Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme

Faruk EKMEKCİ (Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü, Trabzon, Türkiye)
Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika
64 12
Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 26 Sayfa Aralığı: 107 - 124 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme

Öz:
Demokratik barış teorisi (DBT) 1980’lerden bu yana Uluslararası İlişkilerdisiplini içerisinde en çok tartışılmış ve çalışılmış teorilerden birisi, belkide birincisidir. Buna rağmen DBT’ye yönelik Türkçe çalışmalar yokdenecek kadar azdır. Bu makalede önce DBT’nin kökleri, teorikargümanları, tarihsel gelişimi ve ampirik desteğinin bir özetisunulmaktadır. Daha sonra da DBT’ye yönelik teorik ve ampirikeleştirilerin ışığında bu teorinin bir değerlendirilmesi yapılmaktadır. Özolarak belirtmek gerekirse, DBT literatürünün erken dönemdeki bulgularıdisiplinin içindeki ve dışındaki birçok kişiyi kalıcı bir uluslararası barışkonusunda heyecanlandırmışsa da, bugün gelinen noktada demokrasi vebarış arasındaki ilişkinin gerçekliği ve gücü oldukça tartışmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih Siyasi Bilimler

Democratic peace theory: An analysis

Öz:
The democratic peace theory (DPT) is one the most studied theories inthe discipline of International Relations (IR) since 1980s. However, there are few,if any, studies in Turkish on DPT. In this article, I first provide a summary of theintellectual roots, theoretical arguments, historical evolution, and empirical sup- port of the DPT. I then make an extensive evaluation of the DPT in light of thetheoretical and empirical critiques of the theory. Put briefly, I maintain that, de- spite the fact that the early findings in the DPT literature generated enthusiasmboth within and outside of the discipline regarding a probable “eternal peace”, thefactuality as well as the strength of the relationship between democracy andpeace is highly contested today.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih Siyasi Bilimler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Avant, Deborah, ‘The Implications of Marketized Security for IR Theory: the Democratic Peace, Late State Building and the Nature and Frequency of Conflict’, Perspectives on Politics, Cilt 4, No. 3, 2006, s. 507-28.
  • Barkawi, Tarak, ‘War inside the Free World: The Democratic Peace and the Cold War in the Third World’, içinde Tarak Barkawi ve Mark Laffey (der.) Democracy, Liberalism, and War: Rethinking the Democratic Peace Debate, (Boulder: CO, Lynne Reinner Publishers, 2001), s. 107-129.
  • Barkawi, Tarak ve Mark Laffey, ‘The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force, and Globalization’, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt 5, No. 4, 1999, s. 403- 434.
  • Berger, Peter, ‘The Uncertain Triumph of Democratic Capitalism’, içinde Larry Diamond ve Marc F. Plattner (der.) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy Revisited, (Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1993), s. 1-10.
  • Bernholz, Peter, ‘Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for a Viable Democracy’, Albert Breton et al. (der.) Understanding Democracy: Economic and Political Perspectives, (New York, Cambridge University Press, 1997), s. 88-103.
  • Bordens, Kenneth ve Bruce B. Abbott, Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach, 6. baskı, (New York, McGraw Hill, 2005).
  • Brewer, Anthony, Marxist Theories of Imperialism: A Critical Survey, 2. Baskı, (New York: Routledge, 1990).
  • Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce ve David Lalman, War and Reason, (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1992).
  • Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, ve Alastair Smith, ‘An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace’, American Political Science Review, Cilt 93, No. 4, 1999, s. 791-807.
  • Burkhart, Ross E. ve Michael S. Lewis-Beck, ‘Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis’, American Political Science Review, Cilt 88, No. 4, 1994, s. 111– 131.
  • Chan, Steve, ‘Mirror, Mirror on the Wall... Are the Freer Countries more Pacific?’', Journal of Conflict Resolution, Cilt 28, No. 4, 1984, s. 617-648.
  • Cox, Dan G. ve A. Cooper Drury, ‘Democratic Sanctions: Connecting the Democratic Peace and Economic Sanctions’, Journal of Peace Research, Cilt 43, No. 6, 2006, s. 709-722.
