A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations

Fatma ERDOĞANARAS, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Kübra CİHANGİR ÇAMUR, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Gülsel SATOĞLU (Gazi Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi
3 1
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 161 - 177 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.30785/mbud.1284843 İndeks Tarihi: 31-07-2023

A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations

Öz:
The effects of urban rail systems on the real estate market were studied by analysing housing prices around Ankara Koru and Batıkent Metro Stations using the Hedonic Price Model. Quantitative data on residential sales were used. The findings reveal that sale values of residences are more elastic in term of metro effect in Batıkent, where middle-lower income groups live, compared to Koru Metro Station, where middle-upper income groups live. As the distance to the metro station decreases in Batıkent, prices increase. These results suggest that subways can help reduce polarization between income groups in cities while increasing accessibility. Providing access to neighbourhoods with both low and high-income individuals by metro increases housing prices more in favour of low-income groups and reduces income polarization between income groups.
Anahtar Kelime: Metro stations housing prices hedonic price model accessibility transportation planning urban planning

Metro ve Konut Değeri Etkileşiminin Hedonik Fiyat Modeli ile İncelenmesi: Ankara Batıkent ve Koru Metro İstasyonlarının Karşılaştırılması

Öz:
Kentsel raylı sistemlerin emlak piyasası üzerindeki etkileri, Hedonik Fiyat Modeli kullanılarak Ankara Koru ve Batıkent Metro istasyonları çevresindeki konut fiyatları analiz edilerek incelenmiştir. Konut satış değerlerine ilişkin nicel veriler kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, orta-alt gelir grubunun yaşadığı Batıkent'teki konutların satış değerlerinin, orta-üst gelir grubunun yaşadığı Koru Metro İstasyonu'na kıyasla metro etkisi açısından daha esnek olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Batıkent'te, metro istasyonuna yaklaştıkça fiyatlar artmaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, metroların erişilebilirliği artırırken şehirlerdeki gelir grupları arasındaki kutuplaşmayı azaltmaya yardımcı olabileceğini göstermektedir. Hem düşük hem de yüksek gelirli bireylerin yaşadığı mahallelere metro ile erişim sağlanması, konut fiyatlarını düşük gelirli gruplar lehine artırmakta ve gelir grupları arasındaki kutuplaşmayı azaltmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: Metro istasyonları konut fiyatları hedonik fiyat modeli erişilebilirlik ulaşım planlaması

