Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 64 Sayfa Aralığı: 183 - 211 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 İndeks Tarihi: 19-07-2023
Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries
Öz: The environmental problems of the 21st century have led countries to pay attention to issues of sustainability. The UN Sustainable Development Goals have encouraged member-states to strive for social, economic, and environmental objectives through policies that address nature, poverty, peace, equality, and diversity in society up to the year 2030. In recent years, sustainability became one of the leading discourses of a commercial culture shaped by brands, in addition to political, social, and economic fields. In this period, sustainability has also been applied to the countries’ nation branding strategies. This article aims to analyze the impact of sustainability on the formation of nation brand identity based on European countries. As the research sample, the nation branding websites of 27 European Union countries and Great Britain, Norway, Switzerland, and Türkiye were analyzed by a thematic analysis with a qualitative methodology. The research highlights that Northern European nations, which have high scores in the Sustainable Development Growth Index, are more successful in linking sustainability to their nation brand identities. Ultimately, this article highlights the expanding importance of sustainability in nation brand communication in an effort to contribute to existing studies and practices in the field.
Anahtar Kelime: Ulus markalama ve sürdürülebilirlik: Avrupa ülkelerinin karşılaştırmalı bir analizi
Öz: 21. yüzyılda dünyada yaşanan çevresel sorunlar, devletlerin sürdürülebilirlik kavramıyla yakından ilgilenmelerine zemin hazırlamıştır. 2015 yılında Birleşmiş Milletler tarafından ilan edilen “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri”, üye devletlerin toplumsal, ekonomik ve çevresel hedefler doğrultusunda doğa, yoksulluk, barış, eşitlik ve çeşitlilik gibi alanlarda politikalar üretmesini teşvik etmiştir. Son yıllarda ise sürdürülebilirliğin politik, toplumsal ve ekonomik alanların yanı sıra, markalar aracılığı ile şekillenen tüketim toplumunun da önde gelen söylemlerinden biri olarak yerleştiği dikkat çekmektedir. Bu süreçte sürdürülebilirlik olgusunun, ülkelerin ulus markalama stratejilerine de entegre edilmeye başlandığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışma sürdürülebilirliğin ulus marka kimliğinin oluşumu açısından ne derece etkili bir rol üstlendiğini Avrupa ülkeleri bağlamında analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında 27 Avrupa Birliği üyesi ile Birleşik Krallık, İsviçre, Norveç ve Türkiye’den oluşan 31 ülkelik bir örneklem belirlenmiş, bu ülkelerin ulus markalama web siteleri nitel bir tematik analiz yöntemiyle çözümlenmiştir. Gerçekleştirilen çözümleme sonucunda ulus markalar ve sürdürülebilirlik bağlantısı dört farklı seviyede kategorize edilmiş olup, Küresel Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi’nde üst sıralarda yer alan Kuzey Avrupa ülkelerinin sürdürülebilirlik hedeflerini ulus marka kimliklerine daha etkin bir biçimde entegre ettikleri ortaya çıkmıştır. Sonuç olarak sürdürülebilirliğin ulus marka iletişiminde belirginleşen rolüne dikkat çeken bu çalışma, sürdürülebilir ulus markaların oluşturulması çabalarına katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Anholt, S. (1998). Nation-Brands of the twenty-first century. Journal of Brand Management, 5(6), 395-406. https:// doi.org/10.1057/bm.1998.30.
- Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Anholt, S. (2011). Beyond the nation brand: The role of image and identity in international relations. In A. Pike (Ed.), Brands and Branding Geographies (pp. 289-301. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857930842.00027). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Anholt-Ipsos Nation Brand Index (2023). https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2021-10/ NBI-2021-ipsos.pdf, Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- Aronczyk, M. (2013). Branding the nation: The global business of national identity. Oxford University Press.
- Beck, U. (2010). Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity. Theory, Culture & Society (27), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358729.
- Bouchon, F. (2014). Truly Asia and global city? Branding strategies and contested identities in Kuala Lumpur. Place Brand Public Diplomacy (10), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2013.21.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77- 101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Carpenter, S., Takahashi, B., Cunningham, C., & Lertpratchya, A. P. (2016). Climate and sustainability: The roles of social media in promoting sustainability in higher education. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4863–4881.
- de Zúñiga, H. G., Copeland, L., & Bimber, B. (2014). Political consumerism: Civic engagement and the social media connection. New Media & Society (16), 488–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487960.
- Denmark Official Nation Brand Website (2023). “https://denmark.dk/” https://denmark.dk/ , Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- Dinnie, K. (2008). Nation branding: Concepts, issues, practice. Elsevier.
- Europe Sustainable Development Report (2021). https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment. report/2021/Europe+Sustainable+Development+Report+2021.pdf, Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- Fauve, A. (2015). Global Astana: Nation branding as a legitimization tool for authoritarian regimes. Central Asian Survey, 34(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2015.1016799.
- Finland Official Nation Brand Website (2023). “https://www.visitfinland.com/en/” https://www.visitfinland.com/ en/ , Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- Frank, A. K. (2017). What is the story with sustainability? A narrative analysis of diverse and contested understandings. Journal of Environmental Studies and Science, 7(2), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0388-3.
- Frig, M., & Sorsa, V. P. (2020). Nation branding as sustainability governance: A comparative case analysis. Business & Society, 59(6), 1151–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318758322.
- Germany Land of Ideas (2023). “https://land-der-ideen.de/en” https://land-der-ideen.de/en , Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- Germany Official Nation Brand Website (2023). “https://www.germany.travel/en/home.html” https://www. germany.travel/en/home.html , Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (616), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142.
- Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Standards (2023). https://www.globalreporting.org/media/ nmmnwfsm/gri-policymakers-guide.pdf, Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Retrieved from SAGE Publications, Inc.,: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436
- Hassan, S., & Mahrous, A. (2019). Nation branding: the strategic imperative for sustainable market competitiveness. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 1(2), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/ JHASS-08-2019-0025.
- Jang, G., & Paik, W. K. (2012). Korean Wave as tool for Korea’s new cultural diplomacy. Advances in Applied Sociology, 2(3), 196-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2012.23026.
- Jordan, P. (2014). Nation branding: A tool for nationalism? Journal of Baltic Studies, 45(3), 283-303. https://doi.org /10.1080/01629778.2013.860609.
- Kaneva, N. (2011). Nation branding: Toward an agenda for critical research. International Journal of Communication, 5, 117–141.
- Kaneva, N., & Cassinger, C. (2022). Centering gender in public diplomacy and nation branding: an invitation to reimagine the future of the field. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00265-3.
- Ki, E.-J., & Shin, S. (2015). Organization sustainability communication (OSC): Similarities and differences of OSC messages in the United States and South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior (48), 36-43. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.029.
- Larochelle, D. L. (2020). The Greek fandom of Turkish soap operas and the tourism industry: Traveling through borders, realities, and identities. The Journal of Popular Culture, 52(6), 1472-1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12864.
- Larsen, E., Moss, S. M., & Skjelsbæk, I. (Eds.). (2021). Gender equality and nation branding in the Nordic region. Routledge.
- Marklund, C. (2014). Open skies, open minds? Shifting concepts of communication and information in Swedish public debate. In N. Götz, & C. Marklund (Eds.), The Paradox of openness (pp. 143–172). Brill. https://doi. org/10.1163/9789004281196_009.
- Miño, P. (2022). Nation branding as a modern expression of colonialism in Latin America: A focus on Chile, Colombia, and Peru. International Journal of Communication, 16, 2762–2780.
- Nas, A. (2017). Branding and national identity: The analysis of “Turkey: Discover The Potential” campaign. Bilig (83), 201-224.
- Nas, A. (2021). Ulus Markalama: Dünyadan Örneklerle Kuram ve Uygulama. 2. Baskı. https://alparslannas.com websitesinden erişildi. ISBN: 978-625-00-9698-7.
- Norway Official Nation Brand Website (2023). “https://www.visitnorway.com/” https://www.visitnorway.com/ , Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- Nye, J. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
- Nye, J. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 94-109.
- O’Shaughnessy, J., & Jackson, N. (2000). Treating the nation as a brand: Some neglected issues. Journal of Macromarketing, 20(1), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146700201006.
- Olins, W. (2002). Branding the nation—the historical context. Brand Management, 9(4-5), 241-248. https://doi. org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540075.
- Ott, H., Wang, R., & Bortree, D. (2016). Communicating sustainability online: An examination of corporate, nonprofit, and university websites. Mass Communication and Society, 19(5), 671-687. https://doi.org/10.1080 /15205436.2016.1204554.
- Pompper, D. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, sustainability, and public relations: Negotiating multiple complex challenges. Routledge.
