Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial

Momina Anis Motiwala, (Aga Khan University Hospital, Department of Operative Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan)
Sheikh Bilal BADAR, (Aga Khan University Hospital, Department of Operative Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan)
Robia GHAFOOR (Aga Khan University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Karachi, Pakistan)
European Endodontic Journal
1 0
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 38 - 43 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/eej.2020.78941 İndeks Tarihi: 28-07-2023

Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial

Öz:
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of rotary master apical file (RMAF) with ultrasonic activation of end odontic file (UAF) in the removal of silicon oil-based calcium hydroxide (SOBCH) from the canal. Methods: Ethical review committee approval and informed consent was obtained. 60 cases with necrotic teeth in which silicon oil-based intracanal medicament (Metapex) was to be placed were randomised in one of the two groups using sealed envelopes containing assignment codes for medicament removal: RMAF and UAF group. After standard protocol of coronal access, cleaning and shaping, silicon oil-based SOBCH was placed using a Lentulo spiral. A periapical radiograph was taken after SOBCH placement to check for ade quate adaptation. On 7th day, after instrumentation and medicament removal according to respective group, a second radiograph was taken to evaluate the effectiveness. Effectiveness was calculated using a graded scale in which 0 and 1 are effective and 2 and 3 are ineffective cleaning. Teeth were statistically analyzed using the Mann Whitney U and Chi-square test. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the removal effectiveness of group RMAF and Group UAF at coronal (P=0.74) middle (P=0.71) and apical third (P=0.68). According to the graded score both techniques were equally effective in cleaning at all thirds of canal (RMAF=Apical: 1.09±0.70, Middle: 0.61±0.80, Coronal: 0.33±0.48 and UAC=Apical: 1.00±0.77, Middle: 0.52±0.74, Coronal: 0.28±0.46). Effec tiveness of SOBCH removal using the two methods was not statistically significant between maxillary and mandibular teeth (P=0.35). Conclusion: Both the removal methods, Ultrasonic activation of file and Rotary master apical file, for SOBCH were equally effective in all the thirds of canal. And none of the techniques were able to completely remove the SOBCH. Effectiveness of SOBCH removal using the two methods was not statistically different between maxillary and mandibular teeth.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Hargreaves KM, Berman LH, Rotstein I. Cohen's pathways of the pulp. 11th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.
  • 2. Sundqvist G, Johansson E, Sjögren U. Prevalence of black-pigmented bacteroides species in root canal infections. J Endod 1989; 15(1):13–9.
  • 3. Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial effect of camphor ated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydrox ide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1(5):170–5.
  • 4. Gomes BP, Lilley JD, Drucker DB. Variations in the susceptibilities of com ponents of the endodontic microflora to biomechanical procedures. Int Endod J 1996; 29(4):235–41.
  • 5. Valera MC, de Moraes Rego J, Jorge AO. Effect of sodium hypochlorite and five intracanal medications on Candida albicans in root canals. J En dod 2001; 27(6):401–3.
  • 6. Walton RE, Holton IF Jr, Michelich R. Calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medication: effect on posttreatment pain. J Endod 2003; 29(10):627–9.
  • 7. Shuping GB, Orstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation and various medi cations. J Endod 2000; 26(12):751–5.
  • 8. Safavi KE, Nichols FC. Effect of calcium hydroxide on bacterial lipopolysac charide. J Endod 1993; 19(2):76–8.
  • 9. Silva L, Nelson-Filho P, Leonardo MR, Rossi MA, Pansani CA. Effect of cal cium hydroxide on bacterial endotoxin in vivo. J Endod 2002; 28(2):94–8.
  • 10. Mohammadi Z, Dummer PM. Properties and applications of calcium hydroxide in endodontics and dental traumatology. Int Endod J 2011; 44(8):697–730.
  • 11. Gordon TM, Ranly DM, Boyan BD. The effects of calcium hydroxide on bovine pulp tissue: variations in pH and calcium concentration. J Endod 1985; 11(4):156–60.
  • 12. Haapasalo M, Orstavik D. In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 1987; 66(8):1375–9.
  • 13. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren U. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85(1):86–93.
  • 14. Cwikla SJ, Bélanger M, Giguère S, Progulske-Fox A, Vertucci FJ. Dentinal tubule disinfection using three calcium hydroxide formulations. J Endod 2005; 31(1):50–2.
  • 15. Calt S, Serper A. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1999; 25(6):431–3.
  • 16. Margelos J, Eliades G, Verdelis C, Palaghias G. Interaction of calcium hy droxide with zinc oxide-eugenol type sealers: a potential clinical prob lem. J Endod 1997; 23(1):43–8.
  • 17. Kahler B, Rossi-Fedele G. A review of tooth discoloration after regenera tive endodontic therapy. J Endod 2016; 42(4):563–9.
  • 18. Chen BK, George R, Walsh LJ. Discoloration of roots caused by resid ual endodontic intracanal medicaments. ScientificWorldJournal 2014; 2014:404676.
  • 19. Estrela C, Pécora JD, Souza-Neto MD, Estrela CR, Bammann LL. Effect of vehicle on antimicrobial properties of calcium hydroxide pastes. Braz Dent J 1999; 10(2):63–72.
  • 20. Kourti E, Pantelidou O. Comparison of different agitation methods for the removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal: Scanning electron mi croscopy study. J Conserv Dent 2017; 20(6):439–44.
  • 21. Nandini S, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Removal efficiency of cal cium hydroxide intracanal medicament with two calcium chelators: volumetric analysis using spiral CT, an in vitro study. J Endod 2006; 32(11):1097–101.
  • 22. Chou K, George R, Walsh LJ. Effectiveness of different intracanal irriga tion techniques in removing intracanal paste medicaments. Aust Endod J 2014; 40(1):21–5.
