Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 49 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 11 - 18 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tud.2023.22226 İndeks Tarihi: 20-07-2023

Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?

Öz:
Despite developing surgical techniques in urethral surgery, the outcome and compli- cations are still unsatisfactory. Alternative treatment modality has been coming up, particularly in patients with longer stricture, under revision surgery, and penile stric- ture. Tissue engineering grafts are a promising approach for substituting urethral reconstruction. Over the decades, numerous preclinical studies have been published to show the efficacy and safety of different origins of materials, the presence of autolo- gous cells (acellular matrices or autologous cell-seeded matrices), and the construction of engineered tissue (patch or tubularized constructs) on animal models. However, the results of these studies have not yet reached the intended level for daily clinical prac- tice. A PubMed database search was performed for articles, using specific keywords, published between 1998 and 2022, with a selection on using tissue-engineered grafts for urethroplasty. Many materials have been used as a graft, such as acellular bladder matrix, small intestinal submucosa, acellular dermal matrix, and polyglycolic acid with or without cells, and were evaluated according to the functional and anatomical out- comes comprising complications. According to current literature, tubularized scaffolds constructed from co-cultured cells have promising results for the future. However, high-quality evidence through randomized controlled studies with larger sample sizes, with a long-term follow-up is required to determine accurate outcomes.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Mundy AR, Andrich DE. Urethral trauma. Part I: introduction, history, anatomy, pathology, assessment and emergency management. BJU Int. 2011;108(3):310-327. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Santucci RA, Joyce GF, Wise M. Male urethral stricture disease. J Urol. 2007;177(5):1667-1674. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Lumen N, Campos-Juanatey F, Greenwell T, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on urethral stricture disease (Part 1): management of male urethral stricture disease. Eur Urol 08. 2021;80(2):190-200. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Campos-Juanatey F, Osman NI, Greenwell T, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on urethral stricture disease (Part 2): diagnosis, perioperative management, and follow-up in males. Eur Urol 08. 2021;80(2):201-212. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Ekerhult TO, Lindqvist K, Peeker R, Grenabo L. Outcomes of reinterven- tion after failed urethroplasty. Scand J Urol. 2017;51(1):68-72. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Saad S, Osman NI, Chapple CR. Tissue engineering: recent advances and review of clinical outcome for urethral strictures. Curr Opin Urol. 2021;31(5):498-503. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Kanematsu A. Regenerative medicine for urological tissues: updated review 2018. Int J Urol 2018;25(9):788-791. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Albersheim J, Smith DW, Pariser JJ, Dahm P. The reporting quality of ran- domized controlled trials and experimental animal studies for urethro- plasty. World J Urol. 2021;39(7):2677-2683. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Atala A, Danilevskiy M, Lyundup A, et al. The potential role of tissue- engineered urethral substitution: clinical and preclinical studies. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11(1):3-19. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Versteegden LRM, de Jonge PKJD, IntHout J, et al. Tissue engineering of the urethra: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies. Eur Urol. 2017;72(4):594-606. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Atala A. Tissue engineering for the replacement of organ function in the genitourinary system. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(suppl 6):58-73. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Pederzoli F, Joice G, Salonia A, Bivalacqua TJ, Sopko NA. Regenerative and engineered options for urethroplasty. Nat Rev Urol. 2019;16(8):453- 464. [CrossRef]
  • 13. el-Kassaby A, AbouShwareb T, Atala A. Randomized comparative study between buccal mucosal and acellular bladder matrix grafts in complex anterior urethral strictures. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1432-1436. [CrossRef]
