Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 49 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 147 - 161 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tud.2023.23023 İndeks Tarihi: 25-07-2023

The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice

Öz:
Urothelial carcinoma is a heterogeneous disease with histomorphological and genomic variations throughout the same tumor or between tumors from different patients. It has been shown that most of these histologic and genetic differences have prognostic significance and may have a guiding role in determining the appropriate treatment choice for the patient. Therefore, it is crucial for both the pathologist and the clinician to be conscious of these variations and to consider them in patient man agement. Recently, a consensus molecular classification has been developed and cat egorized urothelial carcinomas into 6 subclasses. These molecular subclasses seem to be associated with prognosis and/or response to certain therapeutic approaches like chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitory therapy; however, it has not yet been sufficiently validated and has some limitations for routine application. As is well known, there are therapeutic limitations in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcino mas, especially those inappropriate for standard therapy with platinum-based chemo therapy regimens. Emerging new therapeutic approaches and testing for appropriate patient selection for those are discussed in this article
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Lobo N, Shariat SF, Guo CC, et al. What is the significance of variant histology in urothelial carcinoma? Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(4):653-663. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Lopez-Beltran A, Henriques V, Montironi R, Cimadamore A, Raspol lini MR, Cheng L. Variants and new entities of bladder cancer. Histopa thology. 2019;74(1):77-96. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Babjuk M, Burger M, Compérat EM, et al. European association of urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TaT1 and carcinoma in situ) −2019 update. Eur Urol. 2019;76(5):639-657. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Matsumoto H, Shiraishi K, Azuma H, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for bladder cancer 2019 update by the Japanese urological association: summary of the revision. Int J Urol. 2020;27(9):702-709. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Humphrey PA, Moch H, Cubilla AL, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male Genital Organs-Part B: prostate and bladder tumours. Eur Urol. 2016;70(1):106- 119. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Shah RB, Montgomery JS, Montie JE, Kunju LP. Variant (divergent) histo logic differentiation in urothelial carcinoma is under-recognized in com munity practice: impact of mandatory central pathology review at a large referral hospital. Urol Oncol. 2013;31(8):1650-1655. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Moschini M, D’Andrea D, Korn S, et al. Characteristics and clinical signifi cance of histological variants of bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2017; 14(11):651-668. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Alifrangis C, McGovern U, Freeman A, Powles T, Linch M. Molecular and histopathology directed therapy for advanced bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2019;16(8):465-483. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Minato A, Noguchi H, Moriya R, et al. Evaluation of the extent of variant histology in urothelial carcinoma as a predictive marker of clinical outcomes after radical cystectomy. Cancer Diagn Progn. 2021;1(4):345- 351. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Veskimäe E, Espinos EL, Bruins HM, et al. What is the prognostic and clinical importance of urothelial and nonurothelial histological variants of bladder cancer in predicting oncological outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer? A European Association of Urology muscle invasive and metastatic bladder cancer guidelines panel systematic review. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019;2(6):625-642. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Lagwinski N, Thomas A, Stephenson AJ, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder: a clinicopathologic analysis of 45 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(12):1777-1787. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Grignon DJ, Ro JY, Ayala AG, Johnson DE, Ordóñez NG. Primary adeno carcinoma of the urinary bladder. A clinicopathologic analysis of 72 cases. Cancer. 1991;67(8):2165-2172. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Erdemir F, Tunc M, Ozcan F, et al. The effect of squamous and/or glandu lar differentiation on recurrence, progression and survival in urothelial carcinoma of bladder. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(3):803-807. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Mitra AP, Bartsch CC, Bartsch G, Miranda G, Skinner EC, Daneshmand S. Does presence of squamous and glandular differentiation in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder at cystectomy portend poor prognosis? An intensive case-control analysis. Urol Oncol. 2014;32(2):117-127. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Zargar-Shoshtari K, Sverrisson EF, Sharma P, et al. Clinical outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy in the presence of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder with squamous or glandular differ entiation. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14(1):82-88. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Scosyrev E, Ely BW, Messing EM, et al. Do mixed histological features affect survival benefit from neoadjuvant platinum-based combination chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer? A sec ondary analysis of Southwest Oncology Group-Directed Intergroup Study (S8710) BJU Int. 2011;108(5):693-699. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Klaile Y, Schlack K, Boegemann M, Steinestel J, Schrader AJ, Krabbe LM. Variant histology in bladder cancer: how it should change the manage ment in non-muscle invasive and muscle invasive disease? Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5(5):692-701. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Amin MB. Histological variants of urothelial carcinoma: diagnostic, thera peutic and prognostic implications. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(suppl 2):S96- S118. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Cheng HL, Chou LP, Tsai HW, et al. Urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation: reappraisal of the clinical implication and immunohisto chemically features. Urol Oncol. 2021;39(10):732.e17-732.e23. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Zhong M, Tian W, Zhuge J, et al. Distinguishing nested variants of urothe lial carcinoma from benign mimickers by tert promoter mutation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(1):127-131. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Linder BJ, Frank I, Cheville JC, et al. Outcomes following radical cystec tomy for nested variant of urothelial carcinoma: a matched cohort analy sis. J Urol. 2013;189(5):1670-1675. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Wei Y, Huang H, Ye L. Re: George J. Netto, Mahul B. Amin, Daniel M. Ber ney, et al. The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Uri nary Tract Tumors. Eur Urol. 2022:82:469-82. Eur Urol. 2023;83(1):e15. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Weyerer V, Eckstein M, Compérat E, et al. Pure large nested variant of urothelial carcinoma (LNUC) is the prototype of an FGFR3 mutated aggressive urothelial carcinoma with Luminal-papillary phenotype. Can cers (Basel). 2020;12(3) [CrossRef]
  • 24. Lopez Beltran A, Montironi R, Cheng L. Microcystic urothelial carcinoma: morphology, immunohistochemistry and clinical behaviour. Histopa thology. 2014;64(6):872-879. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Sangoi AR, Beck AH, Amin MB, et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the urinary tract among urologic pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(9):1367-1376. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Mitra AP, Fairey AS, Skinner EC, et al. Implications of micropapillary urothelial carcinoma variant on prognosis following radical cystectomy: a multi-institutional investigation. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(1):48-56. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Sui W, Matulay JT, James MB, et al. Micropapillary bladder cancer: insights from the national cancer database. Bladder Cancer. 2016;2(4):415-423. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Willis DL, Fernandez MI, Dickstein RJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of cT1 micropapillary bladder cancer. J Urol. 2015;193(4):1129-1134. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Spaliviero M, Dalbagni G, Bochner BH, et al. Clinical outcome of patients with T1 micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 2014;192(3):702-707. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Witjes JA, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an inter national collaborative multistakeholder effort(dagger): under the aus pices of the EAU-ESMO guidelines committees. Eur Urol. 2020;77(2):223- 250. [CrossRef]
