TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 605 - 622 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 İndeks Tarihi: 28-07-2023
TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ
Öz: Bu çalışmanın amacı sadece olumlu tonda olan çevrimiçi lokanta yorumlarına karşı hem olumlu hem de olumsuz yorumların bir arada olduğu yorum türünden hangisinin daha etkin olduğunun araştırılmasıdır. İki farklı türde hazırlanan çevrimiçi tüketici yorumlarına yönelik olarak; deneklerin kuşku, tutum, ikna edicilik, lokantayı tercih ve satın alma niyetleri ölçülmüştür. Araştırmanın verileri kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile araştırmaya katılan 156 denekten elde edilmiştir. Veriler bağımlı örneklem t testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, deneklerin sadece olumlu/olumsuz bir arada olan yorumlara karşı daha kuşku ile yaklaşmakta olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Olumlu çevrimiçi yorumlar daha inandırıcı bulunmuştur. Yorum yapılan lokantaya yönelik tutum, yorumların ikna ediciliğine karşı tutum, lokanta tercihi ve satın alma niyeti sadece olumlu yorumların yer aldığı senaryoda daha güçlü sonuçlar üretmiştir. Sadece olumlu tondaki yorumlar hem olumlu hem de olumsuz yorumların bir arada yer aldığı çevrimiçi yorumlar karşısında daha olumlu tutum, tercih ve satın alma niyeti bulunmuştur. Bu çalışma, çevrimiçi yorumlarına yönelik tüketici tepkilerini sadece olumlu yorumların olduğu durum ile olumlu/olumsuz yorumların birlikte yer aldığı durumu karşılaştıran, mevcut bulguları genişleten, bir araştırmadır. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, uygulayıcılar için, çevrimiçi mağaza yorumları üzerinde tekrar düşünmelerini gerektirmektedir. İlave olarak, çevrimiçi tüketici yorumlarından etkilenen uygulayıcıların stratejilerini geliştirmesine yardımcı olabilir.
Anahtar Kelime: THE EFFECT OF ONLINE REVIEWS ON CONSUMERS' ATTITUDE, RESTAURANT PREFERENCE, AND PURCHASE INTENTION
Öz: The aim of the present study was to investigate which type of comments, including those with both positive and negative tones, is more effective against online restaurant reviews with only positive tones. Subjects’ suspiciousness, attitude, persuasiveness, preference, and purchase intentions were measured for online consumer comments prepared in two different types. The data were collected from a total of 156 subjects selected via convenience sampling method and analyzed running dependent sample t-tests. The results revealed that the subjects were more suspicious of being exposed to positive/negative combined reviews. Also, positive online reviews were found to be more convincing. Attitude towards the restaurant where the comments were made, attitude towards the persuasiveness of the online reviews, restaurant preference, and purchase intention produced stronger results in the scenario where only positive comments were present. Only positive online reviews produced more positive attitudes, preferences, and purchase intentions compared with online reviews that included both positive and negative comments. The current study expands the existing knowledge by comparing consumer reactions with online comments in two groups of only positive comments and positive-negative comments together. Our findings invite practitioners to reconsider their online store reviews. Additionally, it can help practitioners who are influenced by online consumer reviews develop their professional strategies.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Allard, T., Dunn, L. H. ve White, K. (2020). Negative reviews, positive impact: Consumer empathetic responding to unfair word of mouth. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 86-108.
- Bakos, J. Y. (1997). Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science, 43(12), 1676-1692.
- Basuroy, S., Chatterjee, S. ve Ravid, S. A. (2003). How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 103-117.
- Berger, J., Sorensen, A. T. ve Rasmussen, S. J. (2010). Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Science, 29(5), 815-827.
- Brandes, L., Godes, D. ve Mayzlin, D. (2022). Extremity bias in online reviews: The role of attrition. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(4), 675-695.
- BrightLocal (2022). Local Consumer Review Survey 2022. Erişim adresi: www.brightlocal.com/research/local-consumer-review-survey/
- Chen, Y. ve Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477-491.
- Chen, Z. ve Lurie, N.H. (2013). Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 463-476.
- Chevalier, J.A. ve Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345-354.
- Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B. ve Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
- Gardete, P. M. (2013). Cheap-talk advertising and misrepresentation in vertically differentiated markets. Marketing Science, 32(4), 609-621.
- Godes, D. ve Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545-560.
- Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T. ve Czaplewski, A.J. (2006). eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 449-456.
- Gürhan-Canli, Z. ve Batra, R. (2004). When corporate image affects product evaluations: The moderating role of perceived risk. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 197-205.
- Hagtvedt, H. (2011). The impact of incomplete typeface logos on perceptions of the firm. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 86-93.
- Hamilton, R., Vohs, K. D. ve McGill, A. L. (2014). We'll be honest, this won't be the best article you'll ever read: The use of dispreferred markers in word-of-mouth communication. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 197-212.
- Hardesty, D. M., Carlson, J. P. ve Bearden, W. (2002). Brand familiarity and invoice price effects on consumer evaluations: the moderating role of skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 1-15.
- Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G. ve Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
- Hernández-Ortega, B. (2020). When the performance comes into play: The influence of positive online consumer reviews on individuals' post-consumption responses. Journal of Business Research, 113, 422-435.
- Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R. ve Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454-462.
- Houser, D. ve Wooders, J. (2006). Reputation in auctions: Theory, and evidence from eBay. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15(2), 353-369.
- Igniyte (2022). 30 essential online review facts and stats. Erişim adresi: https://www.igniyte.co.uk/blog/30-online-review-facts-and-stats/
- Jindal, P. ve Aribarg, A. (2021). The importance of price beliefs in consumer search. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(2), 321-342.
- Kaemingk, D. (2022). Online reviews statistics to know in 2022 Qualtrics. Erişim adresi: https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/online-review-stats/
- Khare, A., Labrecque, L. I. ve Asare, A. K. (2011). The assimilative and contrastive effects of word-of-mouth volume: An experimental examination of online consumer ratings. Journal of Retailing, 87(1), 111-126.
- Klayman, J. (1995). Varieties of confirmation bias. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 32, 385-418.
- Kuksov, D. ve Villas-Boas, J. M. (2010). When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Science, 29(3), 507-524.
- Kupor, D. ve Tormala, Z. (2018). When moderation fosters persuasion: The persuasive power of deviatory reviews. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3) , 490-510.
- Lal, R. ve Sarvary, M. (1999). When and how is the Internet likely to decrease price competition? Marketing Science, 18(4), 485-503.
- Lee, J., Park, D. H. ve Han, I. (2011). The different effects of online consumer reviews on consumers' purchase intentions depending on trust in online shopping malls: An advertising perspective. Internet Research. 21(2), 187-206.
- Lee, N., Bollinger, B. ve Staelin, R. (2022). Vertical versus horizontal variance in online reviews and their impact on demand. Journal of Marketing Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437221107549
- Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3),74-89.
- Mayzlin, D. ve Shin, J. (2011). Uninformative advertising as an invitation to search. Marketing Science, 30(4), 666-685.
- Mizerski, R. W. (1982). An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavorable information. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 301-310.
- Moe, W. W. ve Trusov, M. (2011). The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 444-456.
- Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
- Obermiller, C., Spangenberg, E. ve MacLachlan, D. L. (2005). Ad skepticism: The consequences of disbelief. Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 7-17.
- Packard, G. ve Berger, J. (2017). How language shapes word of mouth's impact. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(4), 572-588.
- Pan, L. Y. ve Chiou, J. S. (2011). How much can you trust online information? Cues for perceived trustworthiness of consumer-generated online information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(2), 67-74.
- Park, C. ve Lee, T. M. (2009). Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business research, 62(1), 61-67.
- Reich, T. ve Maglio, S. J. (2020). Featuring mistakes: The persuasive impact of purchase mistakes in online reviews. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 52-65.
- Rocklage, M. D. ve Fazio, R. H. (2020). The enhancing versus backfiring effects of positive emotion in consumer reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(2), 332-352.
- Saleh, K. (2022). The importance of online customer reviews. Erişim adresi: www.invespcro.com/blog/theimportance- of-online-customer-reviews-infographic.
- Schoenmueller, V., Netzer, O. ve Stahl, F. (2020). The polarity of online reviews: Prevalence, drivers and implications. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(5), 853-877.
- Sherif, M. ve Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Oxford: Yale University Press.
- Shi, X. ve Liao, Z. (2017). Online consumer review and group-buying participation: The mediating effects of consumer beliefs. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 605-617.
- Sonnier, G. P., McAlister, L. ve Rutz, O. J. (2011). A dynamic model of the effect of online communications on firm sales. Marketing Science, 30(4), 702-716.
- Sparks, B.A. ve Browning, V. (2011). The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1310-1323.
- Tang, T., Fang, E. ve Wang, F. (2014). Is neutral really neutral? The effects of neutral user-generated content on product sales. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 41-58.
- Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E. ve Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 90-102.
- Tsao, W. C., Hsieh, M. T., Shih, L. W. ve Lin, T. M. (2015). Compliance with eWOM: The influence of hotel reviews on booking intention from the perspective of consumer conformity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 99-111.
- Wirtz, J. ve Chew, P. (2002). The effects of incentives, deal proneness, satisfaction and tie strength on word of mouth behaviour. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(2), 141-162.
- Yoo, K. H. ve Gretzel, U. (2008). What motivates consumers to write online travel reviews?. Information Technology & Tourism, 10(4), 283-295.
- Zhu, F. ve Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133-148.
| APA | ustaahmetoğlu e, toklu i (2023). TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ. , 605 - 622. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| Chicago | ustaahmetoğlu erol,toklu ismail tamer TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ. (2023): 605 - 622. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| MLA | ustaahmetoğlu erol,toklu ismail tamer TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ. , 2023, ss.605 - 622. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| AMA | ustaahmetoğlu e,toklu i TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ. . 2023; 605 - 622. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| Vancouver | ustaahmetoğlu e,toklu i TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ. . 2023; 605 - 622. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| IEEE | ustaahmetoğlu e,toklu i "TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ." , ss.605 - 622, 2023. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| ISNAD | ustaahmetoğlu, erol - toklu, ismail tamer. "TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ". (2023), 605-622. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| APA | ustaahmetoğlu e, toklu i (2023). TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 24(2), 605 - 622. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| Chicago | ustaahmetoğlu erol,toklu ismail tamer TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 24, no.2 (2023): 605 - 622. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| MLA | ustaahmetoğlu erol,toklu ismail tamer TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, vol.24, no.2, 2023, ss.605 - 622. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| AMA | ustaahmetoğlu e,toklu i TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 2023; 24(2): 605 - 622. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| Vancouver | ustaahmetoğlu e,toklu i TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 2023; 24(2): 605 - 622. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| IEEE | ustaahmetoğlu e,toklu i "TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ." Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 24, ss.605 - 622, 2023. 10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
| ISNAD | ustaahmetoğlu, erol - toklu, ismail tamer. "TÜKETİCİLERİN TUTUM, LOKANTA TERCİHİ VE SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ YORUMLARIN ETKİSİ". Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 24/2 (2023), 605-622. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1140094 |
