Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale

Uzun Akkaya, Kamile; CALIKUSU INCEKAR, MUJDE; Elbasan, Bulent

doi:10.55730/1300-0144.5646

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale

Kamile UZUN AKKAYA, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Müjde ÇALIKUŞU İNCEKAR, (Yüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Hemşireliği Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)

Bülent ELBASAN (Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

10 3

Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 53 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 835 - 844 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5646 İndeks Tarihi: 02-08-2023

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale

Öz:

Background/aim: The Parent Perceptions of Physical Activity Scale (PPPAS) is a scale developed to measure the physical activity perceptions of parents of children with neurodevelopmental disorders about their children. Turkish version of the PPPAS has yet to be established. The purpose of the present study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the PPPAS. Material and methods: The study included 130 parents with neurodevelopmental children. In the validity analyses of PPPAS, language validity, content validity analysis, and confirmatory and explanatory factor analysis were performed for construct validity. In the reliability analyses, Cronbach alpha analysis was used for internal consistency analysis, and intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis was used for test retest. Results: The validity index was calculated as 0.94. Since the factor loading of the three questions in the survey remained below 40%, these questions were removed. Construct validity was achieved for two primary subscales of the PPPAS. It was found that the ICC values for the reliability analysis of the PPPAS showed a perfect fit at the level of 0.918 for the benefits of the physical activity subdimension, and the physical activity barriers subdimension showed a perfect fit at the level of 0.916 (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The Turkish PPPAS, which consists of two subscales, namely the benefits and barriers of physical activity, is valid and reliable. This tool can measure the physical activity perceptions of parents with preschool-age children with neurodevelopmental disorders in the Turkish population.

Anahtar Kelime: Neurodevelopmental disorders physical activity parents reliability validity

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Schroeder SR, Courtemanche A. Early prevention of severe neurodevelopmental behavior disorders: an integration. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2012; 5 (3-4): 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2011. 593697
2. Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010; 7 (1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1201/ b18227-14
3. Neter JE, Schokker DF, Jong E, Renders CM, Seidel JC et al. The prevalence of overweight and obesity and its determinants in children with and without disabilities. Journal of Pediatrics 2011; 158 (5): 735-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jpeds.2010.10.039
4. Rimmer JA, Rowland JL. Physical activity for youth with disabilities: a critical need in an underserved population. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2008; 11 (2): 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518420701688649
5. Rimmer J, Yamaki K, Lowry D, Wang E, Vogel C. Obesity and obesity related secondary conditions in adolescents with intellectual/developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2010; 54 (9): 787-794. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01305.x
6. Shields N, Synnot AJ, Barr M. Perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity for children with disability: a systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2012; 46 (14): 989- 997. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090236
7. Pitchford EA, Siebert E, Hamm J, Yun J. Parental perceptions of physical activity benefits for youth with developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2016; 121 (1): 25-32. https://doi. org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.1.25
8. Downs SJ, Boddy LM, Knowles ZR, Fairclough SJ, Stratton G. Exploring opportunities available and perceived barriers to physical activity engagement in children and young people with Down syndrome. European Journal of Special Needs Education 2013; 28 (3): 270-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/0885 6257.2013.768453
9. Nixon HL. Getting over the worry hurdle: Parental encouragement and the sports involvement of visually impaired children and youths. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 1988; 5 (1): 29-43.
10. Steele CA, Kalnins IV, Jutai JW, Stevens SE, Bortolussi JA et al. Lifestyle health behaviours of 11-to 16-year-old youth with physical disabilities. Health Education Research 1996; 11 (2): 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/11.2.173
11. Lakes KD, Abdullah MM, Youssef J, Donnelly JH, Taylor-Lucas C et al. Assessing parent perceptions of physical activity in families of toddlers with neurodevelopmental disorders: the parent perceptions of physical activity scale (PPPAS). Pediatric Exercise Science 2017; 29 (3): 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1123/ pes.2016-0213
12. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health 2005; 8 (2): 94-104. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
13. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Bechmer A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 2007; 39 (2): 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
14. Child D. The essentials of factor analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Continuum; 2006.
15. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1992; 1 (3): 98-101. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
16. Lakes KD, Vaughan J, Aizik SR, Lucas CT, Cooper D. Development of the Parent Perceptions of Physical Activity Scale (PPPAS): Results from two studies with parents of infants and toddlers. PloS One 2019; 14 (5): e0213570. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213570
17. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SW. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health 2007; 30 (4): 459-467. https:// doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
18. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. NY: Guilford; 2011. pp. 1497-1513.
19. Hooper DJ. Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 2008; 6 (1): 53-60.
20. Doğan İ, Özdamar K. The effect of different data structures, sample sizes on model fit measures. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 2017; 46 (9): 7525- 7533. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2016.1241409
21. Stevens J. Categorical data: The log linear model. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996. pp. 518-557.
22. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 2016; 15 (2): 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. British Medical Journal 1997; 314 (7080): 572.
24. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education 2011; 2: 53. https:// doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
25. Menear K. Parents’ perceptions of health and physical activity needs of children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice 2007; 12 (1): 60-68. https://doi. org/10.3104/reports.1996
26. Stuart ME, Lieberman L, Hand KE. Beliefs about physical activity among children who are visually impaired and their parents. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2006; 100 (4): 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0610000405
27. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington DC; 1996.
28. Schoenborn CA, Barnes PM. Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Adults: United States, 1997–98. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2002.
29. Maruf FA, Ojukwu C, Akindele M. Perception, knowledge, and attitude toward physical activity behaviour: implications for participation among individuals with essential hypertension. High Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Prevention 2018; 25 (1): 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-017-0235-y

APA	Uzun Akkaya K, CALIKUSU INCEKAR M, Elbasan B (2023). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale. , 835 - 844. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
Chicago	Uzun Akkaya Kamile,CALIKUSU INCEKAR MUJDE,Elbasan Bulent Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale. (2023): 835 - 844. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
MLA	Uzun Akkaya Kamile,CALIKUSU INCEKAR MUJDE,Elbasan Bulent Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale. , 2023, ss.835 - 844. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
AMA	Uzun Akkaya K,CALIKUSU INCEKAR M,Elbasan B Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale. . 2023; 835 - 844. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
Vancouver	Uzun Akkaya K,CALIKUSU INCEKAR M,Elbasan B Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale. . 2023; 835 - 844. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
IEEE	Uzun Akkaya K,CALIKUSU INCEKAR M,Elbasan B "Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale." , ss.835 - 844, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
ISNAD	Uzun Akkaya, Kamile vd. "Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale". (2023), 835-844. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5646

APA	Uzun Akkaya K, CALIKUSU INCEKAR M, Elbasan B (2023). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 53(3), 835 - 844. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
Chicago	Uzun Akkaya Kamile,CALIKUSU INCEKAR MUJDE,Elbasan Bulent Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 53, no.3 (2023): 835 - 844. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
MLA	Uzun Akkaya Kamile,CALIKUSU INCEKAR MUJDE,Elbasan Bulent Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.53, no.3, 2023, ss.835 - 844. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
AMA	Uzun Akkaya K,CALIKUSU INCEKAR M,Elbasan B Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 53(3): 835 - 844. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
Vancouver	Uzun Akkaya K,CALIKUSU INCEKAR M,Elbasan B Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 53(3): 835 - 844. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
IEEE	Uzun Akkaya K,CALIKUSU INCEKAR M,Elbasan B "Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 53, ss.835 - 844, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0144.5646
ISNAD	Uzun Akkaya, Kamile vd. "Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the parent perceptions of physical activity scale". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 53/3 (2023), 835-844. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5646