  • 31. Abufaraj M, Foerster B, Schernhammer E, et al. Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of dis ease characteristics and treatment outcomes. Eur Urol. 2019;75(4):649- 658. [CrossRef]
  • 32. Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of non muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline. J Urol. 2016;196(4): 1021-1029. [CrossRef]
  • 33. Meeks JJ, Taylor JM, Matsushita K, et al. Pathological response to neoad juvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive micropapillary bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2013;111(8):E325-E330. [CrossRef]
  • 34. Wright JL, Black PC, Brown GA, et al. Differences in survival among patients with sarcomatoid carcinoma, carcinosarcoma and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2302-2306; discussion 2307. [CrossRef]
  • 35. Compérat E, Amin MB, Epstein JI, et al. The genitourinary pathology soci ety update on classification of variant histologies, T1 substaging, molec ular taxonomy, and immunotherapy and PD-L1 testing implications of urothelial cancers. Adv Anat Pathol. 2021;28(4):196-208. [CrossRef]
  • 36. Cheng L, Zhang S, Alexander R, et al. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the uri nary bladder: the final common pathway of urothelial carcinoma dedif ferentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(5):e34-e46. [CrossRef]
  • 37. Sui W, Matulay JT, Onyeji IC, et al. Contemporary treatment patterns and outcomes of sarcomatoid bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2017;35(7):1055- 1061. [CrossRef]
  • 38. Gu L, Ai Q, Cheng Q, et al. Sarcomatoid variant urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinicopatho logical features and survival outcomes. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20(1):550. [CrossRef]
  • 39. Almassi N, Vertosick EA, Sjoberg DD, et al. Pathological and oncological outcomes in patients with sarcomatoid differentiation undergoing cys tectomy. BJU Int. 2022;129(4):463-469. [CrossRef]
  • 40. Joseph RW, Millis SZ, Carballido EM, et al. PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(12):1303-1307. [CrossRef]
  • 41. Al-Ahmadie HA, Iyer G, Lee BH, et al. Frequent somatic CDH1 loss-of function mutations in plasmacytoid variant bladder cancer. Nat Genet. 2016;48(4):356-358. [CrossRef]
  • 42. Li Q, Assel M, Benfante NE, et al. The impact of plasmacytoid variant his tology on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of bladder after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(1):104-108. [CrossRef]
  • 43. Dayyani F, Czerniak BA, Sircar K, et al. Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma, a chemosensitive cancer with poor prognosis, and peritoneal carcino matosis. J Urol. 2013;189(5):1656-1661. [CrossRef]
  • 44. Diamantopoulos LN, Khaki AR, Grivas P, et al. Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma: response to chemotherapy and oncologic outcomes. Bladder Cancer. 2020;6(1):71-81. [CrossRef]
  • 45. Teo MY, Al-Ahmadie H, Seier K, et al. Natural history, response to systemic therapy, and genomic landscape of plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2021;124(7):1214-1221. [CrossRef]
  • 46. Fox MD, Xiao L, Zhang M, et al. Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 49 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2017;147(5):500-506. [CrossRef]
  • 47. Tamas EF, Nielsen ME, Schoenberg MP, Epstein JI. Lymphoepithelioma like carcinoma of the urinary tract: a clinicopathological study of 30 pure and mixed cases. Mod Pathol. 2007;20(8):828-834. [CrossRef]
  • 48. Lopez-Beltrán A, Luque RJ, Vicioso L, et al. Lymphoepithelioma-like car cinoma of the urinary bladder: a clinicopathologic study of 13 cases. Virchows Arch. 2001;438(6):552-557. [CrossRef]
  • 49. Manocha U, Kardos J, Selitsky S, et al. RNA expression profiling of lym phoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the bladder reveals a basal-like molecular subtype. Am J Pathol. 2020;190(1):134-144. [CrossRef]
  • 50. Lopez-Beltran A, Blanca A, Montironi R, Cheng L, Regueiro JC. Pleomor phic giant cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Hum Pathol. 2009; 40(10):1461-1466. [CrossRef]
  • 51. Mai KT, Bateman J, Djordjevic B, Flood TA, Belanger EC. Clear cell urothe lial carcinoma. Int J Surg Pathol. 2017;25(1):18-25. [CrossRef]
  • 52. Lopez-Beltran A, Amin MB, Oliveira PS, et al. Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, lipid cell variant: clinicopathologic findings and LOH analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(3):371-376. [CrossRef]
  • 53. Moch H. Urinary and male Genital Tumours (Vol. 8). World Health Organ Classif Tumours; 2022.
