Hukuk Analitiği
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 234 - 254 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 İndeks Tarihi: 07-09-2023
Hukuk Analitiği
Öz: Hukuk analitiği, son yıllarda hızla gelişmekte olan bir hesaplamalı hukuk alanıdır. Temelini 1980’lerdeki bilirkişi sistemlerinden alarak, hukuk analitiği zamanla daha çok matematik ile iç içe geçmiş; başta istatistik olmak üzere, hukuk analitiği matematiğin birçok alanından etkilenmiş ve son olarak makina öğrenmesi tekniği ile, çoğu problemin üstesinden gelmiştir. Şimdilerde, hukuk analitiği yapay zekâ disiplinindeki çeşitli araçları kullanır hale gelmiştir. Hukuk analitiğinin hukuki veriyi kullanılabilir kılması ile birlikte, bu alan empirik hukuk çalışmalarının ve hukukta sosyal ağ analizi konularının gündemine girmiştir. Bu araştırmada, hukuk felsefesine dair çeşitli konulardan bahsedilmiş ve hukuk teorisi ile empirik hukuk alanı karşılaştırılmış ve değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca, makina öğrenmesi ve matematiğin hukuk analitiğine olan etkileri incelenmiş ve hukukun hukuk analitiği dolayısı ile matematiğin konusu olabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır. Bunun yanında sosyal ağ analizi araçlarının hukukun kompleks sistemler ile benzerlik gösterebilecek özelliklerini ortaya çıkarma potansiyeli olduğu sonucuna da ulaşılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: Legal Analytics
Öz: Legal analytics is a burgeoning field of computational law that has shown quite an advance in recent years. Taking its foundations from expert systems at 1980’s, legal analytics have become more intertwined with mathematics. Starting from statistics, legal analytics have been effected by various fields of mathematics and lastly with the machine learning technique, it has overcome many of its problems. Nowadays, legal analytics uses various tools that are currently developing from artificial intelligence discipline. As legal analytics made legal data avalaible, the field has come to the fore for empirical legal studies and application of social network analysis on law. In this research, various topics from legal philosophy have been mentioned and legal theory and empirical legal field have been contrasted and evaluated. Also, effects of machine learning and mathematics are also been evaluated and as a result, it has been concluded that law could be a domain of legal analytics and thus, mathematics. It has been also concluded that social network analysis tools have the potential to uncover various aspects of law that shows similiarity with complex systems.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Allen, Layman E. “Symbolic Logic: A Razor-Edged Tool for Drafting and Interpreting Legal Documents.” Yale Law Journal 66 (1957): 833.
- Alpaydin, Ethem. Machine Learning. MIT Press, 2021.
- Ashley, Kevin D. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316761380.
- Ashley, Kevin D. “Prospects for Legal Analytics: Some Approaches to Extracting More Meaning from Legal Texts.” University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/4163495.
- Bell, Felicity. “Empirical Research in Law.” Griffith Law Review 25 (October 2, 2016): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2016.1236440.
- Bhat, P. Ishwara. “383Quantitative Legal Research.” In Idea and Methods of Legal Research, edited by P. Ishwara Bhat, 0. Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199493098.003.0013.
- Cane, Peter, and Herbert M. Kritzer, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.001.0001.
- Dale, Robert. “Law and Word Order: NLP in Legal Tech.” Natural Language Engineering 25, no. 1 (2019): 211–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324918000475.
- Farrell, IP. “H.L.A. Hart and the Methodology of Jurisprudence.” Texas Law Review 84 (March 1, 2006): 983–1011.
- Katz, Daniel, Joshua Gubler, Jon Zelner, Michael II, Eric Provins, and Eitan Ingall. “Reproduction of Hierarchy? A Social Network Analysis of the American Law Professoriate.” Journal of Legal Education 61 (March 3, 2009).
- Katz, Daniel, and Derek Stafford. “Hustle and Flow: A Social Network Analysis of the American Federal Judiciary.” Ohio State Law J. 71 (March 1, 2008).
- Kersting, Kristian. “Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Two Fellow Travelers on the Quest for Intelligent Behavior in Machines.” Frontiers in Big Data 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2018.00006.
- Kramer, Matthew. “Hart, H. L. A.,” June 30, 2018, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee439.pub2.
- Leith, Philip. “The Application of AI to Law” 2 (1988): 31–46.
- Macaulay, Tyson. “Chapter 12 - Threats and Impacts to the IoT.” In RIoT Control, edited by Tyson Macaulay, 221–78. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-419971-2.00012-1.
- Mahesh, Batta. Machine Learning Algorithms -A Review, 2019. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20203995.
- Merchant, Kaiz, and Yash Pande. NLP Based Latent Semantic Analysis for Legal Text Summarization, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2018.8554831.
- Mitchell, Tom / Buchanan Bruce / DeJong, Gerald / Dietterich Thomas / Rosenbloom, Paul /Waibel, Alex. “Machine Learning.” Annual Review of Computer Science 4, no. 1 (June 1, 1990): 417–33.
- Mumcuoğlu, Emre, Ceyhun E. Öztürk, Haldun M. Ozaktas, and Aykut Koç. “Natural Language Processing in Law: Prediction of Outcomes in the Higher Courts of Turkey,” no. 58 (2021).
- Nadkarni, Prakash M, Lucila Ohno-Machado, and Wendy W Chapman. “Natural Language Processing: An Introduction.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18, no. 5 (September 1, 2011): 544–51. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000464.
- Nay, John. “Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning for Law and Policy Texts.” In Legal Informatics, edited by Daniel Martin Katz, Ron Dolin, and Michael J. Bommarito. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- Otte, Evelien, and Ronald Rousseau. “Social Network Analysis: A Powerful Strategy, Also for the Information Sciences.” Journal of Information Science 28, no. 6 (December 1, 2002): 441–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601.
- Potdar, Kedar, Taher Pardawala, and Chinmay Pai. “A Comparative Study of Categorical Variable Encoding Techniques for Neural Network Classifiers.” International Journal of Computer Applications 175 (October 1, 2017): 7–9. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017915495.
- Rebala, Gopinath, Ajay Ravi, and Sanjay Churiwala. An Introduction to Machine Learning, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15729-6.
- Rissland, Edwina L., Kevin D. Ashley, and R.P. Loui. “AI and Law: A Fruitful Synergy” 150 (2003): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00122-X.
- Sarker, Iqbal H. “Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions.” SN Computer Science 2, no. 3 (March 22, 2021): 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x.
- Scott, John. Social Network Analysis. Fourth. 55 City Road, London, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716597.
- Stamper, Ronald. “The Role of Semantics in Legal Expert Systems and Legal Reasoning*.” Ratio Juris 4 (August 2, 2007): 219–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00094.x.
- Summers, Robert, William McRoberts, and Arthur Goodhart. “H.L.A. Hart’s the Concept of Law,” 46:1–20, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9407-3_1.
- Susskind, Richard. “‘Expert Systems in Law: A Jurisprudential Approach to Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning.’” The Modern Law Review 49 (January 18, 2011): 168–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1986.tb01683.x.
- Teramoto, Shinto, and Paulius Jurcys. “Intermediaries, Trust and Efficiency of Communication: A Social Network Perspective,” May 26, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41212-7_6.
- Zhong, Haoxi, Chaojun Xiao, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence, 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.466.
| APA | Çamkerten A (2023). Hukuk Analitiği. , 234 - 254. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| Chicago | Çamkerten Ali Semih Hukuk Analitiği. (2023): 234 - 254. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| MLA | Çamkerten Ali Semih Hukuk Analitiği. , 2023, ss.234 - 254. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| AMA | Çamkerten A Hukuk Analitiği. . 2023; 234 - 254. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| Vancouver | Çamkerten A Hukuk Analitiği. . 2023; 234 - 254. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| IEEE | Çamkerten A "Hukuk Analitiği." , ss.234 - 254, 2023. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| ISNAD | Çamkerten, Ali Semih. "Hukuk Analitiği". (2023), 234-254. https://doi.org/10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| APA | Çamkerten A (2023). Hukuk Analitiği. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi hukuk fakültesi dergisi, 6(1), 234 - 254. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| Chicago | Çamkerten Ali Semih Hukuk Analitiği. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi hukuk fakültesi dergisi 6, no.1 (2023): 234 - 254. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| MLA | Çamkerten Ali Semih Hukuk Analitiği. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi hukuk fakültesi dergisi, vol.6, no.1, 2023, ss.234 - 254. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| AMA | Çamkerten A Hukuk Analitiği. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi hukuk fakültesi dergisi. 2023; 6(1): 234 - 254. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| Vancouver | Çamkerten A Hukuk Analitiği. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi hukuk fakültesi dergisi. 2023; 6(1): 234 - 254. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| IEEE | Çamkerten A "Hukuk Analitiği." Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi hukuk fakültesi dergisi, 6, ss.234 - 254, 2023. 10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
| ISNAD | Çamkerten, Ali Semih. "Hukuk Analitiği". Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi hukuk fakültesi dergisi 6/1 (2023), 234-254. https://doi.org/10.51120/NEUHFD.2023.79 |