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abd Aziz, S., Kasim, R. & Masirin, M. I. H. M. (2019). Urban rail system as the basis of transit oriented development for sustainable development of Kuala Lumpur. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331832546_Urban_Rail_System_as_the_Basis_of_Transit_Orie nted_Development_for_Sustainable_Development_of_Kuala_Lumpur. Access Date: 25.12.2022
  • Açlar, A. & Çağdaş, V. (2008). Taşınmaz Gayrimenkul Değerlemesi. (2nd ed.). Ankara: TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası. ISBN: 978-9944-89-558- 3.
  • Agampatian, R. (2014). Using GIS to measure walkability: A case study in New York Cit’, (Unpublished master's thesis). School of Architecture and the Built Environment Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Al-Mosaind, M. A., Dueker, K. J. & Strathman, J. G. (1993). Light Rail Transit Stations and property values: A Hedonic Price Approach. Transportation Research Record, 1400, 90-94.
  • Alas, B. (2017). Toplu konutlarda şerefiye düzeltmelerinin regresyon analizi ile incelenmesi. Kent Akademisi, 10(4), 396-412.
  • Alas, B. (2021). Metro istasyonları ve metro hatları çevrelerinin konut alt piyasasına etkisi: İstanbul-Kadıköy- Tavşantepe hattı. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(4), 864-874.
  • Alaylı, B. (2006). Land Use Optimization for Improved Transportation System Performance Case Study. (Unpublished master's thesis). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Alkay, E. (2011). The residental mobility pattern in the İstanbul Metropolitan Area. Housing Studies, 4, 521- 539.
  • Alshalalfah, B.W. & Shalaby, A.S. (2007). Relationship of walk access distance to transit with service, travel, and personal characteristic, Urban Transportation Case reports.
  • Asensio, J. (2002). Transport mode choice by commuters to Barcelona’s CBD, Urban Studies,39(10), 1881- 1895.
  • Avcı, S. (2005). Ulaşım coğrafyası açısından Türkiye’nin ulaşım politikaları ve coğrafi sonuçları. Ulusal Coğrafya Kongresi (Prof. Dr. İsmail Yalçınlar Anısına), İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Babalık-Sutcliffe, E. (2002). Urban rail systems: Analysis of the factors behind success. Transport Reviews, 22 (4), 415-447.
  • Bajic, V. (1983). The effects of a new subway line on housing prices in metropolitan Toronto. Urban Studies, 20 (2),147-158.
  • Banister, D., Anderton, K., Bonilla, D., Givoni, M. & Schwanen, T. (2011). Transportation and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 247-270.
  • Barış, F. (1994). Kent içi Toplu Taşımada Raylı Sistemlerin Gerekliliği, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
  • Batur, İ. (2017). Sürdürülebilir kentiçi ulaşımı ve İstanbul: sorunlar ve öneriler. Academia. URL: https://asu.academia.edu/irfanbatur. (Access Date: 22.01.2023).
  • Belzer, D. & Autler, G. (2002). Transit oriented development: Moving from rhetoric to reality (s. 06-15). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
  • Black, A. (1995). Urban mass transportation planning. McGraw-Hill, USA.
  • Blunden, W. R. (1973). The land-use/transport system. UK: Pergamon Press.
  • Bohman, H. & Nilsson, D. (2016). The impact of regional commuter trains on property values: price segments and income. Journal of Transport Geography, 56, 102-109.
  • Bollinger, C. & Ihlanfeldt, K. (1997). The impact of rapid rail transit on economic development: the case of Atlanta's MARTA. Journal of Urban Economics, 42 (2), 179-204.
  • Bourassa, S. C., Hoesli, M. & Vincent, S. P. (2003). Do housing submarkets really matter? Journal of Housing Economics, 12, 12-28, DOI: 1016/S1051- 13770300003-2.
  • Büyükduman, A. (2014). Bir Kent Efsanesi: Konut Balonu. Scala Yayıncılık.
  • Calthorpe, P. (1994). The Region. Peter Katz (Ed.), The New Urbanism; Toward an Architecture of Community (ss. xi-xvi). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Cengiz, E. C. (2020). Financing Urban Rail Investments via Urban Development, Ph.D. Thesis, Istanbul Technical University Institute of Science, Istanbul, 130.
  • Cervero, R. & Kochelman, K. (1997). Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity and design. Transportation Research Part D 2 (n° 3): 199–219. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209 (97)00009-6.
  • Cervero, R. (2003). Road expansion, urban growth, and induced travel: A path analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69 (2), 145-163.
  • Choy, Lennon H. T., Stephen W. K. Mak. & Winky K. O. Ho. (2007). Modelling Hong Kong real estate prices, Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 22, 359- 368.
  • Çınar, T. (2003). Ulaşım Politikalarının Ekonomi İle İlişkisi. IV. Ulaşım ve Trafik Kongresi Sergisi Bildiriler Kitabı, Ankara: TMMOB Makine Mühendisleri Odası, s. 137.
  • Cihangir Camur, K., Erdoğanaras, F., Görer Tamer, N. & Satoğlu, G. (2021). Pandemi sürecinde yürünebilir sokaklar ve mahalle donatılarına erişilebilirlik üzerine bir değerlendirme. İdealkent, 12 (34), 1255-1284. DOI: 10.31198/idealkent.1003035.
  • Cihangir Çamur, K., Erdoğanaras, F. & Demirbilek Çardak, S. (2022). Konut Alanlarında İşlevsel ve Fiziksel Dönüşüm: Ankara Beysukent-Planlamacılar Sitesi’nden Bulgular. İdealkent, 13 (38), 2520-2559. DOI: 10.31198/idealkent.1214599.
  • Davidov, E. (2003). Travel Mode Choice as a Rational Choice- Different Aspects. Doctor Grades Study, Tel- Aviv-Jaffa, Israel.
  • Debrezion, G., Pels, E. & Rietveld, P. (2007). The impact of railway stations on residential and commertial property value: a meta-analysis, Journal of Real Estate, Finance and Economics, 35,161-180.
  • Dong, X., Ben-Akiva, M. E., Bowman, J. L. & Walker, J. L. (2006). Moving from trip based to activity based measures of accessibility. Transportation Research Part A, 40, 163-180.
  • Douglas, C. M., Elizabeth, A. P. & Geoffrey, G. V. (2013). Doğrusal Regresyon Analizine Giriş, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara. ISBN: 978-605-133-618-3.
  • Dube, J., Theriault, M. & Rosiers, F. D. (2013). Commuter rail accessibility and house values: The case of Montreal South Shore, Canada 1992-2009.Transportation Research Part A, 49-66.
  • Erdoğanaras, F., Cihangir Çamur, K., Görer Tamer, N. & Mercan, K. (2020). Covid-19, mahalle, müşterekler, kentsel yaşam ve halk sağlığı, Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, Sayı 76, 115-128, DergiPark, https://doi.org/10.17211/tcd.816835.
  • Eren, Ş. G. (2021). Revisiting The Public and The Public Interest Concepts, in Research and Reviews in Architecture, Planning and Design, Gece Kitaplığı, Editör: H. B. Şolt, ISBN:978-625-7342-75-9, Yayın No: 6984777.
  • Ewing, R. & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294.
  • Gallo, M. (2018). The impact of urban transit systems on property values: a model and some evidence form the city of Naples, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, Article ID,1767149,22 pages.
  • Geurs, K. T. & Van Eck, J. R. R. (2001). Accessibility Measures: Review and Applications (RIVM Report: 408505- 006). Bilthoven: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment.
  • Geurs, K. T. & Van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions, Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127-140.
  • Harjunan, O. (2018). Metro investment and the housing market anticipation effect. Helsinki, Finland: City of Helsinki, Executive Office, Urban Research and Statistics.
  • Handy, S. (2005). Smart growth and the transportation-landuse connection: What does the research tell us? I nternational Regional Science Review, 28 (2), 146-167.
  • Hess , D.B. & Almeida, T.M. (2016). Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York, Urban Studies, 44(5-6), 1041-1068.
  • Hiironen, J., Niukkanen, K. & Touminen, H. (2015). The impact of new subway line on property values in Helsinki Area. FIG Working Week. Sofia.
  • Jach, A. (2001). Şehrin Katmanları. 1st ed. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Keskin, B. (2008). Hedonic analysis of price in the Istanbul housing market. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 12(2), 125-138, DOI: 10.3846/1648-715X.2008.12.125-138.
  • Kütük, T. & Yalçıner, Ö. (2019). Ankara-Batıkent ve Koru Metro istasyonlarının toplu taşım odaklı gelişim (TOD) ve sürdürülebilir kentsel tasarım ilkeleri çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi. Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 4(2), 140-154.
  • Litman, T. (2018). Economic Value of Walkability. Victoria Transport Policy Institute,10, 3-11.
  • Litman, T. & Colman, S. B. (2001). Generated traffic: Implications for transport planning. ITE Journal, 71 (4), 38- 46.
  • Manski, C. F. (2005). Random utility models with bounded ambiguity. Department of Economics and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.
  • Medda, F. R. & Modelewska, M. (2011). Land value capture as a funding source for urban investment. Warsaw: Ernst & Young.
  • Murray A. T., Davis R., Stimson R. J. & Ferreira L. (1998). Public transportation access. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 3(5), 319-328.
  • Nelson, A. C. (1999). Transit stations and commercial property values: a case study with policy and land-use i mplications. Journal of Public Transportation, 2 (3), 4.
  • Özçalık, D. (2018). Taşınmaz değerlemede hedonik regresyon çözümlemesi, Dönem Projesi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Özkan, G. & Yalpır, Ş. (2005). Taşınmaza Ekonomik Bakış ve Değerlendirmesi. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası,10. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 28 Mart - 1 Nisan 2005, Ankara.
  • Pan, H. & Zhang, M. (2008). Rail transit impacts on landuse: Evidence from Shanghai, China. Transportation Research Record, 2008 (1), 16-25.
  • Pan, Q., Pan, H., Zhang, M. & Zhong, B. (2014). Effects of rail transit on residential property values comparison study on the rail transit lines in Huston, Texas and Shanghai, China. Transportation Research Record Journal of Transportation Research Board, 118-127.
  • Ransom, M. R. (2018). The effect of light rail transit service on nearby property values: Ouasi-experimental evidence from Seattle. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 387-404.
  • Rodrigue, J. P., Comtois, C. & Slack, B. (2006). The Geography of Transport Systems. New York: Routledge.
  • Şahin, O. (2019). Investigation of the Effects of Transportation Investments on Real Estate Prices: Case Study Beylikdüzü & Esenyurt, PH.d. Thesis, Boğaziçi University Institute of Science, İstanbul, 185.
  • Sahibinden.com Emlak Satış Web Siteleri, https://www.sahibinden.com/emlak-konut? query_text_mf=koru&query_text=koru ve https://www.sahibinden.com/emlak/ankara-yenimahalle- batikent?query_text_mf=bat%C4%B1kent, (Access Date: 23.10.2022).