  • 54. Lowenthal BM, Sahoo D, Amin MB, Hansel DE. Urothelial proliferation of unknown malignant potential involving the bladder: histopathologic features and risk of progression in De Novo cases and cases with prior neoplasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(7):853-862. [CrossRef]
  • 55. Barkan GA, Wojcik EM, Nayar R, et al. The Paris system for reporting uri nary cytology: the quest to develop a standardized terminology. Adv Anat Pathol. 2016;23(4):193-201. [CrossRef]
  • 56. Yamasaki M, Taoka R, Katakura K, et al. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology improves the negative predictive value of high-grade urothelial carcinoma. BMC Urol. 2022;22(1):51. [CrossRef]
  • 57. Damrauer JS, Hoadley KA, Chism DD, et al. Intrinsic subtypes of high grade bladder cancer reflect the hallmarks of breast cancer biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(8):3110-3115. [CrossRef]
  • 58. Robertson AG, Kim J, Al-Ahmadie H, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cell. 2017;171(3): 540-556.
  • 59. Kamoun A, de Reyniès A, Allory Y, et al. A consensus molecular classifica tion of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2020;77(4):420-433. [CrossRef]
  • 60. Warrick JI, Knowles MA, Yves A, et al. Report from the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consultation conference on molecular pathology of urogenital cancers. II. Molecular pathology of bladder cancer: progress and challenges. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(7): e30-e46. [CrossRef]
  • 61. Guo CC, Bondaruk J, Yao H, et al. Assessment of Luminal and basal phe notypes in bladder cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9743. [CrossRef]
  • 62. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature. 2014;507(7492): 315-322. [CrossRef]
  • 63. Sjödahl G, Eriksson P, Liedberg F, Höglund M. Molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mRNA classification versus tumour-cell phenotype classification. J Pathol. 2017;242(1):113-125. [CrossRef]
  • 64. Seiler R, Ashab HAD, Erho N, et al. Impact of molecular subtypes in mus cle-invasive bladder cancer on predicting response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Urol. 2017;72(4):544-554. [CrossRef]
  • 65. Loriot Y, Necchi A, Park SH, et al. Erdafitinib in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(4):338-348. [CrossRef]
  • 66. Kythreotou A, Siddique A, Mauri FA, Bower M, Pinato DJ. Pd-L1. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71(3):189-194. [CrossRef]
  • 67. Davarpanah NN, Yuno A, Trepel JB, Apolo AB. Immunotherapy: a new treatment paradigm in bladder cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2017;29(3): 184-195. [CrossRef]
  • 68. Zajac M, Scott M, Ratcliffe M, et al. Concordance among four commer cially available, validated programmed cell death ligand-1 assays in urothelial carcinoma. Diagn Pathol. 2019;14(1):99. [CrossRef]
  • 69. Eckstein M, Erben P, Kriegmair MC, et al. Performance of the Food and Drug Administration/EMA-approved programmed cell death ligand-1 assays in urothelial carcinoma with emphasis on therapy stratification for first-line use of atezolizumab and pembrolizumab. Eur J Cancer. 2019;106:234-243. [CrossRef]
  • 70. de Jong JJ, Stoop H, Nieboer D, Boormans JL, van Leenders GJLH. Con cordance of PD-L1 expression in matched urothelial bladder cancer specimens. Histopathology. 2018;73(6):983-989. [CrossRef]
  • 71. Reis H, Serrette R, Posada J, et al. PD-L1 expression in urothelial carci noma with predominant or pure variant histology: concordance among 3 commonly used and commercially available antibodies. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43(7):920-927. [CrossRef]
  • 72. Eckstein M, Sikic D, Strissel PL, Erlmeier F, BRIDGE Consortium Germany. Evolution of PD-1 and PD-L1 gene and protein expression in primary tumors and corresponding liver metastases of metastatic bladder can cer. Eur Urol. 2018;74(4):527-529. [CrossRef]
  • 73. Althammer S, Tan TH, Spitzmüller A, et al. Automated image analysis of NSCLC biopsies to predict response to anti-PD-L1 therapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):121. [CrossRef]
  • 74. Turner N, Grose R. Fibroblast growth factor signalling: from development to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(2):116-129. [CrossRef]
  • 75. Helsten T, Elkin S, Arthur E, Tomson BN, Carter J, Kurzrock R. The FGFR landscape in cancer: analysis of 4,853 tumors by next-generation sequencing. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(1):259-267. [CrossRef]