  • 23. Kumar P, de Ataide IN, Fernandes M, Lambor R. A cone-beam computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of different irrigation devices for removal of silicone oil-based calcium hydroxide from root canal system. J Conserv Dent 2017; 20(2):68–71.
  • 24. Kenee DM, Allemang JD, Johnson JD, Hellstein J, Nichol BK. A quantita tive assessment of efficacy of various calcium hydroxide removal tech niques. J Endod 2006; 32(6):563–5.
  • 25. Bhuyan AC, Seal M, Pendharkar K. Effectiveness of four different tech niques in removing intracanal medicament from the root canals: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2015; 6(3):309–12.
  • 26. Khademi AA, Amini K, Ghodsian B, Zahed SM, Teymori F, Shadmehr E. Re moval efficiency of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with Rin sEndo system in comparison with passive ultrasonic irrigation, an in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015; 12(2):157–60.
  • 27. Raghu R, Pradeep G, Shetty A, Gautham PM, Puneetha PG, Reddy TVS. Retrievability of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with three calcium chelators, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, citric acid, and chi tosan from root canals: An in vitro cone beam computed tomography volumetric analysis. J Conserv Dent 2017; 20(1):25–9.
  • 28. Bolhari B, Shokouhinejad N, Masoudi A. The effect of calcium hydroxide on the bond strength of resilon/epiphany self-etch and assessment of calcium hydroxide removal techniques: an ex-vivo study. J Dent (Tehran) 2012; 9(2):150–5.
  • 29. Khaleel HY, Al-Ashaw AJ, Yang Y, Pang AH, Ma JZ. Quantitative compar ison of calcium hydroxide removal by EndoActivator, ultrasonic and ProTaper file agitation techniques: an in vitro study. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 2013; 33(1):142–5.
  • 30. van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive ultrasonic ir rigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2007; 40(6):415–26.
  • 31. Tamil S, Andamuthu SA, Vaiyapuri R, Prasad AS, Jambai SS, Chittrarasu M. A comparative evaluation of intracanal calcium hydroxide removal with hand file, rotary file, and passive ultrasonic irrigation: an in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019; 11(Suppl 2):S442–5.
  • 32. Sanghvi Z, Mistry KU. Design features of rotary instruments in endodon tics. J Ahmedabad Dent Coll Hosp 2011; 2:6–11.
  • 33. Agrawal P, Garg G, Bavabeedu SS, Arora S, Moyin S, Punathil S. Evalua tion of intracanal calcium hydroxide removal with different techniques: a scanning electron microscope study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19(12):1463–8.
  • 34. Mota de Almeida FJ, Knutsson K, Flygare L. The effect of cone beam CT (CBCT) on therapeutic decision-making in endodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43(4):20130137.
  • 35. American Association of Endodontists; American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics Joint Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111(2):234–7.
  • 36. Küçükkaya Eren S, Aksel H, Parashos P. A novel model for testing the efficiency of removal of calcium hydroxide from complex root canal anatomies. Aust Endod J 2017; 43(1):5–10.
  • 37. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32(2):271–5.
  • 38. Gupta R, Sharma H, Kumari RA, Prakash AC, Rai N, Jain L. Effectiveness of two techniques in removal of calcium hydroxide medicament from root canals: an in-vitro assessment. J Clin Diagn Res 2018; 12(7).
APA Anis Motiwala M, Badar S, ghafoor r (2021). Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial. , 38 - 43. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
Chicago Anis Motiwala Momina,Badar Sheikh Bilal,ghafoor robia Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial. (2021): 38 - 43. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
MLA Anis Motiwala Momina,Badar Sheikh Bilal,ghafoor robia Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial. , 2021, ss.38 - 43. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
AMA Anis Motiwala M,Badar S,ghafoor r Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial. . 2021; 38 - 43. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
Vancouver Anis Motiwala M,Badar S,ghafoor r Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial. . 2021; 38 - 43. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
IEEE Anis Motiwala M,Badar S,ghafoor r "Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial." , ss.38 - 43, 2021. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
ISNAD Anis Motiwala, Momina vd. "Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial". (2021), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2020.78941
APA Anis Motiwala M, Badar S, ghafoor r (2021). Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial. European Endodontic Journal, 6(1), 38 - 43. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
Chicago Anis Motiwala Momina,Badar Sheikh Bilal,ghafoor robia Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial. European Endodontic Journal 6, no.1 (2021): 38 - 43. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
MLA Anis Motiwala Momina,Badar Sheikh Bilal,ghafoor robia Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial. European Endodontic Journal, vol.6, no.1, 2021, ss.38 - 43. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
AMA Anis Motiwala M,Badar S,ghafoor r Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial. European Endodontic Journal. 2021; 6(1): 38 - 43. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
Vancouver Anis Motiwala M,Badar S,ghafoor r Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial. European Endodontic Journal. 2021; 6(1): 38 - 43. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
IEEE Anis Motiwala M,Badar S,ghafoor r "Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial." European Endodontic Journal, 6, ss.38 - 43, 2021. 10.14744/eej.2020.78941
ISNAD Anis Motiwala, Momina vd. "Comparison of Two Different Methods in the Removal of Oil-Based Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canal System: A Triple-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial". European Endodontic Journal 6/1 (2021), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2020.78941
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 8:39

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları