Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 22 Sayfa Aralığı: 404 - 432 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232 İndeks Tarihi: 08-09-2023

THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to investigate the regulatory role of job stress in the relationship between sustainable leadership and innovation strategies. In the studies conducted in the literature, there is no study in which the regulatory role of job stress in the relationship between sustainable leadership and innovation strategies is measured. This situation is important as it constitutes a priority and originality factor for the study. The population of the study consists of employees working in the information and communication sector operating in Turkey. The sample is 402 employees working in the information and communication sector in the Ataşehir region of Istanbul province, selected by convenience sampling method. In the study, scale scores were calculated and kurtosis and skewness coefficients were analyzed to determine the suitability of the scores for normal distribution. Since the scores showed normal distribution, parametric test techniques were used in the study. The t-test and ANOVA test were used to analyze the differences in scale scores according to demographic characteristics. In addition, while analyzing the relationship between the scales with the correlation coefficient, the Process macro developed by Hayes was used for the regulatory role of the job stress scale in the effect of the sustainable leadership scale on the innovation strategies scale. As a result, in this analysis, it was observed that job stress did not have a significant regulatory effect on the relationship between sustainable leadership and innovation strategies.
Anahtar Kelime: Sustainable Leadership Innovation Strategies Job Stress

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR LİDERLİK VE İNOVASYON STRATEJİLERİ İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞ STRESİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürdürülebilir liderlik ve inovasyon stratejileri arasındaki ilişkide iş stresinin düzenleyici rolünü araştırmaktır. Literatürde yapılan çalışmalarda sürdürülebilir liderlik ve inovasyon stratejileri arasındaki ilişkide iş stresinin düzenleyici rolünün ölçüldüğü bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bu durum çalışma için bir öncelik ve özgünlük unsuru oluşturması açısından önemlidir. Araştırmanın evrenini Türkiye'de faaliyet gösteren bilgi ve iletişim sektörü çalışanları oluşturmaktadır. Örneklem ise, İstanbul ili Ataşehir bölgesinde bilgi ve iletişim sektöründe çalışan ve kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 402 çalışandır. Araştırmada ölçek puanları hesaplanmış ve puanların normal dağılıma uygunluğunu belirlemek için basıklık ve çarpıklık katsayıları analiz edilmiştir. Puanlar normal dağılım gösterdiği için çalışmada parametrik test teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Demografik özelliklere göre ölçek puanlarındaki farklılıkları analiz etmek için t-testi ve ANOVA testi kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca ölçekler arasındaki ilişki korelasyon katsayısı ile analiz edilirken, sürdürülebilir liderlik ölçeğinin inovasyon stratejileri ölçeği üzerindeki etkisinde iş stresi ölçeğinin düzenleyici rolü için Hayes tarafından geliştirilen Süreç makrosu kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, bu analizde iş stresinin sürdürülebilir liderlik ve inovasyon stratejileri arasındaki ilişkide anlamlı bir düzenleyici etkiye sahip olmadığı görülmüştür.
Anahtar Kelime: Sürdürülebilir Liderlik İnovasyon Stratejileri İş Stresi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akhlagh, E.M. Moradi, M. Mehdizade, M. & Ahmadi, N.D. (2013). Innovation strategies, performance diversity and development: An empirical analysis in İran construction and housing industry. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 6(2), 31-60.
  • Atakan, S.C. (2017). Yenilik stratejileri ile yenilik performansı arasındaki ilişki. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Girişimcilik Dergisi, 1(2), 29-42.
  • Awasthi, A. Govindan, K. & Gold, S. (2018). Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013
  • Avery, G. (2005). Leadership for sustainable futures: Achieving success in a competitive world. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Bos-Brouwers, H. (2010). Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: evidence of themes and activities in practice. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 417-435.
  • Burns, H. Diamond-Vaught, H. & Bauman, C. (2015). Leadership for sustainability: Theoretical foundations and pedagogical practices that foster change. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 9(1), 86- 100.
  • Carver, C.S. & Scheier, M.F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clercq, D. Menguc, B. & Auh, S. (2008). Unpacking there lationship between an innovation strategy and firm performance: The role of task conflict and politicalactivity. Journal of Business Research, 62, 1046-1053.
  • Cooper, R.G. & Edgett, S.J. (2010). Developing a product innovation and technology strategy for your business. Research Technology Management, 53, 33-40.
  • De Carlo, L.T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.292
  • Demiral, Y. Ünal, B. Kılıç, B. Sosyal, A. Bilgin, A. C. Uçku, R. & Theorell, T. (2007). İş stresi ölçeğinin İzmir Konak Belediyesi’nde çalışan erkek işçilerde geçerlik ve güvenilirliğinin incelenmesi. Toplum Hekimliği Bülteni, 26(1).
  • Deniz, M. (2011). Kobi’ler de yenilik, yenilik stratejileri ve bir uygulama. Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(22), 141-176.
  • Diefendorff, J.M. & Lord, R.G. (2003). The volitional and strategic effects of planning on task performance and goal commitment. Human Performance, 16(4), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532704HUP1604_3
  • Ehnert, I. & Harry, W. (2012). Recent developments and future prospects on sustainable human resource management. Management Revue, 23(3), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/4183719
  • Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ. Qual. Manag., 8, 37-51.
  • Ferdig, M.A. (2007). Sustainability leadership: Co-creating a sustainable future. Journal of Change Management, 7(1), 25-35.
