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design – qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Çetin, P. S., & Eymur, G. (2018). Beyond the writing aspect of argument-driven inquiry: investigating students’ cognitive and affective expectations. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(1), 94-110. DOI: 10.14686/buefad.376998
  • Dori, Y. J., Zohar, A., Fischer-Shachor, D., Kohan-Mass, J., & Carmi, M. (2018). Gender-fair assessment of young gifted students’ scientific thinking skills, International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 1-26.
  • Friesen, S., & Jardine, D. (2009). 21st century learning and learners. Galileo Educational Network.
  • Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329.
  • Greenspan, Y. F. (2016). A Guide to Teaching Elementary Science Ten Easy Steps. Sense Publishers Rotterdam.
  • Harlen, W. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in science and mathematics. Rewiev of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 7(2), 9–33.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
  • Inter Academy Partnership. (2010). Taking IBSE into secondary education report. Retrieved from http://www.interacademies.org/File.aspx?id=15174
  • Johnson, K. E. (2004). Middle school science inquiry: connecting experiences and beliefs to practice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado, Denver.
  • Justice, C., Warry, W., Cuneo, C., Inglis, S., Miller, S., Rice, J., & Sammon, S. (2002). A grammar for inquiry: linking goals and methods in a collaboratively taught social sciences inquiry course. Windsor: Special Publication of the Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education and McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
  • Keçeci, G. (2014). Araştırma ve sorgulamaya dayalı fen öğretiminin öğrencilerin bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve tutumlarına etkisi [The effects of inquiry-based science teaching on students' science process skills and attitudes]. Doctorate Dissertation, Fırat Üniversitesi.
  • Keys, C. W. ve Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645.
  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the Failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
  • Kuhn, D. (2016). What do young science students need to learn about variables? Science Education, 100(2), 392–403.
  • Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (Eds.). (2004). Internet environments for science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Longo, C. M. (2012). Effects of an inquiry-based science program on critical thinking, science process skills, creativity, and science fair achievement of middle school students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Western Connecticut State University, Danbury.
  • Matthews, B. (2006). Mystery Boxes [Instruction booklet]. https://learning.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/SMG-Academy-Mystery-Boxes.pdf
  • Miller, D. K. G. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based, hands-on labs on achievement in middle school science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Liberty University, Lynchburg.
  • Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J. & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
  • Nagy, M. H. (1953). Children's conceptions of some bodily functions. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 83(2), 199-216.
  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards [Adobe Digital Editions version]. doi: 10.17226/4962
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards [Adobe Digital Editions version]. doi: 10.17226/9596
  • Newman, W., Abell, S. K., Hubbard, P. D., McDonald, J., Otaala, J. & Martini, M. (2004). Dilemmas of teaching inquiry in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 257–279.
  • Poderoso, C. (2013). The science experience: The relationship between an inquiry-based science program and student outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). California State University, Fullerton.
  • Prokop, P. & Faněoviěová, J. (2006). Students’ ideas about the human body: do they really draw what they know?. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2(10), 86–95.
  • Ramadas, J & Nair, U. (1996). The system idea as a tool in understanding conceptions about the digestive system. International Journal of Science Education, 18(3), 355-368.
  • Reiss, M. J. & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Students’ understandings of human organs and organ systems. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 383–399.
  • Rosenthal, J. L. (2018). Teacher candidates in the garden. Science Activities, 55(1), 20-27.
  • Stout, B. (2001). Tools for scientific inquiry in a fifth-grade classroom. Primary Voices K – 6, 10(1), 23-27.
  • Sullivan, F. R. (2008). Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 373-394.
  • Tan, M. & Temiz, B. K. (2003). The importance and role of the science process skills in science teaching. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13 (1), 89-101.
  • Teixeira, F. M. (2000). What happens to the food we eat? Children's conceptions of the structure and function of the digestive system. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 507-520.
  • van Riesen, S., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). Supporting learners' experiment design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 475– 491.
  • van Riesen, S. A., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A. A., & de Jong, T. (2022). The influence of prior knowledge on the effectiveness of guided experiment design. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 17– 33.
  • van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P. ve Peeters, M. (2016). Inquiry-based science education: Towards a pedagogical framework for primary school teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 450–469.
  • Vosniadou, S. (2003). How children learn. Educational Practices Series-7. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001254/125456e.pdf%0A%0A
  • Witt, C., & Ulmer, J. (2014). The Impact of Inquiry-Based Learning on the Academic Achievement of Middle School Students. 2010 Western AAAE Research Conference Proceedings
  • Worth, K., Duque, M. ve Saltiel, E. (2009). Desinging and implementing inquiry-based science units for primary education. Pollen Project. Retrieved from www.pollen-europa.net
  • Wu, H-K., & Hsieh, C. E. (2006). Developing sixth grader's inquiry skills to construct explanations in inquiry-based learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1289-1313.
  • Yerlikaya, A. & Güneş, M. H. (2017). Development and validation of the achievement test on body Systems. Participatory Educational Research , Special Issue 2016-III , 68-76 . https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/per/issue/47525/600368
  • Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223.
APA ŞENSOY A, GÜNES M (2023). Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. , 471 - 487. 10.14686/buefad.795391
Chicago ŞENSOY Aslı,GÜNES MUNISE HANDAN Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. (2023): 471 - 487. 10.14686/buefad.795391
MLA ŞENSOY Aslı,GÜNES MUNISE HANDAN Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. , 2023, ss.471 - 487. 10.14686/buefad.795391
AMA ŞENSOY A,GÜNES M Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. . 2023; 471 - 487. 10.14686/buefad.795391
Vancouver ŞENSOY A,GÜNES M Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. . 2023; 471 - 487. 10.14686/buefad.795391
IEEE ŞENSOY A,GÜNES M "Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices." , ss.471 - 487, 2023. 10.14686/buefad.795391
ISNAD ŞENSOY, Aslı - GÜNES, MUNISE HANDAN. "Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices". (2023), 471-487. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.795391
APA ŞENSOY A, GÜNES M (2023). Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 471 - 487. 10.14686/buefad.795391
Chicago ŞENSOY Aslı,GÜNES MUNISE HANDAN Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 12, no.3 (2023): 471 - 487. 10.14686/buefad.795391
MLA ŞENSOY Aslı,GÜNES MUNISE HANDAN Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.12, no.3, 2023, ss.471 - 487. 10.14686/buefad.795391
AMA ŞENSOY A,GÜNES M Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 12(3): 471 - 487. 10.14686/buefad.795391
Vancouver ŞENSOY A,GÜNES M Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 12(3): 471 - 487. 10.14686/buefad.795391
IEEE ŞENSOY A,GÜNES M "Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices." Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, ss.471 - 487, 2023. 10.14686/buefad.795391
ISNAD ŞENSOY, Aslı - GÜNES, MUNISE HANDAN. "Guided Inquiry-Based Learning Practices". Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 12/3 (2023), 471-487. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.795391