  • 76. McConkey DJ, Choi W, Ochoa A, Siefker-Radtke A, Czerniak B, Dinney CP. Therapeutic opportunities in the intrinsic subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2015;29(2):377-394, x-xi. [CrossRef]
  • 77. Teo MY, Mota JM, Whiting KA, et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 alteration status is associated with differential sensitivity to platinum based chemotherapy in locally advanced and metastatic urothelial car cinoma. Eur Urol. 2020;78(6):907-915. [CrossRef]
  • 78. Sliwkowski MX, Mellman I. Antibody therapeutics in cancer. Science. 2013;341(6151):1192-1198. [CrossRef]
  • 79. Rosenberg JE, O’Donnell PH, Balar AV, et al. Pivotal trial of enfortumab vedotin in urothelial carcinoma after platinum and anti-programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(29):2592-2600. [CrossRef]
  • 80. Patelli G, Zeppellini A, Spina F, et al. The evolving panorama of HER2- targeted treatments in metastatic urothelial cancer: A systematic review and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022;104:102351. [CrossRef]
  • 81. Lambert JM, Morris CQ. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for personal ized treatment of solid tumors: a review. Adv Ther. 2017;34(5):1015-1035. [CrossRef]
  • 82. Abel M, Burkenroad A, Sun A, Lu E, Stefanoudakis D, Drakaki A. The evolv ing landscape of antibody-drug conjugates for urothelial carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021;19(3):183-193. [CrossRef]
  • 83. Sheng X, Yan X, Wang L, et al. Open-label, multicenter, Phase II study of RC48-ADC, a HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(1):43-51. [CrossRef]
  • 84. Scherrer E, Kang A, Bloudek LM, Koshkin VS. HER2 expression in urothe lial carcinoma, a systematic literature review. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1011885. [CrossRef]
APA Kankaya D, BAGLAN T (2023). The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice. , 147 - 161. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
Chicago Kankaya Duygu,BAGLAN TOLGA The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice. (2023): 147 - 161. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
MLA Kankaya Duygu,BAGLAN TOLGA The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice. , 2023, ss.147 - 161. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
AMA Kankaya D,BAGLAN T The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice. . 2023; 147 - 161. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
Vancouver Kankaya D,BAGLAN T The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice. . 2023; 147 - 161. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
IEEE Kankaya D,BAGLAN T "The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice." , ss.147 - 161, 2023. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
ISNAD Kankaya, Duygu - BAGLAN, TOLGA. "The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice". (2023), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.23023
APA Kankaya D, BAGLAN T (2023). The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice. Urology research and practice, 49(3), 147 - 161. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
Chicago Kankaya Duygu,BAGLAN TOLGA The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice. Urology research and practice 49, no.3 (2023): 147 - 161. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
MLA Kankaya Duygu,BAGLAN TOLGA The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice. Urology research and practice, vol.49, no.3, 2023, ss.147 - 161. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
AMA Kankaya D,BAGLAN T The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice. Urology research and practice. 2023; 49(3): 147 - 161. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
Vancouver Kankaya D,BAGLAN T The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice. Urology research and practice. 2023; 49(3): 147 - 161. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
IEEE Kankaya D,BAGLAN T "The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice." Urology research and practice, 49, ss.147 - 161, 2023. 10.5152/tud.2023.23023
ISNAD Kankaya, Duygu - BAGLAN, TOLGA. "The Many Faces of Urothelial Carcinomas: An Update From Pathology to Clinical Approach and Challenges in Practice". Urology research and practice 49/3 (2023), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.23023