  • Fullan, M. (2004). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Groeneveld, R.A. & Meeden, G. (1984). Measuring skewness and kurtosis. The Statistician, 33, 391-399. https://doi.org/10.2307/2987742
  • Göral, M. (2012). Liderlik tarzlarının yenilik stratejilerine etkisinin otel işletmeleri açısından değerlendirilmesi [master thesis]. Düzce University.
  • Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Hobfoll, S.E. (1988). The Ecology of Stress. Washington: Hemisphere.
  • Hopkins, K.D. & Weeks, D.L. (1990). Tests for normality and measures of skewness and kurtosis: Their place in research reporting. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(4), 717- 729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490504001
  • Hollmann, S. (2012). Sustainable leadership: Modellentwicklung.empirische Überprüfung und Gestaltungshinweise. Deutschland: Springer.
  • Ivancevich, J.M. & Matteson, M.T. (1980). Optimizing human resources: A case for preventive health and stress management. Organizational Dynamics, 9, 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90037-6
  • Koyluoglu, S. & Dogan. M. (2021). The impact of innovation strategies on business performance: Practices in high technology companies in Turkey. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 168-183. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.4-13
  • Long, B.C. (1998). Coping with workplace stress: A multiple-group comparison of female managers and clerical workers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0167.45.1.65
  • Lopez, M. Perez, M. & Rodriguez, L. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and innovation in European companies. An empirical research. Corporate Ownership and Control, 7(1), 274-284.
  • Lu, L. (1999). Work motivation, job stres and employee’s well-being. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 8(1), 61-73.
  • Mısırdalı Yangil, F. & Dil Şahin, M. (2019), Sürdürülebilir liderlik ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizi. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(5), 2124-2147. http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v7i5.1276
  • Middlebrooks, A. Miltenberger, L. Tweedy, J. Newman, G. & Follman, J. (2009). Developing a sustainability ethic in leaders. Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(2), 31-43.
  • Moors, J.J.A. (1986). The meaning of kurtosis: Darlington reexamined. The American Statistician, 40, 283-284.
  • Murphy, L.R. (1995). Managing job stres: An employees assistance/human resource management partnership. Personel Review, 24(1), 41-50.
  • Özaydın, G. & Çelik, Y. (2020). Liderlik tarzları ve görev performansının tarım işletmelerinde yenilik stratejileri üzerine etkisi (Çumra ilçesi örneği). KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 23(1), 181-193. DOI:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.540374
  • Öztırak, M. (2023). A study on the impact of artificial intelligence anxiety on the innovation-oriented behaviours of employees. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.1255576
  • Pelinescu, E. & Rădulescu, M. (2011). New times, new economy... A new born leader: The eco-leader. Hyperion International Journal of Econophysics & New Economy, 4(1), 81-94.
  • Purvis, B. Mao, Y. & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14, 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ., 32(2), 319-332.
  • Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Šimanskienė, L. & Župerkienė, E. (2014). Sustainable leadership: The new challenge for organizations. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 2(1), 81-93.
  • Sharma, A. Verma, S.Verma, C. & Malhotra, D. (2010). Stress and burnout as predictors of job satisfaction amongst lawyers. Europan Journal of Social Sciences, 14(3), 348-359.
  • Tschmuck, P. (2006). Creativity and innovation in the music industry. Springer.
  • Tubre, T.C. & Judith, M.C. (2000). A meta-analysis of the relationships between role ambiguity, role conflict and performance. Journal of Management, 26(1), 155-169.
  • Wang, X. Van Wart, M. & Lebredo, N. (2014). Sustainability leadership in a local government context. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(3), 339-364.
  • Xavier, L.Y. Jacobi, P.R. & Turra, A. (2019). Local agenda 21: Planning for the future, changing today. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 7-15.
APA OZTIRAK M, YAZICI A (2023). THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES. , 404 - 432. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
Chicago OZTIRAK MESUT,YAZICI Ayşe Meriç THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES. (2023): 404 - 432. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
MLA OZTIRAK MESUT,YAZICI Ayşe Meriç THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES. , 2023, ss.404 - 432. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
AMA OZTIRAK M,YAZICI A THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES. . 2023; 404 - 432. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
Vancouver OZTIRAK M,YAZICI A THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES. . 2023; 404 - 432. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
IEEE OZTIRAK M,YAZICI A "THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES." , ss.404 - 432, 2023. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
ISNAD OZTIRAK, MESUT - YAZICI, Ayşe Meriç. "THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES". (2023), 404-432. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
APA OZTIRAK M, YAZICI A (2023). THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 10(22), 404 - 432. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
Chicago OZTIRAK MESUT,YAZICI Ayşe Meriç THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES. Akademik Hassasiyetler 10, no.22 (2023): 404 - 432. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
MLA OZTIRAK MESUT,YAZICI Ayşe Meriç THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES. Akademik Hassasiyetler, vol.10, no.22, 2023, ss.404 - 432. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
AMA OZTIRAK M,YAZICI A THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES. Akademik Hassasiyetler. 2023; 10(22): 404 - 432. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
Vancouver OZTIRAK M,YAZICI A THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES. Akademik Hassasiyetler. 2023; 10(22): 404 - 432. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
IEEE OZTIRAK M,YAZICI A "THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES." Akademik Hassasiyetler, 10, ss.404 - 432, 2023. 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232
ISNAD OZTIRAK, MESUT - YAZICI, Ayşe Meriç. "THE MODERATOR ROLE OF JOB STRESS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION STRATEGIES". Akademik Hassasiyetler 10/22 (2023), 404-432. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1317232