  • Salon, D. & Shewmake, S. (2011). Opportunities for value capture to fund public transport: a comprehensive review of the literature with a focus on East Asia, available at. SSBN 1753302.
  • Sharma, R. & Newman, P. (2018). Does urban rail increase land value in emerging cities? Value uplift in Bangalore Metro. Transportation Research Part A, 117, 70-86.
  • Shen, Q. (1998). Spatial technologies, accessibility, and the social construction of urban space, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 22(5), 447-464.
  • Siddiqui, S. & Eren, Ş. G. (2022). The Analysis of the sustainability pillars of Karachi City's transportation system. Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 7, 181-190., Yayın No: 7676205. Doi:10.30785/mbud.1024036.
  • Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(4), 246- 257.
  • Vale, D. S. (2015). Transit-oriented development, integration of land use and transport, and pedestrian accessibility: combining node-place model with pedestrian shed ratio to evaluate and classify station areas in Lisbon. Journal of Transport Geography, 70-80.
  • Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2016). TDM Encyclopaedia: Glossary. http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm61.htm
  • Voith, R. (1991). Transportation, sorting and house values. Real Estate Economics, 19 (2), 117-137.
  • Vuchic, V. R. (2007). Urban transit systems and technology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Wong, S. K., Chau, K. W., Yau, Y. & Cheuna, A. K. C. (2011). Property price gradients: the vertical dimension, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 26, 33- 45
  • Yang, R., Yan, H., Xiong, W. & Liu T. (2013). The study pedestrian accessibility to rail transit stations based on KLP model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 96, 714–722.
  • Yen, B. T., Mulley, C., Shaerer, H. & Burke, M. (2018). Announcement, construction or delivery: When does value uplift occur for residential properties? Evidence from Gold Coast Light Rail system in Australia. Land Use Policy, 73, 412-422.
  • Zhang, M. & Wang, W.W. (2013).Decouple indicators on the Co2 emission-economic growth linkage: the Jiangsu Province case, Ecol. Indic., 32,239-244.
APA Erdoğanaras F, CAMUR K, Satoğlu G (2023). A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations. , 161 - 177. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
Chicago Erdoğanaras Fatma,CAMUR KUBRA CIHANGIR,Satoğlu Gülsel A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations. (2023): 161 - 177. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
MLA Erdoğanaras Fatma,CAMUR KUBRA CIHANGIR,Satoğlu Gülsel A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations. , 2023, ss.161 - 177. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
AMA Erdoğanaras F,CAMUR K,Satoğlu G A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations. . 2023; 161 - 177. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
Vancouver Erdoğanaras F,CAMUR K,Satoğlu G A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations. . 2023; 161 - 177. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
IEEE Erdoğanaras F,CAMUR K,Satoğlu G "A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations." , ss.161 - 177, 2023. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
ISNAD Erdoğanaras, Fatma vd. "A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations". (2023), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1284843
APA Erdoğanaras F, CAMUR K, Satoğlu G (2023). A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations. Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 8(1), 161 - 177. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
Chicago Erdoğanaras Fatma,CAMUR KUBRA CIHANGIR,Satoğlu Gülsel A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations. Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi 8, no.1 (2023): 161 - 177. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
MLA Erdoğanaras Fatma,CAMUR KUBRA CIHANGIR,Satoğlu Gülsel A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations. Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, vol.8, no.1, 2023, ss.161 - 177. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
AMA Erdoğanaras F,CAMUR K,Satoğlu G A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations. Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi. 2023; 8(1): 161 - 177. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
Vancouver Erdoğanaras F,CAMUR K,Satoğlu G A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations. Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi. 2023; 8(1): 161 - 177. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
IEEE Erdoğanaras F,CAMUR K,Satoğlu G "A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations." Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 8, ss.161 - 177, 2023. 10.30785/mbud.1284843
ISNAD Erdoğanaras, Fatma vd. "A Study of the Metro and Housing Value Interaction with Hedonic Price Model: Comparison of Ankara Batıkent and Koru Metro Stations". Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi 8/1 (2023), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1284843
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 8:40

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları