BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 47 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 3 - 11 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 28-08-2023

BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Öz:
Background and Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of distally tilted implant length on stress accumulation when evaluated by 3D finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: Four different finite element models were created according to the length of posterior implant. Models 1 and 2 had vertically placed implants, whereas models 3 and 4 had distally tilted posterior implants placed at a 30° angle with differing implant length. A titanium alloy milled framework with 15 mm cantilevers were placed with the implants. An oblique occlusal load of 200 N with 45° inclination was applied from the central fossa of the first molar. Maximum principal (Pmax) and minimum principal (Pmin) stresses were calculated for cortical and trabecular bones, and von Mises stress values were calculated for the implants, abutments, and prosthetic frameworks. Results: The highest Pmax and Pmin values in the cortical bone were found in model 4, whereas the lowest Pmax and Pmin values in the cortical bone were observed in model 2. The highest von Mises stress in implants was seen in model 1 (72.68 MPa), compared with the lowest value found in model 2 (30.68 MPa). Models 3 and 4 had similar von Mises stress values in implants (54.66 MPa and 56.74 MPa, respectively). The highest von Mises stress in abutments occurred in model 4 (82.26 MPa). Conclusions: The increasing length of distally tilted implant did not reduce the stress accumulation in the all-on-four treatment concept. Different prosthetic and surgical options should be considered to modify the stress distribution
Anahtar Kelime: All-on-four Finite Element Analysis İmplant Length Stress Accumulation Tilted İmplant

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Mertens C, Steveling HG. Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla: 8-year prospective results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 464-472.
  • 2. Pozzi A, Arcuri, L, Fabbri G, Singer G, Londono J. Long-term survival and success of zirconia screw-retained implant-supported prostheses for up to 12 years: A retrospective multicenter study. J Prosthet Dent 2023; 129: 96-108.
  • 3. Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014; 7: 219-234.
  • 4. Carls PF, Bernasconi M, Carinci F, Lawrence M, Lambrecht JT. The use of autologous bone for augmentation procedures leads to low prevalence of peri-implantitis-a retrospective study over a 20-year period. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2023; 51: 130-138.
  • 5. Carosi P, Lorenzi C, Laureti M, Ferrigno N, Arcuri C. Short Dental Implants (</= 6 mm) to Rehabilitate Severe Mandibular Atrophy: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2021; 36: 30-37.
  • 6. Chan MH, Nudell YA. All-on-4 Concept Update. Dent Clin North Am 2021; 65: 211-227.
  • 7. Misch C. Dental Implant Prosthetics 2 ed: St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2015.
  • 8. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jörneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4: 241-247.
  • 9. Sertgöz A, Güvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implantsupported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 165-169.
  • 10. Malo P, Rangert B, Nobre M. “All-on-Four” immediate function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 2-9.
  • 11. Wang Q, Zhang ZZ, Bai SZ, Zhang SF. Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept. BMC Oral Health 2022; 22: 469.
  • 12. Ozan O, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018; 33: 64-71.
  • 13. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant lenght and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 35-51.
  • 14. Barikani H, Rashtak S, Akbari S, Badri S, Daneshparvar N, Rokn A. The Effect of Implant Length and Diameter on the Primary Stability in Different Bone Types. J Dent (Tehran) 2013; 10: 449- 455.
  • 15. Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Mante F. Evaluating Parameters of Osseointegrated Dental Implants Using Finite Element Analysis a Two Dimensional ComparativeStudy Examining The Effects of Implant Diameter, Implant Shape, and Load Direction. J Oral Implantol 1998; 24: 80-88.
  • 16. Kilic E, Doganay O. Evaluation of Stress in Tilted Implant Concept With Variable Diameters in the Atrophic Mandible: Three- Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. J Oral Implantol 2020; 46: 19- 26.
  • 17. Martin RB, Burr DB, Sharkey NA. Skeletal Tissue Mechanics New York: Springer; 1998: 127-178.
  • 18. Natali AN, Hart RT, Pavan PG, Knets I. Mechanics of bone tissue In: A. N. Natali, ed. Dental Biomechanics London: Taylor & Francis; 2003: 1-19.
  • 19. Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointe- grated implants related to crestal bone geometry: A three-dimen- sional finite element analysis. J Prosthetic Dent 2008; 100: 422-431.
  • 20. Afrashtehfar KI. The all-on-four concept may be a viable treatment option for edentulous rehabilitation. Evid Based Dent 2016; 17: 56-57.
  • 21. Soto-Peñaloza D, Zaragozí-Alonso R, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Diago M. The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9: 474-488.
  • 22. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43: 149-170.
  • 23. Szabo AL, Nagy AL, Laszlofy C, Gajdacs M, Bencsik P, Karpati K et al. Distally Tilted Implants According to the All-on-Four((R)) Treatment Concept for the Rehabilitation of Complete Edentulism: A 3.5-Year Retrospective Radiographic Study of Clinical Outcomes and Marginal Bone Level Changes. Dent J (Basel) 2022; 10.
  • 24. Eazhil R, Swaminathan SV, Gunaseelan M, Kannan GV, Alagesan C. Impact of implant diameter and length on stress distribution in osseointegrated implants: A 3D FEA study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016; 6: 590-596.
  • 25. Sertgöz A, Güvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implantsupported prosthesis.pdf. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 165-169.
  • 26. Bevilacqua M, Tealdo T, Pera F, Menini M, Mossolov A, Drago C et al. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Load Transmission Using Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths.pdf. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 539-542.
  • 27. Drago C. Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full-Arch, Screw-Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study. J Prosthodont 2018; 27: 402-408.
  • 28. Lee H, Jo M, Sailer I, Noh G. Effects of implant diameter, implant-abutment connection type, and bone density on the biomechanical stability of implant components and bone: A finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent 2022; 128: 716-728.
APA Karaca Ç (2023). BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. , 3 - 11.
Chicago Karaca Çiğdem BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. (2023): 3 - 11.
MLA Karaca Çiğdem BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. , 2023, ss.3 - 11.
AMA Karaca Ç BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. . 2023; 3 - 11.
Vancouver Karaca Ç BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. . 2023; 3 - 11.
IEEE Karaca Ç "BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS." , ss.3 - 11, 2023.
ISNAD Karaca, Çiğdem. "BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS". (2023), 3-11.
APA Karaca Ç (2023). BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. Clinical Dentistry and Research, 47(2), 3 - 11.
Chicago Karaca Çiğdem BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. Clinical Dentistry and Research 47, no.2 (2023): 3 - 11.
MLA Karaca Çiğdem BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. Clinical Dentistry and Research, vol.47, no.2, 2023, ss.3 - 11.
AMA Karaca Ç BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2023; 47(2): 3 - 11.
Vancouver Karaca Ç BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2023; 47(2): 3 - 11.
IEEE Karaca Ç "BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS." Clinical Dentistry and Research, 47, ss.3 - 11, 2023.
ISNAD Karaca, Çiğdem. "BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LENGTH OF TILTED IMPLANTS PLACED IN ATROPHIC EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE ON IMPLANT AND PERI-IMPLANT BONE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS". Clinical Dentistry and Research 47/2 (2023), 3-11.