- Rasmussen, R. K., & Merkelsen, H. (2012). The new PR of states: How nation branding practices affect the security function of public diplomacy. Public Relations Review (38), 810-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. pubrev.2012.06.007.
- Rasmussen, R. K., & Merkelsen, H. (2014). The risks of nation branding as crisis response: A case study of how the Danish government turned the cartoon crisis into a struggle with globalization. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy (10), 230-248. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2014.13.
- Ritzer, G. (1983). The McDonaldization of society. Journal of American Culture, 6(1), 100-107.
- Roser-Renouf, C., Atkinson, L., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2016). The consumer as climate activist. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4759–4783.
- Scharp, K. M., & Sanders, M. L. (2019). What is a theme? Teaching thematic analysis in qualitative communication research methods. Communication Teacher, 33(2), 117-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2018.1536794.
- Schatz, E. (2008). Transnational image making and soft authoritarian Kazakhstan. Slavic Review, 67(1), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.2307/27652766.
- Sharma, R., Kaur, T., & Syan, A. (2021). Sustainability marketing. Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Stolle, D. &. (2013). Political consumerism: Global responsibility in action. Cambridge University Press.
- Sweden Official Nation Brand Website (2023). https://sweden.se/, Accessed: 10.02.2023
- Thomas, L. J. (2020). Teaching content and thematic analysis using Post Secret submissions. Communication Teacher, 34(2), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2019.1640372.
- Thorson, K., Edgerly, S. L., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Xu, Y., & Wang, L. (2016). Seeking visibility in a big tent: Digital communication and the People’s Climate March. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4784–4806.
- Turquality (2023). “http://www.turquality.com/about-us/what-is-turquality-2?__r=8d2bee365c8f2ee” http:// www.turquality.com/about-us/what-is-turquality-2?__r=8d2bee365c8f2ee , Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- United Nation Global Sustainability Goals (2023). “https://sdgs.un.org/goals” https://sdgs.un.org/goals , Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (2023). “https://sdgs.un.org/” https://sdgs.un.org/ , Accessed: 10.02.2023.
- Valaskivi, K. (2013). A brand new future? Cool Japan and the social imaginary of the branded nation. Japan Forum, 25(4), 485-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2012.756538.
- Volcic, Z., & Andrejevic, M. (2011). Nation branding in the era of commercial nationalism. International Journal of Communication, 5, 598-618.
- Weder, F., & Voci, D. (2021). From ignorance to resonance: Analysis of the transformative potential of dissensus and agonistic deliberation in sustainability communication. International Journal of Communication, 15, 163-186.
- White, C. L. (2012). Brands and national image: An exploration of inverse country-of-origin effect. Place Brand Public Diplomacy (8), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2012.6.
- White, K., Hardisty, D. J., & & Habib, R. (2019). The elusive green consumer. Harvard Business Review, 11(1), 124–133.
- Yörük, Z., & Vatikiotis, P. (2013). Turkey, the Middle East & the media | Soft power or illusion of hegemony: The case of the Turkish soap opera “colonialism”. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2361-2385.
| APA | NAS A (2023). Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries. , 183 - 211. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| Chicago | NAS ALPARSLAN Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries. (2023): 183 - 211. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| MLA | NAS ALPARSLAN Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries. , 2023, ss.183 - 211. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| AMA | NAS A Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries. . 2023; 183 - 211. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| Vancouver | NAS A Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries. . 2023; 183 - 211. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| IEEE | NAS A "Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries." , ss.183 - 211, 2023. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| ISNAD | NAS, ALPARSLAN. "Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries". (2023), 183-211. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| APA | NAS A (2023). Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries. Connectist: İstanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences (Online), 0(64), 183 - 211. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| Chicago | NAS ALPARSLAN Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries. Connectist: İstanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences (Online) 0, no.64 (2023): 183 - 211. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| MLA | NAS ALPARSLAN Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries. Connectist: İstanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences (Online), vol.0, no.64, 2023, ss.183 - 211. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| AMA | NAS A Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries. Connectist: İstanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences (Online). 2023; 0(64): 183 - 211. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| Vancouver | NAS A Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries. Connectist: İstanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences (Online). 2023; 0(64): 183 - 211. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| IEEE | NAS A "Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries." Connectist: İstanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences (Online), 0, ss.183 - 211, 2023. 10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
| ISNAD | NAS, ALPARSLAN. "Nation branding and sustainability: A comparative analysis of European countries". Connectist: İstanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences (Online) 64 (2023), 183-211. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1180834 |