  • Cox, Robert W., ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Cilt 10, No. 2, s. 126-155.
  • Dafoe, Allan, ‘Statistical Critiques of the Democratic Peace: Caveat Emptor, American Journal of Political Science, Cilt 55, No. 2, 2011, s. 247-62.
  • Davenport, Christian, State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace, (New York: Cambridge University Press 2007).
  • Davenport, Christian ve David A. Armstrong II, ‘Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996’, American Journal of Political Science, Cilt 48, No. 3, 2004, s. 538-54.
  • Dixon, William J., ‘Democracy and the Management of International Conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Cilt 37, No. 1, 1993, s. 42-68.
  • Downes, Alexander B. ve Mary L. Lilley, ‘Overt Peace, Covert War?: Covert Intervention and the Democratic Peace’, Security Studies, Cilt 19, No. 2, s. 266-306.
  • Doyle, Michael W., ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Cilt 12, No. 3, 1983, s. 205–235.
  • Doyle, Michael W., ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Cilt. 12, No. 4, 1983, s. 323–353.
  • Doyle, Michael W., ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science Review, Cilt 80, No. 4, 1986, s. 1151-70.
  • Elman, Miriam Fendius, ‘Introduction: The Need For A Qualitative Test For the Democratic Peace Theory’, içinde Miriam Fendius Elman (der.) Paths to Peace: Is Democracy the Answer?, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997).
  • Farber, Henry S. ve Joanne Gowa, ‘Polities and Peace’, International Security, Cilt 20, No. 2, 1995, s. 123-146.
  • Farber, Henry S. ve Joanne Gowa, ‘Common Interests or Common Polities? Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace’, The Journal of Politics, Cilt 59, No. 2, 1997, s. 393-417 .
  • Gartzke, Erik, ‘The Capitalist Peace’, American Journal of Political Science, Cilt 51, No. 1, 2007, s. 166-191.
  • Gartzke, Erik ve J. Joseph Hewitt, ‘International Crises and the Capitalist Peace”, International Interactions, Cilt 36, No 2, 2010, s. 115-145.
  • Gartzke, Erik ve Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, “Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies”, American Journal of Political Science, Cilt 48, No 4, 2004, s. 775-795.
  • Gibler Douglas M. ve Jaroslav Tir, ‘Settled Borders and Regime Type: Democratic Transitions as Consequences of Peaceful Territorial Transfers’, American Journal of Political Science, Cilt 54, No 4, 2010, s. 951-968.
  • Gibler, Douglas M. ve Scott Wolford, ‘Alliances, Then Democracy: An Examination of the Relationship Between Regime Type and Alliance Formation’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Cilt 50, No. 1:, 2006, s. 129–153.
  • Gleditsch, Nils Petter, ‘Geography, Democracy and Peace’, International Interactions, Cilt 20, No. 4, 1995, s. 297-323.
  • Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Lene Siljeholm Christiansen ve Håvard Hegre, ‘Democratic Jihad? Military Intervention and Democracy’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4242, 2007.
  • Goldsmith, Benjamin E., ‘A Universal Proposition? Region, Conflict, War and the Robustness of the Kantian Peace’, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt 12, No. 4, 2006, s. 533-563.
  • Hafner-Burton, Emily ve Alexander H. Montgomery, ‘The Hegemon’s Purse: No Economic Peace Between Democracies’, Journal of Peace Research, Cilt 45, No. 1, 2008, s. 111-120.
  • Hegre, Håvard, ‘Development and the Liberal Peace: What Does It Take to Be a Trading State?’, Journal of Peace Research, Cilt 37, No. 1, 2000, s. 5-30.
  • Hegre, Havard, Ellington, Tanja, Gates, Scott, ve Gleditsch, Nils Petter, ‘Towards a Democratic Civil Peace? Opportunity, Grievance, and Civil War 1816-1992’, American Political Science Review, Cilt 95, No. 1, 2001, s. 33-48.
  • Henderson, Errol A., Democracy and War: The End of an Illusion?, (Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publishers, 2002).
  • Henderson, Errol A., ‘Disturbing the Peace: African Warfare, Political Inversion and the Universality of the Democratic Peace Thesis’, British Journal of Political Science, Cilt 39, No. 1, 2009, s. 25-58.
  • Huntley, Wade L., ‘Kant’s Third Image: Systemic Sources of the Liberal Peace’, International Studies Quarterly, Cilt 40, No. 1, 1996, s. 45-76.
  • Kant, Immanuel, ‘Idea for a Universal History with Cosmopolitan Intent’, Ted Humprey (çev.), Perpetual Peace, and Other Essays, (Indianapolis, IN, Hackett Publication Company, [1784] 1983), s: 29-41.
  • Kant, Immanuel, ‘To Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’, Ted Humprey (çev.), Perpetual Peace, and Other Essays, (Indianapolis, IN, Hackett Publication Company, [1795] 1983), s: 107-145.
  • Lai, Brian, ve Dan Reiter, ‘Democracy, Political Similarity, and International Alliances, 1816–1992’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Cilt 44, No. 2, 2000, s. 203-27.
  • Lake, David A., ‘Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War’, American Political Science Review, Cilt 86, No. 1, 1992, s. 24-37.
  • Layne, Christopher, ‘Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace’, International Security, Cilt 19, No. 2, 1994, s. 5–49.
  • Latinobarometer, ‘Informe Latinobarómetro 2010’, 2010, http://www.latinobarometro.org (erişim: 12 Aralık 2011)
  • Lemke, Douglas ve William Reed, ‘Regime Types and Status Quo Evaluations: Power Transition Theory and the Democratic Peace’, International Interactions, Cilt 17, No. 1, 1996, s. 143-64.
  • Levy, Jack S., ‘Domestic Politics and War’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Cilt 18, No. 4, 1988, s. 653-73.
  • Levy, Jack S., ‘The Democratic Peace Hypothesis: From Description to Explanation’, Mershon International Studies Review, Cilt 38, No. 2, 1994, s. 352-54.
  • Lipset, Seymour Martin, ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, Cilt 53, No. 1, 1959, s. 69-105.
  • MacMillan, John, ‘Immanuel Kant and the Democratic Peace’, içinde Beate Jahn (der.), Classical Theory in International Relations, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), s. 52-74.
  • Mansfield, Edward D. ve Jack Snyder, Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War, (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2005).
  • Maoz, Zeev ve Nasrin Abdolali, ‘Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816-1976’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Cilt 33, No. 1, 1989, s. 3-35.
  • Maoz, Zeev ve Bruce Russett, ‘Alliance, Contiguity, Wealth, and Political Stability: Is the Lack of Conflict Among Democracies a Statistical Artifact?’, International Interactions, Cilt 17, No. 3, 1992, s. 245–267.
  • Maoz, Zeev ve Bruce Russett, ‘Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace 1946–1986’, American Political Science Review, Cilt 87, No. 3, 1993, s. 624-638.
  • McDonald, Patrick J., ‘Capitalism, Commitment, and Peace’, International Interactions, Cilt 36, No. 2, 2010, s. 146-168.
  • Miller, T. Christian, ‘Contractors Outnumber Troops in Iraq’, Los Angeles Times, 4 Temmuz 2007.
  • Milner, Helen V., Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997).
  • Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, ‘A Kantian System? Democracy and Third-Party Conflict Resolution’, American Journal of Political Science, Cilt 46, No. 4, 2002, s. 749-759.
  • Moore, Barrington, Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, (Boston, MA, Beacon Press, [1966] 1993).
  • Moravcsik, Andrew, ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’, International Organization, Cilt 51, No. 4, 1997, s. 513–53.
  • Mousseau, Michael, ‘Market Prosperity, Democratic Consolidation, and Democratic Peace’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Cilt 44, No. 4, 2000, s. 472–507.
  • Mousseau, Michael, ‘An Economic Limitation to the Zone of Democratic Peace and Cooperation’, International Interactions, Cilt 28, No. 2, 2002, s. 137-64.
  • Mousseau, Michael, John R. Oneal ve Håvard Hegre, ‘How the Wealth of Nations Conditions the Liberal Peace’, European Journal of International Relations, Cilt 9, No. 2, s. 277-314.
  • Mueller, John, Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War, (New York: Basic Books, 1989).
