Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 144 - 149 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2 İndeks Tarihi: 24-07-2023

Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

Öz:
Objective: Despite the rising geriatric age and the need for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, there are few data regarding its complications and mortality rates in geriatric patients. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients over 18 years old who had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube inserted between January 2016 and December 2020. Age, gender, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy indications, minor and major post-procedure complications, and 30-day mortality rates were compared between geriatric and non-geriatric patients. Results: Females accounted for 276 (47.6%) of the 580 patients, while 304 (52.4%) were males. Among the study population, 65.7% of the patients were older patients (n=381), and the median age was 67.8 years. Alzheimer’s dementia accompanying dysphagia (n=232; 40%) and stroke (n=148; 25%) were the most prevalent diagnoses. No differences were found regarding the complication rate between geriatric patients and non-geriatric patients. The incidence of complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion was 35.8%, with 71.1% are minor. Granuloma (12.6%) was the most minor complication while buried bumper syndrome (4.8%) was the most common major complication. However, peristomal leakage- necrotizing fasciitis and aspiration pneumonia was the most lethal complications. The mortality rate was 0.5%, and there was no significant difference between geriatric patients and non-geriatric patients. Conclusion: We established that older age alone was not a risk factor for geriatric patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy because there was no statistically significant difference between the complication and mortality rates of younger and older individuals. Hence, PEG can be used safely on older patients when necessary.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Volkert D, Beck AM, Cederholm T, Cruz-Jentoft A, Goisser S, Hooper L, Kiesswetter E, Maggio M, Raynaud-Simon A, Sieber CC, Sobotka L, van Asselt D, Wirth R, Bischoff SC. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clin Nutr 2019;38:10-47.
  • 2. Bischoff SC, Austin P, Boeykens K, Chourdakis M, Cuerda C, Jonkers- Schuitema C, Lichota M, Nyulasi I, Schneider SM, Stanga Z, Pironi L. ESPEN guideline on home enteral nutrition. Clin Nutr 2020;39:5-22.
  • 3. Dietrich CG, Schoppmeyer K. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy–Too often? Too late? Who are the right patients for gastrostomy? World J Gastroenterol 2020;26:2464-2471.
  • 4. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant Jr RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980;15:872-875.
  • 5. Sivero L, Telesca DA, Gentile M, Aprea G, Massa G, Cestaro G, Danzi M, Sivero S, Formisano C. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), in elderly patients with dementia and anorexia. Ann Ital Chir 2018;89:305-308.
  • 6. Lee YF, Hsu TW, Liang CS, Yeh TC, Chen TY, Chen NC, Chu CS. The efficacy and safety of tube feeding in advanced dementia patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021;22:357-363.
  • 7. McClave SA, DiBaise JK, Mullin GE, Martindale RG. ACG clinical guideline: nutrition therapy in the adult hospitalized patient. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:315-334.
  • 8. MacLean AA, Miller G, Bamboat ZM, Hiotis K. Abdominal wall necrotizing fasciitis from dislodged percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: a case series. Am Surg 2004;70:827-831.
  • 9. Sobani ZA, Tin K, Guttmann S, Abbasi AA, Mayer I, Tsirlin Y. Safety of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in centenarian patients. Clin Endosc 2018;51:56-60.
  • 10. Freeman C, Ricevuto A, DeLegge MH. Enteral nutrition in patients with dementia and stroke. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2010;26:156-159.
  • 11. Hattori Y, Hamada S, Ishizaki T, Sakata N, Iwagami M, Tamiya N, Akishita M, Yamanaka T. National trends in gastrostomy in older adults between 2014 and 2019 in Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022;22:648-652.
  • 12. Rahman M, Evans K, Arif N, Gorard D. Mental incapacity in hospitalised patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion. Clin Nutr 2012;31:224-229.
  • 13. Wirth R, Volkert D, Bauer J, Schulz R, Borchelt M, Fleischhauer C, Steinhagen- Thiessen E, Sieber CC. [PEG tube placement in German geriatric wards-a retrospective data-base analysis]. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2007;40:21-30.
  • 14. Geeganage C, Beavan J, Ellender S, Bath PM. Interventions for dysphagia and nutritional support in acute and subacute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;17:CD000323.
  • 15. Mitchell SL, Tetroe JM. Survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;55:M735-M739.
  • 16. Stenberg K, Eriksson A, Odensten C, Darehed D. Mortality and complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, a retrospective multicentre study. BMC Gastroenterol 2022;22:361.
  • 17. Taylor CA, Larson DE, Ballard DJ, Bergstrom LR, Silverstein MD, Zinsmeister AR, DiMagno EP. Predictors of outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a community-based study. Mayo Clin Proc 1992;67:1042- 1049.
  • 18. Larson DE, Burton DD, Schroeder KW, DiMagno EP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology 1987;93:48-52.
  • 19. Blomberg J, Lagergren J, Martin L, Mattsson F, Lagergren P. Complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012;47:737-742.
  • 20. Raha SK, Woodhouse K. The use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 161 consecutive elderly patients. Age Ageing 1994;23:162-163.
  • 21. Keung EZ, Liu X, Nuzhad A, Rabinowits G, Patel V. In-hospital and long- term outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with malignancy. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:777-786.
  • 22. Wirth R, Voss C, Smoliner C, Sieber CC, Bauer JM, Volkert D. Complications and mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in geriatrics: a prospective multicenter observational trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012;13:228-233.
  • 23. Sturgis TM, Yancy W, Cole JC, Proctor DD, Minhas BS, Marcuard SP. Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91;2301-2304.
  • 24. Lipp A, Lusardi G. Systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD005571.
  • 25. Lipp A, Lusardi G. Systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;CD005571.
  • 26. Gomes Jr CA, Andriolo RB, Bennett C, Lustosa SA, Matos D, Waisberg DR, Waisberg J. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD008096.
APA Azılı C, KARABACAK H, balas s, APAYDIN M, tamam s, Culcu S, Hasdemir A (2023). Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. , 144 - 149. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
Chicago Azılı Cem,KARABACAK HARUN,balas sener,APAYDIN MUHAMMED,tamam selim,Culcu Serdar,Hasdemir A. Oğuz Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. (2023): 144 - 149. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
MLA Azılı Cem,KARABACAK HARUN,balas sener,APAYDIN MUHAMMED,tamam selim,Culcu Serdar,Hasdemir A. Oğuz Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. , 2023, ss.144 - 149. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
AMA Azılı C,KARABACAK H,balas s,APAYDIN M,tamam s,Culcu S,Hasdemir A Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. . 2023; 144 - 149. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
Vancouver Azılı C,KARABACAK H,balas s,APAYDIN M,tamam s,Culcu S,Hasdemir A Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. . 2023; 144 - 149. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
IEEE Azılı C,KARABACAK H,balas s,APAYDIN M,tamam s,Culcu S,Hasdemir A "Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy." , ss.144 - 149, 2023. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
ISNAD Azılı, Cem vd. "Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy". (2023), 144-149. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
APA Azılı C, KARABACAK H, balas s, APAYDIN M, tamam s, Culcu S, Hasdemir A (2023). Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online), 5(2), 144 - 149. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
Chicago Azılı Cem,KARABACAK HARUN,balas sener,APAYDIN MUHAMMED,tamam selim,Culcu Serdar,Hasdemir A. Oğuz Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online) 5, no.2 (2023): 144 - 149. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
MLA Azılı Cem,KARABACAK HARUN,balas sener,APAYDIN MUHAMMED,tamam selim,Culcu Serdar,Hasdemir A. Oğuz Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online), vol.5, no.2, 2023, ss.144 - 149. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
AMA Azılı C,KARABACAK H,balas s,APAYDIN M,tamam s,Culcu S,Hasdemir A Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online). 2023; 5(2): 144 - 149. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
Vancouver Azılı C,KARABACAK H,balas s,APAYDIN M,tamam s,Culcu S,Hasdemir A Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online). 2023; 5(2): 144 - 149. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
IEEE Azılı C,KARABACAK H,balas s,APAYDIN M,tamam s,Culcu S,Hasdemir A "Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy." European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online), 5, ss.144 - 149, 2023. 10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2
ISNAD Azılı, Cem vd. "Comparison Between Geriatric and Non-geriatric Patients in the Development of Complications After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy". European journal of geriatrics and gerontology (Online) 5/2 (2023), 144-149. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejgg.galenos.2023.2023-2-2