At the basic level, this study includes a philosophical inquiry on the question "What is the problem with being like everyone else?" At a more profound level, it critically considers the concept of existence like "everyone" and tries to define a political practice that develops under the rule of "everyone". While "everyone" confines human existence to mere formality, it shapes the practice of politics under the rule of this formality. The state of subordination to "everyone", which develops under the rule of complete alteration, also prevents human from returning to his inner self as an effort to interpret himself and from hearing the voice of Being. This unconditional externality takes human away from a being and circulates only to others who can be substituted. In addition, externality can manifest itself in different forms, such as identity or mass.