  • 14. El-Kassaby AW, Retik AB, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Urethral stricture repair with an off-the-shelf collagen matrix. J Urol. 2003;169(1):170-173. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Xu YM, Fu Q, Sa YL, Zhang J, Song LJ, Feng C. Outcome of small intestinal submucosa graft for repair of anterior urethral strictures. Int J Urol. 2013;20(6):622-629. [CrossRef]
  • 16. le Roux PJ. Endoscopic urethroplasty with unseeded small intestinal sub- mucosa collagen matrix grafts: a pilot study. J Urol. 2005;173(1):140-143. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Fusco F, De Nunzio C, Salonia A. Long-term results of small intestinal submucosa graft in bulbar urethral reconstruc- tion. Urology. 2012;79(3):695-701. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Colombo F, Austoni E. Small intestinal sub- mucosa (SIS) graft urethroplasty: short-term results. Eur Urol. 2007;51(6):1695-1701. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Sievert KD, Bakircioglu ME, Nunes L, Tu R, Dahiya R, Tanagho EA. Homolo - gous acellular matrix graft for urethral reconstruction in the rabbit: histological and functional evaluation. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1958-1965. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Kim JY, Bullocks JM, Basu CB, et al. Dermal composite flaps reconstructed from acellular dermis: a novel method of neourethral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(7):96e-100e. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano DR, Yoo JJ, Lopez-Bayghen E, Soker S, Atala A. Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need recon- struction: an observational study. Lancet. 2011;377(9772):1175-1182. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Bhargava S, Patterson JM, Inman RD, MacNeil S, Chapple CR. Tissue- engineered buccal mucosa ureth ropla sty-c linic al outcomes. Eur Urol. 2008;53(6):1263-1269. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Fossum M, Skikuniene J, Orrego A, Nordenskjöld A. Prepubertal follow- up after hypospadias repair with autologous in vitro cultured urothelial cells. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(7):755-760. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Karapanos L, Akbarov I, Zugor V, Kokx R, Hagemeier A, Heidenreich A. Safety and mid-term surgical results of anterior urethroplasty with the tissue-engineered oral mucosa graft MukoCell®: a single-center experi- ence. Int J Urol 2021;28(9):936-942. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Barbagli G, Akbarov I, Heidenreich A, et al. Anterior urethroplasty using a new tissue engineered oral mucosa graft: surgical techniques and out- comes. J Urol 2018;200(2):448-456. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Ram-Liebig G, Barbagli G, Heidenreich A, et al. Results of use of tissue- engineered autologous oral mucosa graft for urethral reconstruction: a multicenter, prospective, observational trial. EBioMedicine. 2017;23:185- 192. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Atala A, Guzman L, Retik AB. A novel inert collagen matrix for hypospa- dias repair. J Urol. 1999;162(3 Pt 2):1148-1151. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Villoldo GM, Loresi M, Giudice C, et al. Histologic changes after urethro- plasty using small intestinal submucosa unseeded with cells in rabbits with injured urethra. Urology. 2013;81(6):e1-e5. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Guo H, Sa Y, Huang J, et al. Urethral reconstruction with small intestinal submucosa seeded with oral keratinocytes and TIMP-1 siRNA trans- fected fibroblasts in a rabbit model. Urol Int. 2016;96(2):223-230. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Mantovani F, Tondelli E, Cozzi G, et al. Reconstructive urethroplasty using porcine acellular matrix (SIS): evolution of the grafting technique and results of 10-year experience. Urologia. 2011;78(2):92-97. [CrossRef]
  • 31. Donkov II, Bashir A, Elenkov CH, Panchev PK. Dorsal onlay augmentation urethroplasty with small intestinal submucosa: modified Barbagli tech- nique for strictures of the bulbar urethra. Int J Urol. 2006;13(11):1415- 1417. [CrossRef]
  • 32. Hauser S, Bastian PJ, Fechner G, Müller SC. Small intestine submucosa in urethral stricture repair in a consecutive series. Urology. 2006;68(2):263- 266. [CrossRef]
  • 33. Fiala R, Vidlar A, Vrtal R, Belej K, Student V. Porcine small intestinal sub- mucosa graft for repair of anterior urethral strictures. Eur Urol. 2007;51(6):1702-1708. [CrossRef]
  • 34. Farahat YA, Elbahnasy AM, El-Gamal OM, Ramadan AR, El-Abd SA, Taha MR. Endoscopic urethroplasty using small intestinal submucosal patch in cases of recurrent urethral stricture: a preliminary study. J Endourol. 2009;23(12):2001-2005. [CrossRef]
  • 35. Orabi H, Safwat AS, Shahat A, Hammouda HM. The use of small intestinal submucosa graft for hypospadias repair: pilot study. Arab J Urol. 2013; 11(4):415-420. [CrossRef]
