Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons

HAZEL, Spencer; MORTENSEN, Kristian

Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons

Kristian MORTENSEN, (Postdoctoral Researcher, LCMI, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Spencer HAZEL (PhD candidate, CALPIU Research Centre, Roskilde University, Denmark)

Novitas-Royal

1 0

Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 55 - 70 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons

Öz:

Süreç içi gerçekleşen aktivite tamamlamanın bağımlı işleyişi üzerine son zamanlardaki etkileşimselaraştırmanın devamı olarak bu makale yabancı dil sınıflarında aktivitelerin organizasyonu ve yönetimine özgüolan çevrimsel sırayı incelemektedir. Bu, öğretmen söyletimlerini takip eden öğrenci katılımını kısıtlayan, geleneksel ve kalıplaşmış bir sınıf organizasyonu şekli olarak görülebilir. Bu makale göstermektedir ki,çevrimsel sıra uygulaması bazı etkileşimsel özellikleri devre dışı bıraksa da, sözkonusu yöntem yine dekatılımcıların sürmekte olan aktiviteye karşılıklı yönelimleri neticesinde gerçekleşmektedir. Çalışmamızçevrimsel sıranın başlatıldığı ardışık pozisyonu, bunun katılımcıların konuşmaları ve fiziksel aktiviteleriyle nasilgerçekleştiğini, ve çevrimsel sıra aktivitesini başlatan söz sırasının nasıl tasarlandığını tasvir etmektedir.Çevrimsel sıra aktivitesinin başlatılması ve devam ettirilmesiyle bağlantılı olarak; sınıfın fiziksel düzenlemesi,yapıtlar ve grafik yapılar, öğrenmeye ilişkin aktivitede sadece bağdaştırıcı araçlar olarak değil, aynı zamanda bu(farzedilen) öğrenme aktivitelerinin ortaya çıktığı sürmekte olan etkileşimin organizasyonuna yapı bakımındanbağıntılı özellikler olarak da kullanılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim

Öz:

