Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1158 - 1168 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458 İndeks Tarihi: 08-11-2023

IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS

Öz:
In today's online social networking environments, especially in sharing ideas, Twitter plays a leading role as one of the popular social sharing and interaction platforms all over the world. In many fields (politics, education, health, etc.), social media analysis is effectively utilized in research conducted to determine social priorities and trends. The aim of this study, which was carried out in a similar context, is to determine the priorities and criteria of university candidate students in their university preferences by analyzing social media data. In our country, during university preference periods, there is an effective information sharing and guidance among university candidates through social networks. In this study, the tweets shared on the Twitter platform about university preferences were analyzed with the structural topic model algorithm and prominent themes and trends were determined. As a result of this experimental analysis, 23 topics were discovered that reveal the interests and tendencies of prospective students in their preferences. Percentage rates and keyword groups were also calculated for these topics. According to the findings, the top five topics that determine the preferences of the candidate students were identified as “Entrance Exam (YKS)”, “Job Oppurtunities”, “Information Services”, “Educational Quality”, and “Study Abroad (Erasmus, Farabi)”. It is envisaged that the findings will be a guide in understanding the preference tendencies of the candidate students and determining the future strategies of the universities.
Anahtar Kelime: University Preferences Semantic Analysis Social Media Analysis Twitter

ADAYLARIN ÜNİVERSİTE TERCİHLERİNDEKİ EĞİLİMLERİNİN SOSYAL MEDYA ANALİZİ İLE TESPİT EDİLMESİ

Öz:
Günümüzün çevrimiçi sosyal paylaşım ortamlarında, özelikle fikir paylaşımı konusunda, Twitter tüm dünyada popüler sosyal paylaşım ve etkileşim platformdan biri olarak öncü rol üstlenmektedir. Birçok alanda (siyaset, eğitim, sağlık, vb.) toplumsal önceliklerin ve eğilimlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılan araştırmalarda, sosyal medya analizlerinden etkin bir şekilde faydalanılmaktadır. Benzer kapsamda gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite adayı öğrencilerin, üniversite tercihlerindeki önceliklerinin ve ölçütlerinin sosyal medya verilerinin analizi ile belirlenmesine yöneliktir. Ülkemizde, üniversite tercih dönemlerinde, üniversite adayları arasında sosyal ağlar üzerinden etkin bir bilgi paylaşımı ve yönlendirme söz konusu olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Twitter platformu üzerinde üniversite tercihleri konusunda paylaşılan tivitler yapısal konu modeli algoritmasıyla analiz edilerek öne çıkan temalar ve eğilimler tespit edilmiştir. Gerçekleştirilen bu deneysel analizin sonucunda, aday öğrencilerin tercihlerindeki ilgi alanlarını ve eğilimlerini ortaya koyan 23 topik keşfedilmiştir. Elde edilen bu topikler için ayrıca yüzde oranları ve anahtar kelime grupları da hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, aday öğrencilerin tercihlerini belirleyen ilk beş topik sırasıyla “Giriş Sınavı (YKS)”, “İş Olanakları”, “Bilgi Hizmetleri”, “Eğitim Kalitesi” ve “Yurtdışında Eğitim (Erasmus, Farabi)” olarak tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulguların, aday öğrencilerin tercih eğilimlerinin anlaşılmasında ve üniversitelerin gelecekteki stratejilerinin belirlenmesinde yol gösterici olabileceği öngörülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Üniversite Tercihleri Semantik Analiz Sosyal Medya Analizi Twitter