  • 36. Fossum M, Svensson J, Kratz G, Nordenskjöld A. Autologous in vitro cul- tured urothelium in hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3(1):10-18. [CrossRef]
  • 37. Ram-Liebig G, Bednarz J, Stuerzebecher B, et al. Regulatory challenges for autologous tissue engineered products on their way from bench to bedside in Europe. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;82-83:181-191. [CrossRef]
  • 38. Barbagli G, Balò S, Montorsi F, Sansalone S, Lazzeri M. History and evolu- tion of the use of oral mucosa for urethral reconstruction. Asian J Urol. 2017;4(2):96-101. [CrossRef]
  • 39. Mangera A, Patterson JM, Chapple CR. A systematic review of graft aug- mentation urethroplasty techniques for the treatment of anterior ure- thral strictures. Eur Urol. 2011;59(5):797-814. [CrossRef]
  • 40. Caneparo C, Brownell D, Chabaud S, Bolduc S. Genitourinary tissue engi- neering: reconstruction and research models. Bioengineering (Basel). 2021;8(7). [CrossRef]
  • 41. McAteer H, Cosh E, Freeman G, Pandit A, Wood P, Lilford R. Cost-effec- tiveness analysis at the development phase of a potential health tech- nology: examples based on tissue engineering of bladder and urethra. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2007;1(5):343-349. [CrossRef]
  • 42. Vasyutin I, Butnaru D, Lyundup A, et al. Frontiers in urethra regeneration: current state and future perspective. Biomed Mater. 2021;16(4). [CrossRef]
  • 43. Faure A, Bouty A, Nyo YL, O'Brien M, Heloury Y. Two-stage graft urethro- plasty for proximal and complicated hypospadias in children: a retro- spective study. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(5):286.e1-286.e7. [CrossRef]
  • 44. Atala A. Regenerative medicine strategies. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(1):17- 28. [CrossRef]
  • 45. Atala A, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. Engineering complex tissues. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(160):160rv12. [CrossRef]
  • 46. Lang R, Liu G, Shi Y, et al. Self-renewal and differentiation capacity of urine-derived stem cells after urine preservation for 24 hours. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(1):e53980. [CrossRef]
APA ortac m, Olsen Ekerhult T, Zhao W, Atala A (2023). Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?. , 11 - 18. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
Chicago ortac mazhar,Olsen Ekerhult Teresa,Zhao Weixin,Atala Anthony Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?. (2023): 11 - 18. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
MLA ortac mazhar,Olsen Ekerhult Teresa,Zhao Weixin,Atala Anthony Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?. , 2023, ss.11 - 18. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
AMA ortac m,Olsen Ekerhult T,Zhao W,Atala A Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?. . 2023; 11 - 18. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
Vancouver ortac m,Olsen Ekerhult T,Zhao W,Atala A Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?. . 2023; 11 - 18. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
IEEE ortac m,Olsen Ekerhult T,Zhao W,Atala A "Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?." , ss.11 - 18, 2023. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
ISNAD ortac, mazhar vd. "Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?". (2023), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.22226
APA ortac m, Olsen Ekerhult T, Zhao W, Atala A (2023). Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?. Urology research and practice, 49(1), 11 - 18. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
Chicago ortac mazhar,Olsen Ekerhult Teresa,Zhao Weixin,Atala Anthony Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?. Urology research and practice 49, no.1 (2023): 11 - 18. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
MLA ortac mazhar,Olsen Ekerhult Teresa,Zhao Weixin,Atala Anthony Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?. Urology research and practice, vol.49, no.1, 2023, ss.11 - 18. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
AMA ortac m,Olsen Ekerhult T,Zhao W,Atala A Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?. Urology research and practice. 2023; 49(1): 11 - 18. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
Vancouver ortac m,Olsen Ekerhult T,Zhao W,Atala A Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?. Urology research and practice. 2023; 49(1): 11 - 18. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
IEEE ortac m,Olsen Ekerhult T,Zhao W,Atala A "Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?." Urology research and practice, 49, ss.11 - 18, 2023. 10.5152/tud.2023.22226
ISNAD ortac, mazhar vd. "Tissue Engineering Graft for Urethral Reconstruction: Is It Ready for Clinical Application?". Urology research and practice 49/1 (2023), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.22226