Complementing recent interactional research on the contingent operation of online taskaccomplishment, this paper deals with a specific way of organizing and managing tasks in plenary L2classrooms – namely the round robin. This may seem like a “traditional” and rigid form of classroomorganization that reduces students’ contributions to responses to the teacher’s elicitations. This paper shows thatalthough the round robin puts certain interactional features out of play, it is nonetheless done in and throughparticipants’ mutual orientation to the ongoing activity. The paper describes the sequential position in whichround robins are initiated and how this is talked and embodied into being by the participants as well as thedesign of the turn that initiates the round robin activity. Relevant to the initiation and further development of theround robin are the physical arrangement of the classroom and artefacts and graphic structures that are used notonly as mediating tools in the (supposed) learning relevant activity, but also as structurally relevant features toorganize the ongoing interaction, in which these activities emerge.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Breen, M. (1989). The Evaluation Cycle for Language Learning Tasks. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The Second Language Curriculum (pp. 187-206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. (1994). Same Task, Different Activities: Analysis of a Second Language Acquisition Task from an Activity Theory Approach. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 173-194). Norwood: Ablex Press.
Duranti, A. (1993). Truth and Intentionality: An Ethnographic Critique. Cultural Anthropology, 8(2), 214-245.
Duranti, A. (2006). The Social Ontology of Intentions. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 31-40.
Eriksson, M. (2009). Referring as Interaction: On the Interplay between Linguistic and Bodily Practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 240-262.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing (pp. 67-82). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
Gourlay, L. (2005). OK, Who´s Got Number One? Permeable Triadic Dialogue, Covert Participation and the Co-Construction of Checking Episodes. Language Teaching Research, 9(4), 403-422.
Hauser, E. (2009). Turn-taking and Primary Speakership during a Student Discussion. In H. t. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives (pp. 215- 244). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Hellermann, J. (2007). The Development of Practices for Action in Classroom Dyadic Interaction: Focus in Task Openings. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 83-96.
Hellermann, J. (2008). Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Hellermann, J., & Cole, E. (2009). Practices for Social Interaction in Language Learning Classrooms: Disengagement from Dyadic Task Interaction. Applied Linguistics, 30, 186-215.
Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). On the Contingent Nature of Language- Learning-Tasks. Classroom Discourse, 1(1), 25-45.
Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Malden: Blackwell.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 13-31). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Jones, S. E., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2003). A Child's Point and the Achievement of Intentionality. Gesture, 3(2), 155-185.
Käänta, L. (2010). Teacher Turn-allocation and Repair Practices in Classroom Interaction: A Multisemiotic Perspective. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä.
Koole, T. (2007). Parallel Activities in the Classroom. Language and Education, 21(6), 487- 501.
Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277-309.
Markee, N. (2005). The Organization of Off-task Talk in Second Language Classrooms. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis (pp. 187-213). London: Palgrave.
Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom Talks: An Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 491-500.
McHoul, A. (1978). The Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183-213.
Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second Language Acquisition as Situated Practice: Task Accomplishment in the French Second Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501-518.
Mori, J. (2002). Task Design, Plan, and Development of Talk-in-Interaction: An Analysis of a Small Group Activity in a Japanese Language Classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 323-347.
Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating Sequential Boundaries and Learning Opportunities: A Case from a Japanese Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536-550.
Mori, J., & Hasegawa, A. (2009). Doing being a foreign language learner in a classroom: Embodiment of cognitive states as social events. IRAL, 47, 65-94.
Mortensen, K. (2008). Selecting Next-Speaker in the Second Language Classroom: How to Find a Willing Next-Speaker in Planned Activities. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 55-79.
Mortensen, K. (2009). Establishing Recipiency in Pre-Beginning Position in the Second Language Classroom. Discourse Processes, 46(5), 491-515.
Paoletti, I., & Fele, G. (2004). Order and Disorder in the Classroom. Pragmatics, 14(1), 69- 85.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual Changes and Methodological Challenges: On Language and Learning from a Conversation Analytic Perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, C. Jenks & S. Walsh (Eds.), Conceptualising Learning in Applied Linguistics (pp. 105-126). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pitsch, K. (2006). Sprache, Körper, Intermediäre Objekte: Zur Multimodalität der Interaktion im bilinguales Geschichtsunterricht. Bielefeld University, Bielefeld.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
Sahlström, F. (2002). The Interactional Organization of Hand Raising in Classroom Interaction. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 47-57.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Practices and Actions: Boundary Cases of Other-Initiated Repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499-545.
Schegloff, E. A. (2009). One Perspective on Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 357-406). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seedhouse, P. (1999). Task-Based Instruction. English Language Teaching Journal, 53(3), 149-156.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions - 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

APA	MORTENSEN K, HAZEL S (2011). Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons. , 55 - 70.
Chicago	MORTENSEN Kristian,HAZEL Spencer Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons. (2011): 55 - 70.
MLA	MORTENSEN Kristian,HAZEL Spencer Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons. , 2011, ss.55 - 70.
AMA	MORTENSEN K,HAZEL S Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons. . 2011; 55 - 70.
Vancouver	MORTENSEN K,HAZEL S Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons. . 2011; 55 - 70.
IEEE	MORTENSEN K,HAZEL S "Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons." , ss.55 - 70, 2011.
ISNAD	MORTENSEN, Kristian - HAZEL, Spencer. "Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons". (2011), 55-70.

APA	MORTENSEN K, HAZEL S (2011). Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons. Novitas-Royal, 5(1), 55 - 70.
Chicago	MORTENSEN Kristian,HAZEL Spencer Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons. Novitas-Royal 5, no.1 (2011): 55 - 70.
MLA	MORTENSEN Kristian,HAZEL Spencer Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons. Novitas-Royal, vol.5, no.1, 2011, ss.55 - 70.
AMA	MORTENSEN K,HAZEL S Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons. Novitas-Royal. 2011; 5(1): 55 - 70.
Vancouver	MORTENSEN K,HAZEL S Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons. Novitas-Royal. 2011; 5(1): 55 - 70.
IEEE	MORTENSEN K,HAZEL S "Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons." Novitas-Royal, 5, ss.55 - 70, 2011.
ISNAD	MORTENSEN, Kristian - HAZEL, Spencer. "Inıtıatıng round robıns ın the l2 classroom – Prelımınary observatıons". Novitas-Royal 5/1 (2011), 55-70.