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84.
  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Blei et al., 2003 - Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(4/5), 993–1022.
  • Cano-Marin, E., Mora-Cantallops, M., & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2023). Twitter as a predictive system: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113561
  • Doğan, M. E., & Topa Çiftçi, G. (2019). Üniversite Yönetimi ve Öğrenci İletişiminde Sosyal Medya Kullanımı: Fenomen Rektörler. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.534613
  • Grandjean, M. (2016). A social network analysis of Twitter: Mapping the digital humanities community. Cogent Arts and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2016.1171458
  • Günüç, S., Odabaşı, H. F., & Kuzu, A. (2013). 21. Yüzyıl Öğrenci Özelliklerinin Öğretmen Adayları Tarafından Tanımlanması: Bir Twitter Uygulaması. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama.
  • Gurcan, F. (2023). What issues are data scientists talking about? Identification of current data science issues using semantic content analysis of Q&A communities. PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1361.
  • Gurcan, F., Boztas, G. D., Dalveren, G. G. M., & Derawi, M. (2023). Digital Transformation Strategies, Practices, and Trends: A Large-Scale Retrospective Study Based on Machine Learning. Sustainability, 15(9), 7496.
  • Gurcan, F., & Cagiltay, N. E. (2022). Exploratory Analysis of Topic Interests and Their Evolution in Bioinformatics Research Using Semantic Text Mining and Probabilistic Topic Modeling. IEEE Access, 10, 31480–31493. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160795
  • Gurcan, F., Dalveren, G. G. M., Cagiltay, N. E., Roman, D., & Soylu, A. (2022). Evolution of Software Testing Strategies and Trends: Semantic Content Analysis of Software Research Corpus of the Last 40 Years. IEEE Access, 10, 106093–106109. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3211949
  • Gurcan, F., Dalveren, G. G. M., Cagiltay, N. E., & Soylu, A. (2022). Detecting Latent Topics and Trends in Software Engineering Research Since 1980 Using Probabilistic Topic Modeling. IEEE Access, 10, 74638– 74654. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3190632
  • Gurcan, F., Dalveren, G. G. M., & Derawi, M. (2022). Covid-19 and E-Learning: An Exploratory Analysis of Research Topics and Interests in E-Learning During the Pandemic. IEEE Access, 10, 123349–123357. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3224034
  • Gurcan, F., & Sevik, S. (2019). Expertise Roles and Skills Required by the Software Development Industry. 1st International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference: Innovative Technologies for Digital Transformation, IISEC 2019 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/UBMYK48245.2019.8965571
  • Himelboim, I., Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., & Espina, C. (2017). Classifying Twitter Topic- Networks Using Social Network Analysis. Social Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691545
  • Karami, A., Lundy, M., Webb, F., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Twitter and Research: A Systematic Literature Review through Text Mining. IEEE Access, 8, 67698–67717. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983656
  • Kumar, A., & Jaiswal, A. (2020). Systematic literature review of sentiment analysis on Twitter using soft computing techniques. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.5107
  • Martínez-Rojas, M., Pardo-Ferreira, M. del C., & Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2018). Twitter as a tool for the management and analysis of emergency situations: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.008
  • Mimno, D., Wallach, H. M., Talley, E., Leenders, M., & McCallum, A. (2011). Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. EMNLP 2011 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference.
  • Ozyurt, O., Gurcan, F., Dalveren, G. G. M., & Derawi, M. (2022). Career in Cloud Computing: Exploratory Analysis of In-Demand Competency Areas and Skill Sets. Applied Sciences, 12(19), 9787.
  • Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). Stm: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02
  • Röder, M., Both, A., & Hinneburg, A. (2015). Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. WSDM 2015 - Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/2684822.2685324
  • Sezgin, M., & Altay, I. (2021). Üniversite Tercihinde Sosyal Medyanın Aracı Rolü. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 3(4), 87–104.
  • Uddin, G., Sabir, F., Guéhéneuc, Y. G., Alam, O., & Khomh, F. (2021). An empirical study of IoT topics in IoT developer discussions on Stack Overflow. Empirical Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10021-5
  • Vayansky, I., & Kumar, S. A. P. (2020). A review of topic modeling methods. Information Systems, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2020.101582
  • WeAreSocial. (2023). Creative Agency - We Are Social UK. Retrieved July 23, 2023, from https://wearesocial.com/uk/
  • Yücel, E., & Karataş Yücel, E. (2022). Evaluation of social media usage of universities in Turkey: A qualitative application for twitter posts. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1034520
  • Zimbra, D., Abbasi, A., Zeng, D., & Chen, H. (2018). The state-of-the-art in twitter sentiment analysis: A review and benchmark evaluation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3185045
APA Gurcan F (2023). IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS. , 1158 - 1168. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
Chicago Gurcan Fatih IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS. (2023): 1158 - 1168. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
MLA Gurcan Fatih IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS. , 2023, ss.1158 - 1168. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
AMA Gurcan F IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS. . 2023; 1158 - 1168. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
Vancouver Gurcan F IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS. . 2023; 1158 - 1168. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
IEEE Gurcan F "IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS." , ss.1158 - 1168, 2023. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
ISNAD Gurcan, Fatih. "IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS". (2023), 1158-1168. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
APA Gurcan F (2023). IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 1158 - 1168. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
Chicago Gurcan Fatih IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 16, no.4 (2023): 1158 - 1168. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
MLA Gurcan Fatih IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.16, no.4, 2023, ss.1158 - 1168. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
AMA Gurcan F IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 16(4): 1158 - 1168. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
Vancouver Gurcan F IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023; 16(4): 1158 - 1168. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
IEEE Gurcan F "IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS." Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16, ss.1158 - 1168, 2023. 10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458
ISNAD Gurcan, Fatih. "IDENTIFICATION OF THE TRENDS OF CANDIDATES IN UNIVERSITY PREFERENCES BY SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS". Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 16/4 (2023), 1158-1168. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1337458