Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 341 - 351 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.29216/ueip.1293074 İndeks Tarihi: 11-10-2023
Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries
Öz: Without democracy and the alternative channels it brings, it is challenging to guarantee sustainable development. The lack of a democratic dimension of sustainable development research enables citizens and institutions to realize their development visions. In this context, the study aims to investigate the effects of democracy on sustainable development empirically. The relationship between democracy and sustainable development was investigated with the help of the annual data for the period 1990-2019 and the Han and Phillips (2010) method for the E-7 countries. According to the findings, democracy has a statistically significant and positive effect on sustainable development. On the other hand, the variables of GDP, innovation, and renewable energy consumption discussed in the study also have a positive and statistically significant effect on sustainable development. The study's findings show that democracy is a significant factor in promoting sustainable development in E-7 countries.
Anahtar Kelime: Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmada Demokrasi Etkili mi? E7 Ülkelerinden Ampirik Kanıtlar
Öz: Demokrasi ve getirdiği alternatif kanallar olmadan, sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı garanti etmek zordur. Sürdürülebilir kalkınma araştırmalarının eksik kalan demokrasi boyutu, vatandaşların ve kurumların kalkınma vizyonlarını gerçekleştirmelerini sağlar. Bu kapsamda çalışmanın amacı, demokrasinin sürdürülebilir kalkınmada üzerinde etkilerini ampirik olarak araştırmaktır. Demokrasi ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma arasındaki ilişki, 1990-2019 dönemine ait yıllık veriler ve E-7 ülkeleri için Han ve Phillips (2010) yöntemi yardımıyla araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre demokrasinin, sürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerinde istatistiki olarak anlamlı ve olumlu bir etkisi vardır. Öte yandan çalışmada ele alınan GSYİH, inovasyon ve yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi değişkenlerinin de sürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerinde pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi vardır. Çalışmanın bulguları, E-7 ülkelerinde sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın desteklenmesinde demokrasinin çok önemli bir faktör olduğunu göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J. A. (2005). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
- Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., Rjoub, H., Kalugina, O. A., and Hussain, N. (2022). Economic Growth, Renewable Energy Consumption, And Ecological Footprint: Exploring The Role of Environmental Regulations and Democracy in Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development, 30(4), 595-605.
- Appiah Michael, Benjamin Kroenke, Emmanuel Awusi, and Elizabeth Dankwa Yeboah (2019). The Impact of GDP Growth on Achieving Sustainable Development in Ghana. International Journal of Academic Management Science Research, 3(3), 61-71.
- Ar, H., and Çelik Uğuz., S. (2017). Küresel Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedeflerinde Turizmin Rolü: Türkiye Örneği. Journal of International Social Research, 10(49), 521-530.
- Arellano M. and Bond S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
- Arellano M. and Bover O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-51.
- Arellano, M. and Bond S. (1998). Dynamic Panel Data Estimation Using DPD98 for Gauss. A Guide for Users. Access Address: https://w.american.edu/cas/economics/ gaussres/regress/dpd/dpd98.pdf
- Artan, S., ve Kalaycı, C. (2014). Gelişmiş Ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Dışa Açıklık, Demokrasi Ve Gelir Dağılımı Ilişkisi. SGD-Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, 4(2), 69-88.
- Blundell R. and Bond S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143.
- Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future, Report of The World Commission On Environment and Development. Access Address: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/ documents/5987our-common-future.pdf .
- Çelik, Y. ve Sofracı, İ., E. (2022). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Politikası Aracı Olarak Çevre Vergileri: Türkiye ve Seçilmiş Ülkelerde Çevre Vergilerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 7(1), 1-31.
- Çetin, V., Kapçak, S., ve Can, A. (2022). Türkiye’de Demokrasinin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Üzerindeki Etkisi: ARDL Sınır Testi. Balkan ve Yakın Doğu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8, 136-145.
- Congleton, R. D. (1992). Political Institutions and Pollution Control. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 7(3), 412-421.
- Gedik, Y. (2020). Sosyal, Ekonomik ve Çevresel Boyutlarla Sürdürülebilirlik ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3), 196-215.
- Greene W. (2007). Econometric Analysis. 6th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company Inc.
- Haseeb, M., and Azam, M. (2021). Dynamic Nexus Among Tourism, Corruption, Democracy and Environmental Degradation: A Panel Data Investigation. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 5557-5575.
- Hassoun, S. E. S., and Hicham, A. Y. A. D. (2020). Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development: Evidence from 17 OECD Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 4(1), 41-60.
- Joseph, J. (2001). Sustainable Development and Democracy in The Megacities. Development in Practice, 11(2-3), 218-231.
- Kinda, S. (2011). Democratic Institutions and Environmental Quality: Effects and Transmission Channels. Available at SSRN 2714300. Access Address: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=2714300.
- Lv, Z. (2017). The Effect Of Democracy On CO2 Emissions In Emerging Countries: Does The Level Of Income Matter?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 900-906.
- McHugh, Heather (1995). Sustaining the Vision: Lessons for USAID's Move Toward Sustainability and Sustainable Development
- Özmehmet, E., (2012). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Yaklaşımları, Journal of Yaşar University, 3(12), 1-23.
- Payne, R.A. (1995). Freedom and the Environment. Journal of Democracy, 6(3), 41-55.
- Peşkircioğlu, N. (2016). 2030 Sürdürülebilir Kalkinma Hedefleri: Küresel Verimlilik Hareketine Doğru. Anahtar Dergisi, 22(335), 4-9.
- Plessis, D. C. (1999). Sustainable Development Demands Dialogue Between Developed and Developing Worlds. Building Research & Information, 27(6), 378-389.
- Reuveny, R. ve Q. Li (2003). Economic Openness, Democracy and Income Inequality: An Empirical Analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 36(5), 575-601.
- Tabachnick, B., Fidell, L. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT press.
- Yiğit, S. (2021). An Empirical Perspective on the Relationship Between Innovation Performance and Sustainable Development. Ege Academic Review, 21(1), 47-57.
- Zhang, L., Khan, Z., Abbas, S., and Ahamed, H. (2023). The Roles of Renewable Energy, Globalization, Population Expansion and Deliberative Democracy On Sustainable Development in South Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(38), 88775-88788
| APA | Dogan E, Ozarslan B (2023). Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries. , 341 - 351. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| Chicago | Dogan Emrah,Ozarslan Basak Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries. (2023): 341 - 351. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| MLA | Dogan Emrah,Ozarslan Basak Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries. , 2023, ss.341 - 351. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| AMA | Dogan E,Ozarslan B Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries. . 2023; 341 - 351. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| Vancouver | Dogan E,Ozarslan B Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries. . 2023; 341 - 351. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| IEEE | Dogan E,Ozarslan B "Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries." , ss.341 - 351, 2023. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| ISNAD | Dogan, Emrah - Ozarslan, Basak. "Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries". (2023), 341-351. https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| APA | Dogan E, Ozarslan B (2023). Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 7(2), 341 - 351. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| Chicago | Dogan Emrah,Ozarslan Basak Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi 7, no.2 (2023): 341 - 351. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| MLA | Dogan Emrah,Ozarslan Basak Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, vol.7, no.2, 2023, ss.341 - 351. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| AMA | Dogan E,Ozarslan B Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi. 2023; 7(2): 341 - 351. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| Vancouver | Dogan E,Ozarslan B Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi. 2023; 7(2): 341 - 351. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| IEEE | Dogan E,Ozarslan B "Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries." Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 7, ss.341 - 351, 2023. 10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
| ISNAD | Dogan, Emrah - Ozarslan, Basak. "Is Democracy Effective in Sustainable Development? Empirical Evidence from E7 Countries". Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi 7/2 (2023), 341-351. https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1293074 |