  • Nye, Joseph S., Peace in Parts: Integration and Conflict in Regional Organizations, (Boston: Little Brown, 1971).
  • Oneal, John R. and Bruce Russett, ‘The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence and Conflict, 1950–1985’, International Studies Quarterly, Cilt 41, No. 2, 1997, s. 267–94.
  • Oren, Ido, ‘The Subjectivity of the “Democratic” Peace: Changing US Perceptions of Imperial Germany’, International Security, Cilt 20, No. 2, 1995, s. 147-184.
  • Owen, John, ‘How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace’, International Security, Cilt 19, No. 2, 1994, s. 87-125.
  • Przeworski, Adam, ve Fernando Limongi, ‘Modernization: Theories and Facts’, World Politics, Cilt 49, No. 2, 1997, s. 155-183.
  • Quackenbush, Stephen L. ve Michael Rudy, ‘Evaluating the Monadic Democratic Peace’, Conflict Management and Peace Science, Cilt 26, No. 3, 2009, s. 268-285
  • Reynal-Querol, Marta, ‘Ethnicity, Political Systems, and Civil Wars’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Cilt 46, No. 1, 2002, s. 29-54.
  • Rosato, Sebastian, ‘The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory’, American Political Science Review, Cilt 97, No. 4, 2003, s. 585–602.
  • Rousseau, David, Christopher Gelpi, Dan Reiter, ve Paul K. Huth, ‘Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918-1988’, American Political Science Review, Cilt 90, No. 3, 1996, s. 512-533.
  • Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Evelyn H. Stephens, ve John D. Stephens, Capitalist Development and Democracy, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).
  • Russett, Bruce, Grasping the Democratic Peace Principles for a Post-Cold War World, (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1993).
  • Russett, Bruce, ve John R. Oneal, Triangulating Peace, (New York, W. W. Norton, 2001).
  • Small, Melvin ve J. David Singer, ‘The War Proneness of Democratic Regimes, 1816- 1965’, The Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, Cilt 1, No. 4, 1976, s. 50-68.
  • Singer, Peter W, Corporate Warriors: The Rise of Privatized Military Industry, Güncellenmiş baskı, (New York, Cornell University Press, 2008).
  • Spiro, David E.. ‘The Insignificance of the Liberal Peace’, International Security, Cilt 19, No. 2, 1994, s. 50-86.
  • Thompson, William R., ‘Democracy and Peace: Putting the Cart Before the Horse?’, International Organization, Cilt 50, No. 1, 1996, s. 141-174.
  • The Washington Post, ‘1994 State Of The Union Address’, 25 Ocak 1994.
  • The Washington Post, ‘The Promise of Democratic Peace: Why Promoting Freedom Is the Only Realistic Path to Security’, 11 Aralık 2005.
  • Zacher, Mark W. ve Richard A. Matthew, ‘Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands’, içinde Charles E. Kegley (der.) Controversies in International Relations Theory, (New York, St. Martin's Press, 1995), s. 107-50.
APA EKMEKCİ F (2011). Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme. , 107 - 124.
Chicago EKMEKCİ Faruk Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme. (2011): 107 - 124.
MLA EKMEKCİ Faruk Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme. , 2011, ss.107 - 124.
AMA EKMEKCİ F Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme. . 2011; 107 - 124.
Vancouver EKMEKCİ F Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme. . 2011; 107 - 124.
IEEE EKMEKCİ F "Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme." , ss.107 - 124, 2011.
ISNAD EKMEKCİ, Faruk. "Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme". (2011), 107-124.
APA EKMEKCİ F (2011). Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 7(26), 107 - 124.
Chicago EKMEKCİ Faruk Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika 7, no.26 (2011): 107 - 124.
MLA EKMEKCİ Faruk Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, vol.7, no.26, 2011, ss.107 - 124.
AMA EKMEKCİ F Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika. 2011; 7(26): 107 - 124.
Vancouver EKMEKCİ F Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika. 2011; 7(26): 107 - 124.
IEEE EKMEKCİ F "Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme." Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 7, ss.107 - 124, 2011.
ISNAD EKMEKCİ, Faruk. "Demokratik barış teorisi: Bir değerlendirme". Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika 7/26 (2011), 107-124.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 16:43

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları