Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 205 - 210 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41 İndeks Tarihi: 24-07-2023

YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy

Öz:
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To examine the informative features and qualities of YouTube videos on high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in terms of the informative reliability of the videos. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The included videos were evaluated individually using two orthopedic surgeons using modified DISCERN score and JAMA Benchmark score. Videos were categorized according to publishing year, video type, video length, number of views, and view rates. Any correlation between these categories and JAMA and modified DISCERN scores were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-six videos were available for evaluation. Mean-modified DISCERN and JAMA scores were 2.6 and 2.0 for observer 1 and 2.5 and 1.9 for observer 2, respectively. Median view rates of the videos published between 2008-2011, 2012-2015, and 2015-2020 were 2559.00, 3314.0, and 7458.00, respectively (p=0.003). Other variables showed no difference compared to the publishing year groups (p>0.05). JAMA scores by both observers were positively correlated with video length. A weak positive correlation between mean JAMA score and view rate and a positive correlation between modified DISCERN scores by both observers and video length were found. Mean-modified DISCERN scores and video length values had a strong correlation (p=0.001; r=0.609). A significant correlation was found between JAMA and modified DISCERN scores. Mean modified DISCERN scores showed a moderate increase correlated with the mean JAMA score increase (p=0.017; r=0.463). CONCLUSION: Although the view rate has increased over time, the informative quality and reliability of YouTube videos concerning HTO are low and did not improve over the last decade.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Jackson JP, Waugh W. Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43-B:746-51.
  • 2. Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW, Lee JS, Ha JH, Kim JH, et al. Second-look arthroscopic assessment of cartilage regeneration after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy. 2014; 30(1): 72-9.
  • 3. Koshino T, Wada S, Ara Y, Saito T. Regeneration of degenerated articular cartilage after high tibial valgus osteotomy for medial compartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee. 2003; 10(3): 229-36.
  • 4. Thambiah MD, Tan MKL, Hui JHP. Role of High Tibial Osteotomy in Cartilage Regeneration - Is Correction of Malalignment Mandatory for Success? Indian J Orthop. 2017; 51(5): 588-99.
  • 5. Bonasia DE, Dettoni F, Sito G, Blonna D, Marmotti A, Bruzzone M, et al. Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment overload/arthritis in the varus knee: prognostic factors. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(3): 690-8.
  • 6. Day M, Wolf BR. Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Arthrosis/Overload. Clin Sports Med. 2019; 38(3): 331-49.
  • 7. Noyes FR, Mayfield W, Barber-Westin SD, Albright JC, Heckmann TP. Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: an operative technique and rehabilitation program to decrease complications and promote early union and function. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34(8): 1262-73.
  • 8. Pehlivanoglu T, Yildirim K, Beyzadeoglu T. High Tibial Osteotomy. In: Nikolopoulos DD, Safos GK, Michos J, editors. Tibia Pathology and Fractures, IntechOpen; 2020.p.109-31.
  • 9. YouTube. (2020). https://blog.youtube/press/
  • 10. Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES, Cleary M, Byrne DP, Devitt BM, et al. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(3): 840-5.
  • 11. Gokcen HB, Gumussuyu G. A Quality Analysis of Disc Herniation Videos on YouTube. World Neurosurg. 2019; 124: e799-e804.
  • 12. Kaicker J, Dang W, Mondal T. Assessing the quality and reliability of health information on ERCP using the DISCERN instrument. Health Care Curr Rev. 2013; 1(1): 1-4.
  • 13. Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(10): 1995-2002.
  • 14. O’Neill SC, Baker JF, Fitzgerald C, Fleming C, Rowan F, Byrne D, et al. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(10): E645-9.
  • 15. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012; 39(5): 899-903.
  • 16. Smith PE, McGuire J, Falci M, Poudel DR, Kaufman R, Patterson MA, et al. Analysis of YouTube as a Source of Information for Diabetic Foot Care. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2019; 109(2): 122-6.
  • 17. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 ; 53(2): 105-11.
  • 18. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor- -Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997; 277(15): 1244-5.
  • 19. Akpolat AO, Kurdal DP. Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate? J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1): 78.
  • 20. Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, Hamati F, LaPrade RF, Forsythe B, et al. YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019; 1(2): e109-14.
  • 21. Kuru T, Erken HY. Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Rotator Cuff Tears. Cureus. 2020; 12(2): e6852.
  • 22. Ng MK, Emara AK, Molloy RM, Krebs VE, Mont M, Piuzzi NS. YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Total Knee/Hip Arthroplasty: Quantitative Analysis of Video Reliability, Quality, and Content. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29(20): e1034-44.
  • 23. Oztermeli A, Karahan N. Evaluation of YouTube Video Content About Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Cureus. 2020; 12(8): e9557.
  • 24. Springer B, Bechler U, Koller U, Windhager R, Waldstein W. Online Videos Provide Poor Information Quality, Reliability, and Accuracy Regarding Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2020; 36(12): 3037-47.
  • 25. Krakowiak M, Szmuda T, Fercho J, Ali S, Maliszewska Z, Słoniewski P. YouTube as a source of information for arteriovenous malformations: A content-quality and optimization analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021; 207: 106723.
  • 26. Duran MB, Kizilkan Y. Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube. Andrologia. 2021; 53(8): e14118.
  • 27. Sari E, Umur LF. Quality Analysis of Hallux Valgus Videos on YouTube. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2021; 111(5).
  • 28. Cassidy JT, Baker JF. Orthopaedic Patient Information on the World Wide Web: An Essential Review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98(4): 325-38.
  • 29. Yaradilmis YU, Evren AT, Okkaoglu, MC, Ozturk O, Haberal B, Ozdemir M. Evaluation of quality and reliability of YouTube videos on spondylolisthesis. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery. 2020; 22: 100827.
APA Yıldırım K, Yalçınozan M (2023). YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy. , 205 - 210. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
Chicago Yıldırım Kerem,Yalçınozan Mehmet YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy. (2023): 205 - 210. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
MLA Yıldırım Kerem,Yalçınozan Mehmet YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy. , 2023, ss.205 - 210. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
AMA Yıldırım K,Yalçınozan M YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy. . 2023; 205 - 210. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
Vancouver Yıldırım K,Yalçınozan M YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy. . 2023; 205 - 210. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
IEEE Yıldırım K,Yalçınozan M "YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy." , ss.205 - 210, 2023. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
ISNAD Yıldırım, Kerem - Yalçınozan, Mehmet. "YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy". (2023), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
APA Yıldırım K, Yalçınozan M (2023). YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, 8(3), 205 - 210. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
Chicago Yıldırım Kerem,Yalçınozan Mehmet YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences 8, no.3 (2023): 205 - 210. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
MLA Yıldırım Kerem,Yalçınozan Mehmet YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.8, no.3, 2023, ss.205 - 210. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
AMA Yıldırım K,Yalçınozan M YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 8(3): 205 - 210. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
Vancouver Yıldırım K,Yalçınozan M YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 8(3): 205 - 210. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
IEEE Yıldırım K,Yalçınozan M "YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy." Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, 8, ss.205 - 210, 2023. 10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41
ISNAD Yıldırım, Kerem - Yalçınozan, Mehmet. "YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information on High Tibial Osteotomy". Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences 8/3 (2023), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.4274/cjms.2021.2021-41